Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Sep;16(9):965-72.
doi: 10.1089/acm.2009.0531.

A randomized trial of nature scenery and sounds versus urban scenery and sounds to reduce pain in adults undergoing bone marrow aspirate and biopsy

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A randomized trial of nature scenery and sounds versus urban scenery and sounds to reduce pain in adults undergoing bone marrow aspirate and biopsy

Noah Lechtzin et al. J Altern Complement Med. 2010 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy (BMAB) is painful when performed with only local anesthetic. Our objective was to determine whether viewing nature scenes and listening to nature sounds can reduce pain during BMAB.

Design: This was a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Adult patients undergoing outpatient BMAB with only local anesthetic were assigned to use either a nature scene with accompanying nature sounds, city scene with city sounds, or standard care. The primary outcome was a visual analog scale (0-10) of pain. Prespecified secondary analyses included categorizing pain as mild and moderate to severe and using multiple logistic regression to adjust for potential confounding variables.

Results: One hundred and twenty (120) subjects were enrolled: 44 in the Nature arm, 39 in the City arm, and 37 in the Standard Care arm. The mean pain scores, which were the primary outcome, were not significantly different between the three arms. A higher proportion in the Standard Care arm had moderate-to-severe pain (pain rating ≥4) than in the Nature arm (78.4% versus 60.5%), though this was not statistically significant (p = 0.097). This difference was statistically significant after adjusting for differences in the operators who performed the procedures (odds ratio = 3.71, p = 0.02).

Conclusions: We confirmed earlier findings showing that BMAB is poorly tolerated. While mean pain scores were not significantly different between the study arms, secondary analyses suggest that viewing a nature scene while listening to nature sounds is a safe, inexpensive method that may reduce pain during BMAB. This approach should be considered to alleviate pain during invasive procedures.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00315796.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
The Nature Scene and the City Scene. These are copies of the two images used in the study. During the study, these large photographic-quality murals were mounted on stands next to the procedure table.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Patient flow. Eighty-seven percent (87%) of patients screened were randomly assigned to one of the three study arms.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
Pain ratings. Histograms of pain ratings during bone marrow biopsies showing less moderate and severe pain in the Nature arm compared to the Standard Care arm.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Portenoy RK. Lesage P. Management of cancer pain. Lancet. 1999;353:1695–1700. - PubMed
    1. Foley KM. Advances in cancer pain. Arch Neurol. 1999;56:413–417. - PubMed
    1. Portnow J. Lim C. Grossman SA. Assessment of pain caused by invasive procedures in cancer patients. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2003;1:435–439. - PubMed
    1. Yaster M. Pain relief. Pediatrics. 1995;95:427–428. - PubMed
    1. Colt HG. Morris JF. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy without premedication: A retrospective study. Chest. 1990;98:1327–1330. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data