Bioconservatism, bioenhancement and backfiring
- PMID: 32308552
- PMCID: PMC7155838
- DOI: 10.1080/03057240.2019.1576125
Bioconservatism, bioenhancement and backfiring
Abstract
The prospect of enhancing ourselves through the use of new biotechnologies is for the most part, hypothetical. Nevertheless, the question of whether we should undertake such enhancement is worthy of discussion as it may become possible in the future. In this article, we consider one form of argument that conservative opponents of biotechnological means of enhancement (bioconservatives) deploy in opposition to the use of enhancement technologies-the backfiring objection. This is the objection that the use of such technologies is liable to go wrong and lead to outcomes that are inferior to the outcomes intended. We will argue that the objection is not nearly as significant as bioconservatives suppose it to be. Bioconservatives sometimes supplement the backfiring objection by arguing that change will be irreversible, that the new (or the unconventional) is especially liable to backfire and that humans possess severe and permanent limitations which cannot be overcome. We consider these ways of supplementing the backfiring objection and argue that each of them, when properly understood, is of limited value to the bioconservative. We also consider how traditional approaches to moral education can be supplemented by bioenhancement.
Keywords: Brave New World; backfire; bioconservatism; bioenhancement; conservative; enhancement; moral education.
© 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Similar articles
-
Bioconservatism, bioliberalism, and the wisdom of reflecting on repugnance.Monash Bioeth Rev. 2009 Mar;28(1):4.1-21. doi: 10.1007/BF03351306. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2009. PMID: 19839275 Review.
-
Getting moral enhancement right: the desirability of moral bioenhancement.Bioethics. 2013 Mar;27(3):124-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01907.x. Epub 2011 Jul 29. Bioethics. 2013. PMID: 21797913 Free PMC article.
-
Moral bioenhancement: much ado about nothing?Bioethics. 2015 May;29(4):223-32. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12100. Epub 2014 Jun 9. Bioethics. 2015. PMID: 24909343
-
How moral bioenhancement affects perceived praiseworthiness.Bioethics. 2024 Feb;38(2):129-137. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13237. Epub 2023 Nov 6. Bioethics. 2024. PMID: 37929918
-
The ethical desirability of moral bioenhancement: a review of reasons.BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Sep 16;15:67. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-67. BMC Med Ethics. 2014. PMID: 25227512 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Adapting Ourselves, Instead of the Environment: An Inquiry into Human Enhancement for Function and Beyond.Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2024 Jun;58(2):589-637. doi: 10.1007/s12124-023-09797-6. Epub 2023 Aug 19. Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2024. PMID: 37597122 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abram, N. J., McGregor, H. V., Tierney, J. E., Evans, M. N., McKay, N. P., Kaufman, D. S., & The PAGES 2k Consortium . (2016). Early onset of industrial-era warming across the oceans and continents. Nature, 536(7617), 411–418. - PubMed
-
- Aderet, O. (2018, August 20). Uri Avnery, Veteran Peace activist and among first Israelis to meet Arafat, dies at 94. Haaretz. Retrieved from https://www.haaretz.com
-
- Agar, N. (2013). Moral bioenhancement is dangerous. Journal of Medical Ethics, 41(4), 343–345. - PubMed
-
- Avalos, H. (2005). Fighting words: The origins of religious violence. Amherst: Prometheus Books.
-
- BBC . (2013, December 16). 10 dangerous things in Victorian/Edwardian Homes. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-25259505
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources