The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20201101120344/https://philpapers.org/rec/SCHPTB
Noûs 48 (2):193-218 (2014)

Abstract
In this paper, I begin by defending permissivism: the claim that, sometimes, there is more than one way to rationally respond to a given body of evidence. Then I argue that, if we accept permissivism, certain worries that arise as a result of learning that our beliefs were caused by the communities we grew up in, the schools we went to, or other irrelevant influences dissipate. The basic strategy is as follows: First, I try to pinpoint what makes irrelevant influences worrying and I come up with two candidate principles. I then argue that one principle should be rejected because it is inconsistent with permissivism. The principle we should accept implies that it is sometimes rational to maintain our beliefs, even upon learning that they were caused by irrelevant influences
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2014
DOI 10.1111/nous.12006
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,784
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News.David Christensen - 2007 - Philosophical Review 116 (2):187-217.
Reflection and Disagreement.Adam Elga - 2007 - Noûs 41 (3):478–502.
Higher Order Evidence.David Christensen - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (1):185-215.
Change in View.Gilbert Harman - 1986 - MIT Press.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No Exception for Belief.Susanna Rinard - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94 (1):121-143.
Belief and Credence: Why the Attitude-Type Matters.Elizabeth Jackson - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (9):2477-2496.
Should Agents Be Immodest?Marc‐Kevin Daoust - forthcoming - Analytic Philosophy.
Uniqueness and Metaepistemology.Daniel Greco & Brian Hedden - 2016 - Journal of Philosophy 113 (8):365-395.
The Uniqueness Thesis.Matthew Kopec & Michael G. Titelbaum - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (4):189-200.

View all 97 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Belief Revision and Relevance.Peter Gardenfors - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:349 - 365.
The Ethics of Belief: Conservative Belief Management.Melissa Bergeron - 2006 - Social Epistemology 20 (1):67 – 78.
Believing Conjunctions.Simon J. Evnine - 1999 - Synthese 118 (2):201-227.
Nietzsche on Agency and Self-Ignorance.Paul Katsafanas - 2012 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 43 (1):5-17.
Is the Truth Table Task Mistaken?Aline Sevenants, Kristien Dieussaert & Walter Schaeken - 2012 - Thinking and Reasoning 18 (2):119 - 132.
What’s The Question?Alvin Plantinga - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Research 20:19-43.
Stake-Invariant Belief.Brad Armendt - 2008 - Acta Analytica 23 (1):29-43.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-12-28

Total views
516 ( #11,117 of 2,350,159 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
38 ( #18,443 of 2,350,159 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes