Skip to content

run!(method, loss)? #6

Open
Open
@jbrea

Description

@jbrea

I'm starting to believe that maybe it is better not to talk about data at all, perhaps it is best to ask users to directly return a cost (or a vector of costs if it makes sense for some algorithms) in this way data could in principle change during inference in a user defined way, what do you think?
Originally posted by @francescoalemanno in #5

This sounds like a good idea! I have to think about this and look also at the methods that would be nice to be implemented in the future to see if this is flexible enough...

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions