- From: Henry S. Thompson <[email protected]>
- Date: 03 Nov 2000 18:06:12 +0000
- To: <[email protected]>
- Cc: "www-xml-schema-comments@w3. org" <[email protected]>, "Ningang chen" <[email protected]>, "w3c-xml-schema-ig" <[email protected]>
Sorry, I don't agree. We went through this at the f2f, and agreed
that _our_ Notations should be named with QNames. There is no
connection between them and XML 1.0 Notations. What specifically do
you see as the problem with, e.g.
... xmlns:po="http://www.example.com/foo" ...
<simpleType name="myNot">
<restriction base='NOTATION'>
<enumeration value="po:type"/>
<enumeration value="po:code"/>
</restriction>
</simpleType>
<element name="test">
<complexType>
<attribute name="foo" type="myNot"/>
</complexType>
</element>
and an instance
... xmlns:po="http://www.example.com/foo" ...
<test foo="po:code">...</test>
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: [email protected]
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Friday, 3 November 2000 13:06:17 UTC