The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20250607124729/https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/100337
Skip to content

regenerate configure using updated autoconf-archive #100337

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

eli-schwartz
Copy link
Contributor

Improves message for openssl lookup.

See gh-15556 which originally implemented this change and pushed it upstream.

Improves message for openssl lookup.

See pythongh-15556 which originally implemented this change and pushed it
upstream.
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

Most changes to Python require a NEWS entry.

Please add it using the blurb_it web app or the blurb command-line tool.

@eli-schwartz
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is a trivial wording change to a log message in configure, so it shouldn't need a blurb.

Copy link
Member

@FFY00 FFY00 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the contribution, however this is working as expected (notice the failing test).

CPython expects a specific version of autoconf, see https://devguide.python.org/getting-started/setup-building/#regenerate-configure.

A container with the correct version is provided at https://quay.io/repository/tiran/cpython_autoconf.

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase I have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants