Bibliography
Primary sources
Amery, L.S., “Home Rule and the Colonial Analogy” in S. Rosenbaum (ed.), Against Home Rule: The Case for the Union (London, Warne, 1912), pp. 128-52.
Butt, Isaac, Irish Federalism! Its Meaning, Its Objects and Its Hopes, 1st ed., (Dublin, Falconer, 1870)
Childers, Robert Erskine The Framework of Home Rule (London, Edward Arnold, 1911)
Dicey, A.V., “Home Rule from an English Point of View”, Contemporary Review 42 (1882) 66-86
Dicey, A.V. Lectures Introductory to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 2nd ed., (London, Macmillan, 1886)
Dicey, A.V., England’s Case against Home Rule, 3rd ed. (London, Murray, 1887)
Secondary sources
Dictionary of Irish Biography, (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009)
Bell, Duncan, The Idea of Greater Britain – Empire and the Future of World Order, 1860-1900 (New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 2007)
Bew, Paul, John Redmond (Dublin: Historical Association of Ireland, 1996)
Byrne, Elaine, “Irish Home Rule - Stepping-Stone to Imperial Federation?” History Ireland 20(1) (2012), pp. 25-7.
Ewart, Wilfred, A Journey in Ireland: 1921 (London, Putnam, 1922)
Gwynn, Denis, The Life of John Redmond (Edinburgh, Harrap, 1932)
Hall, H. Duncan, The British Commonwealth of Nations – A Study of its Past and Future Development (London, Methuen, 1920)
Hall, H. Duncan, Commonwealth – A History of the British Commonwealth of Nations, (London, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1971)
Kane, Nathan, A Study of the Debate on Scottish Home Rule, 1886-1914 (unpublished Ph.D thesis, University of Edinburgh, 2015).
Keith, A.B., Selected Speeches and Documents on British Colonial Policy, 1763-1917, Part II (Oxford University Press, 1961)
Kelly, James, “The making of law in eighteenth-century Ireland: the significance and import of Poynings’ Law” in N.M. Dawson (ed.) Reflections on Law and History (Dublin, Four Courts Press, 2006) pp. 259-277
Kendle, John, The Colonial and Imperial Conferences 1887-1911 (London, Longmans, 1967)
Kendle, John, Ireland and the Federal Solution (Kingston and Montreal, McGill-Queen’s, 1989)
Kendle, J.E., “The Round Table Movement and ‘Home Rule All Round’”, The Historical Journal, 11(2) (1968), pp. 332-53.
Kennedy, BA, “Sharman Crawford’s Federal Scheme for Ireland” in HA Cronne et al (eds) Essays in British and Irish History (London, Muller, 1949), pp. 235-54.
Loughlin, James, Gladstone, Home Rule and the Ulster Question, 1882-93, (Dublin, Gill and Macmillan, 1986)
McIntyre, W. David, The Britannic Vision (London, Palgrave Macmillan, 2009)
Mohr, Thomas, “The Statute of Westminster: An Irish Perspective” Law and History Review 30(1) (2013), pp. 749-91
Mohr, Thomas, “The United Kingdom and Imperial Federation, 1900 to 1939: A Precedent for British Legal Relations with the European Union?” Comparative Legal History 4(2) (2016), pp. 1-31
Mohr, Thomas, “The Irish Question and the Evolution of British Imperial Law, 1916-1922” Dublin University Law Journal 39(2) (2016), pp. 405-428
Mohr, Thomas “The Impact of Canadian Confederation in Ireland” in Martel, M., J. Krikorian and A Schubert (eds), Globalizing Canadian Confederation - Canada and the World in 1867 (Toronto, University of Toronto, 2017), pp. 178-93.
Mohr, Thomas, “Law and the Foundation of the Irish State on 6 December 1922” Irish Jurist 59 (2018), pp. 31-58.
Morgan, Kenneth O., Wales in British Politics, 1868-1922 (Cardiff, University of Wales Press, 1963)
O’Day, Alan, Irish Home Rule, 1867-1921 (Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1998)
Pearl, Cyril, The Three Lives of Gavan Duffy (Sydney, New South Wales University Press, 1979)
Thornley, David, Isaac Butt and Home Rule (London, MacGibbon and Kee, 1964)
Wheatley, Michael, “John Redmond and federalism in 1910” Irish Historical Studies 32 (2001), pp. 343-64.
Top of page
Notes
David Thornley, Isaac Butt and Home Rule (London, MacGibbon and Kee, 1964), pp. 91-4 and O’Day, Irish Home Rule, 1867-1921 (Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1998), pp. 28-32. Earlier proposals on Irish autonomy within the United Kingdom include that of William Sharman Crawford in the 1840s. See BA Kennedy, “Sharman Crawford’s Federal Scheme for Ireland” in HA Cronne et al (eds), Essays in British and Irish History (London, Muller, 1949), pp. 235-54.
Isaac Butt, Irish Federalism! Its Meaning, Its Objects and Its Hopes, 1st ed., (Dublin, Falconer, 1870), pp. 11-12.
Alan O’Day, Irish Home Rule, pp. 38-41.
James Loughlin, Gladstone, Home Rule and the Ulster Question, 1882-93, (Dublin, Gill and Macmillan, 1986), pp. 35-52.
For example, see the views of Patrick James Smyth (1826-1885), an Irish home rule MP who consistently argued in favour of a return to Grattan’s parliament in preference to any federal settlement, in “Rev Mr Galbraith on Federalism - Letter to the Editor” Irish Times, 3 December 1875, p. 6.
For a short biography of Henry Grattan (1746-1820) see Dictionary of Irish Biography, (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009), vol. 4, pp. 200-5. The autonomy enjoyed by Grattan’s parliament owed a great deal to the abrogation of a statute known as Poynings’ Law (10 Henry VII c.4 (Irl.)) whose provisions resulted in important limitations on the autonomy of the Irish parliament. See James Kelly, “The making of law in eighteenth-century Ireland: the significance and import of Poynings’ Law” in N.M. Dawson (ed.) Reflections on Law and History (2006) p. 259-77.
Isaac Butt, Irish Federalism, pp. 34-35. For example, Grattan’s parliament lacked a responsible executive and bills passed by Grattan’s parliament still had to obtain the royal assent. Other limits on its autonomy are discussed in Robert Erskine Childers, The Framework of Home Rule (London, Edward Arnold, 1911), pp. 42-59.
British Library, Gladstone Papers, volume 587, MS 44672.
Thomas Mohr, “The Impact of Canadian Confederation in Ireland” in M. Martel, J. Krikorian and A Schubert (eds), Globalizing Canadian Confederation - Canada and the World in 1867 (Toronto, University of Toronto, 2017), pp. 185-7.
Isaac Butt, Irish Federalism!, p. 81.
Editorial, The Times, 16 April 1886, p. 9.
Section 1, Suspensory Act 1914 (UK).
Sections 3 and 5, British North America Act 1867 (UK)
Section 146, British North America Act 1867 (UK)
Duncan Hall, Commonwealth – A History of the British Commonwealth of Nations, (London, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1971), p. 36
See Section 1, Statute of Westminster Act 1931 (UK). For unification with Canada see British North America Act 1949 (UK). This statute was renamed the “Newfoundland Act” in Canada under the Schedule to the Constitution Act 1982 (Canada).
Duncan Hall, Commonwealth, pp. 5-32.
Sir Thomas Inskip (1876-1947), attorney general of England and Wales (1928-1929) and (1932-1936) at Hansard, Parliamentary Debates (House of Commons), vol. 297, col. 1611, 11 February 1935.
Thomas Mohr, “The Statute of Westminster: An Irish Perspective” Law and History Review 30(1) (2013), p. 750.
Ibid.
For example, Isaac Butt, Isaac, Irish Federalism!, p. 81 and Hansard, Parliamentary Debates, 10 May 1886, vol. 305, cols. 585–8; 7 June 1886, vol. 306, cols. 1221–30.
For example, see L. S. Amery, “Home Rule and the Colonial Analogy” in S. Rosenbaum (ed.), Against Home Rule: The Case for the Union (London, Warne, 1912), pp. 129-31. This confusion was epitomised by the frequent use of the hybrid term “Dominion home rule” by commentators of such diverse political views in the late 19th and early 20th centuries that its precise meaning was often rendered ambiguous. For example, see Wilfred Ewart, A Journey in Ireland: 1921 (London, Putnam, 1922), pp. 19, 36, 42-3, 61-2, 74, 83, 85-6, 114, 138 and 157. Erskine Childers used the equally confusing term “colonial home rule”. For example, see Childers The Framework of Home Rule, p. 203.
“Mr T.P. O’Connor’s Tour in Canada”, Freeman’s Journal, 26 October 1910, p. 5.
For example, see Robert Erskine Childers, The Framework of Home Rule, pp. 198-203.
“Mr T.P. O’Connor’s Tour in Canada”, Freeman’s Journal, 26 October 1910, p. 5.
For example, see Duncan Bell, The Idea of Greater Britain – Empire and the Future of World Order, 1860-1900 (New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 2007) pp. 1-5.
W. David McIntyre, The Britannic Vision (London, Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), pp. 81-2 and John Kendle, Ireland and the Federal Solution (Kingston and Montreal, McGill-Queen’s, 1989), p. 4.
Isaac Butt, Irish Federalism! pp. 14-6 and 60-2.
John Kendle, Ireland and the Federal Solution, pp. 88-90.
Denis Gwynn, The Life of John Redmond (Edinburgh, Harrap, 1932), p. 221 and Kendle, Ibid., p. 154.
Alan O’Day, Irish Home Rule, pp. 257-8.
A. V. Dicey, “Home Rule from an English Point of View”, Contemporary Review 42 (1882), pp. 66-86.
A. V. Dicey, England’s Case against Home Rule, 3rd ed. (London, Murray, 1887), p. 54. See also J.E. Kendle, “The Round Table Movement and ‘Home Rule All Round’”, The Historical Journal, 11(2) (1968), p. 342.
Ibid., p. 196.
A.V. Dicey, Lectures Introductory to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 2nd ed., (London, Macmillan, 1886), p. 127.
A “Scottish Home Rule Association” was founded in 1886 and a Welsh equivalent called “Cymru Fydd”, meaning “Young Wales”, was also founded in 1886. These movements never enjoyed anything close to the electoral success enjoyed by the movement for Irish home rule. See John Kendle, Ireland and the Federal Solution, pp. 62, 64, 65, 71-2 and 103, Nathan Kane, A Study of the Debate on Scottish Home Rule, 1886-1914, (unpublished Ph.D thesis, University of Edinburgh, 2015) and Kenneth O. Morgan, Wales in British Politics, 1868-1922 (Cardiff, University of Wales Press, 1963).
John Kendle, Ireland and the Federal Solution, pp. 88-90.
Not all Imperial federalists agreed that the creation of a federal United Kingdom should be a preliminary to creating a federal British Empire. For example, Philip Kerr concluded “Federalism for the Empire, and Federalism for the United Kingdom are two entirely distinct ideas.” It should also be remembered that some Imperial federalists were Unionists who opposed the principle of Irish home rule as a prelude to federalising the United Kingdom or the Empire: see J.E. Kendle, “The Round Table Movement and ‘Home Rule All Round’”, The Historical Journal, 11(2) (1968), pp. 339, 347-8 and 351.
Duncan Hall, The British Commonwealth of Nations – A Study of its Past and Future Development (London, Methuen, 1920), pp. 62-3.
Thomas Mohr, “The United Kingdom and Imperial Federation, 1900 to 1939: A Precedent for British Legal Relations with the European Union?” Comparative Legal History 4(2) (2016), pp. 1-31.
Cyril Pearl, The Three Lives of Gavan Duffy (Sydney, New South Wales University Press, 1979), p. 224.
A. B. Keith, Selected Speeches and Documents on British Colonial Policy, 1763-1917, Part II (Oxford University Press, 1961), pp. 197-207.
Parliamentary Papers, 1897, Cmd. 8596, 15.
John Kendle, The Colonial and Imperial Conferences 1887-1911 (London, Longmans, 1967), pp. 39-52.
Thomas Mohr, “The United Kingdom and Imperial Federation”, pp. 1-31
The National Archives of the United Kingdom (henceforth “TNA”), CO 886/5B, 2nd meeting, 25 May 1911.
Ibid.
The South African figure only took into account the white population of that Dominion (TNA, CO 886/5B, 2nd meeting, 25 May 1911).
John Kendle, Ireland and the Federal Solution, p. 58.
Ibid., p. 71.
Elaine Byrne, “Irish Home Rule - Stepping-Stone to Imperial Federation?” History Ireland 20(1) (2012), pp. 25-7.
“Mr. Redmond – Ireland’s Defence”, Irish Independent, 15 March 1915, p. 5.
See also Butt, Irish Federalism, pp. 81-9; Gwynn, Life of John Redmond, pp. 50 and 55; Bew, John Redmond pp. 30-1 and Michael Wheatley, “John Redmond and federalism in 1910” Irish Historical Studies 32 (2001), p. 354.
“The National League”, Freeman’s Journal, 9 September 1885, p. 2.
Duncan Hall, The British Commonwealth of Nations, p. 142.
Thomas Mohr, “The Irish Question and the Evolution of British Imperial Law, 1916-1922” Dublin University Law Journal 39(2) (2016), pp. 414-8.
TNA, CAB 32/1, 9th Day, 16 April 1917.
Elaine Byrne, “Irish Home Rule”,pp. 25-7.
Michael Wheatley, “John Redmond and federalism in 1910”, p. 354.
Ibid., p. 343.
Ibid., pp. 357-8.
Scotland Act 1998; Government of Wales Act 1998 and Northern Ireland Act 1998 (UK).
For example, see Butt, Irish Federalism, pp. 71-80 and Hansard, Parliamentary Debates (House of Commons), vol. 60, col 1432, 2 April 1914.
For example, Hansard, Parliamentary Debates (House of Commons), vol. 60, col. 1660, 6 April 1914 and Amery “Home Rule”, p. 143.
L. S. Amery, “Home Rule and the Colonial Analogy”, p. 144.
For example, Hansard, Parliamentary Debates (House of Commons), vol. 38, col. 106, 6 May 1912 and vol. 60, col. 1431-4, 2 April 1914. See also Robert Erskine Childers, The Framework of Home Rule, pp. 198-203.
“Nationalist Home Rule Demand”, Irish Times, 19 October 1910, p. 7.
For example, Hansard, Parliamentary Debates (House of Commons), vol. 60, col. 1660, 6 April 1914.
See L. S. Amery, “Home Rule and the Colonial Analogy”, p. 142.
Second Schedule, Constitution of the Irish Free State (Saorstát Éireann) Act, 1922 (Ireland).
See Thomas Mohr, “Law and the Foundation of the Irish State on 6 December 1922” Irish Jurist 59 (2018), pp. 31-58.
Hansard, Parliamentary Debates (House of Commons), , vol. 159, col. 51, 23 November 1922.
Ibid. at 60-1.
Articles 2 and 3 of the original text of the 1937 Constitution. The territorial claim was removed by the Nineteenth Amendment of the Constitution Act 1998 (Ireland)
The home rule institutions in Northern Ireland were suspended by Northern Ireland (Temporary Provisions) Act 1972 before being abolished by the Northern Ireland Constitution Act 1973 (UK).
Top of page