[B! STAP事件] STAP retracted

blackshadow Nature論文の撤回についてのコメント

2014/07/03 リンク

unique120 Nature、反省してねぇーな。

2014/07/03 リンク

urashimasan 　事件を小さく見せようとしているし、反省より言い訳。／”Before publishing, we had checked that the results had been independently replicated in the laboratories of the co-authors”小保方氏が密着指導した若山研での『STAP作成』かな。

STAP事件

2014/07/03 リンク

sph_375 お疲れ様ですた(^q^)

2014/07/02 リンク

mobanama 撤回かくにん!よかった(どうでも(今更))。

どうでもいい

2014/07/02 リンク

taroleo “We — research funders, research practitioners, institutions and journals — need to put quality assurance and laboratory professionalism ever higher on our agendas, to ensure that the money entrusted by governments is not squandered, and that citizens’ trust in science is not betrayed.”

2014/07/02 リンク

k-takahashi 『data that were an essential part of the authors’ claims had been misrepresented. Figures that were described as representing different cells and different embryos were in fact describing the same cells and the same embryos.』

科学

2014/07/02 リンク

zyugem これは撤回に関するエディター記事。

2014/07/02 リンク

eureka555 Nature自身の検証は甘いと思うなぁ。refereeとかeditorの利益相反とかちゃんと公表してほしい。「need to put quality assurance」は賛成。理研は専任者を置いて、投稿前に生データチェックを受けるべき。

2014/07/02 リンク

roadman2005 "Before publishing, we had checked that the results had been independently replicated in the laboratories of the co-authors, and we regret that we did not capture the authors’ assurances in the author-contributions statements."

2014/07/02 リンク