
Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded into a large amount of related projects for saving online and digital history.
History is littered with hundreds of conflicts over the future of a community, group, location or business that were "resolved" when one of the parties stepped ahead and destroyed what was there. With the original point of contention destroyed, the debates would fall to the wayside. Archive Team believes that by duplicated condemned data, the conversation and debate can continue, as well as the richness and insight gained by keeping the materials. Our projects have ranged in size from a single volunteer downloading the data to a small-but-critical site, to over 100 volunteers stepping forward to acquire terabytes of user-created data to save for future generations.
The main site for Archive Team is at archiveteam.org and contains up to the date information on various projects, manifestos, plans and walkthroughs.
This collection contains the output of many Archive Team projects, both ongoing and completed. Thanks to the generous providing of disk space by the Internet Archive, multi-terabyte datasets can be made available, as well as in use by the Wayback Machine, providing a path back to lost websites and work.
Our collection has grown to the point of having sub-collections for the type of data we acquire. If you are seeking to browse the contents of these collections, the Wayback Machine is the best first stop. Otherwise, you are free to dig into the stacks to see what you may find.
The Archive Team Panic Downloads are full pulldowns of currently extant websites, meant to serve as emergency backups for needed sites that are in danger of closing, or which will be missed dearly if suddenly lost due to hard drive crashes or server failures.
Given a binary tree, determine if it is a valid binary search tree (BST).
Assume a BST is defined as follows:
Example 1:
Example 2:
这道验证二叉搜索树有很多种解法,可以利用它本身的性质来做,即左<根<右,也可以通过利用中序遍历结果为有序数列来做,下面我们先来看最简单的一种,就是利用其本身性质来做,初始化时带入系统最大值和最小值,在递归过程中换成它们自己的节点值,用long代替int就是为了包括int的边界条件,代码如下:
C++ 解法一:
Java 解法一:
这题实际上简化了难度,因为有的时候题目中的二叉搜索树会定义为左<=根<右,而这道题设定为一般情况左<根<右,那么就可以用中序遍历来做。因为如果不去掉左=根这个条件的话,那么下边两个数用中序遍历无法区分:
20 20
/ \
20 20
它们的中序遍历结果都一样,但是左边的是 BST,右边的不是 BST。去掉等号的条件则相当于去掉了这种限制条件。下面来看使用中序遍历来做,这种方法思路很直接,通过中序遍历将所有的节点值存到一个数组里,然后再来判断这个数组是不是有序的,代码如下:
C++ 解法二:
Java 解法二:
下面这种解法跟上面那个很类似,都是用递归的中序遍历,但不同之处是不将遍历结果存入一个数组遍历完成再比较,而是每当遍历到一个新节点时和其上一个节点比较,如果不大于上一个节点那么则返回 false,全部遍历完成后返回 true。代码如下:
C++ 解法三:
当然这道题也可以用非递归来做,需要用到栈,因为中序遍历可以非递归来实现,所以只要在其上面稍加改动便可,代码如下:
C++ 解法四:
Java 解法四:
最后还有一种方法,由于中序遍历还有非递归且无栈的实现方法,称之为 Morris 遍历,可以参考博主之前的博客 Binary Tree Inorder Traversal,这种实现方法虽然写起来比递归版本要复杂的多,但是好处在于是 O(1) 空间复杂度,参见代码如下:
C++ 解法五:
Github 同步地址:
#98
类似题目:
Binary Tree Inorder Traversal
Find Mode in Binary Search Tree
参考资料:
https://leetcode.com/problems/validate-binary-search-tree/
https://leetcode.com/problems/validate-binary-search-tree/discuss/32101/My-java-inorder-iteration-solution
https://leetcode.com/problems/validate-binary-search-tree/discuss/32109/My-simple-Java-solution-in-3-lines
https://leetcode.com/problems/validate-binary-search-tree/discuss/32112/Learn-one-iterative-inorder-traversal-apply-it-to-multiple-tree-questions-(Java-Solution)
LeetCode All in One 题目讲解汇总(持续更新中...)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: