Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

Weakened evidence for mid-latitude impacts of Arctic warming

Nature Climate Change volume 10, pages 1065–1066 (2020)Cite this article

Subjects

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

To the Editor — The idea that rapid Arctic warming might be changing weather patterns at lower latitudes rose to prominence in 2012. At that time, amidst rising global temperatures and record low Arctic sea-ice cover, parts of the mid-latitudes had just experienced a run of extremely cold winters1. Some scientists speculated that these cold snaps were driven by Arctic-induced changes in the atmospheric circulation, pointing to an unexpected 25-year winter cooling trend over Eurasia, an ostensible shift in the Arctic Oscillation and increased meandering of the jet stream as evidence2,3. These tendencies would continue as the Arctic warmed further, they predicted. Such ideas were controversial from the outset. Very quickly, other scientists questioned the idea, arguing that the cooling and circulation trends were not robust and unlikely to continue in the longer term4,5. Jennifer Francis, whose seminal work proposed that Arctic warming was leading to a wavier jet stream, predicted in 2014 that “within a few years, as Arctic amplification continues, we will have enough data to know whether or not we’re right”6.

Also, over the past six or so years, there has been a surge of modelling studies suggesting only a weak influence of Arctic warming on mid-latitudes8,9,10,11,12,13. The magnitudes of the simulated responses are consistently weaker than observations might imply, for reasons that are uncertain and contentious14,15,16. A recent review concluded that observations provide strong evidence of Arctic influence on mid-latitudes16; this conclusion, however, was drawn from surveying influential studies that reported now-outdated trends. We argue that updated observational and reanalysis records (Fig. 1) tell much the same story as models: that the Arctic influence on mid-latitudes is small compared to other aspects of climate variability, and that observed periods of strong correlation (such as 1988/89 to 2011/12) are an artefact of internal variability11,17,18.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Indicators of Arctic change and its possible mid-latitude impacts.

References

  1. Cohen, J. et al. Nat. Geosci. 7, 627–637 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Francis, J. A. & Vavrus, S. J. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L06801 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen, J. L., Furtado, J. C., Barlow, M. A., Alexeev, V. A. & Cherry, J. E. Environ. Res. Lett. 7, 014007 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Screen, J. A. & Simmonds, I. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 959–964 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barnes, E. A. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 4734–4739 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kintisch, E. Science 344, 250–253 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Screen, J. A. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 577–582 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McCusker, K. E., Fyfe, J. C. & Sigmond, M. Nat. Geosci. 9, 838–842 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sun, L., Perlwitz, J. & Hoerling, M. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 5345–5352 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Blackport, R., Screen, J. A., van der Wiel, K. & Bintanja, R. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 697–704 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Blackport, R. & Screen, J. A. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay2880 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dai, A. & Song, M. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 231–237 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ogawa, F. et al. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 3255–3263 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mori, M., Kosaka, Y., Watanabe, M., Nakamura, H. & Kimoto, M. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 123 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Screen, J. A. & Blackport, R. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 934–936 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cohen, J. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 20–29 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kolstad, E. W. & Screen, J. A. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 7583–7591 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Warner, J. L., Screen, J. A. & Scaife, A. A. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2019GL085679 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Overland, J. E. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 992–999 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Siew, P. Y. F., Li, C., Sobolowski, S. P. & King, M. P. Weather Clim. Dynam. 1, 261–275 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fetterer, F., Knowles, K, Meier, W. N, Savoie, M. & Windnagel, A. Sea Ice Index Version 3 (National Snow and Ice Data Center, 2017).

  22. Arctic oscillation. NOAA Climate Prediction Center https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/precip/CWlink/daily_ao_index/ao.shtml (2020).

  23. Hersbach, H. et al. Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc. 146, 1999–2049 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors were supported by a UK Natural Environmental Research Council (NERC) grant (NE/P006760/1). The sea-ice extent data are available from the National Snow and Ice Data Center21. The Arctic Oscillation index is provided by the NOAA Climate Prediction Center (ref. 22). ERA-5 reanalysis23 data are freely available at the Copernicus Climate Change Service Climate Data Store (https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/home).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

    Russell Blackport & James A. Screen

  2. Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

    Russell Blackport

Authors
  1. Russell Blackport
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James A. Screen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James A. Screen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blackport, R., Screen, J.A. Weakened evidence for mid-latitude impacts of Arctic warming. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 1065–1066 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00954-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00954-y

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene