CFML Conventional Wisdom

On 21 March 2013 19:14, Mike Henke <[email protected]> wrote: Sorry about that! heh No

Checkout out ValidateThis. It's pretty nice bases on jquery validation. On Thursday, March 21,

CFML Developers: What do you use for form validation? At work, we're looking for a new form

Well, I don't think so... 2012/2/10 Tony <[email protected]> I havent seen a post in a while

Hi Paul, and welcome to the list and look forward to your contribution. The OpenBD has a very

Hi Peter, and all, My bio isn't nearly that interesting, but here it goes. I have been working

Sean Daniels said the following on 02/02/2011 04:32 PM: > On Feb 2, 2011, at 4:54 PM, Peter J.

-- aw2.0 www.aw20.co.uk -----Original Message----- From: cfml-conventional-wisdom+noreply@

This issue came up in a comment thread on Gary Gilbert's blog: http://www.garyrgilbert.com/blog/

You're missing the point - the toDataUri() function would be a more generic function capable of

> I propose this: > > toDataUri(data, mimeType:auto, encoding:base64) > This makes the

Jamie, We build a lot of tools that are in themselves tools. So we have a system for example that

On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Andrew Penhorwood <[email protected]> wrote: > It seems

On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Alan Williamson (aw2.0 ltd) <[email protected]> wrote: > Open

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Peter Boughton wrote: > Doh! I completely forgot about this

Oh, and rematch should also have an option to return sub-expressions (as strings rather than pos/len,

On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 5:37 AM, Alan Williamson (aw2.0 ltd) <[email protected]> wrote: > I

[1,2,3] &= 4 ==> "Error you can only concatenate same types. Try [1,2,3] &= [4]"

On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Henry Ho <[email protected]> wrote: Any thought of doing a

Andy Wu said the following on 22/03/10 06:47: > Peter J. Farrell wrote: >>> That won'

+1 for overloaded arithmetic operators. Less typing, if nothing else. On Mar 9, 7:35 pm, Matthew

Thank you for clarification. Some ideas: a) By default take collection as list, otherwise set "

On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Alan Williamson <[email protected]> wrote: > you are right

> With a query you get the row in the "index" and the query > row in the "item

Which I am going to take was because of backward compatability. The question I would have asked is

I'm going to start tracking some of this in "pages" on the google group so the details