The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20201103183640/https://github.com/TheAlgorithms/Java/pull/1757
Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improved README.md #1757

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
from
Open

Improved README.md #1757

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@SATHIYAIT
Copy link

@SATHIYAIT SATHIYAIT commented Oct 12, 2020

Describe your change:

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?

References

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Java files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all uppercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Java naming conventions.
  • All new algorithms have a URL in its comments that points to Wikipedia or other similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the commit message contains Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.
Copy link

@SethiPandi SethiPandi left a comment

I'm not a maintainer, but I saw this and just left some comments anyway.


[![Open in Gitpod](https://gitpod.io/button/open-in-gitpod.svg)](https://gitpod.io/#https://github.com/TheAlgorithms/Java)


### All algorithms are implemented in Java (for educational purposes)
These implementations are for learning purposes. The implementations may be less efficient than the Java standard library.
This implementations are only for learning purposes. The implementations is probably less efficient than the Java standard library.

This comment has been minimized.

@SethiPandi

SethiPandi Oct 15, 2020

The old sentence was perfectly fine, the new one is grammatically incorrect.


## Contribution Guidelines
Read our [Contribution Guidelines](CONTRIBUTING.md) before you contribute.

## Community Channel
We're on [Gitter](https://gitter.im/TheAlgorithms)! Please join us.
We are on [Gitter](https://gitter.im/TheAlgorithms)! Please join us.

This comment has been minimized.

@SethiPandi

SethiPandi Oct 15, 2020

This isn't an improvement at all, apostrophes are good things.

@@ -3,21 +3,21 @@
[![Gitter chat](https://img.shields.io/badge/Chat-Gitter-ff69b4.svg?label=Chat&logo=gitter&style=flat-square)](https://gitter.im/TheAlgorithms) 


NOTE: A [Development](https://github.com/TheAlgorithms/Java/tree/Development) branch is made for this repo where we're trying to migrate the existing project to a Java project structure. You can switch to [Development](https://github.com/TheAlgorithms/Java/tree/Development) branch for contributions. Please refer [this issue](https://github.com/TheAlgorithms/Java/issues/474) for more info.
NOTE: A [Development](https://github.com/TheAlgorithms/Java/tree/Development) branch is made for this repo where we are trying are best to migrate the existing project to a Java project structure. You can switch to [Development](https://github.com/TheAlgorithms/Java/tree/Development) branch for contributions. Please refer [this issue](https://github.com/TheAlgorithms/Java/issues/474) for more info.

This comment has been minimized.

@SethiPandi

SethiPandi Oct 15, 2020

This is also grammatically incorrect.
Also it's "our best" not "are best".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.