Digital Millennium Copyright Act
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) contains two main sections that have been a source of particular controversy since they went into effect in 2000. The "anti-circumvention" provisions (sections 1201 et seq. of the Copyright Act) bar circumvention of access controls and technical protection measures. The "safe harbor" provisions (section 512) protect service providers who meet certain conditions from monetary damages for the infringing activities of their users and other third parties on the net.
Congress ostensibly passed the "anti-circumvention" provisions of the DMCA to discourage copyright "pirates" from defeating DRM and other content access or copy restrictions on copyrighted works, and to ban the "black box" devices intended for that purpose. In practice the DMCA anti-circumvention provisions have done little to stop "Internet piracy." Yet the DMCA has become a serious threat that jeopardizes fair use, impedes competition and innovation, and chills free expression and scientific research. If you circumvent DRM locks for noninfringing fair uses or create the tools to do so you might be on the receiving end of a lawsuit.
The DMCA “safe harbors” protect service providers from monetary liability based on the allegedly infringing activities of third parties. To receive these protections service providers must comply with the conditions set forth in Section 512, including “notice and takedown” procedures that give copyright holders a quick and easy way to disable access to allegedly infringing content. Section 512 also contains provisions allowing users to challenge improper takedowns. Without these protections, the risk of potential copyright liability would prevent many online intermediaries from providing services such as hosting and transmitting user-generated content. Thus the safe harbors, while imperfect, have been essential to the growth of the Internet as an engine for innovation and free expression.
EFF has fought hard against the DMCA circumvention provisions in the courts, Congress and other forums, and has fought equally hard to make sure the DMCA safe harbors shelter innovation and creativity. Learn more through the links below.
-
January 1, 2017
-
December 25, 2016
-
December 21, 2016
-
December 12, 2016
-
December 5, 2016
-
November 1, 2016
-
October 26, 2016
-
October 11, 2016
-
September 28, 2016
-
September 26, 2016
- 1 of 25
- next ›
-
September 30, 2016
-
August 12, 2016
-
August 5, 2016
-
July 21, 2016
-
May 20, 2016
-
May 10, 2016
-
April 22, 2016
-
April 1, 2016
-
November 5, 2015
-
October 27, 2015
-
May 18, 2015
-
February 9, 2015
-
November 3, 2014
-
October 27, 2014
-
April 11, 2014
Pages
-
December 14, 2016
-
October 31, 2016
-
October 4, 2016
-
September 28, 2016
-
September 28, 2016
-
September 23, 2016
-
August 17, 2016
-
August 15, 2016
-
July 26, 2016
-
June 27, 2016
-
June 17, 2016
-
April 4, 2016
-
December 17, 2015
-
December 16, 2015
-
December 10, 2015
Pages
-
November 29, 2016
-
November 29, 2016
-
September 30, 2016
-
August 12, 2016
-
August 5, 2016
-
August 5, 2016
-
July 21, 2016
-
April 22, 2016
-
April 22, 2016
-
April 1, 2016
-
March 16, 2016
Representative list of reported cases in the U.S. federal courts in which Section 1201 anti-circumvention claims were raised.Minor revisions made on 17 March 2016.
-
July 9, 2015
-
November 3, 2014
-
May 28, 2014
-
April 11, 2014
-
January 2, 2014
-
August 22, 2013
-
August 22, 2013
-
May 9, 2013
-
March 28, 2013
Pages
-
At issue in this case was whether three software programmers who created the BnetD game server -- which interoperates with Blizzard video games online -- were in violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) and Blizzard Games' end user license agreement (EULA).
-
EFF and Davis Wright Tremaine LLP are defending the Yes Men and other activists in a lawsuit filed against them by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce over political criticism of the Chamber's stance on climate change legislation.
-
Marvel is suing NCSoft and Cryptic makers of the massively popular multiplayer online game "City of Heroes " for copyright and trademark infringement.
-
The DMCA has increasingly been used to stymie competition rather than fight "piracy." This case is another example of that trend.
-
In 2003 EFF applied for four exemptions to the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA) asking the Copyright Office to allow consumers to:
-
In the 2009 rulemaking EFF won three critical exemptions protecting the important work of video remix artists iPhone owners and cell phone recyclers from legal threats.
-
In 2005, Macrovision sued Sima to block the sale of the Sima CopyThis! (CT-1, CT-Q1, CT-100, CT-2, CT-200) and GoDVD (SCC, and SCC-2) products, which are designed to digitize analog video, such as the analog video outputs of DVD players and analog VCRs.
-
In September 2008, the motion picture industry sued RealNetworks over its RealDVD software, which was designed to allow consumers to copy their DVDs to their computers for later playback.
-
EFF has urged a federal judge to reject arguments from Warner Brothers Entertainment claiming that the company’s automated scheme to send copyright infringement notices absolves it of responsibility for the system’s major flaws. In this case, Warner is accused of sending thousa
-
The RIAA sought to force the Missouri ISP Charter Communications to turn over the identities of its customers who the RIAA believed had engaged in peer to peer filesharing.
-
-
Opening the (Garage) Door to Free Competition
Fighting the abuse of copyright law to stifle competition, EFF helped Skylink score an important victory in the Federal Circuit that puts much-needed limits on the controversial "anti-circumvention" provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). Chamberlain, the manufacturer of garage doors, invoked the provision to stop Skylink from selling a "universal" remote control that works with Chamberlain garage doors. The court rejected Chamberlain's claims, noting that if it adopted the company's interpretation of the DMCA, it would threaten many legitimate uses of software within electronic and computer products – something the law aims to protect.
-
EFF helped defend a printer cartridge company against a competitor's overreaching copyright claims under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). Lexmark brought a DMCA lawsuit against Static Controls in an effort to eliminate the market for remanufactured or refilled Lexmark toner cartridges, which would have forced owners of Lexmark laser printers to buy more expensive cartridges from Lexmark. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ultimately rejected that effort, concluding that Lexmark's "protection measure" was aimed at protecting the company from legitimate competition, rather than "piracy."
-
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act prohibits "circumventing" digital rights management (DRM) and other "technological measures" used to protect copyrighted works.
-
In a case that proves no one is safe from over-zealous copyright enforcement, EFF is helping Harvard Law School Professor Larry Lessig defend fair use online.
-
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) limits the circumvention of software that's designed to restrict access to copyrighted works. Unfortunately, such a blanket restriction can chill competition, free speech, and fair use.
-
Like many other companies that host content on behalf of users, video-hosting service Veoh has been bedeviled by copyright lawsuits.
-
In March 2007, Viacom sued YouTube and Google, alleging that they should be held responsible for the copyright infringements committed by YouTube users.
-
Green v. Department of Justice is an EFF lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act’s anti-circumvention and anti-trafficking provisions on First Amendment grounds.