Ambrose, J. D., 1980, A re-evaluation of the Melanthoideae (Liliaceae) using numerical analyses, in: Petaloid Monocotyledons (C. D. Brickell et al., eds.), PP. 65–81, Academic, London.
Google Scholar
Ancibor, E., 1979, Systematic anatomy of vegetative organs of the Hydrocharitaceae, Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 78:237–266.
Google Scholar
Arber, A., 1925, Monocotyledons. A Morphological Study, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Google Scholar
Ashlock, P. D., 1971, Monophyly and associated terms, Syst. Zool. 20:63–69.
Google Scholar
Ashlock, P. D., 1974, The uses of cladistics, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5:81–99.
Google Scholar
Barthlott, W., and Fröhlich, D., 1983, Micromorphologie und Orientierungs-Muster epi-cuticularer Wachs-Kristalloide: Ein neues systematisches Merkmal bei Monocotylen, Plant Syst. Evol. (in press).
Google Scholar
Behnke, H.-D., 1968, Zum Feinbau der Siebröhren-Plastiden bei Monocotylen, Naturwissenschaften
55:120–141.
Google Scholar
Behnke, H.-D., 1971, Zum Feinbau der Siebröhren-Plastiden von Aristolochia und Asarum (Aristolochiaceae), Planta
97:62–69.
Google Scholar
Behnke, H.-D., 1981, Siebelement-Plastiden, Phloem-Protein und Evolution der Blütenpflanzen: II. Monocotyledonen, Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges. 94:647–662.
Google Scholar
Behnke, H.-D., and Barthlott, W., 1983, New evidence from the ultrastructural and micro-morphological fields in angiosperm classification, Nord. J. Bot. 3:43–66.
Google Scholar
Behnke, H.-D., and Dahlgren, R., 1976, The distribution of characters within an angiosperm system, 2. Sieve element plastids, Bot. Not. 129:287–295.
Google Scholar
Bergson, H., 1908, L’evolution creatice, Paris.
Google Scholar
Björnstad, I., 1970, Comparative embryology of Asparagoideae-Polygonatae, Liliaceae, Nytt Mag. Bot. 17:169–207.
Google Scholar
Björnstad, I., and Friis, I., 1972, Studies on the genus Haemanthus L. (Amaryllidaceae). II. A revision of the section Demeusa (De Wild. & Th. Dur.) Pax & Hoffm. emend. I. Björnstad & I. Friis, Nor. J. Bot. 19:207–222.
Google Scholar
Bonde, N., 1977, Cladistic classification as applied to vertebrates, in Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution (M. K. Hecht, P. C. Goody, and B. M. Hecht, eds.), pp. 741–804, Plenum, New York.
Google Scholar
Boudet, A. M., Lecusson, R., and Boudet, A., 1975, Mise en évidence et propriétés de deux formes de la 5-déshydroquinate hydrolyase chez les végétaux supérieurs, Planta (Berl.) 124:67–75.
CAS
Google Scholar
Boudet, A. M., Boudet, A., and Bouyssou, H., 1977, Taxonomic distribution of isoenzymes of dehydroquinate hydrolyase in the angiosperms, Phytoehemistry
16:919–922.
CAS
Google Scholar
Bremer, K., and Wanntorp, H.-E., 1978, Phylogenetic systematics in botany, Taxon
21:311–329.
Google Scholar
Bremer, K., and Wanntorp, H.-E., 1981a, A cladistic classification of green plants, Nord. J. Bot. 1:1–13.
Google Scholar
Bremer, K., and Wanntorp, H.-E., 1981b, The cladistic approach to plant classification, in: Advances in Cladistics (V. Funk and D. R. Brooks, eds.), pp. 87–94, New York Botantical Gardens, New York.
Google Scholar
Brewbaker, J. L., 1967, The distribution and phylogenetic significance of binucleate and trinucleate pollen grains in the angiosperms, Am. J. Bot. 54:1069–1083.
Google Scholar
Burger, W. C., 1977, The Piperales and the monocots. Alternative hypotheses of mono-cotyledonous flowers, Bot. Rev. 43:346–393.
Google Scholar
Burger, W. C., 1981, Heresy revived: The monocot theory of angiosperm origin, Evol. Theory
5:189–225.
Google Scholar
Bush, G. L. 1975, Modes of animal speciation, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 6:339–364.
Google Scholar
Cantino, P. D., 1982, Affinities of the Lamiales: A cladistic analysis, Syst. Bot. 7:237–248.
Google Scholar
Chanda, S., and Ghosh, K., 1976, Pollen morphology and its evolutionary significance in Xanthorrhoeaceae, in: The Evolutionary Significance of the Exine (I. K. Ferguson and J. Muller, eds.), pp. 527–559, Academic, London.
Google Scholar
Cheadle, V. I., 1943, The origin and certain trends of specialization of the vessels in the Monocotyledoneae, Am. J. Bot. 30:11–17.
Google Scholar
Cheadle, V. I., 1944, Specialization of vessels within the xylem of each organ in the Monocotyledoneae, Am. J. Bot. 31:81–92.
Google Scholar
Cheadle, V. I., 1953, Independent origin of vessels in the monocotyledons and dicotyledons, Phytomorphology
3:23–44.
Google Scholar
Cheadle, V. I., and Kosakai, H., 1980, Occurrence and specialization of vessels in Commelinales, Phytomorphology
30:98–117.
Google Scholar
Cheadle, V. I., and Kosakai, H., 1982, Occurrence and specialization of vessels in Xyridales, Nord. J. Bot. 2:97–109.
Google Scholar
Chupov, V. S., and Kutiavina, N. G., 1978, The comparative immuno-electrophoretic investigation of seed proteins of Liliaceae (in Russian), Bot. Zh. 63:473–493.
Google Scholar
Chupov, V. S., and Kutiavina, N. G., 1981, Serological studies in the order Liliales (in Russian), Bot. Zh. 66:75–81.
Google Scholar
Clifford, H. T., 1970, Monocotyledon classification with special reference to the origin of grasses (Poaceae), in: New Research in Plant Anatomy (N. K. B. Robson et al., eds.), Bot. J. Linn. Soc. (Suppl. 1) 1970:25–34.
Google Scholar
Clifford, H. T., and Williams, W. T., 1980, Interrelationships amongst the Liliatae: A graph theory approach, Aust. J. Bot. 28:261–268.
Google Scholar
Conover, M., 1982, The vegetative morphology and development of the reticulate-veined Lilliiflorae and their parallel veined allies, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Massachusetts.
Google Scholar
Cracraft, I., 1975, Historical biogeography and earth history: Perspectives for a future synthesis, Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 62:227–250.
Google Scholar
Crisci, I. V., and Stussey, T. F., 1980, Determining primitive character states for phylo-genetic reconstruction, Syst. Bot. 5:112–135.
Google Scholar
Crisci, I. V., and Stussey, T. F., 1982, Of reason and logic: Evolutionary polarity revisited, Syst. Bot. 7:230.
Google Scholar
Cronquist, A., 1963, The taxonomic significance of evolutionary parallelism, Sida
1:109–116.
Google Scholar
Cronquist, A., 1968, The Evolution and Classification of Flowering Plants, Nelson, London.
Google Scholar
Cronquist, A., 1969, Broad features of the system of angiosperms, Taxon
18:188–193.
Google Scholar
Cronquist, A., 1981, An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants, Columbia University Press, New York.
Google Scholar
Cullen, J., 1978, A preliminary survey of ptyxis (vernation) in the angiosperms. Notes R. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh
37:161–214.
Google Scholar
Daghlian, C. P., 1981, A review of the fossil record of monocotyledons, Bot. Rev. 47:517–555.
Google Scholar
Dahlgren, R. (in cooperation with Hansen, B., Jakobsen, K., and Larsen, K.), 1974, An-giospermernes Taxonomi, 1, Akademisk Forlag, Copenhagen.
Google Scholar
Dahlgren, R. (in cooperation with Hansen, B., Jakobsen, K., Jensen, S. R., Larsen, K., and Nielsen, B. J.), 1979, Angiospermernes Taxonomi, 1, 2nd ed., Akademisk Forlag, Copenhagen.
Google Scholar
Dahlgren, R. 1980, A revised system of classification of the angiosperms, Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 80:91–124.
Google Scholar
Dahlgren, R., 1983, General aspects of angiosperm evolution and macrosystematics, Nord. J. Bot. 3:119–149.
Google Scholar
Dahlgren, R., and Clifford, H. T., 1981, Some conclusions from a comparative study of the monocotyledons and related dicotyledonous orders, Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges. 94:203–227.
Google Scholar
Dahlgren, R., and Clifford, H. T., 1982, The Monocotyledons: A Comparative Study, Academic, London.
Google Scholar
Darwin, C., 1859, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, Murray, London.
Google Scholar
Daumann, E., 1970, Das Blütennektarium der Monocotyledonen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung seiner systematischen und phylogenetischen Bedeutung, Feddes Repert. 80:463–590.
Google Scholar
Davis, G. L., 1966, Systematic Embryology of the Angiosperms, Wiley, New York.
Google Scholar
De Vos, M., 1972, The genus Romulea in South Africa, J. S. Afr. Bot. (Suppl.) 9:1–307.
Google Scholar
Dilcher, D. L., 1979, Early angiosperm reproduction: An introductory report, Rev. Paleobot. Palynol. 27:291–328.
Google Scholar
Dressier, R. L., 1981, The Orchids—Natural History and Classification, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Google Scholar
Duncan, T., 1980, Cladistics for the practicing taxonomists—An eclectic view, Syst. Bot. 5:136–148.
Google Scholar
Eastop, V., 1979, Stenorrhyncha as angiosperm taxonomists, Symb. Bot. Ups. 22:120–134.
Google Scholar
Eldredge, N., and Cracraft, J., 1980, Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process, Columbia University Press, New York.
Google Scholar
El-Gazzar, A., and Hamza, M. K., 1975, On the monocots-dicots distinction, Publ. Cairo Univ. Herb. 6:15–28.
Google Scholar
Emberger, L., 1960, Traité de Botanique, Vol. II, Les végétaux vasculaires (M. Chaudefaut and L. Emberger, eds.), Masson, Paris.
Google Scholar
Engler, A., 1919, Araceae, Das Pflanzenreich 4(23A).
Google Scholar
Erdtman, G., 1952, Pollen Morphology and Plant Taxonomy: Angiosperms, Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm.
Google Scholar
Estabrook, G. F., 1972, Cladistic methodology: A discussion of the theoretical basis for the induction of evolutionary history, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3:427–456.
Google Scholar
Estabrook, G. F., 1977. Does common equal primitive?, Syst. Bot. 2:36–42.
Google Scholar
Estabrook, G. F., 1978, Some concepts for the estimation of evolutionary relationships, Syst. Bot. 3:146–158.
Google Scholar
Estabrook, G. F., and McMorris, F. R., 1980, When is one estimate of evolutionary relationships a refinement of another?, J. Math. Biol. 10:367–373.
Google Scholar
Estabrook, G. F., Johnson, C. S., and McMorris, F. R., 1975, An idealized concept of the cladistic character, Math. Biosci. 23:263–272.
Google Scholar
Estabrook, G. F., Johnson, C. S., and McMorris, F. R., 1976a, An algebraic analysis of cladistic characters, Discrete Math. 16:141–147.
Google Scholar
Estabrook, G. F., Johnson, C. S., and McMorris, F. R., 1976b, A mathematical foundation for the analysis of cladistic character compatibility, Math. Biosci. 29:181–187.
Google Scholar
Farris, J. S., and Kluge, G., 1979, A botanical clique, Syst. Zool. 28:400–411.
Google Scholar
Felsenstein, J., 1978, Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading, Syst. Zool. 27:401–410.
Google Scholar
Felsenstein, J., 1979, Alternative methods of phylogenetic inference and their relationship, Syst. Zool. 28:49–62.
Google Scholar
Felsenstein, J., 1981, A likelihood approach to character weighting and what it tells us about parsimony and compatibility, Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 16:183–196.
Google Scholar
Funk, V. A., 1981, Special concerns in estimating plant phylogenies, in: Advances in Cladistics (V. A. Funk and D. M. Brooks, eds.), pp. 73–86, New York Botanical Gardens, New York.
Google Scholar
Funk, V. A., and Stussey, T. F., 1978, Cladistics for the practicing taxonomist, Syst. Bot. 3:159–178.
Google Scholar
Goldblatt, P., 1977, The genus Moraea in the winter rainfall region of Southern Africa, Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 63:657–786.
Google Scholar
Gornall, R. J., Bohm, B. A., and Dahlgren, R., 1979, The distribution of flavonoids in the angiosperms, Bot. Not. 132:1–30.
CAS
Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., 1980, Is a new and general theory of evolution emerging?, Paleobiology
6:119–130.
Google Scholar
Haines, R. W., and Lye, K. A., 1975, Seedlings of Nymphaeaceae, Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 70:255–265.
Google Scholar
Hamann, U., 1961, Merkmalsbestand und Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen der “Farinosae,” Willdenowia
2:639–768.
Google Scholar
Hamann, U., 1962a, Weiteres über Merkmalsbestand und Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen der “Farinosae,” Willdenowia
3:169–207.
Google Scholar
Hamann, U., 1962b, Beitrag zur Embryologie der Centrolepidaceae mit Bemerkungen über den Bau der Blüten und Blütenstände und die systematische Stellung der Familie, Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges. 75:153–171.
Google Scholar
Hamann, U., 1966, Embryologische, morphologisch-anatomische und systematische Untersuchungen an Philydraceen, Willdenowia
4:1–178.
Google Scholar
Hamann, U., 1975, Neue Untersuchungen zur Embryologie und Systematik der Centrolepidaceae, Bot. Jahrb. 96:154–191.
Google Scholar
Hamann, U., 1976, Hydatellaceae—A new family of Monocotyledoneae, N. Z. J. Bot. 14:193–196.
Google Scholar
Harborne, J. B., 1973, Flavonoids as systematic markers in the angiosperms, in: Chemistry in Botanical Classification (G. Bendz and J. Santesson, eds.), pp. 103–115, Academic, New York.
Google Scholar
Harris, P. J., and Hartley, R. D., 1980, Phenolic constituents of the cell walls of monocotyledons, Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 8:153–160.
CAS
Google Scholar
Hennig, W., 1950, Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik, Deutscher Zentralverlag, Berlin.
Google Scholar
Hennig, W., 1966, Phylogenetic Systematics, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois.
Google Scholar
Hennig, W., 1969, Die Stammesgeischichte der Insekten, Kramer, Frankfurt am Main.
Google Scholar
Heslop-Harrison, Y., and Shivanna, K. R., 1977, The receptive surface of the angiosperm stigma, Ann. Bot. 41:1233–1258.
Google Scholar
Hickey, L. J., and Doyle, J. A., 1977, Early Cretaceous fossil evidence for angiosperm evolution, Bot. Rev. 43:3–104.
Google Scholar
Holttum, R. E., 1967, Comparative morphology, taxonomy and evolution, Phytomorphology
17:36–41.
Google Scholar
Huber, H., 1969, Die Samenmerkmale und Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse der Liliiflorae Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München. 8:219–538.
Google Scholar
Huber, H., 1977, The treatment of the monocotyledons in an evolutionary system of classification, Plant Syst. Evol., Suppl. 1 1977:285–298.
Google Scholar
Hull, D. L., 1966, Phylogenetic numericlature, Syst. Zool. 15:14–17.
Google Scholar
Hull, D. L., 1967, Certainty and circularity in evolutionary taxonomy, Evolution
21:174–189.
Google Scholar
Hull, D. L., 1970, Contemporary systematic philosophies, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1:19–54.
Google Scholar
Hull, D. L., 1979, The limits of cladism, Syst. Zool. 28:416–440.
Google Scholar
Hutchinson, J., 1934, The Families of Flowering Plants, II, Monocotyledons, Macmillan, London.
Google Scholar
Hutchinson, J., 1959, The Families of Flowering Plants, II, Monocotyledons, 2nd ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Google Scholar
Huxley, I., 1958, Evolutionary processes and taxonomy with special reference to grades, Upps. Univ. Årsskrift
1958:21–38.
Google Scholar
Inamdar, J. A., and Aleykutty, K. M., 1979, Studies on Cabomba aquatica (Cabombaceae), Plant Syst. Evol. 132:161–166.
Google Scholar
Krajncic, B., and Dévidé, Z., 1979, Flower development in Spirodela polyrrhiza (Lemna-ceae), Plant Syst. Evol. 132:305–312.
Google Scholar
Leavitt, R. G., 1904, Trichomes of the root in vascular cryptogams and angiosperms, Proc. Boston Nat. Hist. Soc. 31:273–313.
Google Scholar
Martin, A. C., 1946, The comparative internal morphology of seeds, Am. Midl. Nat. 36:513–660.
Google Scholar
Mayr, E., 1974, Cladistic analysis or cladistic classification? Z. Zool. Syst. Evolutionsforsch. 12:94–128.
Google Scholar
McMorris, F. R., 1975, Compatibility criteria for cladistic and qualitative taxonomic characters, in: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference Numerical Taxonomy (G. F. Estabrook ed.), pp. 399–429, Freeman, San Francisco, California.
Google Scholar
McNeill, J., 1978, Purposeful phenetics, Syst. Zool. 28:465–482.
Google Scholar
Meacham, C. A., 1980, Phylogeny of the Berberidaceae with an evaluation of classifications, Syst. Bot. 5:149–172.
Google Scholar
Meacham, C. A., 1981, A manual method for character compatibility analysis, Taxon 30:591–600.
Google Scholar
Meeuse, A. D. J., 1978, Nectarial secretion, floral evolution, and the pollination syndrome in early Angiosperms, Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. Ser. C Biol. Med. Sci. 81:300–326.
Google Scholar
Metcalfe, C. R., 1971, Anatomy of the Monocotyledons, Vol. V, Cyperaceae, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Google Scholar
Mitter, C., 1981. “Cladistics” in botany. Syst. Zool. 30:373–376.
Google Scholar
Moore, H. E., Jr., 1953, The genus Milia (Amaryllidaceae-Allieae) and its allies, Gentes Herb. 8:269–294.
Google Scholar
Muller, J., 1981, Fossil pollen records of extant angiosperms, Bot. Rev. 47:1–146.
Google Scholar
Müller-Doblies, D., 1968, Über die Verwandtschaft von Typha und Sparganium im Inflo-rescenz-und Blütenbau, Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 89:451–562.
Google Scholar
Nelson, G. J., 1970, Outline of a theory of comparative biology. Syst. Zool. 19:373–376.
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Nelson, G. J., 1971, Paraphyly and polyphyly: Redefinitions. Syst. Zool. 21:471–472.
Google Scholar
Nelson, G. J., 1972, Comments on Hennig’s “Phylogenesc systematics” and its influence on ichthyology, Syst. Zool. 21:364–374.
Google Scholar
Nelson, G. J., 1974, Classification as an expression of phylogenetic relationships. Syst. Zool. 22:344–359.
Google Scholar
Nelson, G., 1978, Ontogeny, phylogeny, paleontology, and the Biogenetic Law, Syst. Zool. 27:324–345.
Google Scholar
Nelson, G., and Platnick, N., 1981, Systematics and Bio geography, Columbia University Press, New York.
Google Scholar
Patterson, C., 1978, Evolution. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Google Scholar
Rasmussen, F. N., 1982, The gynostemium of the neottioid orchids, Opera Bot. 65:1–97.
Google Scholar
Rieppel, O., 1978, Ontogeny and the recognition of primitive character states, Zool. Syst. Evolutionsforsch. 17:57–61.
Google Scholar
Sattler, R., and Singh, V., 1978, Floral organogenesis of Echinodorus amazonicus Rataj and floral construction of the Alismatales, Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 77:141–156.
Google Scholar
Savile, D. B. O., 1979, Fungi as aids in higher plant classification, Bot. Rev. 45:377–503.
Google Scholar
Seigler, D. S., 1977, Plant systematics and alkaloids, Alkaloids
16:1–82.
CAS
Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G., 1961, Principles of Animal Taxonomy, Columbia University Press, New York.
Google Scholar
Singh, V., and Sattler, R., 1977, Development of the inflorescence and flower in Sagittaria cuneata, Can. J. Bot. 55:1087–1105.
Google Scholar
Slater, J. A., 1976, Monocots and chinch-bugs: A study of host plant relationships in the Lygaeid subfamily Blissinae (Hemiptera: Lygidae), Biotropica
8:143–165.
Google Scholar
Sneath, P., and Sokal, R., 1962, Numerical taxonomy, Nature
4818:855–856.
Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M., 1979, Macroevolution: Pattern and Process, Freeman, San Francisco, California.
Google Scholar
Stant, M. Y., 1964, Anatomy of the Alismataceae, J. Linn. Soc. (Bot.) 59:1–42.
Google Scholar
Stant, M. Y., 1967, Anatomy of Butomaceae, J. Linn. Soc. (Bot.) 60:31–60.
Google Scholar
Steenis, C. G. G. J., 1982, Pentastemona, a new 5-merous genus of monoctyledons from North Sumatra, Blumea
28:151–163.
Google Scholar
Stebbins, G. L., 1974, Flowering Plants: Evolution above the Species Level, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Google Scholar
Stevens, P. F., 1980, Evolutionary polarity of character states, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11:333–358.
Google Scholar
Stevens, P. F., 1981, On ends and means, or how polarity criteria can be assessed, Syst. Bot. 6:186–188.
Google Scholar
Takhtajan, A., 1969, Flowering Plants. Origin and Dispersal, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.
Google Scholar
Takhtajan, A., 1980, Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta) Bot. Rev. 46:295–359.
Google Scholar
Tattersall, I., and Eldredge, N., 1977, Fact, theory, and fantasy in human paleontology, Am. Sci. 65:204–211.
PubMed
CAS
Google Scholar
Thanikaimoni, G., 1978, Pollen morphological terms: Proposed definitions—1, in: IV International Palyn. Conference, Lucknow (1976–1977), Vol. 1, pp. 228–239.
Google Scholar
Thorne, R. F., 1976, A phylogenetic classification of the Angiospermae, Evol. Biol. 9:35–106.
Google Scholar
Tomlinson, P. B., 1962, Phylogeny of the Scitamineae—Morphological and anatomical considerations, Evolution
16:192–213.
Google Scholar
Tomlinson, P. B., 1969, Anatomy of the Monocotyledons. III. Commelinales-Zingiberales, (C. R. Metcalfe, ed.), Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Google Scholar
Tomlinson, P. B., 1974, Development of the stomatal complex as a taxonomic character in the monocotyledons, Taxon
23:109–128.
Google Scholar
Tomlinson, P. B., 1982, Anatomy of the Monocotyledons. VII. Helobiae (Alismatales), (C. R. Metcalfe, ed.), Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Google Scholar
Uhl, N. W., and Moore, H. E., 1980, Androecial development in six polyandrous genera representing five major groups of palms; Ann. Bot. 45:57–70.
Google Scholar
Untawale, A. G., and Bhasin, R. K., 1973, On endothecial thickenings in some monoco-tyledonous families, Curr. Sci. 42:398–400.
Google Scholar
Utech, F. H., and Kawano, S., 1976, Biosystematic studies on Disporum (Liliaceae-Polygonatae): IV. Floral biology of D. sessile D. Don and D. smilacinum A. Gray from Japan, Bot. Mag. Tokyo
89:159–171.
Google Scholar
Van Steenis, C. G. G. J., 1982, Pentastemona, a new 5-merous genus of monocotyledons from North Sumatra, Blumea
28:151–163.
Google Scholar
Van Tieghem, P., 1887, Structure de la racine et disposition des radicelles dans Centrole-pidées, Eriocaulées, Joncées, Mayacées, et Xyridées, J. Bot. 1:305–315.
Google Scholar
Van Tieghem, P., and Duliot, H., 1888, Récherches comparatives sur l’origine des membres endogénes dans les plantes vasculaires, Ann. Sci. Nat., Ser. 7
8:1–666.
Google Scholar
Velenovsky, J., 1907, Vergleichende Morphologie der Pflanzen, II, Rivnat, Prague.
Google Scholar
Von Staudermann, W., 1924, Die Haare der Monocotyledonen, Bot. Archiv
8:105–184.
Google Scholar
Walker, J. W., 1975, Comparative pollen morphology and phylogeny of the Ranalean complex, in: The Origin and Early Evolution of Angiosperms (C. B. Beck, ed.), pp. 241–299, Columbia University Press, New York.
Google Scholar
Walker, J. W., 1976, Evolutionary significance of the exine in the pollen of primitive angiosperms, in: The Evolutionary Significance of the Exine (I. K. Ferguson and J. Muller, eds.), pp. 251–308, Academic, London.
Google Scholar
Wagner, P., 1977, Vessel types of monocotyledons: A survey, Bot. Not. 130:383–402.
Google Scholar
Watrous, L. E., and Wheeler, Q. D., 1981, The out-group comparison method of character analyses, Syst. Zool. 30:1–11.
Google Scholar
Wernham, H. F., 1912, Floral evolution: With particular reference to the sympetalous dicotyledons.—IX. Summary and conclusion. Evolutionary genealogy and some principles of classification, New Phytol. 11:373–397.
Google Scholar
Wheeler, Q. D., 1981, The ins and outs of character analysis: A response to Crisci and Stussey, Syst. Bot. 6:297–306.
Google Scholar
Wilder, G. J., and Harris, D. H., 1982, Laticifers in Cyclanthus bipartitus Poit. (Cyclanthaceae), Bot. Gaz. 143:84–93.
Google Scholar
Wiley, E. O., 1978, The evolutionary species concept reconsidered, Syst. Zool. 27:17–26.
Google Scholar
Wiley, E. O., 1979, An annotated Linnean hierarchy, with comments on natural taxa and competing systems, Syst. Zool. 28:308–337.
Google Scholar
Wiley, E. O., 1980, Phylogenetic systematics and vicariance biogeography, Syst. Bot. 5:194–220.
Google Scholar
Wiley, E. O., 1981, Phylogenetics, I Wiley, New York.
Google Scholar
Wunderlich, R., 1959, Zur Frage der Phylogenie der Endospermtypen bei den Angiospermen, Oest. Bot. Z. 106:203–293.
Google Scholar
Yakolev, M. S., and Zhukova, G. Y., 1980, Chlorophyll in embryos of angiosperm seeds, a review: Bot. Notiser
133:323–336.
Google Scholar
Young, D. A., 1981, Are the angiosperms primitively vesselless?, Syst. Bot. 6:313–330.
Google Scholar
