workflow-engine
Here are 309 public repositories matching this topic...
Opened from the Prefect Public Slack Community
elliot: Hey folks is anyone else getting a deprecation warning on marshmallow? Something like:
...
/home/rof/.pyenv/versions/3.9.1/lib/python3.9/site-packages/marshmallow/fields.py:198
/home/rof/.pyenv/versions/3.9.1/lib/python3.9/site-packages/marshmallow/fields.py:198: RemovedInMarshmallow4Warning: Passing fi
-
Updated
Jul 14, 2021 - Java
-
Updated
Jul 13, 2021 - Elixir
-
Updated
Jul 12, 2021 - C#
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
There is an optional config for namespace called "sampled retention days" that can be specified when create a namespace. It was created long ago as workaround for long retentions before long term archival was available.
Describe the solution you'd like
We should get rid of the sampled retention.
**Describe alternatives
-
Updated
Jun 8, 2021 - Python
Description
When using the zbctl to create a worker we are able to set some flags, like the timeout of the job activation, but it is not clear from the help what the unit is and how the parameter should look like.
[zell camunda-cloud/ ns:bece6b37-3b9c-4fd0-8e79-4990cd0d057d-zeebe]$ zbctl create worker
Error: accepts 1 arg(s), received 0
Usage:
zbctl create worker <type> [flag
-
Updated
Jul 14, 2021 - Groovy
-
Updated
Jul 14, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Apr 19, 2020 - Java
-
Updated
Jul 14, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Feb 27, 2021 - Clojure
-
Updated
Jun 10, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Jun 11, 2021 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Jul 13, 2021 - Python
Group support
We should have a group support to handle permissions access from a LDAP, SSO, ...
allowed_resolvers_groups
on templates for example.
admin_groups
on configuration for example.
Describe the bug
Deploying a new job, then pulling logs via the CLI results in a panic (SIGSEGV).
To Reproduce
odin deploy -f test.job.yaml
odin log -i {job_id}
vagrant@vagrant:~/odin$ odin log -i dea194794589
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x40 pc=0x79c764]
goroutine
-
Updated
Jul 13, 2021 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Jun 22, 2021 - Go
-
Updated
Apr 26, 2021 - Java
-
Updated
Jul 14, 2021 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Apr 26, 2019 - PHP
-
Updated
May 31, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Dec 7, 2020 - C#
Improve this page
Add a description, image, and links to the workflow-engine topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.
Add this topic to your repo
To associate your repository with the workflow-engine topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."
Summary
From an archived workflow, click on "Resubmit" in the UI
The created workflow do not have the appropriate labels
/!\ the bug happens only for archived workflows (when you resubmit a "normal" workflow, the labels are kept)
Be cautious, some labels should not be copied (like workflows.argoproj.io or workflows.argoproj.io/phase)
however, the labels placed manually by the us