Impact
If an application using Puma allows untrusted input in a response header, an attacker can use newline characters (i.e. CR, LF or/r, /n) to end the header and inject malicious content, such as additional headers or an entirely new response body. This vulnerability is known as HTTP Response Splitting.
While not an attack in itself, response splitting is a vector for several other attacks, such as cross-site scripting (XSS).
This is related to CVE-2019-16254, which fixed this vulnerability for the WEBrick Ruby web server.
Patches
This has been fixed in 4.3.2 and 3.12.3 by checking all headers for line endings and rejecting headers with those characters.
Workarounds
Add a Rack middleware to your application which accomplishes the same header check:
class HTTPResponseSplittingMiddleware
CRLF_REGEX = /[\r\n]/.freeze
def initialize(app)
@app = app
end
def call(env)
status, headers, body = @app.call(env)
headers.reject! { |_k, v| CRLF_REGEX =~ v.to_s }
[status, headers, body]
end
end
References
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
Impact
If an application using Puma allows untrusted input in a response header, an attacker can use newline characters (i.e.
CR,LFor/r,/n) to end the header and inject malicious content, such as additional headers or an entirely new response body. This vulnerability is known as HTTP Response Splitting.While not an attack in itself, response splitting is a vector for several other attacks, such as cross-site scripting (XSS).
This is related to CVE-2019-16254, which fixed this vulnerability for the WEBrick Ruby web server.
Patches
This has been fixed in 4.3.2 and 3.12.3 by checking all headers for line endings and rejecting headers with those characters.
Workarounds
Add a Rack middleware to your application which accomplishes the same header check:
References
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: