The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20080908204517/http://www.centernetworks.com:80/startup-uk

Why The UK Is a Great Place to Build a Startup!

There is a lot of talk at the moment about the relative merits of building a start-up in Europe, and of the UK trying to become more like Silicon Valley in its approach to start-ups.

Being an Australian who moved to London to launch her start-up, I can relate a very personal tale about why I chose the UK as the most compelling place to be entrepreneurial.

1. It’s easier to stand out from the crowd

The London web start-up scene is relatively younger than in Silicon Valley, so it is smaller, and more co-dependent on each other. We all want to be successful, and as there isn’t so much competition yet, we aren’t afraid of helping each other. This smaller community means its easier to get to know everyone, and become known. I arrived in London in September, and within a few months I have met, become friends with, or at least know of most web start-ups, journalists, VCs, Angels and other key players. I imagine in the Valley its a little more competitive and crowded, so it is harder to stand-out and become known.

2. Excellent source of cheap smart developers

The proximity of mainland Europe to the UK is a huge boon. We have access to one of the fastest growing bases for outsourced off-shore development in Eastern Europe, with countries like Romania, Ukraine and Latvia sprouting firms full of hard-working, smart, well-spoken developers, with only 1-2 hours time difference from the UK. The developers of my site, Skimbit are based in Romania, and they cost me half to a third what it would cost me to hire local developers; they speak excellent English, are completely up to date with new technologies and trends, and are only an hour away on a plane to visit them face-to-face. Having worked with my team in Romania while based in Sydney, I fully appreciate the benefit of working in similar time zones.

3. Market to an untapped audience with propositions you know will work

Besides being a fan of affordable development resources, UK’s proximity to Europe also represents a huge market opportunity. Everyone is so busy targeting the US, that they forget the rest of the world is out there, speaks relatively good English, and is web savvy. You can take a concept that works in the US, and market it to a European audience, with confidence that the model works, with less competition. Of course, web applications should be international in their outlook, but there are so many web applications that seem hugely popular in the US, that no one has ever heard of here, possibly because marketing efforts for these sites concentrate on the US. In my start-up’s case, there are a few web applications that do some of what Skimbit does, and I consider this a strength, because no one has ever heard of any of them in the UK, so I have validation my proposition is going to work, and an untapped audience to market to in Europe.

4. Benefit from the helpfulness of other entrepreneurs

I’m not the only one who wants to make the UK, and London specifically, an exciting base for global entrepreneurship. The city is buzzing with creative, smart, passionate entrepreneurs, investors, journalists and mentors, and what I have found particularly special is how much everyone wants to help! Everyone tries extra hard to help, get you introductions, give you feedback, lend you advice... It feels like one very extended family here! There are a few key networking events to go to, and within a short amount of time, if you are personable, passionate and polite, you will be surprised how much everyone will give you free help.

It might be like that in the US, (I will soon find out, as I head to Silicon Valley in a week!), but I suspect the distributed nature of tech centres in the US (Silicon Valley, New York, etc) and lack of public transport in the Valley may work against the creation of as close knit group. There is a lot to be said for meeting up for a few drinks with an experienced investor and businessperson, and to constantly be bumping into the same group of people at each networking event, which enhances the perception of intimacy in the London scene.

Of course, there are some huge disadvantages to being based in London. Cost of living is sky high, and funding of start-ups, although getting more common, is not as easy to get as in the US. The weather is also a little more gloomy, although you can conclude that makes it more compelling to work even harder indoors! But the wonderful thing about London is that you truly feel you are at the heart of global events – even though you have your head down working hard, you are always aware that there is a world of politics, art, theatre, music, sport and travel all around you, and I think it provides a very necessary balance, as well as a useful motivation, to keep working hard.

Alicia Navarro is CEO and founder of Skimbit, a social decision-making tool to help research and make decisions, with the help of others. Alicia is an Australian based in London.

AddThis
Forward
RSS Feed
COMMENTS - Add New Comment
Submitted by Search Engine Optimization Journal on April 15, 2008 - 10:44am.

"Everyone is so busy targeting the US, that they forget the rest of the world is out there..."

Very true! These points above are absolutely valid and I'm surprised more people aren't trying to get in on the UK market first... especially with the unsteady one currently in the US. Great article!

Submitted by Anonymous on April 15, 2008 - 12:48pm.

I live in Vancouver and I totally agree with the article. There're pros and cons:

Pros: close proximity to a) one of the largest consumer market in the world and b) also networking events where you get to meet with potential VCs, investors, partners, advertisers etc.

Cons: too competitive, everyone wants to be one up on the other in matters not even relating to building the next great product/service. Too difficult to hire and retain good people, they often get poached to higher paying jobs. High cost of living which means companies have to pay higher too. If it's a self-funded startup, it's hard to pay that kind of salary. Why would any employee sacrifice their financial security for a founder's dream.

Submitted by Anonymous on April 15, 2008 - 2:35pm.

London has very little seed Angel money without giving away the whole company. i.e $500k for 30% equity The US has more appetite for risk, return and reward.

They will look at risky new ideas. Would twitter or Youtube etc have ever got (sam) funding in the UK - NO.

The exit returns are much higher in the US. Would Sphere really have got $30m in the UK? - NO

Would Skype, Last.FM or MySQL have ever been bought by a UK company - NO

Sorry like Peter Nixey, Micheal Birch, Keith Teare and many other UK entrepreneurs they have to think like Dick Whittington and move to the Valley. I am sure most of the UK startups on the web mission 08 will find funding easier and a few may even stay behind.

Submitted by Anonymous on June 13, 2008 - 4:32am.

Last.FM is a UK startup though. They're based in London :)

Submitted by Mat on April 15, 2008 - 3:12pm.

I'm glad to see someone take a run at this subject, as London has evolved over the last 12 months and is a great place to run a startup.

However, I would qualify that by saying that it is a great place IF you are planning to bootstrap and IF you are planning to work with people offshore to keep costs down.

If you need to hire in London or raise money in London, things ain't so pretty.

London is a very expensive place to hire people. Talented people gravitate to well paid jobs in the finance, media and other sectors, so competing for that talent is very expensive. London does not have the same track record of tech startups creating wealth for early employees, so offering equity or options is not perceived as having the same value as in places like Silicon valley

London remains a very hard place to raise funding at decent valuations. It has improved in the last 24 months, but in 2004 I raised money for a tech startup with a working product, early blue-chip customers and £100k in year one licence revenue. £250K cost 40% of the company. At the end of the day this was just too big a slice of the company for too little capital. At the time it was the only option, but it screwed up the dynamics of the company permanently. I am told that in the US early stage investors understand that they need to leave something on the table for the founders and future rounds. I don't think that is understood in the UK.

I was at a lunch with John O'Connell who founded and sold Staffware, one of the bigger UK tech success stories. I asked him bluntly whether, if he did it all again, he would have founded Staffware in the UK or the USA. There was no hesitation, he said the USA every time.

Submitted by Darren on April 15, 2008 - 4:52pm.

Yeah great get funding in the UK and then hire outside of the UK :p

Its actually even cheaper if you do it outside of london, people in london tend to forget that the UK is not london. Sorry a minor annoyance of mine.

It would be cheaper for me to move to San fran than it would london and to be honest if I ever get the choice I would.

The problem with the UK is investing establishment don't have a history of making google sized wins so they tend to look at traditional businesses more. I think a great example is Dragons Den, you have 4 dragons who never invest in web stuff because they just don't get it.

There are people doing deals but I bet they would get better deals in the US.

Submitted by Mike Butcher on April 15, 2008 - 6:36pm.

The UK is indeed a great place to start up, but, being hard-headed about it for a moment, I would agree with previous commenters. It's expensive to live in and hire in. But it's advantage is that there are bigger investors here and it is a multicultural hub of Europe. In London's case, every European startup and VC passes through the city at some point, and because the UK has been very open to Eastern Europeans (either working here or creating off-shore links), it has tapped all that talent, while other European countries have been far more hesitant. But I also see Barcelona and Berlin becoming hubs in the future...

Submitted by Alicia on April 16, 2008 - 4:53am.

I think deep down I agree with all previous commenters, and perhaps its pride, stubbornness, and a desire to be part of the process that helps make the UK more like the US in terms of web start-ups, that makes me post entries like this.

Paradigms never shift unless people are pushing, and I believe the reasons given for starting/funding/selling in the US are true now, but can equally be true for the UK in a short amount of time.

Perhaps I am naive, and in a year, you will see me sunbathing in San Francisco with a hefty bank account and scoffing at my juvenile belief that I could have achieved that if I'd stayed in the UK.

Submitted by Dashford on April 23, 2008 - 9:44am.

I too am keen to see the UK mature as a home to vibrant startups. I would love to be able to raise the series-A funding I need for www.mymission2.com in the UK. But here are some other points to consider:

- the free market economy dictates the levels of risk/reward in UK versus US ... we can't force it. Hopefully soon the UK/Europe will want some of the action rather than watch all the innovation pounds disappear into dollars.

- advertising revenue models pretty much need the US market. Why wouldn't a UK startup want a US audience and advertising revenue? The market is huge!

- who wants to live in the US anyway?!

Mashup and NESTA are doing their best to cheer on some UK startups.

What can we all do to help?

David
www.mymission2.com

Become a sponsor

SPONSORS

SocialText
Clicky Web Analytics
Web 2.0 Expo New York 2008

PARTNERS

read centernetworks anywhere!
Advertise here

OTHER STUFF