Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 4:8:e9044.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.9044. eCollection 2020.

Public priorities on locally-driven sea level rise planning on the East Coast of the United States

Affiliations

Public priorities on locally-driven sea level rise planning on the East Coast of the United States

Adam T Carpenter. PeerJ. .

Abstract

Sea level rise poses a substantial concern to communities worldwide. Increased inundation, storm surge, saltwater intrusion, and other impacts create challenges which will require considerable planning to address. Recognizing the broad and differing scope of sea level rise issues and the variability of policy options to address them, local planning frameworks are necessary in addition to tools and resources available from state and federal governments. To help assess priorities and preferences on sea level rise planning, a survey of 503 persons affiliated with coastal communities on the East Coast of the United States was conducted in December 2017. This survey studied key aspects locally-driven sea level rise plans, including planning priorities, funding options, methods to resolve conflict, and potential responses. Six key findings address these and other concerns to provide the foundation of a locally driven framework for public officials.

Keywords: Climate change; Coastal communities; Environmental policy; Planning; Preparedness; Priorities and preferences; Public engagement; Public officials; Resilience; Sea level rise.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Adam T. Carpenter is an employee of the American Water Works Association (Washington, DC, United States).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Perceived community vulnerability to disasters (n = 503).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Preferred funding and responsibility for future flooding and sea level rise (n = 503) (Carpenter, 2019).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Desired protection strength of SLR measures (n = 503).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Significant differences between resident (n = 235) and non-resident (n = 268) respondents.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Auermuller L, Maxwell-Doyle M. Getting to Resilience. A New Jersey Community Planning Tool. http://www.prepareyourcommunitynj.org/ 2013
    1. Boone HN, Boone DA. Analyzing likert data. Journal of Extension. 2012;50(2):2TOT2.
    1. California Coastal Commission SLR policy guidance. 2015. https://www.coastal.ca.gov/climate/slrguidance.html https://www.coastal.ca.gov/climate/slrguidance.html
    1. Carifio J, Perla R. Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing Likert scales. Medical Education. 2008;42(12):1150–1152. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03172.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carpenter AT. Exploration of local sea level rise planning public perceptions. Journal of Mason Graduate Research. 2018;6(1):1–37. doi: 10.13021/G8jmgr.v6i1.2382. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources