Talk:Future Days

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Progressive Rock High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electronic music Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Can-Future Days (album cover).jpg

Image:Can-Future Days (album cover).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:42, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done The image has been updated accordingly. However, it is probably better to leave the notice on the talk page as a matter of record. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 14:02, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 April 2025

It has been proposed in this section that Future Days be renamed and moved to Future Days (album).

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Future Days → Future Days (album) – I think it's unlikely that there will be a primary topic any more with the TV episode also named this. Trying to move the episode to primary would definitely be recentism, but I don't think making a DAB page would be controversial. (I am still nominating this for RM since it's a decently major album with obvious notability.) ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:03, 15 April 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Valorrr ^{(lets chat)} 04:37, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Move: Sure, the wiki lists as one of the reasons for a move the need "to be disambiguated in some way to avoid confusion with an existing, similarly named topic.." I really like this album, but it's doesn't seem to be a primary topic for the words "Future Days", at least now. LastJabberwocky (talk) 19:31, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, WP:RECENTISM. Unlikely that the TV episode has more long-term notability than this well-received and influential album. 162 etc. (talk) 21:01, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As far as being "well-received" goes, the episode got more than a dozen reviews and extremely high ratings, so that should theoretically not matter as far as this discussion is concerned. And when talking about influence, I don't see a mention of how the album influenced future works. So if we're talking about simply being "good", they are both of equal importance and validity. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 00:04, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]