Talk:Garhwal Kingdom

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country

India: Uttarakhand / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Uttarakhand (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Nepal Low‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Garhwal Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:35, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Date founded

@Ekabhishek: you provided the date 823 in an old edit to this page, without adding a citation.[1]

Tarbooj (talk · contribs) later entered 888 in the infobox,[2] but not changing your text that still says 823.

Can you provide a citation to resolve this inconsistency? – Fayenatic London 09:18, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. [3] – Fayenatic London 23:16, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 23 May 2025

It has been proposed in this section that Garhwal Kingdom be renamed and moved to Garhwal kingdom.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Garhwal Kingdom → Garhwal kingdom – Sources don't usually cap kingdom here. Dicklyon (talk) 05:47, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kingdom of Garhwal? Blueboar (talk) 14:53, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A few of the ancient Indian kingdoms are done that way; most not. More stats. Dicklyon (talk) 23:48, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support The ngrams don't have enough results for a wildcard search eg Garhwal kingdom * but google shcollar (here) is quite convincing that this is not consistently capped per MOS:CAPS and WP:NCCAPS. Cinderella157 (talk) 06:47, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kingdom of Garhwal per consistency with almost every other kingdom (e.g. Kingdom of France, Kingdom of Italy, etc.) 🐔 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 22:45, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That is not the pattern for most of the ancient India kingdoms. Dicklyon (talk) 03:49, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here are more n-gram stats to include that alternative. Note that it would still be lowercase kingdom when non sentence-initial. And Gahrwal kingdom is historically much more common. Dicklyon (talk) 03:55, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]