Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 1;49(2):241-256.
doi: 10.1080/03057240.2019.1576125. eCollection 2020.

Bioconservatism, bioenhancement and backfiring

Affiliations

Bioconservatism, bioenhancement and backfiring

Tamara Kayali Browne et al. J Moral Educ. .

Abstract

The prospect of enhancing ourselves through the use of new biotechnologies is for the most part, hypothetical. Nevertheless, the question of whether we should undertake such enhancement is worthy of discussion as it may become possible in the future. In this article, we consider one form of argument that conservative opponents of biotechnological means of enhancement (bioconservatives) deploy in opposition to the use of enhancement technologies-the backfiring objection. This is the objection that the use of such technologies is liable to go wrong and lead to outcomes that are inferior to the outcomes intended. We will argue that the objection is not nearly as significant as bioconservatives suppose it to be. Bioconservatives sometimes supplement the backfiring objection by arguing that change will be irreversible, that the new (or the unconventional) is especially liable to backfire and that humans possess severe and permanent limitations which cannot be overcome. We consider these ways of supplementing the backfiring objection and argue that each of them, when properly understood, is of limited value to the bioconservative. We also consider how traditional approaches to moral education can be supplemented by bioenhancement.

Keywords: Brave New World; backfire; bioconservatism; bioenhancement; conservative; enhancement; moral education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abram, N. J., McGregor, H. V., Tierney, J. E., Evans, M. N., McKay, N. P., Kaufman, D. S., & The PAGES 2k Consortium . (2016). Early onset of industrial-era warming across the oceans and continents. Nature, 536(7617), 411–418. - PubMed
    1. Aderet, O. (2018, August 20). Uri Avnery, Veteran Peace activist and among first Israelis to meet Arafat, dies at 94. Haaretz. Retrieved from https://www.haaretz.com
    1. Agar, N. (2013). Moral bioenhancement is dangerous. Journal of Medical Ethics, 41(4), 343–345. - PubMed
    1. Avalos, H. (2005). Fighting words: The origins of religious violence. Amherst: Prometheus Books.
    1. BBC . (2013, December 16). 10 dangerous things in Victorian/Edwardian Homes. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-25259505

LinkOut - more resources