Raging Bull (1980)
Genre:
Biography / Drama / Sport (more)
Plot Outline: A biographical film about the middleweight champ, the physically tough, but emotionally self-destructive Jake LaMotta. (more) (view trailer)
User Comments:
Easy to Admire, Difficult to Love
(more)
User Rating:
        
8.4/10 (34,351 votes)
top 250: #71
Runtime:
129 min
Country:
USA
Language:
English
Color:
Black and White / Color
Sound Mix:
Dolby
Certification:
Australia:M (original rating) / Portugal:M/16 / Australia:MA (DVD rating) / Canada:R (Nova Scotia/Ontario) / Canada:PA (Manitoba) / Argentina:18 / Canada:13+ (Quebec) / Chile:18 / Denmark:15 (DVD rating) / Finland:K-16 / France:U / Israel:16 / Italy:VM14 / Netherlands:16 / Norway:18 / Singapore:NC-16 / Spain:13 / Sweden:15 / UK:18 (re-rating) (2000) / UK:18 (video rating) (1986) / UK:X (original rating) / USA:R / West Germany:16
Trivia:
Martin Scorsese's father Charles is one of the mob wiseguys crowding the LaMotta brothers at a Copa nightclub table.
(more)
Goofs:
Factual errors: Joey and Jake attend a dance that occurs on Saturday, 6 August 1941. In 1941, August 6 was actually a Wednesday.
(more)
Quotes:
[first lines]
Jake La Motta:
I remember those cheers / They still ring in my ears / After years, they remain in my thoughts. / Go to one night / I took off my robe, and what'd I do? I forgot to wear shorts. / I recall every fall / Every hook, every jab / The worst way a guy can get rid of his flab. / As you know, my life wasn't drab. / Though I'd much... [...]
(more)
Awards:
Won 2 Oscars.
Another 18 wins
&
15 nominations
(more)
|
|
User Comments:
61 out of 97 people found the following comment useful:-
Easy to Admire, Difficult to Love, 27 February 2004

Author:
James Hitchcock from Tunbridge Wells, England
The routine use of black-and-white film to make movies seems to have ended
in the mid-sixties, probably killed off by the advent of colour
television.
Since then black-and-white has been used very sparingly; even Polanski's
`Chinatown', obviously conceived as homage to the films noirs of the 1940s
and 1950s, was shot in colour.
`Raging Bull'- a biography of the boxer Jake La Motta who for a time held
the world middleweight championship- is one of the few exceptions. The use
of black-and-white seems to have been inspired by the fact that the film
depicts real-life events that occurred in the forties and fifties.
Scorsese
has tried to capture the look of both the films and the newsreels of that
period. This is remarkably effective for the boxing scenes, which have a
raw, brutal power and graphically depict the aggressive nature of the
sport.
The other remarkable thing about the film is the performance of Robert de
Niro, for which he won a well-deserved Best Actor Academy Award. De Niro
actually learned to box for the film, and did all the boxing scenes
himself
without using a stunt double, but his portrayal of La Motta's private life
is equally effective.
Some boxers- Henry Cooper comes to mind- are hard-hitting inside the ring
but gentlemanly and restrained outside. La Motta, as portrayed in this
film,
did not fall into this category. De Niro portrays him as a man with a very
short fuse, seething with anger and violence. Unlike his great rival Sugar
Ray Robinson, an elegant practitioner of the art of boxing, La Motta tries
to overpower his rivals with brute force rather than relying on skill. His
aggression is not something confined to the ring, but rather an inherent
part of his personality, and comes out in his dealings with others. He
treats his beautiful wife Vicki particularly badly, frequently (and
irrationally) suspecting her of infidelity and subjecting her to both
verbal
and physical abuse. Besides De Niro's dominating performance, there are
also
very good contributions from Cathy Moriarty as Vicki and from Joe Pesci as
La Motta's loyal brother Joey, another frequent target of abuse despite
his
loyalty.
For me, this is a very good film, yet one that falls just short of the
classic status that some have claimed for it. At times it is enthralling
to
watch, but at others, particularly in the first half, it seems to lack
structure, as La Motta takes on a series of opponents without the
significance of these fights ever becoming clear. More could have been
made
of the gambling-inspired corruption that infested the sport at this period
and which may well have contributed to La Motta's sense of frustration- at
one time it is made clear to him that his getting a chance to fight for
the
world title depends upon his taking a dive in a non-title fight. The main
weakness, however, is a sense of emptiness at its centre, resulting from
the
lack of a character who can engage our sympathies. As I said, it is De
Niro's performance that dominates the film, but for all his fine acting,
even he cannot make us sympathise with a drunken, self-pitying, paranoid,
violent wife-beater. As a character study of an unpleasant character it is
excellent, but it can go no further than that. I cannot agree that this is
the greatest film of the eighties; indeed, for me it was not even the
greatest sporting film of the eighties. (I preferred both `Chariots of
Fire'
and `Eight Men Out'). It is an easy film to admire, but a difficult one to
love. 7/10.
Check for other user comments. - I have seen this movie and would like to comment on it
Message Boards Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for Raging Bull (1980)
Recommendations If you like this title, we also recommend... Goodfellas (1990) Show more recommendations Add a recommendation
Email this page to a friend 
Update Information
|