The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20220228123240/https://philpapers.org/rec/STODTA
Informal Logic 32 (3):327-356 (2012)

Authors
Mark Stone
Furman University
Abstract
Denying the antecedent is an invalid form of reasoning that is typically identified and frowned upon as a formal fallacy. Contrary to arguments that it does not or at least should not occur, denying the antecedent is a legitimate and effective strategy for undermining a position. Since it is not a valid form of argument, it cannot prove that the position is false. But it can provide inductive evidence that this position is probably false. In this role, it is neither defective nor deceptive. Denying the antecedent provides inductive support for rejecting a claim as improbable
Keywords Argument, argumentation, conditional, denying the antecedent, fallacy, undermine
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 66,571
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Practical Study of Argument.Trudy Rose Govier - 1985 - Belmont, CA, USA: Wadsworth Pub. Co..
Studies in the Way of Words.Paul Grice - 1989 - Philosophy 65 (251):111-113.
Studies in the Way of Words.D. E. Over - 1990 - Philosophical Quarterly 40 (160):393-395.
Fallacies.C. L. Hamblin - 1970 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 160:492-492.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Plea for Ecological Argument Technologies.Fabio Paglieri - 2017 - Philosophy and Technology 30 (2):209-238.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Conditional-Assertion Theories of Conditionals.William Lycan - 2006 - In Judith Jarvis Thomson & Alex Byrne (eds.), Content and Modality: Themes From the Philosophy of Robert Stalnaker. Oxford University Press. pp. 148--164.
Stoic Conditionals, Necessity and Explanation.Scott Labarge - 2002 - History and Philosophy of Logic 23 (4):241-252.
Chrysippus's Response to Diodorus's Master Argument.Harry Ide - 1992 - History and Philosophy of Logic 13 (2):133-148.
Review of Perry's Knowledge, Possibility, and Consciousness. [REVIEW]Yujin Nagasawa - 2004 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 10.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-04-19

Total views
53 ( #207,400 of 2,467,681 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #114,776 of 2,467,681 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes