I sent the same appeal to 10,000 donors. One version raised $67,000. The other raised $142,000. The only difference? Where I put the word "you." Donor-centered writing isn't just niceâit's profitable: ⢠"You" in the first sentence increases response by 23% ⢠Stories about donors (not beneficiaries) raise more money ⢠Questions outperform statements in both open and response rates One organization rewrote their case statement from "we need" to "you can" language and saw major gift closes increase by 41%. The most powerful word in fundraising isn't "give"âit's "you." What small language shift has made the biggest difference in your fundraising?
Fundraising
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
-
-
Most founders think speaking faster shows confidence. It's actually killing their pitch. One of the reasons Steve Jobs became such a legendary presenter was his masterful control of pace and silence. He took time to build tension, to let ideas land, and to respond thoughtfully. This video shared by Fadi Amoudi is a perfect example of his approach. After coaching hundreds of technical founders, here are three unexpected patterns that transform how investors perceive your pitch: 1. Master the Power of Silence Don't rush to fill every second with words. Instead: ⢠Take a full 3-second pause after stating your value proposition ⢠Let key metrics land before explaining them ⢠Breathe between major transition points The silence feels uncomfortable. That's exactly why it works. 2. Lead with Questions, Not Answers Stop opening with solutions. Instead: ⢠Start with a thought-provoking industry question ⢠Frame the problem in a new way ⢠Let the tension build before revealing your approach The best questions make investors rethink their existing assumptions. 3. Break the Flow Intentionally Perfect polish isn't always perfect. Instead: ⢠Change your pace when highlighting key differentiators ⢠Lower your voice for crucial insights ⢠Use strategic pauses before important revelations These subtle pattern breaks command attention naturally. Powerful communication isn't just about what you say. It's also about how you say it. These patterns trigger psychological principles of attention, tension, and memory. They work beyond fundraising â they work in board meetings, team presentations, and customer pitches. Want to master these? Schedule a call with me: https://t2m.io/xqsqyBoV #communication #storytelling #publicspeaking #fundraisingÂ
-
Your case for support is boring. Not because your mission isn't important. Because you're writing for committees, not humans. Here's what every case statement includes: ⦿ History of the organization ⦿ Impressive statistics ⦿ List of programs ⦿ Credentials and awards ⦿ How funds will be used Here's what donors actually want: ⦿ What changes if I say yes? ⦿ What breaks if I say no? ⦿ Why me, why now? ⦿ Who else believes in this? ⦿ What happens after I give? The case statement that raises money reads like a invitation to adventure, not an annual report. Try this instead: ð¦ðð®ð¿ð ðð¶ððµ ððµð² ð³ðððð¿ð², ð»ð¼ð ððµð² ð½ð®ðð Paint the world you're building, not the history you're preserving. ð ð®ð¸ð² ð¶ð ð½ð²ð¿ðð¼ð»ð®ð¹, ð»ð¼ð ð¶ð»ððð¶ðððð¶ð¼ð»ð®ð¹ Use "you" more than "we." They're the hero, not you. ðð¿ð²ð®ðð² ðð¿ð´ð²ð»ð°ð, ð»ð¼ð ð´ðð¶ð¹ð Opportunity expires, not hope. FOMO beats obligation every time. ð¦ðµð¼ð ðºð¼ðºð²ð»ðððº, ð»ð¼ð ð»ð²ð²ð± Winners attract investment. Losers attract pity. ð£ð¿ð¼ðºð¶ðð² ðð¿ð®ð»ðð³ð¼ð¿ðºð®ðð¶ð¼ð», ð»ð¼ð ðð¿ð®ð»ðð®ð°ðð¶ð¼ð» They're not buying services. They're building legacy. One client rewrote their case. Removed every committee word. Told one powerful story instead. Their campaign goal? Exceeded by 40%. Your case for support shouldn't sound professional. It should sound unstoppable. When did you last read yours out loud?
-
As a founder who raised a $500K pre-seed ð° Here are my biggest (updated) takeaways about fundraising: 1) ððð«ð¥ð² ð¢ð§ð¯ðð¬ðð¨ð«ð¬ ððð ð¨ð§ ð²ð¨ð®, ð§ð¨ð ð²ð¨ð®ð« ð¢ððð. Itâs about trust...they need to believe you can figure it out and make it happen. You matter more than your pitch deck. 2) ðð¨ð§'ð ð°ðð¬ðð ðð¢ð¦ð ð¨ð§ ððð¬ ðð¨ð¨ ððð«ð¥ð². Unless you have multiple exits or significant traction, focus on your product and users. Early VC calls should be about understanding the milestones youâll need to hit. Donât ask for money, ask: âAt what point would a business like ours be exciting to you?â Theyâll tell you. 3) ððð¢ð¬ð ð ð¬ð¦ðð¥ð¥ðð« ð«ð¨ð®ð§ð ðð¢ð«ð¬ð. Donât aim for a $4M seed round out of the gate. Too many founders try and fail. Start with angels or your personal network. 4) ðð¨ð® ðð¨ð§'ð ð§ððð ð¨ð®ðð¬ð¢ðð ððð©ð¢ððð¥ ðð¨ ðð®ð¢ð¥ð ð²ð¨ð®ð« ððð. If you think you do, youâre probably not being resourceful enough. 5) ð ð®ð§ðð«ðð¢ð¬ð¢ð§ð ððð¤ðð¬ ð¥ð¨ð§ð ðð« ðð¡ðð§ ð²ð¨ð® ðð¡ð¢ð§ð¤. Plan accordingly, and donât underestimate the time commitment. 6) ðð¨ð§âð ððð¤ð ð«ðð£ðððð¢ð¨ð§ ð©ðð«ð¬ð¨ð§ðð¥ð¥ð². I made this mistake early on. A ânoâ isnât always about you. Sometimes itâs about themâinvestors often like to appear wealthier than they really are. 7) ððð¢ð¬ð¢ð§ð ð¦ð¨ð§ðð² ð°ð¡ðð§ ð²ð¨ð®âð«ð ððð¬ð©ðð«ððð ð¢ð¬ ð ð¥ð¨ð¬ð¢ð§ð ð ðð¦ð. I know sometimes this is hard to avoid but investors can sense desperation from a mile away. Walk into meetings with confidence, believing theyâre lucky to get on your cap table. 8) ðððð© ð²ð¨ð®ð« ð¢ð§ð¯ðð¬ðð¨ð«ð¬ ð®ð©ððððð. Investors are people, and knowing others are excited about your idea gives them comfort. Set expectations upfront, send regular updates, and donât just rely on email...pick up the damn phone. 9) ðð¢ðð ðð¡ð ð¦ð¨ð¦ðð§ðð®ð¦. When you secure one investment, itâs the best time to close another. Keep the energy going. This is underrated. 10) ðð®ðððð¬ð¬ ðð§ð ððð¢ð¥ð®ð«ð ð¥ð¨ð¨ð¤ ðð¡ð ð¬ðð¦ð ðð ðð¢ð«ð¬ð. Both are full of ânoâs.â The difference in a successful raise is they didn't give up. To all the founders out there fundraising...Stay positive, stay persistent, and keep building. ð #startups #venturecapital #fundraising
-
Most fundraising appeals are too polite. Too indirect. Too passive. Too focused on what ð¸ð¦Â doâ instead of what the donor makes possible. If you want more clarity, more confidence, and more response in your writing, start here: ð¦ðð¼ð½ ðð¼ð³ðð²ð»ð¶ð»ð´ ðð¼ðð¿ ð¶ðºð½ð®ð°ð. ð¦ðð®ð¿ð ðð¿ð®ð»ðð³ð²ð¿ð¿ð¶ð»ð´ ð¼ðð»ð²ð¿ððµð¶ð½. I call it ðð°ðð¶ðð² ð©ð¼ð¶ð°ð² ððð»ð±ð¿ð®ð¶ðð¶ð»ð´. And it looks like this: âTogether, we help feed peopleâ â¡ï¸ âYou feed hungry peopleâ âYou are helping provide educationâ â¡ï¸ âYouâre educating childrenâ âWith your support, we can offer shelterâ â¡ï¸ âYou provide shelter to those in needâ âThanks to you, weâre able to offer medical assistanceâ â¡ï¸ âYouâre delivering lifesaving medical careâ âYour donations support our advocacy effortsâ â¡ï¸ âYouâre championing human rightsâ This isnât about semantics. Itâs about ð¦ð®ð±ð°ð¸ð¦ð³ð®ð¦ð¯ðµ. When the donor sees themselves as the one acting, they feel agency. They feel urgency. They feel ðªð¯ð·ðªðµð¦ð¥. So cut the qualifiers. Eliminate the disclaimers. And write like the donor is the one holding the pen. ðð²ð°ð®ððð² ððµð²ð ð®ð¿ð². Whatâs one sentence in your next appeal you can rewrite with ð¥ð°ð¯ð°ð³ ð±ð°ð¸ð¦ð³Â at the center?
-
I canât believe Iâm writing about the merits of memecoins. But something changed my mind recently - one memecoin might have saved thousands of childrensâ lives. Memecoins are a joke. Literally. The first - and most popular, Dogecoin, was created in 2013 by two software engineers mocking the thousands of worthless cryptocurrencies. Donât get me wrong. On-chain assets are unlocking fintech innovations like open banking, or open finance that have mostly been broken promises until crypto came along. But 99% of the time, when someone asks me about investing in a coin they read about - it's usually dog ð© Unlike other cryptocurrencies, memecoinsâ creators and investors make no pretense about their intrinsic value: zero. Thaâs why memecoins have exploded as a quirky asset class - blatant (and mutually acknowledged) pump and dump schemes, capitalizing on popular trends in internet culture. Popular memecoin creators have started donating a slice of their profits to charitable causes - usually as a publicity stunt. But last week, a memecoin did something no one expected: raising money to treat a rare disease in children, a niche market that usually goes unfunded. A fintech startup founder, Siqi Chen announced a charity fundraiser for his daughter, Mira, who was diagnosed with an extremely rare and dangerous brain tumor in September. Someone created a memecoin, $MIRA, and donated half of the entire tokenâs circulating supply to Siqi. Within days, it raised over $1m for the cause. In contrast, the traditional crowdfunding platform, GoFundMe only raised 80% of its $300,000 target. For context, the cost of bringing a new drug to market falls between $1.3 billion and $2.8 billion. So a new fundraising mechanism that is >3x as effective is no joke. One reason for the superior effectiveness of memecoinsâ as a funding vehicle is the tradeable nature of the asset. Early participants profit from its success. Thatâs a powerful incentive for awareness that traditional crowdfunding platforms lack. The other reason is that memecoins - like memestocks - speak to a large, borderless ecosystem of investors, promoters, and influencers. Meme investing communities have proven very vocal, eager, capable and ideologically-motivated to deploy capital instantly. Traditional charities, or NGOs, donât come anywhere close. Whether its WeWork, Theranos, or FTX, its easy to laugh at new fangled investing ideas. Ridicule the hot air and fluff that often comes with grifters eager to make a quick buck off the hot new thing. And sometimes that scorn is a much-needed reality check. But as the $MIRA memecoin reminds us, innovations - even laughable ones - have a way advancing our species forward in ways we seldom can forsee.
-
The one minute pitch that gets investors to say YES Your pitch isn't failing because your idea is bad. It's failing because you're saying too much. After pitching my startup, Fluently (an AI English-speaking coach, https://lnkd.in/eA8BEMnC) dozens of times and watching 100+ pitches from other founders, Iâve noticed a pattern: "The founders who raise aren't necessarily smarter, they're clearer." Here's the 60-second pitch formula that actually works: 1) Hook (5 sec) "[Company] is solving [specific pain] for [target market]." 2) Problem (10 sec) "Today, [audience] struggles with [problem] costing them [quantified pain]." 3) Solution (15 sec) "We've built [solution] that delivers [unfair advantage] through [key benefit]." 4) Traction (10 sec) "We've already [achievement], growing [metrics] month-over-month." 5) Market (5 sec) "This is a $[X]B market growing [Y]% annually." 6) Team (5 sec) "Our team built [previous success] and has deep expertise in [domain]." 7) Ask (10 sec) "We're raising [$ amount] to [specific milestone], which gets us to [...]." Most founders don't ramble for 20 minutes, lose the investor in the first 30 seconds, and wonder why they didn't get funded. Don't be that founder. Keep it tight. Keep it clear ðª
-
Want to raise money from foundations? It's not just about persistenceâit's about speaking their language. When I first started seeking foundation support for Mongabay, I faced a wall of silence. No responses. When I was lucky, I got a "No thanks." At the time, I thought I was taking the right approach. I targeted foundations aligned with our work in journalism and conservation. But I quickly learned that good alignment isn't enough. The way I framed our work needed to change. Program officers aren't just looking to support great causes; they want to achieve impact. Once I shifted my outreach to focus on how Mongabay could help them achieve their goals, my success rate increasedâthough there are still far more non-responses and nos than yeses. Here are a few lessons I've learned: 1/ Focus on their objectives, not yours. â³ Foundations are often trying to solve complex challenges. Instead of leading with what Mongabay does, I began emphasizing how our work supports their mission. 2/ Be concise and clear. â³ Program officers are busy. Long-winded pitches didnât get me far. Clear, succinct messaging worked better. 3/ Cold outreach is tough. â³ The reality? Most cold messages go unanswered. Whenever possible, I leaned on introductions where I could get them. 4/ Relationships matter. â³ In philanthropy, as in life, trust is built over time. Regular updates, even when not tied to an ask, help maintain connections. 5/ Measure impact. â³ Reporting back on how foundation support has translated into tangible results has been key to securing renewals. Even now, I don't have allâor even mostâof the answers. But over the years, I've seen Mongabay's foundation support grow from zero to several million dollars annually. This increased support has allowed us to expand from a team of two to about 120, dramatically scaling our impact. It's clear proof that refining your approach can lead to meaningful results. For those navigating the fundraising landscape, remember: Foundations arenât just writing checks; theyâre investing in outcomes. Speak to that, and youâre on the right path.
-
+2
-
Trust is not something you have, but something you do. 6 proven ways to build unshakeable trust with your team, TODAY: (Sample situations and scripts are included) 1. Say what you do. Minimize surprises. âWhy: Consistency in communication ensures everyone is on the same page, reducing uncertainties and building reliability. âSituation: After a meeting, promptly send out a summary of what was agreed upon, including the next steps, owners, and deadlines. âScript: "Thank you for the productive meeting. As discussed, here are our next steps with respective owners and deadlines. Please review and let me know if any clarifications are needed." 2. Do what you say. Deliver on commitments. âWhy: Keeping your word demonstrates dependability and earns you respect and trust. âSituation: Regularly update stakeholders on the project's progress. Send out a report showing the project is on track, and proactively communicate any potential risks. âScript: "Here's the latest project update. We're on track with our milestones. I've also identified some potential risks and our mitigation strategies." 3. Extend the bridge of trust. Assume good intent. âWhy: Trust grows in a culture of understanding and empathy. Giving others the benefit of the doubt fosters a supportive and trusting environment. âSituation: If a team member misses an important meeting, approach them with concern and understanding instead of jumping to conclusions. âScript: "I noticed you werenât at todayâs meeting, [Name]. I hope everything is okay. We discussed [key topics]. Let me know if you need a recap or if there's anything you want to discuss or add." 4. Be transparent in communication, decision-making, and admitting mistakes. âWhy: Honesty in sharing information and rationale behind decisions strengthens trust. âSituation: Be clear about the reasoning behind key decisions, especially in high-stakes situations. âScript: "I want everyone to understand why we made this decision. Here are the factors we considered and how they align with our objectives..." 5. Champion inclusivity. Engage and value all voices. âWhy: Inclusivity ensures a sense of belonging and respect, which is foundational for trust. âSituation: Encourage diverse viewpoints in team discussions, ensuring everyone feels their input is valued and heard. âScript: Example Script: "I'd really like to hear your thoughts on this, [Name]. Your perspective is important to our team." 6. Be generous. Care for others. âWhy: Offering support and resources to others without expecting anything in return cultivates a culture of mutual trust and respect. âSituation: Proactively offer assistance or share insights to help your colleagues. âScript: "I see youâre working on [project/task]. I have some resources from a similar project I worked on that might be helpful for you." PS: Trust Is Hard-Earned, Easily Lost, Difficult To Reestablish...Yet Absolutely Foundational. Image Credit: BetterUp . com
-
A âmajorâ donor said to me once âThe only reason I give honestly is because of you." While it might sound like the ultimate compliment, itâs actually a red flag. Hereâs why: Donors should be engaged through a hearts-and-minds approach, but not just a single person. Of course, part of my job is building trust and personal connectionsâbut if Iâm the only contact for that donor, weâve got a problem. Sustainable funding is the goalâ¦not just immediate dollars in the door driven by one person. If the donor doesnât trust at least two other people at the organization, I havenât set them up to truly invest in the work itself. My charm might open the door, but their belief in the mission is what weaves them into the ecosystem. They shouldnât just be riding for meâthey should be riding for the impact, the purpose, the vision. So yeah, itâs a cute moment for my ego, but it also means I needed to organize my team and do a little more. Program staff touchpoints beyond the development folks are crucial. Donor relationships that depend solely on me donât ensure longevityâand this work demands sustainability. Make sure folks are riding for your work, not just you. #SustainableFunding #BuildingTrust #AskSadé #SadeKnows