The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20201009163752/https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/pull/42442
Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update tensorflow.keras.metrics.pbtxt #42442

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 8, 2020

Conversation

@adriangb
Copy link
Contributor

@adriangb adriangb commented Aug 17, 2020

See #42097 (comment)

ccing @pavithrasv : is this the right place to make this edit?

@pavithrasv
Copy link
Member

@pavithrasv pavithrasv commented Aug 17, 2020

Thank you for the PR @adriangb. You need not update the pbtxt files afaik. It's enough to add those strings in losses.py file against the function.

@keras_export('keras.losses.log_cosh', 'keras.losses.logcosh')
@adriangb
Copy link
Contributor Author

@adriangb adriangb commented Aug 17, 2020

Ah makes sense, will do!

@gbaned gbaned self-assigned this Aug 18, 2020
@gbaned gbaned requested a review from pavithrasv Aug 18, 2020
@gbaned gbaned added this to Assigned Reviewer in PR Queue via automation Aug 18, 2020
@adriangb adriangb force-pushed the adriangb:patch-1 branch from 532edc9 to 06fa2e1 Aug 29, 2020
@adriangb
Copy link
Contributor Author

@adriangb adriangb commented Aug 29, 2020

Just pushed the change @pavithrasv, please take a look when you have a chance. Thanks.

Copy link
Member

@pavithrasv pavithrasv left a comment

Thank you for the PR!

PR Queue automation moved this from Assigned Reviewer to Approved by Reviewer Aug 30, 2020
@adriangb
Copy link
Contributor Author

@adriangb adriangb commented Aug 30, 2020

I assume the test failures due to API change are expected and just require manual approval/override?

@gbaned
Copy link
Contributor

@gbaned gbaned commented Aug 31, 2020

@adriangb Can you please address Ubuntu Sanity errors? Thanks!

@gbaned gbaned removed the ready to pull label Aug 31, 2020
PR Queue automation moved this from Approved by Reviewer to Reviewer Requested Changes Aug 31, 2020
@adriangb
Copy link
Contributor Author

@adriangb adriangb commented Aug 31, 2020

I think I see what happened. Can you re-approve @gbaned ?

@gbaned
Copy link
Contributor

@gbaned gbaned commented Sep 3, 2020

@adriangb Still, Ubuntu Sanity errors appearing, Can you fix those?. Thanks!

@adriangb adriangb force-pushed the adriangb:patch-1 branch from 933c2b7 to 112e2ae Sep 3, 2020
@adriangb
Copy link
Contributor Author

@adriangb adriangb commented Sep 3, 2020

I see that I left duplicate decorator, I think that was the problem this time. I rebased to the last commit in master and re-applied the decorator (a single time). For some reason ci_sanity.sh is building the container but not running for me so... do you mind approving again @gbaned ? Thanks

@gbaned gbaned requested a review from pavithrasv Sep 7, 2020
PR Queue automation moved this from Reviewer Requested Changes to Approved by Reviewer Sep 8, 2020
PR Queue automation moved this from Approved by Reviewer to Reviewer Requested Changes Oct 2, 2020
@googlebot
Copy link

@googlebot googlebot commented Oct 2, 2020

All (the pull request submitter and all commit authors) CLAs are signed, but one or more commits were authored or co-authored by someone other than the pull request submitter.

We need to confirm that all authors are ok with their commits being contributed to this project. Please have them confirm that by leaving a comment that contains only @googlebot I consent. in this pull request.

Note to project maintainer: There may be cases where the author cannot leave a comment, or the comment is not properly detected as consent. In those cases, you can manually confirm consent of the commit author(s), and set the cla label to yes (if enabled on your project).

ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.

@googlebot googlebot added cla: no and removed cla: yes labels Oct 2, 2020
@adriangb adriangb force-pushed the adriangb:patch-1 branch from 5107f20 to e5804e4 Oct 2, 2020
@googlebot
Copy link

@googlebot googlebot commented Oct 2, 2020

CLAs look good, thanks!

ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.

@googlebot googlebot added cla: yes and removed cla: no labels Oct 2, 2020
@annarev annarev added the API review label Oct 2, 2020
@annarev
Copy link
Member

@annarev annarev commented Oct 2, 2020

The change adds a symbol to the API and therefore needs to be reviewed by API owners. More details: https://github.com/tensorflow/community/blob/master/governance/api-reviews.md

@adriangb
Copy link
Contributor Author

@adriangb adriangb commented Oct 2, 2020

The change adds a symbol to the API and therefore needs to be reviewed by API owners. More details: https://github.com/tensorflow/community/blob/master/governance/api-reviews.md

Could you at least tag the API owners? The link in the doc you linked is currently broken (https://github.com/orgs/tensorflow/teams/api-owners). @pavithrasv already okayed this PR.

@annarev
Copy link
Member

@annarev annarev commented Oct 2, 2020

The change adds a symbol to the API and therefore needs to be reviewed by API owners. More details: https://github.com/tensorflow/community/blob/master/governance/api-reviews.md

Could you at least tag the API owners? The link in the doc you linked is currently broken (https://github.com/orgs/tensorflow/teams/api-owners). @pavithrasv already okayed this PR.

Forgot to mention that I did add "API review" tag.

@kkimdev kkimdev requested review from fchollet and removed request for kkimdev Oct 2, 2020
@adriangb
Copy link
Contributor Author

@adriangb adriangb commented Oct 2, 2020

Btw, I'm running bazel to update the goldens but even with --jobs=1 and inside a fresh tensorflow/tensorflow:devel container I'm getting unrelated compilation errors and it takes ages. I wish there was a way to make changes in TF that didn't require compiling a bunch of unrelated C++ APIs. If there is, please do share!

@chsigg chsigg removed their request for review Oct 5, 2020
@mihaimaruseac
Copy link
Collaborator

@mihaimaruseac mihaimaruseac commented Oct 7, 2020

Let me import this locally and try doing the goldens internally.

PR Queue automation moved this from Reviewer Requested Changes to Approved by Reviewer Oct 7, 2020
@adriangb
Copy link
Contributor Author

@adriangb adriangb commented Oct 7, 2020

Let me import this locally and try doing the goldens internally.

Thank you! I gave you access to my fork in case you want to just push there.

@mihaimaruseac
Copy link
Collaborator

@mihaimaruseac mihaimaruseac commented Oct 7, 2020

Let me import this locally and try doing the goldens internally.

Thank you! I gave you access to my fork in case you want to just push there.

Thanks for giving access to the fork. I'll work on the imported change since that is slightly faster, but if the changed failed to import I would have used the fork

@copybara-service copybara-service bot merged commit 7ad2723 into tensorflow:master Oct 8, 2020
12 of 13 checks passed
12 of 13 checks passed
Ubuntu CPU Internal CI build failed
Details
Android Demo App Internal CI build successful
Details
Intel® oneDNN -- Community CI Build oneDNN unit tests successful
Details
Linux GPU Internal CI build successful
Details
MacOS CPU Python3 Internal CI build successful
Details
TFLite Android Demo App Internal CI build successful
Details
TFLite Makefile Internal CI build successful
Details
TFLite iOS Tests Internal CI build successful
Details
Ubuntu Sanity Internal CI build successful
Details
Windows Bazel Internal CI build successful
Details
Windows Bazel GPU Internal CI build successful
Details
cla/google All necessary CLAs are signed
import/copybara Change imported to the internal review system
Details
PR Queue automation moved this from Approved by Reviewer to Merged Oct 8, 2020
@mihaimaruseac mihaimaruseac deleted the adriangb:patch-1 branch Oct 8, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
PR Queue
  
Merged
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

9 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.