Abstract
Shortwave cloud radiative effect (SWCRE), known as the cooling effect triggered by cloud, plays a vital role in adjusting the global radiation budget. As the Arctic gets warmer, it may become a more indispensable factor curbing this warming tendency. Research has pointed out a significant relationship between sea ice cover (SIC) and SWCRE over the Arctic during summer (June–August). Although no evidence has been found on cloud response to SIC during summer on the average of the Arctic, this study regards cloud as an inter-connection which can regulate SIC and SWCRE in a particular place: Barents and Kara Sea region (15°E–85°E, 70°N–80°N). Its SWCRE and SIC vary significantly, with their trends being 5.85 w∙m−2 and − 5.87% per decade compared to those of the Arctic mean (2.93 w∙m−2 and − 4.65% per decade). In this area, we find that the growing number of low-level cloud which is resulted from the loss on SIC may be accountable for the increase in SWCRE, as is shown in the correlation coefficient between low-level cloud and SIC reaches − 0.4. The correlation coefficient between low-level cloud and SWCRE is 0.6. It reflects a SIC-cloud-SWCRE negative feedback. Moreover, a regression fitting model is being established to quantify the contribution of Arctic cloud in the process of slowing down the Arctic warming. It reveals that this specific region would turn into an ice-free region with sea surface temperature (SST) 1.5 °C higher than reality during 2001 if we stop the increase in SWCRE. This result presents how fascinating the contribution cloud has been making in its way slowing down the warming pace.





Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets analyzed during the current study are available in the ERA5 repository, https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-single-levels-monthly-means?tab=overview, https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-pressure-levels-monthly-means?tab=overview.
Change history
02 August 2022
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-022-04156-8
References
Chen T, Rossow WB, Zhang Y (2000) Radiative effects of cloud-type variations. J Clim 13(1):264–286. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013%3c0264:REOCTV%3e2.0.CO;2
Choi Y, Hwang J, Ok J, Park DR, Su H, Jiang JH, Huang L, Limpasuvan T (2020) Effect of Arctic clouds on the ice-albedo feedback in midsummer. Int J Climatol 40(10):4707–4714. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6469
Choi Y-S, Kim B-M, Hur S-K, Kim S-J, Kim J-H, Ho C-H (2014) Connecting early summer cloud-controlled sunlight and late summer sea ice in the Arctic: Arctic cloud, sunlight, and sea ice. J Geophys Res Atmospheres 119(19):11,087-11,099. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022013
Comiso JC, Parkinson CL, Gersten R, Stock L (2008) Accelerated decline in the Arctic sea ice cover. Geophys Res Lett 35(1):L01703. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031972
Curry JA, Schramm JL, Ebert EE (1995) Sea ice-albedo climate feedback mechanism. J Clim 8(2):240–247. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1995)008%3c0240:SIACFM%3e2.0.CO;2
Eastman R, Warren SG (2010) Interannual variations of arctic cloud types in relation to sea ice. J Clim 23(15):4216–4232. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3492.1
Gultepe I, Isaac GA (2007) Cloud fraction parameterization as a function of mean cloud water content and its variance using in-situ observations. Geophys Res Lett 34(7):L07801. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028223
Gultepe I, Kuhn T, Pavolonis M, Calvert C, Gurka J, Heymsfield AJ, Liu PSK, Zhou B, Ware R, Ferrier B, Milbrandt J, Bernstein B (2014) Ice fog in arctic during FRAM–Ice Fog Project: aviation and nowcasting applications. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 95(2):211–226. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00071.1
He M, Hu Y, Chen N, Wang D, Huang J, Stamnes K (2019) High cloud coverage over melted areas dominates the impact of clouds on the albedo feedback in the Arctic. Sci Rep 9(1):9529. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44155-w
Hersbach H, Bell B, Berrisford P, Horányi AJ, Nicolas J, Radu R, Schepers D, Simmons A, Soci C, Dee D (2019) Global reanalysis: goodbye ERA-Interim, hello ERA5. ECMWF Newsletter 159:17–24. https://doi.org/10.21957/vf291hehd7
Jouan C, Girard E, Pelon J, Gultepe I, Delanoë J, Blanchet J-P (2012) Characterization of Arctic ice cloud properties observed during ISDAC: ISDAC ARCTIC ICE CLOUDS. J Geophys Res Atmospheres 117(D23):n/a-n/a https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017889
Kay JE, Gettelman A (2009) Cloud influence on and response to seasonal Arctic sea ice loss. J Geophys Res 114(D18):D18204. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011773
Kay JE, Holland MM, Bitz CM, Blanchard-Wrigglesworth E, Gettelman A, Conley A, Bailey D (2012) The influence of local feedbacks and northward heat transport on the equilibrium arctic climate response to increased greenhouse gas forcing. J Clim 25(16):5433–5450. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00622.1
Kay JE, L’Ecuyer T, Chepfer H, Loeb N, Morrison A, Cesana G (2016) Recent advances in arctic cloud and climate research. Curr Clim Change Rep 2(4):159–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-016-0051-9
Kay JE, L’Ecuyer T, Gettelman A, Stephens G, O’Dell C (2008) The contribution of cloud and radiation anomalies to the 2007 Arctic sea ice extent minimum. Geophys Res Lett 35(8):L08503. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033451
Koenigk T, Mikolajewicz U, Jungclaus JH, Kroll A (2009) Sea ice in the Barents Sea: seasonal to interannual variability and climate feedbacks in a global coupled model. Clim Dyn 32(7–8):1119–1138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-008-0450-2
Lawrence DM, Slater AG, Tomas RA, Holland MM, Deser C (2008) Accelerated Arctic land warming and permafrost degradation during rapid sea ice loss. Geophys Res Lett 35(11):L11506. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033985
Li J, Wang W-C, Mao J, Wang Z, Zeng G, Chen G (2019) Persistent spring shortwave cloud radiative effect and the associated circulations over southeastern China. J Clim 32(11):3069–3087. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0385.1
Li J, You Q, He B (2020) Distinctive spring shortwave cloud radiative effect and its inter‐annual variation over southeastern China. Atmospheric Sci Lett 21(6) https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.970
Libiseller C, Grimvall A (2002) Performance of partial Mann-Kendall tests for trend detection in the presence of covariates. Environmetrics 13(1):71–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/env.507
Liu Y, Key JR, Liu Z, Wang X, Vavrus SJ (2012) A cloudier Arctic expected with diminishing sea ice. Geophys Res Lett 39(5):n/a-n/a https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051251
Loeb NG, Doelling DR, Wang H, Su W, Nguyen C, Corbett JG, Liang L, Mitrescu C, Rose FG, Kato S (2018) Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Energy Balanced and Filled (EBAF) Top-of-Atmosphere (TOA) Edition-4.0 Data Product. J Clim 31(2):895–918. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0208.1
Manabe S, Stouffer RJ (1980) Sensitivity of a global climate model to an increase of CO 2 concentration in the atmosphere. J Geophys Res 85(C10):5529. https://doi.org/10.1029/JC085iC10p05529
Morrison AL, Kay JE, Chepfer H, Guzman R, Yettella V (2018) Isolating the liquid cloud response to recent Arctic sea ice variability using spaceborne lidar observations. J Geophys Res Atmospheres 123(1):473–490. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027248
Morrison AL, Kay JE, Frey WR, Chepfer H, Guzman R (2019) Cloud response to Arctic sea ice loss and implications for future feedback in the CESM1 climate model. J Geophys Res Atmospheres 124(2):1003–1020
Palm SP, Strey ST, Spinhirne J, Markus T (2010) Influence of Arctic sea ice extent on polar cloud fraction and vertical structure and implications for regional climate. J Geophys Res 115(D21):D21209. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD013900
Pavolonis MJ, Key JR (2003) Antarctic cloud radiative forcing at the surface estimated from the AVHRR Polar Pathfinder and ISCCP D1 datasets, 1985–93. J Appl Meteorol 42(6):827–840
Serreze MC, Barrett AP, Stroeve JC, Kindig DN, Holland MM (2008) The emergence of surface-based Arctic amplification. Cryosphere Discuss 2(4):601–622
Serreze MC, Barry RG (2011) Processes and impacts of Arctic amplification: a research synthesis. Glob Planet Change 77(1–2):85–96
Shupe MD, Intrieri JM (2004) Cloud radiative forcing of the Arctic surface: the influence of cloud properties, surface albedo, and solar zenith angle. J Clim 17(3):616–628
Solomon S, Manning M, Marquis M, Qin D (2007) Climate change 2007-the physical science basis: Working group I contribution to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge university press
Yu Y, Taylor PC, Cai M (2019) Seasonal variations of arctic low-level clouds and its linkage to sea ice seasonal variations. J Geophys Res Atmospheres 124(22):12206–12226
Acknowledgements
We thank Nanjing Hurricane Translation for reviewing the English language quality of this paper.
Funding
This work is jointly supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant 42075068.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: Peng Liu, Yunhao Fu, and Mingyue Tang; methodology: software, validation: Yunhao Fu and Peng Liu; formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, visualization: Yunhao Fu and Peng Liu; writing—review and editing: Yunhao Fu and Peng Liu; resources, supervision, funding acquisition, project administration: Peng Liu. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this article was revised: The Acknowledgements and Funding have been corrected.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Appendix
Appendix
Regression fitting model.
The example of regression fitting model is as follows, \({{{x}}}_{{{t}}}\) stands for independent variable, \({{{y}}}_{{{t}}}\) stands for dependent variable. If we want to build a linear connection between \({{{x}}}_{{{t}}}\) and \({{{y}}}_{{{t}}}\), we can use the ordinary least squares approach.
The formula above is just a basic example on implementing the linear regression progress. The specific formualtion on the talked data is as follows, \({\mathrm{ASR}}_t\) is the independent variable while \({\mathrm{SIC}}_t\) and \({\mathrm{SST}}_t\) are the dependent variables.This model is designed to justify the relationship between ASR and the dependent variables: SIC and SST by comparing the fitting regression result \(\mathrm{SIC}'_t\;\mathrm{and}\;\mathrm{SST}'_t\) to the oringnal data \(SIC_t\;\mathrm{and}\;SST_t\).
CONSTANT-SWCRE method is the same as the method used above but keep SWCRE as a constant figure. It is worth noting that it shares the same \({{{b}}}_{{{s}}{{i}}{{c}}}\), \({{{b}}}_{{{s}}{{s}}{{t}}}\), \({{{a}}}_{{{s}}{{i}}{{c}}}\), \(a_{sst}\) with the abovementioned. However, it ignores the rise in SWCRE from 1979 to 2020 and maintains SWCRE as it is in 1979 as time passes. This approach is designed to test the effect of SWCRE by comparing the CONSTANT-SWCRE result \(\mathrm{SIC}''_t\) and \({\mathrm{SST}''}_t\) to the oringnal data \({SIC}_t\;\mathrm{and}{\;SST}_t\).
S: Annually mean slope on SWCRE in both regions (Arctic and Novaya) from 1979 to 2020.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Fu, Y., Liu, P. & Tang, M. The Arctic sea ice-cloud radiative negative feedback in the Barents and Kara Sea region. Theor Appl Climatol 150, 1–11 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-022-04137-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-022-04137-x

