Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb;81(1):1-23.
doi: 10.1093/mollus/eyu055. Epub 2014 Sep 5.

One, four or 100 genera? A new classification of the cone snails

Affiliations

One, four or 100 genera? A new classification of the cone snails

N Puillandre et al. J Molluscan Stud. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

We present a new classification for the genus Conus sensu lato (family Conidae), based on molecular phylogenetic analyses of 329 species. This classification departs from both the traditional classification in only one genus and from a recently proposed shell- and radula-based classification scheme that separates members of this group into five families and 115 genera. Roughly 140 genus-group names are available for Recent cone snails. We propose to place all cone snails within a single family (Conidae) containing four genera-Conus, Conasprella, Profundiconus and Californiconus (with Conus alone encompassing about 85% of known species)-based on the clear separation of cone snails into four distinct and well-supported groups/lineages in molecular phylogenetic analyses. Within Conus and Conasprella, we recognize 57 and 11 subgenera, respectively, that represent well-supported subgroupings within these genera, which we interpret as evidence of intrageneric distinctiveness. We allocate the 803 Recent species of Conidae listed as valid in the World Register of Marine Species into these four genera and 71 subgenera, with an estimate of the confidence for placement of species in these taxonomic categories based on whether molecular or radula and/or shell data were used in these determinations. Our proposed classification effectively departs from previous schemes by (1) limiting the number of accepted genera, (2) retaining the majority of species within the genus Conus and (3) assigning members of these genera to species groups/subgenera to enable the effective communication of these groups, all of which we hope will encourage acceptance of this scheme.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Simplified version of the Bayesian tree based on the concatenation of sequences of three mitochondrial gene regions (COI, 16S, 12S) and published by Puillandre et al. (2014: fig. 2) showing the proposed classification. Genera and subgenera with multiple species are reduced to triangles, whose lengths are proportional to the branch lenghts. Posterior probabilities (>0.95) are shown for each node. Only (sub)genera with at least one sequenced representative are figured.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. AVISE J.C., LIU J.-X. On the temporal inconsistencies of Linnean taxonomic ranks. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2011;102:707–714.
    1. BANDYOPADHYAY P.K., STEVENSON B.J., OWNBY J.-P., CADY M.T., WATKINS M., OLIVERA B.M. The mitochondrial genome of Conus textile, coxI-coxII intergenic sequences and conoidean evolution. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 2008;46:215–223. - PMC - PubMed
    1. BIGGS J.S., WATKINS M., PUILLANDRE N., OWNBY J.P., LOPEZ-VERA E., CHRISTENSEN S., MORENO K.J., BERNALDEZ J., LICEA-NAVARRO A., SHOWERS CORNELI P., OLIVERA B.M. Evolution of Conus peptide toxins: analysis of Conus californicus Reeve, 1844. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 2010;56:1–12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. BOUCHET P., KANTOR Y., SYSOEV A., PUILLANDRE N. A new operational classification of the Conoidea (Gastropoda) Journal of Molluscan Studies. 2011;77:273–308.
    1. CASTELIN M., LORION J., BRISSET J., CRUAUD C., MAESTRATI P., UTGE J., SAMADI S. Speciation patterns in gastropods with long-lived larvae from deep-sea seamounts. Molecular Ecology. 2012;21:4828–4853. - PubMed