COLLECTED BY

Organization: Archive Team

Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded into a large amount of related projects for saving online and digital history.

History is littered with hundreds of conflicts over the future of a community, group, location or business that were "resolved" when one of the parties stepped ahead and destroyed what was there. With the original point of contention destroyed, the debates would fall to the wayside. Archive Team believes that by duplicated condemned data, the conversation and debate can continue, as well as the richness and insight gained by keeping the materials. Our projects have ranged in size from a single volunteer downloading the data to a small-but-critical site, to over 100 volunteers stepping forward to acquire terabytes of user-created data to save for future generations.

The main site for Archive Team is at archiveteam.org and contains up to the date information on various projects, manifestos, plans and walkthroughs.

This collection contains the output of many Archive Team projects, both ongoing and completed. Thanks to the generous providing of disk space by the Internet Archive, multi-terabyte datasets can be made available, as well as in use by the Wayback Machine, providing a path back to lost websites and work.

Our collection has grown to the point of having sub-collections for the type of data we acquire. If you are seeking to browse the contents of these collections, the Wayback Machine is the best first stop. Otherwise, you are free to dig into the stacks to see what you may find.

The Archive Team Panic Downloads are full pulldowns of currently extant websites, meant to serve as emergency backups for needed sites that are in danger of closing, or which will be missed dearly if suddenly lost due to hard drive crashes or server failures.

Collection: Archive Team: The Github Hitrub

This collection is a set of Github repository archives from two major sets: A panic grab upon the acquisition by Microsoft, and a larger, ongoing set of Pretty Much Everything.

TIMESTAMPS

The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20201011122916/https://github.com/dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet/pulse

dotnet / BenchmarkDotNet

October 4, 2020 – October 11, 2020

Overview

3 Active Pull Requests

3 Active Issues
- 0 Merged Pull Requests
- 3 Open Pull Requests
- 3 Closed Issues
- 0 New Issues

There hasn’t been any commit activity on dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet in the last week.

Want to help out?

3 Pull requests opened by 2 people

Documentation: add --maxWidth description
#1554 opened Oct 10, 2020
Apply name (glob) filters to substring of fully qualified [Benchmark] method name
#1555 opened Oct 11, 2020
Simplify code: remove sort before adding to HashSet
#1556 opened Oct 11, 2020

3 Issues closed by 2 people

Error 42883: Function with smallint parameter does not exist
#1553 closed Oct 5, 2020
Nullable Reference Types, setup Attributes vs Constructor+IDisposable
#1551 closed Oct 5, 2020
NullReferenceException when run in WSL
#1475 closed Oct 5, 2020

7 Unresolved conversations

Sometimes conversations happen on old items that aren’t yet closed. Here is a list of all the Issues and Pull Requests with unresolved conversations.

Is it possible to benchmark an IL interpreter with BDN?
#1541 commented on Oct 10, 2020 • 5 new comments
Enable supported GcMode characteristics with corerun
#1552 commented on Oct 10, 2020 • 5 new comments
Inconsistency between benchmark filter and hint
#1539 commented on Oct 11, 2020 • 2 new comments
Fix Merge operation failed for EtwProfiler
#1545 commented on Oct 5, 2020 • 2 new comments
Console Tool throws System.Reflection.ReflectionTypeLoadException
#1460 commented on Oct 9, 2020 • 1 new comment
CSV export not printing units in cells
#1533 commented on Oct 10, 2020 • 1 new comment
hardware counters: don't try to exclude non-existing overhead for long running benchmarks
#1547 commented on Oct 5, 2020 • 0 new comments

You can’t perform that action at this time.