Talk:Become (extended play)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Rock music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 16 May 2025

It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Become (extended play) → Become
Become → Deleted to make room

– This article was disambiguated to differentiate from Become (album), but that is a redirect, not its own article (it used to be an article, but was redirected as non-notable in 2020). The hatnote already present on the EP article is sufficient. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 01:05, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, honestly DAB is primary here.--Ortizesp (talk) 13:41, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I'm neutral on what is the primary topic here but if it retains a disambiguator it should be Become (EP), I don't think I've ever seen it spelled out like this. orangesclub 🍊 04:23, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This I agree with, though I still stand by nomination of course. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 04:40, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I agree that the disambiguation page is primary. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 16:57, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Frankly, I don't know how to respond to this or the above oppose vote. How is a dab page primary over an article? Is there any precedent for that? There's only one article to link to. Makes no sense to me. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 22:49, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support or convert Become into a redirect to Becoming (philosophy). I think the disambiguation page is unnecessary with just two entries, only one is an article. Frost 04:17, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]