The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20211015002416/https://github.com/public-apis/public-apis/issues/2189
Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Projects based on Blockchain Technology other than Cryptocurrencies should be added to the Blockchain Category #2189

Open
pawelborkar opened this issue Oct 3, 2021 · 5 comments
Open

Projects based on Blockchain Technology other than Cryptocurrencies should be added to the Blockchain Category #2189

pawelborkar opened this issue Oct 3, 2021 · 5 comments
Labels
good first issue hacktoberfest important new category

Comments

@pawelborkar
Copy link
Collaborator

@pawelborkar pawelborkar commented Oct 3, 2021

  • Projects based on Blockchain Technology other than Cryptocurrencies should be added to the Blockchain Category
  • Projects which uses blockchain technology and are Cryptocurrencies should be added to the Cryptocurrency category only and not to the Blockchain category.
  • No API should be added to both the categories. If it's crypto then add it to cryptocurrency if it's not and uses blockchain technology then add it to the Blockchain category.

Thanks
@pawelborkar pawelborkar mentioned this issue Oct 3, 2021
Closed
@RenatoLopes771
Copy link

@RenatoLopes771 RenatoLopes771 commented Oct 3, 2021

Maybe we should consider having Blockchain and Blockchain (Cryptocurrency)?

@pawelborkar
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@pawelborkar pawelborkar commented Oct 3, 2021

Maybe we should consider having Blockchain and Blockchain (Cryptocurrency)?

Nope. It's better to have a separate category for both of them with the proposed naming convention.

@megamayoy
Copy link

@megamayoy megamayoy commented Oct 3, 2021

Could you please assign this to me?

@kinshukdua kinshukdua mentioned this issue Oct 4, 2021
Merged
8 tasks
pawelborkar added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 4, 2021
@pawelborkar
Merge pull request #2220 from kinshukdua/master
Verified
This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature.
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23 Learn about vigilant mode.
Loading status checks…
9553abf 
Create Blockchain category & move Covalent to Blockchain. Ref #2189
@amitbatra31 amitbatra31 mentioned this issue Oct 4, 2021
Closed
9 tasks
@Abduttayyeb Abduttayyeb mentioned this issue Oct 4, 2021
Closed
9 tasks
@Abduttayyeb Abduttayyeb mentioned this issue Oct 4, 2021
Merged
9 tasks
matheusfelipeog added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 4, 2021
@matheusfelipeog
Change Bitquery to Blockchain section (#2189)
Verified
This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature.
GPG key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23 Learn about vigilant mode.
Loading status checks…
192db12 
Ref: #2189
@Abduttayyeb Abduttayyeb mentioned this issue Oct 4, 2021
Closed
9 tasks
@dexterpuru dexterpuru mentioned this issue Oct 5, 2021
Merged
9 tasks
@pawelborkar
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@pawelborkar pawelborkar commented Oct 6, 2021

Could you please assign this to me?

It's not a bug which can be assigned in order to get fixed but more like an announcement and a short guide for the PRs regarding the Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Categories only.

@megamayoy
Copy link

@megamayoy megamayoy commented Oct 8, 2021 •
edited

@pawelborkar Aha, I thought that you want people to contribute to separate the APIs in cryptocurrencies section into two categories based on the guidelines you mentioned above.

@dexterpuru dexterpuru mentioned this issue Oct 8, 2021
Open
9 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
good first issue hacktoberfest important new category
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
4 participants
@megamayoy @pawelborkar @matheusfelipeog @RenatoLopes771