The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20210125131321/https://github.com/grandyang/leetcode/issues/374
Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[LeetCode] 374. Guess Number Higher or Lower #374

Open
grandyang opened this issue May 30, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

[LeetCode] 374. Guess Number Higher or Lower #374

grandyang opened this issue May 30, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@grandyang
Copy link
Owner

@grandyang grandyang commented May 30, 2019

 

We are playing the Guess Game. The game is as follows:

I pick a number from 1 to  n. You have to guess which number I picked.

Every time you guess wrong, I'll tell you whether the number is higher or lower.

You call a pre-defined API guess(int num) which returns 3 possible results (-11, or 0):

-1 : My number is lower
 1 : My number is higher
 0 : Congrats! You got it!

Example:

n = 10, I pick 6.

Return 6.

这道题是一道典型的猜价格的问题,根据对方说高了还是低了来缩小范围,最简单快速的方法就是折半搜索法,原理很简单,参见代码如下:

 

// Forward declaration of guess API.
// @param num, your guess
// @return -1 if my number is lower, 1 if my number is higher, otherwise return 0
int guess(int num);

class Solution {
public:
    int guessNumber(int n) {
        if (guess(n) == 0) return n;
        int left = 1, right = n;
        while (left < right) {
            int mid = left + (right - left) / 2, t = guess(mid);
            if (t == 0) return mid;
            else if (t == 1) left = mid;
            else right = mid;
        }
        return left;
    }
};

 

类似题目:

Guess Number Higher or Lower II 

 

LeetCode All in One 题目讲解汇总(持续更新中...)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
1 participant