Stabilize UnsafeCell::raw_get()
#88551
Merged
+34
−4
Conversation
|
r? @m-ou-se (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
@bors r+ rollup |
|
|
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 1, 2021
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#86376 (Emit specific warning to clarify that `#[no_mangle]` should not be applied on foreign statics or functions) - rust-lang#88040 (BTree: remove Ord bound from new) - rust-lang#88053 (Fix the flock fallback implementation) - rust-lang#88350 (add support for clobbering xer, cr, and cr[0-7] for asm! on OpenPower/PowerPC) - rust-lang#88410 (Remove bolding on associated constants) - rust-lang#88525 (fix(rustc_typeck): produce better errors for dyn auto trait) - rust-lang#88542 (Use the return value of readdir_r() instead of errno) - rust-lang#88548 (Stabilize `Iterator::intersperse()`) - rust-lang#88551 (Stabilize `UnsafeCell::raw_get()`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
This PR stabilizes the associated function
UnsafeCell::raw_get(). The FCP has already completed. While there was some discussion about the naming after the close of the FCP, it looks like people have agreed on this name. Still, it would probably be best if alibs-apimember had a look at this and stated whether more discussion is needed.While I was at it, I added some tests for
UnsafeCell, because there were barely any.Closes #66358.