
Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded into a large amount of related projects for saving online and digital history.
History is littered with hundreds of conflicts over the future of a community, group, location or business that were "resolved" when one of the parties stepped ahead and destroyed what was there. With the original point of contention destroyed, the debates would fall to the wayside. Archive Team believes that by duplicated condemned data, the conversation and debate can continue, as well as the richness and insight gained by keeping the materials. Our projects have ranged in size from a single volunteer downloading the data to a small-but-critical site, to over 100 volunteers stepping forward to acquire terabytes of user-created data to save for future generations.
The main site for Archive Team is at archiveteam.org and contains up to the date information on various projects, manifestos, plans and walkthroughs.
This collection contains the output of many Archive Team projects, both ongoing and completed. Thanks to the generous providing of disk space by the Internet Archive, multi-terabyte datasets can be made available, as well as in use by the Wayback Machine, providing a path back to lost websites and work.
Our collection has grown to the point of having sub-collections for the type of data we acquire. If you are seeking to browse the contents of these collections, the Wayback Machine is the best first stop. Otherwise, you are free to dig into the stacks to see what you may find.
The Archive Team Panic Downloads are full pulldowns of currently extant websites, meant to serve as emergency backups for needed sites that are in danger of closing, or which will be missed dearly if suddenly lost due to hard drive crashes or server failures.
Given two binary trees, write a function to check if they are the same or not.
Two binary trees are considered the same if they are structurally identical and the nodes have the same value.
Example 1:
Example 2:
Example 3:
判断两棵树是否相同和之前的判断两棵树是否对称都是一样的原理,利用深度优先搜索 DFS 来递归。代码如下:
解法一:
这道题还有非递归的解法,因为二叉树的四种遍历(层序,先序,中序,后序)均有各自的迭代和递归的写法,这里我们先来看先序的迭代写法,相当于同时遍历两个数,然后每个节点都进行比较,可参见之间那道 Binary Tree Preorder Traversal,参见代码如下:
解法二:
也可以使用中序遍历的迭代写法,对应之前那道 Binary Tree Inorder Traversal,参见代码如下:
解法三:
对于后序遍历的迭代写法,貌似无法只是用一个栈来做,因为每次取出栈顶元素后不立马移除,这样使用一个栈的话两棵树结点的位置关系就会错乱,分别使用各自的栈就好了,对应之前那道 Binary Tree Postorder Traversal,参见代码如下:
解法四:
对于层序遍历的迭代写法,其实跟先序遍历的迭代写法非常的类似,只不过把栈换成了队列,对应之前那道 Binary Tree Level Order Traversal,参见代码如下:
解法五:
Github 同步地址:
#100
类似题目:
Binary Tree Preorder Traversal
Binary Tree Inorder Traversal
Binary Tree Postorder Traversal
Binary Tree Level Order Traversal
参考资料:
https://leetcode.com/problems/same-tree/
https://leetcode.com/problems/same-tree/discuss/32684/My-non-recursive-method
https://leetcode.com/problems/same-tree/discuss/32687/Five-line-Java-solution-with-recursion
LeetCode All in One 题目讲解汇总(持续更新中...)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: