![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
451 out of 521 people found the following comment useful :-
I was a fan of the "V for Vendetta" graphic novel, and Alan Moore
disinheriting the film was a bit discouraging. But he's always been a
little crazy. The film version is everything I could have possibly
hoped for - gripping, chilling, intense, exciting, heartbreaking. It
gets Moore's music if not his exact words; elements are slightly
different, subplots removed. But the idea - as V himself would be so
proud to say - remains the same.
423 out of 512 people found the following comment useful :-
"Remember, remember, the fifth of November, gunpowder treason and plot.
I see no reason why the gunpowder treason should ever be forgot."
332 out of 424 people found the following comment useful :-
There are some that will, upon seeing this film, say that it was akin
to Andrew Lloyd Weber attempting to make a political statement: overly
dramatic. These people would be well served to remember that the symbol
of drama is a mask, which certainly begs one important question- Why,
if you are so put off by an overtly dramatic motion picture, would you
choose to see a movie that stars as the (anti)hero a man in a mask? I
just saw this film at an advanced screening and I must say it is
nothing short of uniquely brilliant. Entertaining from the start, V
manages to combine a strong socio-political message in a compact and
highly intense experience. Infused with issues and concepts that
pervade in the global political climate of our times, this movie is
endowed with a tremendous timely relevance that belies its trappings as
a mere action adventure.
242 out of 310 people found the following comment useful :- When I first saw ads for this movie, I thought it was going to be excessively cheesy: some dude with a stupid mask, "V for Vendetta" = cheesy name, and even though I knew the Wachowski brothers were capable of movies of Matrix quality, I also knew they were capable of movies of the Matrix sequels quality. Oddly enough, my girlfriend talked me into seeing the movie, and I would have to say I'm glad she did. It had been a long time since I have seen a movie that actually got my adrenaline going, not only because of the action, but because I actually cared about the characters. The action and story are very well balanced. This movie kept me uniquely interested until the end of the movie; most movies I've seen in the last few years, regardless of how much I may have enjoyed them, I have wondered when they were going to be over: I did not have one of these moments with Vendetta. My only fear about this movie is that the political message against totalitarian governments will be seen as an attempt to hit close to home with the political atmosphere in the U.S. Keep in mind that it is fiction, and that it is not necessarily trying to push any liberal agenda, even if the evil government is a conservative one. See this movie. It is intelligent, engaging, and different than most movies out there today.
227 out of 324 people found the following comment useful :- I saw this movie yes today here in Denmark, and i didn't know what to expect, because i haven't heard of the V or read the Comics from publisher DC comics. But was i in for a BIG treat, this movie is so superbly acted by all the actors, especially Natalie Portman performed according to me to an Oscar nomination next year. The movie is perfectly put together, so if you haven't read the comics you will be on the edge of you seat the whole movie. Its really that good folks. And lastly, the visual effects is fantastic, and the action scenes is nothing but spectacular. Watch this movie :-).
236 out of 355 people found the following comment useful :-
well... all i can say is goddamn.
191 out of 281 people found the following comment useful :- V for Vendetta rating: 3.5 out of 4 V for Vendetta is a swift and smugly entertaining portrait of revolution. Albeit, this is a Wachowski Brothers revolution, meaning there must be wildly theatric heroes and crisply tailored CGI stunts all set comfortably in an oppressive Totalitarian society. But this is more than The Matrix with a Victorian flare. V for Vendetta offers up a convincing vision of the near-future paired with an operatic comic book tale of love, mystery, and a Guy-Fawkes-masked rebellion. Our hero is V (Hugo Weaving), a masked terrorist with a mind for the subversive, a taste for the eloquent, and a hand for knife-wielding acrobatics. His accidental apprentice (or maybe hostage) is Evey (Natalie Portman), a young woman V saved from the fondling grasps of corrupt Fingermen (kind of the CIA for the V for Vendetta world) as she hurried across town past curfew. Our oppressor in this world is High Chancellor Stutler (John Hurt), whose persona is shown primarily through a five-story tall projection of his ever-angry head. The exposition for this near-future lies mostly in the implosion of America after the middle-eastern war expanded into a world war that reached its tendrils even through Western Europe. America folded into civil strife while Britain became the final bastion of modern civilization after a biological attack isolated the island into a zone of quarantine. Stutler rose to power in the chaos and now rules Britain with the mantra "England Prevails!" Rest assured, however, this is not a reality governed by rolling robots and giant overhead blimps; it's a world that's, instead, very similar to ours. The technological innovations are hidden subtly into the film's environment, refusing to take precedent over the historically opulent flavors of England's architecture. V for Vendetta has a flare for the theatric and operatic, after all. There's no room for bleeping robots and bounding technology. On the eve of November 5th, when Britain traditionally celebrated freedom and truth, V launches a subversive plot to topple High Chancellor Stutler and his surrounding administration. Hijacking the British Television Network, he broadcasts a speech that sets the date one year from November 5th as the date of the revolution. Our story takes place in the interim year leading up to the supposed revolution, with the evolution of Evey's politics, the ongoing vendetta V has set against the players of a mysterious government plot, and the deepening hole V digs for Stutler and his boys to stumble into once that fateful date arrives. "Remember, remember the fifth of November." What separates V's rebellion from the teeming hordes of other cinematic coupe d'etats made over the years is that V for Vendetta approaches the topic with one eye held straight at the politics of the present. Hot button headline topics continually rear their heads here. Bush is paralleled to Stutler, the news media is heavily clouded, our hero is paired with images of suicide bombers and subway attacks; not to mention the undeniable fact that we are asked to sympathize with an outright terrorist. Is terrorism justified when paired against a strict oppressor? In the political climate of today--where the title of terrorism is threatening to mirror the clout McCarthy granted the title of Communism--V for Vendetta's answer to that question is a sure-handed yes. But V for Vendetta is no heavy-handed political allegory. At its heart, V for Vendetta is entertainment. And as any entertainment with a hand in Victorian elegance, V for Vendetta must have romance. But before you conjure images of the Fawkes mask flying in a sweaty bald-headed scene of lust, realize first that there also is a master-grasshopper dynamic between Evey and V. The romance is formed as an understatement and rarely addressed, let to simmer below the surface and lend more chemistry to scenes that would otherwise ring hollow. Natalie Portman may have stolen the tabloid exposure with her shiny shaved head, but Hugo Weaving is the masked performance that steals the show. Much of the role's success lies in the writing, for V is made not to be simply a mask. There's a theme throughout the film asking whether behind masks of revolution, there lie fighting men and women, or only their ideals. V answers this question with charisma. Contradicting the common mantra that masked figures must be laconic, V, in fact, probably has the most lines of all. The character is full and rich with quirks and personality, but still exists with that essential air of mystery. Weaving achieves the same level of iconic performance that he did with Agent Smith in The Matrix. It really is that good. There's been debate over the quality of adaptation the Wachowski Brothers offered to Alan Moore's original graphic novel. Moore has publicly separated himself from the film, quoting in the New York Times last week that "the screenplay's rubbish." Well, before we all walk away from the ticket line, remember primly that Alan Moore will be the first to tell you himself that he is a selfish, pretentious prick. He knows it, and we know it. Let's move on. The screenplay's fine. In fact, it's a near-masterpiece. What the Wachowski Brothers have done is find the right balance between the theatrics of the graphic novel, and the solemnity to the richly Victorian narrative. They form a dynamic that plays to both sides, allowing for a story that sparks both political debate and giddy entertainment. We'll first shake our heads at the sentimental, soft-focus flashbacks and silly sub-plot for "nuclear human experimentation"; but when mulled over, we realize it's just the comic book mentality showing its spots. After all, V wouldn't start all his sentences with v-words had this film shunned its comic roots. And anyway, V for Vendetta is a vividly vivacious and voluptuous volley of a very violently fun time.
153 out of 209 people found the following comment useful :-
This marks the fantastic return of the Wachowski brothers.Those who
were disappointed with their last two efforts will not be disappointed
here,there is no doubt that the Brothers are talented.Here they make
their comeback.But not as filmmakers,but as producers and writers.And
to be honest ,this film thrills you from beginning to end.You'll be
blown away with this adrenaline excitement and dramatically intense
thriller.
72 out of 104 people found the following comment useful :- *** This comment may contain spoilers ***
The problem is to realize that terrorist groups, diseases and economic
crises are used by the government to frighten you so that you will see
in it your last hope of survival. "I want everyone to remember why they
need us!" I've seen the movie on its wold premiere in Berlin, a city
which has its own strong history with a reign of terror closely related
to the movie. But in the movie, it is Great Britain in the near future
which is threatening its own people. The graphic novel written in the
1980s by David Lloyd and Alan Moore never has been more actual than
nowadays. President Bush's call for Congress to give him the power to
use the military in law enforcement roles in the event of a bird flu
pandemic - where there is no pandemic jet.
163 out of 291 people found the following comment useful :- OK, I only went to see this because of the Wachowski brothers involvement. I went totally expecting to hate this movie about a terrorist but it was so much more. I'm amazed to say that it's AWESOME! While not an action picture there's plenty of action and at least one funny homage to The Matrix. You've gotta see it. It's very inspiring, believe it or not and it didn't make me want to blow up buildings either. It just made me appreciate freedom even more. Hugo Weaving is terrific and Natalie Portman leaves Princess Amadala far behind with her performance as Evey. Everyone's great. Stephen Rea is terrific too. I just can't believe I liked this movie. I'm still in shock.
| |