The RecouseClaim API has deviceClassName fields to reference the DeviceClass resource in the .spec.devices.requests[*].exactly.deviceClass and the .spec.devices.requests[*].firstAvailable.deviceClassName in the following:

• kubernetes/staging/src/k8s.io/api/resource/v1beta2/types.go

  Lines 762 to 775 in da50238

  	// DeviceClassName references a specific DeviceClass, which can define
  	// additional configuration and selectors to be inherited by this
  	// subrequest.
  	//
  	// A class is required. Which classes are available depends on the cluster.
  	//
  	// Administrators may use this to restrict which devices may get
  	// requested by only installing classes with selectors for permitted
  	// devices. If users are free to request anything without restrictions,
  	// then administrators can create an empty DeviceClass for users
  	// to reference.
  	//
  	// +required
  	DeviceClassName string `json:"deviceClassName" protobuf:"bytes,2,name=deviceClassName"`

• kubernetes/staging/src/k8s.io/api/resource/v1beta2/types.go

  Lines 653 to 666 in da50238

  	// DeviceClassName references a specific DeviceClass, which can define
  	// additional configuration and selectors to be inherited by this
  	// request.
  	//
  	// A DeviceClassName is required.
  	//
  	// Administrators may use this to restrict which devices may get
  	// requested by only installing classes with selectors for permitted
  	// devices. If users are free to request anything without restrictions,
  	// then administrators can create an empty DeviceClass for users
  	// to reference.
  	//
  	// +required
  	DeviceClassName string `json:"deviceClassName" protobuf:"bytes,1,name=deviceClassName"`

However, as I can see API conventions documentation, the object referencing field name should be named as {field}Ref format: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/sig-architecture/api-conventions.md#naming-of-the-reference-field

Are these intended violations? Or is the documentation not correct?