Abstract
The paper elaborates two points: i) There is no principal opposition between predicate logic and adherence to subject-predicate form, ii) Aristotle's treatment of quantifiers fits well into a modern study of generalized quantifiers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
J. Barwise and R. Cooper [1981], Generalized quantifiers and natural language, Linguistics and Philosophy 4, pp. 159–219.
J. van Benthem [1984], Questions about quantifiers, J. Symbolic Logic 49, pp. 443–466.
E. Keenan and J. Stavi [1986], A semantic characterization of natural language determiners, Linguistics and Philosophy 9, pp. 253–326.
P. Lindström [1966], First-order predicate logic with generalized quantifiers, Theoria 32, pp. 186–195.
J. Łukasiewicz [1957], Aristotle's Syllogistic, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
A. Mostowski [1957], On a generalization of quantifiers, Fund. Math. 44, pp. 12–36.
D. Westerståhl [1989], Quantifiers in formal and natural languages, in Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. IV, eds. D. Gabbay & F. Guenthner, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 1–131.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
To the memory of Jerzy Słupecki
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Westerståhl, D. Aristotelian syllogisms and generalized quantifiers. Studia Logica 48, 577–585 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00370209
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00370209