Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 May 20

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 20

[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 20, 2025.

Wikipedia:LOSSOFEDITINGPRIVILAGES

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per G7. -- Tavix (talk) 21:11, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unrealistic misspelling/typo of "privilages" instead of "privileges". WP:LOSSOFEDITINGPRIVILEGES does not exist (and should maybe be created?). I am bad at usernames (talk | contribs) 20:34, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, misspelling. This wasn't an intentional misspelling redirect unlike all those I made last year that got deleted. All along I thought that that word had an "a" instead of an "e" between the l and the g Cyber the tiger🐯 (talk) 21:06, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I just put a G7 tag on it Cyber the tiger🐯 (talk) 21:07, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Software Group

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:28, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The phrase, "Software Group", does not currently appear in the target article, IBM, and it sounds awfully ambiguous to me. BD2412 T 19:49, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Advanced DC Motors

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 May 27#Advanced DC Motors

German Film Museum

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Deutsches Filminstitut was suggested as a target, however there was no further support for it. There was no opposition either, hence I am retargeting to it. Jay 💬 17:57, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect is incorrect. It would have to redirect to (or be the title of) "Deutsches Filmmuseum", which doesn't have an article in the English Wikipedia yet. I already tried to speedydelte it, but it was declined although the redirect is clearly redirecting to the wrong article. Therefore, there actually shouldn't be much to discuss. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxeto0910 (talk • contribs) 15:26, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a look at the article it's targeting and done a bit of an update and cleanup there, as well as checking and fixing articles linking to it. Agree that it could be deleted for now, although it would be nice to have at least a stub article on the other museum. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 01:35, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It has to be deleted until we have an article about it, as the current link target is just wrong. If you want to write a short stub article about the Deutsches Filmmuseum and correct this redirect by linking to it, you have my support though. Maxeto0910 (talk) 13:55, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment/opinion: The target of this redirect is clearly wrong.
However, the correct target de:Deutsches Filmmuseum in the German Wikipedia has currently the following text in it [my rough and somewhat shortened and modified translation from German]: The articles Deutsches Filmmuseum and de:DFF – Deutsches Filminstitut & Filmmuseum overlap thematically. You are welcome to take part in the redundancy discussion or help directly to merge the articles. In de:DFF – Deutsches Filminstitut & Filmmuseum, it says: The Deutsches Filminstitut & Filmmuseum e. V. has been a publicly funded film research institution based in Frankfurt am Main since 1949. In 2006, the Deutsches Filmmuseum, also founded in Frankfurt in 1984, was merged with the Filminstitut, but the original founding name Deutsches Filminstitut e. V. was only abandoned in 2019. The homepage www.dff.film/ also shows the title DFF – Deutsches Filminstitut & Filmmuseum. And: the German Wikipedia page de:DFF – Deutsches Filminstitut & Filmmuseum has its counterpart in the English Wikipedia: en:Deutsches Filminstitut.
Therefore, I suggest modifying the redirect to the target en:Deutsches Filminstitut.
--Cyfal (talk) 11:54, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusalkii (talk) 17:56, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Notified of this discussion at the suggested target Deutsches Filminstitut.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 15:34, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Filmi music

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 May 28#Filmi music

Citation templates

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. No further participation after a week of relisting, nor did the earlier participants respond after being pinged. I am retargeting to Citation#Styles as an alternate target as there was no support for the XNR. Jay 💬 13:56, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:XNR. I reproduce my comment a related discussion:

...my searches before making this nomination showed that Wikipedia's citation templates are far from the PTOPIC for that title. In fact, it is far more likely that a reader searching "citation template" is looking for an article (or section) on something like this. Yesterday enwiki was viewed by 77.7 M unique devices, but we only have 118,000 active users, and I'd hope most of those know enough to not search "citation template" in mainspace hoping to end up at WP:CITET.

While helping new users is a worthy goal, we should put our readers first, especially in this case where the word does not refer unambiguously to Wikipedia (unlike something like "redirects for discussion" which is unambiguous). Cremastra (u — c) 23:48, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Citation#Styles with a hatnote to current target. That is where I would expect the redirect to go as a non-Wikipedian. Ca talk to me! 04:23, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Since the nom apparently disagrees with the proposed target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:33, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Xbox Series X

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was de-refine. Jay 💬 14:08, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should this redirect to a section? The article is about the two, but very similar consoles. Jumping to the section skips an informative introduction. Same with Xbox Series S and variations. Stumbling9655 (talk) 17:48, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:32, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Derefine(?). Since the separate section only talks about the hardware, readers are best served by being directed to the lead that covers a more broader view of the topic. Xbox Series S and other redirects to their respective sections should be bundled in. mwwv converse∫edits 19:03, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to just the article per Mwwv. Readers are better served by seeing the lead section first for both redirects (and any similar ones) in this case. Skynxnex (talk) 19:30, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget all that's in the section is mostly just its hardware and doesn't tell the reader any information on the console itself, would be better to redirect to the top Gonna eatpizza (talk) 14:08, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Linguistic elaboration

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 14:16, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not in target page. When I opened a discussion at Linguistics WikiProject in late 2023 (archive), no one else found anything in the literature or proposed any possible incoming wikilinks to make use of this redirect, and creator also supported opening this discussion. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 05:46, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

A GLOSSARY of the Construction, Decoration and Use of Arms and Armor IN ALL COUNTRIES AND IN ALL TIMES

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep * Pppery * it has begun... 18:57, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No apparent reason for this capitalisation, and it seems very unlikely that people would search or link this redirect with its combination of Normal Capitals and ALL CAPS. Nyttend (talk) 02:03, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am indifferent, but the redirect had been linked at Dhal (shield); I just bypassed the redirect. Citations use Wikipedia's house style anyway, which is Title Case. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 06:10, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. I can see where someone would get this from looking at the book. With most editions of the book the "glossary" and the "in all countries and in all times" are written in capital case, while the rest is not. PARAKANYAA (talk) 08:43, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
See this Amazon listing [1] PARAKANYAA (talk) 08:44, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Zldksn flqmtm

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 02:38, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Recently created from the QWERTY equivalents of the Hangul keyboard. WP:PANDORA; we can't have Hangul->English redirects for every article. Anerdw (talk) 01:42, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Uhh, what? I see no reason to redirect "Qwerty uiop" to this anglophone actor's article, let alone the comparable phrase for the keyboard in another writing system not used in English. And his article doesn't mention Korea at all, except a brief reference to appearing in a film adapted from something originally produced in South Korea. Finally, if I take the title of his Korean article, ko:키아누 리브스, and run it through this transliteration website, I'm told that it becomes "kianu ribeuseu". Delete. Nyttend (talk) 02:08, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • To clarify - it's not the transliteration, it's the QWERTY equivalents of the characters "키아누 리브스" as typed on a Hangul keyboard. Still delete. Anerdw (talk) 22:58, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Collapsoe bottom

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Rusalkii (talk) 02:39, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible typo; zero incoming links besides Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/Template redirects (which tells AWB to automatically bypass links to this "shortcut"). Delete per WP:AFFINITY. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:47, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I also support deleting collapsoe top. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:44, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
​Bundled Template:Collapsoe top with this nomination. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 13:55, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I believe there were once links that used this upon transfer from some other wiki, can’t remember if it was another language or collapse alternative E. It’s unlikely that problem will come up again, so as the page creator I agree with deletion. CFCF (talk) 14:48, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW the only hits google finds are OCR errors or Latin texts, but it finds nothing (other than this redirect) on any site with a wikipedia.org domain. Thryduulf (talk) 10:19, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2025_May_20&oldid=1292936156"