Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior: the effect of one bad apple on the barrel
- PMID: 19254236
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02306.x
Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior: the effect of one bad apple on the barrel
Abstract
In a world where encounters with dishonesty are frequent, it is important to know if exposure to other people's unethical behavior can increase or decrease an individual's dishonesty. In Experiment 1, our confederate cheated ostentatiously by finishing a task impossibly quickly and leaving the room with the maximum reward. In line with social-norms theory, participants' level of unethical behavior increased when the confederate was an in-group member, but decreased when the confederate was an out-group member. In Experiment 2, our confederate instead asked a question about cheating, which merely strengthened the saliency of this possibility. This manipulation decreased the level of unethical behavior among the other group members. These results suggest that individuals' unethicality does not depend on the simple calculations of cost-benefit analysis, but rather depends on the social norms implied by the dishonesty of others and also on the saliency of dishonesty.
Similar articles
-
Effects of performance goals and social norms on academic dishonesty in a test.Br J Educ Psychol. 2020 May;90(2):537-559. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12310. Epub 2019 Jul 30. Br J Educ Psychol. 2020. PMID: 31361037
-
Dishonest deed, clear conscience: when cheating leads to moral disengagement and motivated forgetting.Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Mar;37(3):330-49. doi: 10.1177/0146167211398138. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011. PMID: 21307176
-
Social class, power, and selfishness: when and why upper and lower class individuals behave unethically.J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Mar;108(3):436-49. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000008. Epub 2015 Jan 26. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015. PMID: 25621858
-
Academic dishonesty today, unethical practices tomorrow?J Prof Nurs. 2013 Nov-Dec;29(6):402-6. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.10.009. J Prof Nurs. 2013. PMID: 24267935 Review.
-
Intuitive Honesty Versus Dishonesty: Meta-Analytic Evidence.Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 Sep;14(5):778-796. doi: 10.1177/1745691619851778. Epub 2019 Jul 10. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019. PMID: 31291557
Cited by
-
Self-Serving Altruism? The Lure of Unethical Actions that Benefit Others.J Econ Behav Organ. 2013 Sep 1;93:10.1016/j.jebo.2013.04.005. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2013.04.005. J Econ Behav Organ. 2013. PMID: 24273360 Free PMC article.
-
A strategic interaction model of punishment favoring contagion of honest behavior.PLoS One. 2014 Jan 28;9(1):e87471. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087471. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24489917 Free PMC article.
-
Everybody else is doing it: exploring social transmission of lying behavior.PLoS One. 2014 Oct 15;9(10):e109591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109591. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 25333483 Free PMC article.
-
Spot on for liars! How public scrutiny influences ethical behavior.PLoS One. 2017 Jul 17;12(7):e0181682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181682. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28715476 Free PMC article.
-
The Spreading of Social Energy: How Exposure to Positive and Negative Social News Affects Behavior.PLoS One. 2016 Jun 2;11(6):e0156062. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156062. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27253877 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials