Skip to main content
Log in

The Arctic sea ice-cloud radiative negative feedback in the Barents and Kara Sea region

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Climatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 02 August 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Shortwave cloud radiative effect (SWCRE), known as the cooling effect triggered by cloud, plays a vital role in adjusting the global radiation budget. As the Arctic gets warmer, it may become a more indispensable factor curbing this warming tendency. Research has pointed out a significant relationship between sea ice cover (SIC) and SWCRE over the Arctic during summer (June–August). Although no evidence has been found on cloud response to SIC during summer on the average of the Arctic, this study regards cloud as an inter-connection which can regulate SIC and SWCRE in a particular place: Barents and Kara Sea region (15°E–85°E, 70°N–80°N). Its SWCRE and SIC vary significantly, with their trends being 5.85 w∙m−2 and − 5.87% per decade compared to those of the Arctic mean (2.93 w∙m−2 and − 4.65% per decade). In this area, we find that the growing number of low-level cloud which is resulted from the loss on SIC may be accountable for the increase in SWCRE, as is shown in the correlation coefficient between low-level cloud and SIC reaches − 0.4. The correlation coefficient between low-level cloud and SWCRE is 0.6. It reflects a SIC-cloud-SWCRE negative feedback. Moreover, a regression fitting model is being established to quantify the contribution of Arctic cloud in the process of slowing down the Arctic warming. It reveals that this specific region would turn into an ice-free region with sea surface temperature (SST) 1.5 °C higher than reality during 2001 if we stop the increase in SWCRE. This result presents how fascinating the contribution cloud has been making in its way slowing down the warming pace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from €39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available in the ERA5 repository, https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-single-levels-monthly-means?tab=overview, https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-pressure-levels-monthly-means?tab=overview.

Change history

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Nanjing Hurricane Translation for reviewing the English language quality of this paper.

Funding

This work is jointly supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant 42075068.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: Peng Liu, Yunhao Fu, and Mingyue Tang; methodology: software, validation: Yunhao Fu and Peng Liu; formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, visualization: Yunhao Fu and Peng Liu; writing—review and editing: Yunhao Fu and Peng Liu; resources, supervision, funding acquisition, project administration: Peng Liu. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peng Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: The Acknowledgements and Funding have been corrected.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 17 KB)

Appendix

Appendix

Regression fitting model.

The example of regression fitting model is as follows, \({{{x}}}_{{{t}}}\) stands for independent variable, \({{{y}}}_{{{t}}}\) stands for dependent variable. If we want to build a linear connection between \({{{x}}}_{{{t}}}\) and \({{{y}}}_{{{t}}}\), we can use the ordinary least squares approach.

$$x_t\rightarrow y_t\;\left(t=1,\;2\dots,n\right)$$
$$b=\frac{\sum_{t=1}^n=x_ty_t-nx^\ast y^\ast}{\sum_{t=1}^n\;x_t\;x_t-nx^\ast x^\ast},\;a=y^\ast-bx^\ast\;,\;y'_t=\;bx_t\;+\;a\;\left(x^\ast={\textstyle\sum_{t=1}^n}\;x_t/n\;y^\ast\;=\;{\textstyle\sum_{t=1}^n}\;Y_t/n\right)$$

The formula above is just a basic example on implementing the linear regression progress. The specific formualtion on the talked data is as follows, \({\mathrm{ASR}}_t\) is the independent variable while \({\mathrm{SIC}}_t\) and \({\mathrm{SST}}_t\) are the dependent variables.This model is designed to justify the relationship between ASR and the dependent variables: SIC and SST by comparing the fitting regression result \(\mathrm{SIC}'_t\;\mathrm{and}\;\mathrm{SST}'_t\) to the oringnal data \(SIC_t\;\mathrm{and}\;SST_t\).

$$ASR_t\rightarrow SIC_t\;\left(t=1,\dots,42\right)$$
$$b_{sic}=\frac{\sum_{t=1}^n=ASR_t\;SIC_t-nASR^\ast SIC^\ast}{\sum_{t=1}^n\;ASR_t\;ASR_t\;-nASR^\ast\;ASR\ast},\;a_{sic}=\;SIC^\ast\;-\;b_{sic}\;ASR^\ast,\;SIC'_t\;=\;b_{sic}ASR_t\;+\;a_{sic}$$
$$ASR_t\rightarrow SIT_{t\;}\left(t=1,\dots,42\right)$$
$$b_{sst}\;=\;\frac{\sum_{t=1\;}^nASR_tSST_t-nASR^\ast SST^\ast}{\sum_{t=1}^n\;ASR_tASR_t-nASR^\ast ASR^\ast}\;,\;a_{sst}\;=\;SST^\ast-\;b_{sst}ASR^\ast,\;SST'_t\;=\;b_{sst}ASR_t+\;a_{sst}$$
$$\left(ASR^\ast=\sum\nolimits_{t=1}^nASR_t/n\;SIC^\ast=\sum\nolimits_{t=1}^nSIC_t/n\;SST^\ast\;=\sum\nolimits_{t=1}^nSST_t/n\right)$$

CONSTANT-SWCRE method is the same as the method used above but keep SWCRE as a constant figure. It is worth noting that it shares the same \({{{b}}}_{{{s}}{{i}}{{c}}}\), \({{{b}}}_{{{s}}{{s}}{{t}}}\), \({{{a}}}_{{{s}}{{i}}{{c}}}\), \(a_{sst}\) with the abovementioned. However, it ignores the rise in SWCRE from 1979 to 2020 and maintains SWCRE as it is in 1979 as time passes. This approach is designed to test the effect of SWCRE by comparing the CONSTANT-SWCRE result \(\mathrm{SIC}''_t\) and \({\mathrm{SST}''}_t\) to the oringnal data \({SIC}_t\;\mathrm{and}{\;SST}_t\).

$$\mathrm{SIC}''_t\;=\;b_{sic}\;\left({\mathrm{ASR}}_t\;+\;S\left(\mathrm t-1979\right)\right)\;+\;a_{sic}\;,\;\mathrm{SST}''_t\;=\;b_{sst}\;\left({\mathrm{ASR}}_t\;+\;\mathrm S\left(\mathrm t-1979\right)\right)\;+\;a_{sst}$$

S: Annually mean slope on SWCRE in both regions (Arctic and Novaya) from 1979 to 2020.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fu, Y., Liu, P. & Tang, M. The Arctic sea ice-cloud radiative negative feedback in the Barents and Kara Sea region. Theor Appl Climatol 150, 1–11 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-022-04137-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-022-04137-x

Keywords