The moral obligation to create children with the best chance of the best life
- PMID: 19076124
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00687.x
The moral obligation to create children with the best chance of the best life
Abstract
According to what we call the Principle of Procreative Beneficence (PB),couples who decide to have a child have a significant moral reason to select the child who, given his or her genetic endowment, can be expected to enjoy the most well-being. In the first part of this paper, we introduce PB,explain its content, grounds, and implications, and defend it against various objections. In the second part, we argue that PB is superior to competing principles of procreative selection such as that of procreative autonomy.In the third part of the paper, we consider the relation between PB and disability. We develop a revisionary account of disability, in which disability is a species of instrumental badness that is context- and person-relative.Although PB instructs us to aim to reduce disability in future children whenever possible, it does not privilege the normal. What matters is not whether future children meet certain biological or statistical norms, but what level of well-being they can be expected to have.
Comment in
-
The Case Against the Case for Procreative Beneficence (PB).Bioethics. 2016 Sep;30(7):490-9. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12253. Epub 2016 Mar 22. Bioethics. 2016. PMID: 27000681
Similar articles
-
The fallacy of the Principle of Procreative Beneficence.Bioethics. 2009 Jun;23(5):265-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00655.x. Epub 2008 May 9. Bioethics. 2009. PMID: 18477055 Review.
-
On the partiality of procreative beneficence: a critical note.J Med Ethics. 2015 Sep;41(9):771-4. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102420. Epub 2015 Apr 23. J Med Ethics. 2015. PMID: 25907895
-
When intuition is not enough. Why the Principle of Procreative Beneficence must work much harder to justify its eugenic vision.Bioethics. 2014 Nov;28(9):447-55. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12044. Epub 2013 Jul 10. Bioethics. 2014. PMID: 23841936
-
Procreative reasons-relevance: on the moral significance of why we have children.Bioethics. 2009 Jun;23(5):291-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00656.x. Epub 2008 Apr 25. Bioethics. 2009. PMID: 18445093 Review.
-
Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children.Bioethics. 2001 Oct;15(5-6):413-26. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00251. Bioethics. 2001. PMID: 12058767
Cited by
-
Procreative beneficence and in vitro gametogenesis.Monash Bioeth Rev. 2012 Sep;30(2):29-48. doi: 10.1007/BF03351338. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2012. PMID: 23409535 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Preimplantation genetic testing: indications and controversies.Clin Lab Med. 2010 Sep;30(3):519-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2010.04.008. Epub 2010 Jun 12. Clin Lab Med. 2010. PMID: 20638568 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The good, the bad, and the utilitarian: attitudes towards genetic testing and implications for disability.Curr Psychol. 2022 Jan 17:1-22. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02568-9. Online ahead of print. Curr Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35068904 Free PMC article.
-
Ethical Issues of Using CRISPR Technologies for Research on Military Enhancement.J Bioeth Inq. 2018 Sep;15(3):327-335. doi: 10.1007/s11673-018-9865-6. Epub 2018 Jul 2. J Bioeth Inq. 2018. PMID: 29968018 Review.
-
Defending eugenics : From cryptic choice to conscious selection.Monash Bioeth Rev. 2018 Jul;35(1-4):24-35. doi: 10.1007/s40592-018-0081-2. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2018. PMID: 29804244 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous