The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20190923195640/http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n1655/n1655.htm
B. Technical -- General
|
1a. New script? Name? | No. |
1b. Addition of characters to existing block?
Name? | Yes. Unified Canadian Aboriginal Syllabics |
2. Number of characters | 8 |
3. Proposed category | Category A |
4. Proposed level of implementation and
rationale | Level 1 |
5a. Character names included in proposal? | Yes |
5b. Character names in accordance with
guidelines? | Yes |
5c. Character shapes reviewable? | Yes |
6a. Who will provide computerized font? | Michael
Everson, Everson Gunn Teoranta |
6b. Font currently available? | Michael Everson,
Everson Gunn Teoranta |
6c. Font format? | TrueType |
7a. Are references (to other character sets, dictionaries,
descriptive texts, etc.) provided? | Yes. Six of the characters are
used in the Apple Mac OS localization (xF0-xF4):
 The other two
characters are required for archival purposes (old data and
transliterations) |
7b. Are published examples (such as samples from
newspapers, magazines, or other sources) of use of proposed characters
attached? | No |
8. Does the proposal address other aspects of character
data processing? | No |
C. Technical -- Justification
|
1. Contact with the user community? | Yes. The Baffin
Divisional Board of Education, Iqaluit, NWT. |
2. Information on the user community? | There are
some 30,000 Inuit. |
3a. The context of use for the proposed
characters? | QAI and NGAI are archival; the others are commonly used
to write Inuktitut. |
3b. Reference | |
4a. Proposed characters in current use? | Yes |
4b. Where? | In Nunavut. |
5a. Characters should be encoded entirely in
BMP? | Yes. Positions U+166F - U+167F are proposed for the
encoding. |
5b. Rationale | Part of the Syllabics block. |
6. Should characters be kept in a continuous
range? | Yes |
7a. Can the characters be considered a presentation form of
an existing character or character sequence? | No. No Canadian
Syllabics characters are decomposed. This is the accepted coding convention
for Syllabics in 10646. |
7b. Where? | |
7c. Reference | |
8a. Can any of the characters be considered to be similar
(in appearance or function) to an existing character? | No |
8b. Where? | |
8c. Reference | |
9a. Combining characters or use of composite sequences
included? | No |
9b. List of composite sequences and their corresponding
glyph images provided? | No |
10. Characters with any special properties such as control
function, etc. included? | No |