Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A new framework for isolating individual feedback processes in coupled general circulation climate models. Part II: Method demonstrations and comparisons

  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We here use a coupled atmosphere-surface single column climate model to illustrate how the CFRAM, a new climate feedback analysis framework formulated in Part I of the two-part series papers, can be applied to isolate individual contributions to the total temperature change of a climate system from the external forcing alone, and from each of individual physical and dynamical processes associated with the energy transfer with the space and within the climate system. We demonstrate that the isolation of individual feedbacks in the CFRAM is achieved without referencing to a virtual climate system as in the online feedback suppression method. We show that partial temperature changes estimated by the online feedback suppression method include the “compensating effects” of other feedbacks when the feedback under consideration is suppressed. The partial temperature changes are addable in the CFRAM but they are not in the online feedback suppression method. We also apply the CFRAM to isolate the contributions to the lapse rate feedback from individual physical and dynamical feedback processes. We show that the lapse rate feedback includes not only the partial effect of each feedback that directly contributes to energy flux perturbations at the TOA (such as water vapor feedback), but also the total effects of those feedbacks that do not contribute to energy flux perturbations at the TOA (such as evaporation and moist convection feedbacks). Because the contributions to the lapse rate feedback from various physical and dynamical processes tend to cancel one another, the net lapse rate feedback is a residual of many large terms. This leads to a large uncertainty not only in estimating the lapse rate feedback itself, but also in other feedbacks whose effects are either partially or totally lumped into the lapse rate feedback.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Bony S et al (2006) How well do we understand and evaluate climate feedback processes? J Clim 19:3445–3482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai M (2005) Dynamical amplification of polar warming. Geophys Res Lett 32:L22710. doi:10.1029/2005GL024481

  • Cai M (2006) Dynamical greenhouse-plus feedback and polar warming amplification Part I: A dry radiative-transportive climate model. Clim Dyn 26:661–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai M, Lu J-H (2007) Dynamical greenhouse-plus feedback and polar warming amplification Part II: Meridional and vertical asymmetries of the global warming. Clim Dyn 29:375–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cess RD (1975) Global climate change: an investigation of atmospheric feedback mechanisms. Tellus 27:193–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colman R (2003) A comparison of climate feedbacks in general circulation models. Clim Dyn 20:865–873

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu Q, Liou KN (1993) Parameterization of the radiative properties of cirrus clouds. J Atmos Sci 50:2008–2025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall A, Manabe S (1999) The role of water vapour feedback in unperturbed climate variability and global warming. J Clim 12:2327–2346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Held IM, Soden BJ (2000) Water vapor feedback and global warming. Annu Rev Energy Environ 25:441–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu J-H, Cai M (2008) A new framework for isolating individual feedback processes in coupled general circulation climate models. Part I: Formulation. Clim Dyn. doi:10.1007/s00382-008-0425-3

  • Manabe S, Wetherald RT (1967) Thermal equilibrium of the atmosphere with a given distribution of relative humidity. J Atmos Sci 24:241–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy V et al (2001) Radiative forcing of climate change. In: Houghton JT et al (eds) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 349–416

  • Schneider EK, Kirtman BP, Lindzen RS (1999) Tropospheric water vapor and climate sensitivity. J Atmos Sci 56:1649–1658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soden BJ, Held IM (2006) An assessment of climate feedbacks in coupled ocean atmosphere models. J Clim 19:3354–3360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherald R, Manabe S (1988) Cloud feedback processes in a general circulation model. J Atmos Sci 45:1397–1415

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to Dr. Qiang Fu who provided us the radiative transfer model (Fu and Liou 1993), which is the core part of the coupled atmosphere-surface single column climate model used in this study. We are grateful for constructive comments from two anonymous reviewers. This work is supported by grants from the NOAA/Office of Global Programs (GC04-163 and GC06-038).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming Cai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cai, M., Lu, J. A new framework for isolating individual feedback processes in coupled general circulation climate models. Part II: Method demonstrations and comparisons. Clim Dyn 32, 887–900 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-008-0424-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-008-0424-4

Keywords