The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20200803100718/https://philpapers.org/rec/FISE-20
In Arkadiusz Chrudzimski & Thomas Binder (eds.), Franz Brentano: Sämtliche veröffentlichte Schriften: Vermischte Schriften. Berlin, Allemagne: De Gruyter (2019)

Authors
Denis Fisette
Université du Québec à Montréal
Abstract
This is the introduction to volume IX of Brentano’s Complete Published Writings: Sämtliche veröffentlichte Schriften: Vermischte Schriften. Brentano’s writings reproduced in this volume provide a substantial complement to important aspects of Brentano's philosophy which are less explicit in the other works he published during his lifetime. This volume contains thirteen writings: three of them belong to the period of Würzburg, two to the Italian period, and the others belong to the period of his teaching in Vienna. They can be grouped under three broad categories. The first corresponds to the theme of the future of philosophy and the philosophical prospects in the late nineteenth century. This issue is recurrent in Brentano's work and is to be found in several of his writings published in this volume, notably in his inaugural address at the University of Vienna, in which he seeks, among other things, to trace the sources of discouragement with respect to the state of philosophy at that time and to rehabilitate confidence and optimism in the future of philosophy. The second topic pertains to Brentano’s philosophy of the history of philosophy and in addition to the article already mentioned in which Brentano elaborates his theory of the four phases, the article „Was für ein Philosoph manchmal Epoche macht“ is an application of the principles of his philosophy of history to Plotinus’ philosophy. The last section entitled Reviews and circumstantial writings contains more circumstantial writings including four reviews, Brentano’s 1908 paper on Thomas von Aquin and a short polemical paper on research without prejudice. It includes „Der Atheismus und die Wissenschaft“ which is an anonymous article in which Brentano criticizes the author of an article published in a Vienna journal on the compatibility of theism with a philosophy that defines itself as science; the second is Brentano’s reply to a critical review of his Psychology by Adolf Horwicz, the third is a review of J. Delitzsch's book on Thomas von Aquinas , and the last is a significant review of a book by Franz Miklosich on the topic of subjektlose Sätze.
Keywords Brentano  descriptive psychology  philosophy of history  Auguste Comte  philosophical program
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Upload history
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Franz Brentano et le positivisme d’Auguste Comte.Denis Fisette - 2014 - Les Cahiers Philosophiques de Strasbourg 35 (1):85-128.
Deskriptive Psychologie.Franz Brentano, Roderick M. Chisholm & Wilhelm Baumgartner - 1985 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 47 (2):330-331.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Einleitung.[author unknown] - 2013 - In Sämtliche Schriften Und Briefe. De Gruyter.
Einleitung.[author unknown] - 1999 - In Sämtliche Schriften Und Briefe. Band 4: 1677-Juni 1690. Akademie Verlag.
Sämtliche Schriften.Jakob Friedrich Fries - 1900 - Aalen, Scientia-Verlag.
F. S. Gutjahr: Einleitung zu den Schriften des Neuen Testamentes. [REVIEW]Theodor Innitzer - 1907 - Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Theologie 21:510.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-02-21

Total views
58 ( #159,739 of 2,329,861 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #48,396 of 2,329,861 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes