Skip to main content
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2013 Jul 5;368(1621):20130121. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0121

The marine nitrogen cycle: recent discoveries, uncertainties and the potential relevance of climate change

Maren Voss 1,, Hermann W Bange 2, Joachim W Dippner 1, Jack J Middelburg 3, Joseph P Montoya 4, Bess Ward 5
PMCID: PMC3682741  PMID: 23713119

Abstract

The ocean's nitrogen cycle is driven by complex microbial transformations, including nitrogen fixation, assimilation, nitrification, anammox and denitrification. Dinitrogen is the most abundant form of nitrogen in sea water but only accessible by nitrogen-fixing microbes. Denitrification and nitrification are both regulated by oxygen concentrations and potentially produce nitrous oxide (N2O), a climate-relevant atmospheric trace gas. The world's oceans, including the coastal areas and upwelling areas, contribute about 30 per cent to the atmospheric N2O budget and are, therefore, a major source of this gas to the atmosphere. Human activities now add more nitrogen to the environment than is naturally fixed. More than half of the nitrogen reaches the coastal ocean via river input and atmospheric deposition, of which the latter affects even remote oceanic regions. A nitrogen budget for the coastal and open ocean, where inputs and outputs match rather well, is presented. Furthermore, predicted climate change will impact the expansion of the oceans' oxygen minimum zones, the productivity of surface waters and presumably other microbial processes, with unpredictable consequences for the cycling of nitrogen. Nitrogen cycling is closely intertwined with that of carbon, phosphorous and other biologically important elements via biological stoichiometric requirements. This linkage implies that human alterations of nitrogen cycling are likely to have major consequences for other biogeochemical processes and ecosystem functions and services.

Keywords: ocean, nitrogen, budget

1. Introduction

The nitrogen cycle on the Earth has evolved over three billion years through biogeochemical and microbial processes coupled via natural feedbacks that keep the nitrogen cycle of the oceans in approximate balance [1]. However, recent findings strongly suggest a significant imbalance of the oceans' nitrogen budget towards higher losses than inputs [2,3]. Moreover, new processes have been identified, such as the anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) process [4], the conversion of ammonia and nitrite to dinitrogen gas or the denitrification by eukaryotic species such as foraminifera [5]. Previously, canonical denitrification by prokaryotes was thought to be the only removal process of reactive nitrogen. Likewise, the single major N source to the ocean was considered to be the nitrogen-fixing photoautotrophic bacteria of the genus Trichodesmium, a species that occurs globally in tropical and subtropical waters [6]. However, today, numerous other nitrogen-fixing bacteria have been described which may raise the estimate of the global nitrogen input to the oceans significantly [7]. Moreover, nitrogen fixation seems to be a significant process not only in tropical surface waters and some benthic systems [8], but also in anoxic waters, at the sea floor [9], in estuaries and in river plumes where diatom–diazotroph associations prevail [10,11]. Nitrification, the microbially mediated, two-step oxidation of ammonium to nitrite and nitrate, was traditionally attributed to bacteria, but ammonia-oxidizing archaea now seem even more important [1214].

On top of these recent findings and uncertainties are the perturbation of the nitrogen cycle by fossil fuel combustion and the production of artificial fertilizers, which together exceed the amount produced by natural nitrogen fixation [15,16]. The extra nitrogen disrupts the N balance in marine systems, fuels eutrophication of coastal oceans and supports extension of hypoxic zones [17]. These sites act as an additional, poorly quantified, source of nitrous oxide (N2O). Climate change imposes numerous threats to the functioning of the Earth's elemental cycles. This overview paper will give a brief insight into the functioning of the marine nitrogen cycle, how the major processes are interlinked, what is known and where the critical limits of our understanding are.

2. Surface water processes: assimilation of dissolved inorganic nitrogen, dissolved organic nitrogen and nitrogen fixation

(a). Global patterns in dissolved inorganic nitrogen concentrations

Nitrogen is an essential element for all life forms but, in sea water, nitrogen mostly occurs as inert dissolved N2 gas (more than 95%) that is inaccessible to most species. The rest is reactive nitrogen (Nr), such as nitrate, ammonia and dissolved organic compounds. Nitrate concentrations in surface waters vary from almost zero in the tropics and subtropics up to several tens of micromoles per litre in the temperate and Arctic and Antarctic oceans (figure 1a).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Nitrate concentrations in (a) surface waters of the ocean and (b) at 1000 m depth. Adapted from Boyer et al. [18].

The increase in deep-water nutrient concentration from the northern Atlantic towards the Indian and Pacific oceans (figure 1b) is a result of a global circulation pattern, called the oceanic ‘conveyor belt’ [19]. The circulation is driven by the excess salt in the northern Atlantic Ocean where surface waters sink to the bottom and travel southwards. This southward current partly supplies water to the Antarctic Circumpolar Current, and continues to the Indian and the Pacific Oceans [19] from whence the flow returns to the surface to travel back through the Indonesian Islands the Tasman Sea [20], and further into the Indian and Atlantic Oceans. The residence time of the Atlantic water is around 180 years, whereas the complete overturning of ocean deep waters takes approximately 1000 years [19].

Four major processes deliver nutrient-rich waters to the surface: upwelling, winter mixing, eddies and diffusion from below a permanent or seasonal thermocline (table 1). Coastal upwelling is especially strongly developed in eastern boundary currents along the west coasts off North and South America and Africa, where nutrient-rich water from approximately 200 m is brought to the surface (figure 1a). The upwelled water stimulates primary production and the export of organic material, with the consequence of oxygen deficiency in subsurface waters owing to remineralization. The recycling of organic matter at depth leads to accumulation of nutrients with nitrate concentrations between 20 and 50 µmol l−1 (figure 1b). At high latitudes, deep wintertime convection mixes the waters down to a depth of several hundred metres so that seasonal interfaces are destroyed. Thus, nutrients from greater depth are redistributed into the surface layer to provide the nutrient reservoir for the spring bloom in the following year. In the open ocean, eddy fields are generated by baroclinic or barotropic instabilities and large-scale gyres by the divergence of the horizontal wind field. Within these, structure nutrients are supplied to the surface by Ekman pumping, stimulating blooms of phytoplankton [21,22]. To what extent these sites contribute to global primary production is difficult to estimate, because the occurrence of eddies is transient and varies greatly in time and location. For the Atlantic Ocean, roughly one-third of the total N flux may be delivered by eddy transport [23]. Phytoplankton living in surface waters drives the N cycle and often consumes all inorganic nutrients down to a depth where ambient light level is 1–0.1% of the surface irradiation. At these depths, turbulent diffusion is another important source for primary production [24].

Table 1.

Summary of major nitrogen nutrient sources to the ocean.

source of nutrient major sites of occurrence example of sites where process is of significance type of nutrient timing
convective overturning high latitudes North Atlantic, Greenland and Norwegian Seas Inline graphic autumn, winter
wind induced and Ekman upwelling eastern boundary upwelling systems off Oregon/California/Mexico, Peru/Chile, Iberian Peninsula/Mauretania, Namibia, NW Indian Ocean (Arabian Sea) Inline graphic, DON during upwelling season (depending on the direction of the wind fields)
eddy activity/gyres everywhere frontal systems; Gulf stream, Kuroshio, Polar front Inline graphic sporadically/permanent
diffusion thermoclines oligotrophic ocean Inline graphic permanent, depending on the gradient
rivers continental shelves Amazon, Mississippi, Yangtze, Mekong Inline graphic permanent
atmospheric deposition coastal, but globally relevant oligotrophic tropical ocean Inline graphic sporadically
shelf processes on continental shelves European shelf, Patagonian shelf Inline graphic permanent
regeneration of particles everywhere in the water column and in sediments high latitude surface waters in summer, low latitude surface waters, benthic boundary layers Inline graphic permanent

Our understanding of ocean productivity regulation was significantly advanced when the concept of new and regenerated production was introduced by Dugdale & Goering [25]. They defined new production as that based on the input of nitrate from outside the euphotic zone (including nitrogen fixation), whereas regenerated production (based on ammonium) fuels a ‘microbial loop’ first introduced by Azam et al. [26] within a defined surface layer of the ocean. Based on Dugdale and Goerings's concept, only the amount of newly produced biomass can be quantitatively exported to the deep ocean without running down the primary production system [27]. However, this concept assumes that sources of new nitrogen are small, and that the ocean is in steady state, which often seems not to be the case [3,6,28]. Other potential problems with the Dugdale and Goering concept are bacterial uptake of dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN), assimilation of dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) and nitrification in the euphotic zone [29,30]. Of the global net primary production in the oceans of 1900 Tg C yr−1 [31], 320 Tg yr−1 should be N, using a C : N ratio of 6. To these, about 140 Tg N yr−1 are added by nitrogen fixation [32], whereas global losses may be around 400 Tg N yr−1 [33]. A global nitrogen budget considering all natural and human sources and incorporating recent discoveries has not yet been put together, but qualitative attempts have been made [3,6,32,34].

Nitrogen in atmospheric deposition develops into a significant N source in the open ocean, where usually very little combined nitrogen occurs in surface waters [15]. To what extent these atmospheric nutrients support oceanic productivity, and decrease oxygen concentrations, remains unclear, but Dentener et al. [35] estimate a total nitrogen deposition of 46.2 Tg N yr−1, whereas Duce et al. [15] derive a global estimate of 67 Tg N yr−1.

(b). Nitrogen fixation

Nitrogen-fixing organisms are independent of combined N sources and able to use the dissolved N2 gas, which has concentrations of over 400 µmol l−1 in sea water. In order to be used as a source of nitrogen, dinitrogen has to be reduced to ammonium for which specific enzymes are required [36]. Moreover, nitrogen-fixing species rely on phosphate and require iron in much larger quantities than other phytoplankton [37]. Therefore, co-limitation of Fe and P occurs [38] and may even regulate the global occurrence of nitrogen-fixing species. Because the Fe input from land is lower in the Pacific than the Atlantic Ocean [39], the tropical Atlantic Ocean may experience higher overall N fixation than the Pacific [40]. But recent evidence suggests higher rates in the Pacific Ocean than previously assumed, possibly higher than in the Atlantic Ocean [28,41].

Nitrogen fixation in the ocean has long been focused on the large bloom-forming genus Trichodesmium [6], until smaller unicellular species were discovered and their potential fixation activity demonstrated [7,42,43]. These are heterotrophic nitrogen fixers, including the photoheterotroph group-A (UCYN-A), which lacks the photosystem II [44], and Richelia intracellularis, a symbiont that fixes nitrogen in diatoms cells and has been found in tropical river plumes [45,46].

Nitrogen fixation may also be an important source of nitrogen to support biological production in deep-sea environments. Mehta et al. [47] described a diverse group of organisms possessing nifH genes, and therefore potentially capable of fixing N2, from hydrothermal vent sites of the Juan de Fuca Ridge system. Other archaeal nifH sequences, many of uncertain phylogeny, have been linked to subsurface circulation through hydrothermal vent systems [48] and to methane cold seeps [9,4951] and a mud volcano [52]. Further work at a cold seep field has revealed that methanotrophic archaea form syntrophic associations with sulfur-reducing bacteria, and that these consortia actively fix N2 [9,50,51]. The overall contribution of these benthic diazotrophs to the oceanic nitrogen budget remains poorly known, but may be significant.

Nitrogen fixation rates based on direct measurements are sparse, and the variability is extremely high [6]. Therefore, global estimates of total marine nitrogen fixation are often based on geochemical factors such as unbalanced N : P ratios (N* method) which are assumed to support nitrogen fixation. Recently, Groszkopf et al. [53] reported a global marine N-fixation rate of 177 Tg N yr−1 based on extrapolation of direct measurement, and suggest that N2 fixers other than Trichodesmium are quite important outside the tropics. From global nutrient distributions and an ocean circulation model, Deutsch et al. [32] calculated a nitrogen fixation rate of 140 Tg N yr−1, which agrees well with other estimates in the range of 100–200 Tg N yr−1 [6]. It seems that lower estimates mainly result from model exercises where additional factors limiting N fixation such as iron have been implemented [54,55]. The global N-fixation rate of 140 Tg N yr−1 has been largely unquestioned and is widely used [3].

(c). The role of dissolved organic nitrogen in nitrogen cycling

Dissolved organic nitrogen is rather uniformly distributed in the water column of the open ocean, with slightly higher concentrations in the surface than at depth, but with DON increasing considerably towards coastal areas and in estuaries [56]. With a mean concentration of 5.8 ± 2 µmol l−1, DON may potentially be more important than inorganic forms, because DON concentrations comprise between 18 per cent and 85 per cent of the total nitrogen pool in coastal and open ocean surface water, respectively, with particulate nitrogen being negligible [56]. The DON pool is not as inert as suggested by the relatively high and constant concentrations found in the oceans, but a small part of it is rather dynamic and consumed by phytoplankton and bacteria [57]. Furthermore, DON is mainly of autochthonous origin because it stems from direct release by phytoplankton and bacteria [58,59], egestion and excretion from micro- and meso-zooplankton [60], or viral lysis of bacterioplankton [61].

In coastal waters, rivers are a major source of allochthonous DON, and its composition, bioavailability and quantities may vary with land use [62]. Another allochthonous source relevant also for the open ocean is the DON in atmospheric deposition [63,64]. DON is actively channelled into cells via membrane transport systems [65] and seems to be a quite active component of coastal nitrogen cycling [66,67]. Better understanding of the dynamic of DON is essential to quantify its role in the nitrogen and carbon cycles and how these will respond to anthropogenic perturbations and global change.

(d). Stoichiometry of C : N : P in the ocean

The close similarity between nitrogen and phosphorous ratios in plankton and in deep-water nutrients was first noted by Redfield [68], who suggested that life in the ocean adjusts the nutrients according to its requirements. Today, the perception is, rather, vice versa, that life has adjusted to the oceanic ratios. The C : N : P ratio of 106 : 16 : 1 on a molar basis is still a fundamental concept in marine sciences and mirrors the metabolic demands of an average living cell [69]. This ‘Redfield ratio’ allows linking elemental cycles and has been widely used in ecosystem and element flux models [32]. The cellular stoichiometry is important for the regulation of organic C and N cycling and also for the linkage between single-cell activity and ecosystem function. Heterotrophic organisms maintain low nitrate concentrations in the water when organic C : N ratios match the stoichiometric demands, but as soon as organic carbon becomes limiting, denitrification decreases, and nitrification is enhanced [70]. It may be quite important to focus nutrient management scenarios to maintain balanced elemental ratios because nitrogen supply in excess of the demand leads to significant enrichment of Nr [71].

The ultimately limiting element for ocean productivity had been debated over decades, and a consensus seems to be that nitrogen is limiting on short time-scales, whereas on geological time scales it seems to be phosphorus [72,73]. Both these views are based on input and loss rates and the turnover of the elements, which all may vary over time [74]. However, human perturbations affecting the input or loss of substances ultimately impact the global elemental cycles and the productivity.

3. Biogeochemistry of oxygen deficiency zones

Oxygen controls the distributions of N-cycle processes based on the fact that some microbial reactions require oxygen and others are inhibited by it. Both the microbial pathways that lead to net loss of fixed nitrogen, denitrification and anammox, occur only in the near or total absence of oxygen. These conditions occur in coastal and shelf sediments around the world and in a few locations in the water column where relatively high oxygen utilization rates and low ventilation rates lead to oxygen depleted zones of several hundred metres thickness (e.g. Arabian Sea). Regions where the oxygen concentration is low enough to induce anaerobic metabolism are known as oxygen minimum zones or more precisely oxygen-deficient zones (ODZs) experiencing oxygen concentrations less than 10 µmol l−1, an expression we use throughout this text. Nitrogen cycling in ODZs is fundamentally different from the rest of the open ocean, because only in ODZs can net loss of fixed N occur in the water column.

Denitrification and anammox both lead to the formation of gaseous dinitrogen (and N2O in the case of the former) and both consume DIN, but have potentially different effects on the carbon cycle. Denitrifying bacteria are mostly heterotrophs, and respire DIN at O2 concentrations below 60 µmol l−1 while oxidizing organic matter. Some denitrifiers, however, are autotrophs, and fix CO2 while oxidizing reduced sulfur compounds with nitrate. Anammox bacteria are also autotrophic, fixing CO2 while oxidizing ammonium plus nitrite to dinitrogen, and oxidizing nitrite to nitrate, all anaerobically. In the open ocean ODZs, denitrification and anammox are both constrained by the stoichiometry of the organic matter supply, and anammox must depend on denitrification for the continuous supply of DIN. The complete utilization of organic matter of average composition (see stoichiometry above) under anaerobic conditions should lead to the loss of fixed N from both denitrification and anammox in the ratio of 71 : 29, i.e. 29 per cent of the fixed N loss is attributed to anammox.

In sediments and coastal systems, however, there are multiple sources of organic matter and DIN, such that the average composition rule does not apply. With an allochthonous supply of ammonium in a stratified basin or sediment, the proportion of anammox can be much higher. It was surprising, therefore, that the first reported direct measurements of anammox and denitrification in the ODZs (where the average rule should apply) failed to detect denitrification. This suggested that all of the fixed N loss was due to anammox. This is apparently a robust result, although the number of measurements is still rather small [7577]. Only in the Arabian Sea has denitrification been detected at appreciable levels [77,78], whereas another study nearby failed to detect either anammox or denitrification [79]. There are several alternative explanations for the variation in the proportion of anammox and denitrification in the ODZs, but this is an active area of research with no current consensus.

From stoichiometric model studies, Koeve & Kähler [80] conclude that the proportion of anammox and denitrification does not vary widely in the ocean, and direct measurements of excess N2 and DIN concentrations verify that organic matter loss in the ODZs does indeed produce net Redfield stoichiometry [81]. Thus, resolving the question of the relative contribution of anammox and denitrification has small ramifications for the magnitude of the overall fixed N loss. One fundamental difference between the two processes is that denitrification involves N2O as an intermediate, whereas anammox does not. This issue is explored in §3a.

(a). Nitrous oxide production, consumption and release from the ocean

The marine pathways of N2O and the quantification of its oceanic emissions have received increased attention during recent decades [82,83]. N2O acts as a strong greenhouse gas and in the stratosphere it is the precursor of ozone-depleting nitric oxide (NO) radicals [84,85]. Because of the ongoing decline of chlorofluorocarbons and the continuous increase of N2O in the atmosphere, the contributions of N2O to both the greenhouse effect and ozone depletion will be even more pronounced in the twenty-first century [84,86]. The oceans, including coastal areas such as continental shelves, estuaries and upwelling areas are a major source of N2O and contribute about 30 per cent (5.5 Tg N yr−1) to the atmospheric N2O budget [84]. Oceanic N2O is produced as a by-product during bacterial as well as archaeal nitrification; however, nitrifying archaea dominate N2O production [87,88]. N2O occurs also as an intermediate during denitrification. It is produced by the reduction of Inline graphic and, in turn, can be further reduced to N2. Nitrification is the dominating N2O production process, whereas denitrification contributes only 7–35% to the overall N2O water column budget in the ocean [89,90]. The importance of other microbial processes, such as dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonia and anammox, for oceanic, N2O production is largely unknown [83].

The amount of N2O produced during both nitrification and denitrification strongly depends on the prevailing dissolved oxygen (O2) concentrations and is significantly enhanced under low (i.e. suboxic) O2 conditions [2,91]. N2O is usually not detectable in anoxic waters because of its reduction to N2 during denitrification. Thus, significantly enhanced N2O concentrations are generally found at oxic/suboxic boundaries in the oceans [2,83]. The strong O2 sensitivity of N2O production is also observed in coastal systems that are characterized by seasonal shifts in the O2 regime [92]. A biological source of N2O in the well-oxygenated, mixed layer/euphotic zone seems to be unlikely (see discussion in Freing et al. [90]). A recent study of both the N2O air/sea fluxes and N2O diapycnal fluxes into the mixed layer in the coastal upwelling off Mauritania, northwest Africa indicated that surfactants may have a dampening effect on air–sea exchanges of N2O [93]. However, for a reassessment of the global coastal N2O emissions, further laboratory and field studies of the effect of surfactants on the air/sea flux of N2O are needed.

Global maps of N2O in the surface ocean [94,95] show supersaturation of N2O in coastal and equatorial upwelling regions as well as N2O anomalies close to zero (i.e. near equilibrium) in large parts of the open ocean. Since the studies of Nevison et al. [94] and Suntharalingam & Sarmiento [95], the amount of available N2O data has been steadily increasing. Therefore, the project ‘Marine Methane and Nitrous Oxide’ database has been launched with the aim to collect and archive N2O datasets and to provide actual fields of surface N2O for emission estimates [96].

The observed ongoing deoxygenation of the open ocean [97] can be translated into an additional N2O accumulation of less than 6 per cent [83]. In contrast to the open ocean, Naqvi et al. [92] cautioned that global N2O emissions from shallow hypoxic/anoxic coastal systems might increase significantly in the future. It seems realistic to expect that the N2O emissions from shallow hypoxic/anoxic coastal systems will increase in the near future due to increasing nutrient inputs (caused by the ongoing industrialization and intensification of agricultural activities), whereas future N2O emissions from the open ocean owing to decreasing oxygen in mid water depths seem to be of minor significance.

4. Shelf processes

The coastal ocean is conveniently partitioned into a proximal, i.e. spatially heterogeneous part, including estuaries, lagoons, etc., and a distal compartment, i.e. the continental shelf. The coastal ocean is the eventual sink of most anthropogenic DIN delivered by rivers, groundwater and atmospheric deposition.

(a). Proximal coastal systems

Each year, rivers transport about 40–66 Tg N yr−1 to coastal ecosystems, 40 per cent in the form of DIN (mainly nitrate), 40 per cent in the form of particulate nitrogen and the remaining 20 per cent as dissolved organic nitrogen [62]. The variability in the export is impacted by anthropogenic nitrogen input, whereas DON export varies between 10 and 25 per cent of total N [62]. Submarine groundwater discharge delivers about 4 Tg N yr−1 to near-shore ecosystems. Further inputs of nitrogen to the proximate coastal ocean include nitrogen fixation in the water column, sediments and vegetated ecosystems totalling about 15 Tg N yr−1 and atmospheric deposition (about 1 Tg N yr−1). Losses of fixed nitrogen include export to the continental shelf (38 Tg N yr−1), emission of N2O (0.5 Tg N yr−1), denitrification (4–8 Tg N yr−1), fish landings (3.7 Tg N yr−1) and burial (22 Tg N yr−1; figure 2). This burial occurs mainly in vegetated systems such as seagrass meadows and mangroves [98], because of trapping of particulate nitrogen and assimilation of dissolved inorganic and organic nitrogen [67]. The present-day and future nitrogen cycling in proximal coastal systems differs substantially from that before the Anthropocene. Eutrophication has resulted in community shifts such as a loss of submerged vegetation and proliferation of macroalgae and phytoplankton. This will eventually lead to lower rates of nitrogen burial. Denitrification may be higher or lower depending on conditions [99], whereas N2O emission is higher because of extensive oxic–anoxic interfaces with high rates of nitrification and denitrification.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Nitrogen budget of the ocean. All numbers are given in the text. The table below considers the smaller numbers, therefore the larger numbers are given in parentheses; net primary production is no input/loss term.

(b). Distal coastal systems

The fixed nitrogen budget of continental shelf systems is primarily governed by exchanges with the open ocean (figure 2). Globally, continental shelves receive about 38 Tg N yr−1 exported from the proximal coastal zone, 7.5 Tg N yr−1 from atmospheric deposition (almost all anthropogenic) and a small contribution by nitrogen-fixing organisms (about 2 Tg N yr−1). Continental shelf systems lose nitrogen via denitrification (100–250 Tg N yr−1); the uncertainty, however, is high [100]. Because the global estimate of 400 Tg N yr−1 removal per year exists, about 200–300 Tg N yr−1 remain for the open ocean (figure 2). Recent estimates suggested five times higher denitrification rates in permeable sediments [101], so the number may need an upward revision in the future. Most nitrogen entering the continental shelf comes from nitrate exchanges with the open ocean (450–600 Tg N yr−1). The majority of the nitrogen imported from subsurface oceanic waters is returned in the form of DON and particulate organic nitrogen (PON) to open ocean surface waters (about 390 Tg N yr−1). This organic nitrogen exported from coastal systems supports the reported heterotrophy of oceanic gyre ecosystems and constitutes a source of fixed nitrogen for micro-organisms. A budget of these numbers for the three systems (figure 2) reveals a relatively low uncertainty in the numbers around 10 per cent that supports the reliability of the estimates.

5. Model achievements and global budgets considering nitrogen

Ocean biogeochemical and ecosystem models often have Nr as model currency, i.e. nitrogen is modelled as a state variable. The models in use differ in many aspects, in particular regarding complexity in model formulation and spatial coverage. Detailed process models such as nitrogen-fixing models, e.g. Fennel et al. [102] and Hood et al. [103], and denitrification models, for example [104,105], are designed to investigate single processes (see review by Hood [106]).

Ocean biogeochemical circulation models are often based on the nitrogen–phytoplankton–zooplankton–detritus model of Fasham et al. [107], which was the first model to consider DON and bacteria as state variables. This model was coupled to a circulation model and estimated basin-wide nitrate and chlorophyll-a and the relative magnitude of different new N sources [108]. Since then, the complexity of the models has increased by including multiple nutrients, or plankton functional groups. The development of the concept of excess nitrogen N* [109] or excess phosphorous P* [32] was a milestone because it allows coupling of the nitrogen to phosphorous and carbon cycles [3,32]. The imbalance between input and losses and the findings of higher estimates of both terms would result in higher turnover rates of the nitrogen cycle and the question of how other cycles are still linked.

A major uncertainty in global modelling remains meteorological forcing, especially in the tropics. Large differences exist between monthly mean climatologic datasets and reanalysis data of NCEP/NCAR or ECMWF in wind stress forcing [110], as well as in atmospheric temperature of up to 0.8 K in the late 1980s and early 1990s [111]. A further uncertainty is the lack of consensus concerning the question of whether or not it is necessary to include explicit formulations of microbes as state variables [106].

6. Impact of climate change

A recent summary explored climate change effects on the future ocean [112] caused by the increase of CO2 in the atmosphere [84,113]. There are direct (warming and acidification) and indirect (oxygen depletion) effects. These factors produce further changes that contribute more or less clearly to the many possible changes in ocean biogeochemistry (figure 3). Warming of the sea water, a direct consequence of the increasing air temperature, enhances stratification of the ocean and microbial activity. This may not develop equally everywhere in the ocean. In the Arctic and in low latitudes (from 20° N to 20° S) stronger stratification of the water column is expected than in the rest of the ocean, which would, in turn, affect nutrient supply and light availability. Another important impact is the declining solubility of gases, especially of O2 itself, potentially increasing the size of ODZ [97,114]. Ocean acidification may stimulate N2-fixing cyanobacteria [115]. In areas where primary production increases, more oxygen is consumed at depth during remineralization and potentially more N2O can escape to the atmosphere when the water masses reach the surface (see section §3a). However, increasing temperatures may change the balance between production and respiration so that less export of organic matter may occur counteracting oxygen losses in the deep ocean.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Schematic of the major effects of climate change on the ocean biogeochemistry. The graphic does not consider the differences between effects in Arctic and tropical latitudes except for the different effects on primary production (PP); nutrient supply (1) from below the thermocline is restricted due to stronger stratification in low latitudes, but PP is enhanced (2) at high latitudes because of higher light availability. Plus and minus symbols emphasize the positive or negative feedback of a process. OA, ocean acidification; SST, sea surface temperature; PP, primary production; ODZ, oxygen deficiency zone; O2, oxygen concentrations, N2O, nitrous oxide.

Ocean acidification may directly result in significantly reduced nitrification rates accompanied reduced N2O production [116]. However, this scenario might be globally counteracted by the generation of more N2O when the nitrification process itself shows an overall positive response to lower pH values such as some studies suggest [87,117]. Therefore, it seems reasonable to assume only a minor effect of decreasing pH on N2O production during nitrification, but mesocosm and field experiments to verify the effect of ocean acidification on N2O production in the ocean are missing. Recently published model results by Suntharalingam et al. [118] show that atmospheric deposition of anthropogenic N to the ocean might lead to an enhanced global oceanic N2O production (0.06–0.34 Tg N y–1) especially in regions which are sensitive to changes in dissolved oxygen such as coastal zones. At this point, it is difficult to predict which process may dominate, because the interaction of processes is too complex to evaluate the net effect on ocean carbon and nitrogen cycles.

Acknowledgements

The paper is a contribution to the HYPER Project funded by the BONUS+ programme. J.W.D. has been supported by the BONUS+ Project AMBER. Suggestions to the final text by Mirko Lunau are greatly acknowledged.

References

  • 1.Canfield DE, Glazer AN, Falkowski PG. 2010. The evolution and future of earth's nitrogen cycle. Science 330, 192–196 10.1126/science.1186120 (doi:10.1126/science.1186120) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Codispoti LA, Brandes JA, Christensen JP, Devol AH, Naqvi SWA, Paerl HW, Yoshinari T. 2001. The oceanic fixed nitrogen and nitrous oxide budgets: moving targets as we enter the anthropocene? Sci. Marina 65, 85–105 10.3989/scimar.2001.65s285 (doi:10.3989/scimar.2001.65s285) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gruber N, Galloway JN. 2008. An Earth-system perspective of the global nitrogen cycle. Nature 451, 293–296 10.1038/nature06592 (doi:10.1038/nature06592) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.van de Graaf AA, Mulder A, Bruijn Pd, Jetten MSM, Robertson LA, Kuenen JG. 1995. Anaerobic oxidation of ammonium is a biologically mediated process. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61, 1246–1251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Risgaard-Petersen N. 2006. Evidence for complete denitrification in a benthic foraminifer. Nature 443, 94–96 10.1038/nature05070 (doi:10.1038/nature05070) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Capone DG, Burns JA, Montoya JP, Subramaniam A, Mahaffey C, Gundersoen T, Michaels AF, Carpenter EJ. 2005. Nitrogen fixation by Trichodesmium spp.: an important source of new nitrogen to the tropical and subtropical North Atlantic Ocean. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 19, 1–17 10.1029/2004GB002331 (doi:10.1029/2004GB002331) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zehr JP, Carpenter EJ, Villareal TA. 1998. New perspectives on nitrogen-fixing microorganisms in tropical and subtropical oceans. Trends Microbiol. 8, 68–73 10.1016/S0966-842X(99)01670-4 (doi:10.1016/S0966-842X(99)01670-4) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Capone DG. 1988. Benthic nitrogen fixation. In Nitrogen cycling in coastal marine environments (eds Blackburn TH, Sorensen J.), pp. 85–123 Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (SCOPE). London, UK: John Wiley and Sons [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dekas AE, Poretsky RS, Orphan VJ. 2009. Deep-sea archaea fix and share nitrogen in methane-consuming microbial consortia. Science 326, 422–426 10.1126/science.1178223 (doi:10.1126/science.1178223) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Carpenter EJ, Montoya JP, Burns J, Mulholland MR, Subramaniam A, Capone DG. 1999. Extensive bloom of a N2-fixing diatom/cyanobacterial association in the tropical Atlantic Ocean. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 185, 273–283 10.3354/meps185273 (doi:10.3354/meps185273) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Grosse J, Bombar D, Doan HN, Lam NN, Voss M. 2010. Mekong River influence on nitrogen fixation rates and phytoplankton species composition. Limnol. Oceanogr. 55, 1668–1680 10.4319/lo.2010.55.4.1668 (doi:10.4319/lo.2010.55.4.1668) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Könneke M, Bernhard AE, Torre JRdI, Walker CB, Waterbury JB, Stahl DA. 2005. Isolation of an autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing marine archaeon. Nature 437, 543–546 10.1038/nature03911 (doi:10.1038/nature03911) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Martens-Habbena W, Berube PM, Urakawa H, Torre JRdl, Stahl DA. 2009. Ammonia oxidation kinetics determine niche separation of nitrifying Archaea and Bacteria. Nature 461, 976–981 10.1038/nature08465 (doi:10.1038/nature08465) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wuchter C, et al. 2006. Archaeal nitrification in the ocean. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 12 317–12 322 10.1073/pnas.0600756103 (doi:10.1073/pnas.0600756103) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Duce RA, et al. 2008. Impacts of atmospheric anthropogenic nitrogen on the open ocean. Science 320, 893–897 10.1126/science.1150369 (doi:10.1126/science.1150369) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenko J, Melillo JM. 1997. Human domination of earth`s ecosystems. Science 277, 494–499 10.1126/science.277.5325.494 (doi:10.1126/science.277.5325.494) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Diaz RJ, Rosenberg R. 2008. Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems. Science 321, 926–929 10.1126/science.1156401 (doi:10.1126/science.1156401) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Boyer TP, Antonov JI, Garcia HE, Johnson DR, Locarnini RA, Mishonov AV, Pitcher MT, Baranova OK, Smolyar IV. 2006. NOAA atlas NESDIS 60. World ocean database 2005 (ed. Levitus S.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Broecker WS. 1991. The great ocean conveyor. Oceanography 4, 79–89 10.5670/oceanog.1991.07 (doi:10.5670/oceanog.1991.07) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Speich S, Blanke B, Vries P.d., Drijfhout S, Döös K, Ganachaud A, Marsh R. 2002. Tasman leakage: a new route in the global ocean conveyor belt. Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 55-1–55-4 10.1029/2001GL014586 (doi:10.1029/2001GL014586) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fong AA, Karl DM, Lukas R, Letelier RM, Zehr JP, Church MJ. 2008. Nitrogen fixation in an anticyclonic eddy in the oligotrophic north pacific ocean. ISME J. 2, 663–676 10.1038/ismej.2008.22 (doi:10.1038/ismej.2008.22) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.McGillicuddy DJ, et al. 2007. Eddy/wind interactions stimulate extraordinary mid-ocean plankton blooms. Science 316, 1021–1026 10.1126/science.1136256 (doi:10.1126/science.1136256) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Oschlies A, Garcon V. 1998. Eddy-induced enhancement of primary production in a model of the North Atlantic Ocean. Nature 394, 266–269 10.1038/28373 (doi:10.1038/28373) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Schafstall J, Dengler M, Brandt P, Bange H. 2010. Tidal-induced mixing and diapycnal nutrient fluxes in the Mauritanian upwelling region. J. Geophys. Res. 115, C10014. 10.1029/2009JC005940 (doi:10.1029/2009JC005940) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dugdale RE, Goering JJ. 1967. Uptake of new and regenerated forms of nitrogen in primary productivity. Limnol. Oceanogr. 12, 196–206 10.4319/lo.1967.12.2.0196 (doi:10.4319/lo.1967.12.2.0196) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Azam F, Fenchel T, Field JG, Gray JS, Meyer-Reil LA, Thingstad F. 1983. The ecological role of water-column microbes in the sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 10, 257–263 10.3354/meps010257 (doi:10.3354/meps010257) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Eppley RW, Peterson BJ. 1979. Particulate organic matter flux and planktonic new production in the deep ocean. Nature 282, 677–680 10.1038/282677a0 (doi:10.1038/282677a0) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Karl D, et al. 2002. Dinitrogen fixation in the world's oceans. Biogeochemistry 57, 47–98 10.1023/A:1015798105851 (doi:10.1023/A:1015798105851) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bronk DA, Glibert PM, Ward BB. 1994. Nitrogen uptake, dissolved organic nitrogen release, and new production. Science 265, 1843–1846 10.1126/science.265.5180.1843 (doi:10.1126/science.265.5180.1843) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yool A, Martin AP, Fernández C, Clark DR. 2007. The significance of nitrification for oceanic new production. Nature 447, 999–1002 10.1038/nature05885 (doi:10.1038/nature05885) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Behrenfeld MJ, et al. 2006. Climate-driven trends in contemporary ocean productivity. Nature 444, 752–755 10.1038/nature05317 (doi:10.1038/nature05317) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Deutsch C, Sarmiento JL, Sigman DM, Gruber N, Dunne JP. 2007. Spatial coupling of nitrogen inputs and losses in the ocean. Nature 445, 163–167 10.1038/nature05392 (doi:10.1038/nature05392) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Codispoti LA. 2007. An oceanic fixed nitrogen sink exceeding 400 TgN a−1 vs the concept of homeostasis in the fixed-nitrogen inventory. Biogeosciences 4, 233–253 10.5194/bg-4-233-2007 (doi:10.5194/bg-4-233-2007) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Galloway JN, Townsend AR, Erisman JW, Bekunda M, Cai Z, Freney JR, Martinelli LA, Seitzinger SP, Sutton MA. 2008. Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: recent trends, questions, and potential solutions. Science 320, 889–892 10.1126/science.1136674 (doi:10.1126/science.1136674) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dentener F, et al. 2006. Nitrogen and sulfur deposition on regional and global scales: a multimodel evaluation. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 20, GB4003. 10.1029/2005GB002672 (doi:10.1029/2005GB002672) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mulholland MR, Capone DG. 2000. The nitrogen physiology of the marine N2-fixing cyanobacteria Trichodesmium spp. Trends Plant Sci. 4, 148–153 10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01576-4 (doi:10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01576-4) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Berman-Frank I, Quigg A, Finkel ZV, Irwin AJ, Haramaty L. 2007. Nitrogen-fixation strategies and Fe requirements in cyanobacteria. Limnol. Oceanogr. 52, 2260–2269 10.4319/lo.2007.52.5.2260 (doi:10.4319/lo.2007.52.5.2260) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mills MM, Ridame C, Davey M, Roche JL, Geider RJ. 2004. Iron and phosphorus co-limit nitrogen fixation in the eastern tropical North Atlantic. Nature 429, 292–294 10.1038/nature02550 (doi:10.1038/nature02550) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jickells TD, et al. 2005. Global iron connections between desert dust, ocean biogeochemistry, and climate. Science 308, 67–71 10.1126/science.1105959 (doi:10.1126/science.1105959) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Moore CM, et al. 2009. Large-scale distribution of Atlantic nitrogen fixation controlled by iron availability. Nat. Geosci. 2, 867–871 10.1038/NGEO1667 (doi:10.1038/NGEO1667) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Deutsch C, Gruber N, Key RM, Sarmiento JL. 2001. Denitrification and N2 fixation in the Pacific Ocean. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 15, 483–506 10.1029/2000GB001291 (doi:10.1029/2000GB001291) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Montoya JP, Holl CM, Zehr JP, Hansen A, Villareal TA, Capone DG. 2004. High rates of N2 fixation by unicellular diazotrophs in the oligotrophic Pacific Ocean. Nature 430, 1027–1031 10.1038/nature02824 (doi:10.1038/nature02824) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zehr JP, Waterbury JB, Turner PJ, Montoya JP, Omoregie E, Steward GF, Hansen A, Karl DM. 2001. Unicellular cyanobacteria fix N2 in the subtropical North Pacific Ocean. Nature 412, 635–639 10.1038/35088063 (doi:10.1038/35088063) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zehr JP, Bench SR, Carter BJ, Hewson I, Niazi F, Shi T, Tripp HJ, Affourtit JP. 2008. Globally distributed uncultivated oceanic N2-fixing cyanobacteria lack oxygenic photosystem II. Science 322, 1110–1112 10.1126/science.1165340 (doi:10.1126/science.1165340) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Foster RA, Kuypers MM, Vagner T, Paerl RW, Musat N, Zehr JP. 2011. Nitrogen fixation and transfer in open ocean diatom–cyanobacterial symbioses. ISME J. 5, 1484–1493 10.1038/ismej.2011.26 (doi:10.1038/ismej.2011.26) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bombar D, Moisander PH, Dippner JW, Foster RA, Voss M, Karfeld B, Zehr JP. 2011. Distribution of diazotrophic microorganisms and nifH gene expression in the Mekong River plume during intermonsoon. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 424, 39–52 10.3354/meps08976 (doi:10.3354/meps08976) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Mehta MP, Butterfield DA, Baross JA. 2003. Phylogenetic diversity of nitrogenase (nifH) genes in deep-sea and hydrothermal vent environments of the Juan de Fuca Ridge. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 960–970 10.1128/AEM.69.2.960-970.2003 (doi:10.1128/AEM.69.2.960-970.2003) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mehta MP, Huber JA, Baross JA. 2005. Incidence of novel and potentially archaeal nitrogenase genes in the deep Northeast Pacific Ocean. Environ. Microbiol. 7, 1525–1534 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00836.x (doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00836.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Dang H, Luan X, Zhao J, Li J. 2009. Diverse and novel nifH and nifH-like gene sequences in the deep-sea methane seep sediments of the Okhotsk Sea. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 2238–2245 10.1128/AEM.02556-08 (doi:10.1128/AEM.02556-08) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Orphan VJ, Turk KA, Green AM, House CH. 2009. Patterns of 15N assimilation and growth of methanotrophic ANME-2 archaea and sulfate-reducing bacteria within structured syntrophic consortia revealed by FISH-SIMS. Environ. Microbiol. 11, 1777–1791 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01903.x (doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01903.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Pernthaler A, Dekas AE, Brown CT, Goffredi SK, Embaye T, Orphan VJ. 2008. Diverse syntrophic partnerships from deep-sea methane vents revealed by direct cell capture and metagenomics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 7052–7057 10.1073/pnas.0711303105 (doi:10.1073/pnas.0711303105) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Miyazaki J, Higa R, Toki T, Ashi J, Tsunogai U, Nunoura T, Imachi H, Takai K. 2009. Molecular characterization of potential nitrogen fixation by anaerobic methane-oxidizing archaea in the methane seep sediments at the number 8 Kumano Knoll in the Kumano Basin, offshore of Japan. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 7153–7162 10.1128/aem.01184-09 (doi:10.1128/aem.01184-09) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Groszkopf T, et al. 2012. Doubling of marine dinitrogen-fixation rates based on direct measurements. Nature 488, 361–364 10.1038/nature11338 (doi:10.1038/nature11338) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Monteiro FM, Dutkiewicz S, Follows MJ. 2011. Biogeographical controls on the marine nitrogen fixers. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 25, GB2003. 10.1029/2010GB003902 (doi:10.1029/2010GB003902) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Moore JK, Doney SC, Lindsay K. 2004. Upper ocean ecosystem dynamics and iron cycling in a global three-dimensional model. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 18, GB4028. 10.1029/2004GB002220 (doi:10.1029/2004GB002220) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bronk DA. 2002. Dynamics of DON. In Biogeochemistry of marine dissolved organic matter (eds Hansell DA, Carlson CA.), pp. 153–200 Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Academic Press [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kirchmann D.2000. Uptake and regeneration of inorganic nutrients by marine heterotrophic bacteria. In Microbial ecology of the oceans (ed. DL Kirchmann), pp. 261–288, Wiley Series in Ecological and Applied Microbiology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • 58.Bronk DA, Ward BB. 1999. Gross and net nitrogen uptake and DON release in the euphotic zone of Monterey Bay, California. Limnol. Oceanogr. 44, 573–585 10.4319/lo.1999.44.3.0573 (doi:10.4319/lo.1999.44.3.0573) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ogawa H, Amagai Y, Koike I, Kaiser K, Benner R. 2001. Production of refractory dissolved organic matter by bacteria. Science 292, 917–920 10.1126/science.1057627 (doi:10.1126/science.1057627) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Nagata T, Kirchman DL. 1992. Release of dissolved organic matter by heterotrophic protozoa: implications for microbial food webs. Arch. Hydrobiol. Beih Ergebn Limnol. 35, 99–109 [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Fuhrman JA, Noble RT. 1995. Viruses and protists cause similar bacterial mortality in coastal seawater. Limnol. Oceanogr. 40, 1236–1242 10.4319/lo.1995.40.7.1236 (doi:10.4319/lo.1995.40.7.1236) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Seitzinger SP, Harrison JA, Dumont E, Beusen AHW, Bouwman AF. 2005. Sources and delivery of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus to the coastal zone: an overview of global nutrient export from watersheds (NEWS) models and their application. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 19, 1–11 10.1029/2005GB002606 (doi:10.1029/2005GB002606) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Cornell S, Rendell A, Jickells T. 1995. Atmospheric inputs of dissolved organic nitrogen to the oceans. Nature 376, 243–246 10.1038/376243a0 (doi:10.1038/376243a0) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Jickells T, Baker AR, Cape JN, Cornell SE, Nemitz E. 2013. The cycling of organic nitrogen through the atmosphere. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 368, 20130115. 10.1098/rstb.2013.0115 (doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0115) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Mulholland MR, Lomas MW. 2008. Nitrogen uptake and assimilation. In Nitrogen in the marine environment, 2nd edn (eds Capone D, Bronk D, Mulholland M, Carpenter E.), pp. 303–384 New York, NY: Academic Press [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Korth F, Deutsch B, Liskow I, Voss M. 2011. Uptake of dissolved organic nitrogen by size-fractionated plankton along a salinity gradient from the North Sea to the Baltic Sea. Biogeochemistry 111, 347–360 10.1007/s10533-011-9656-1 (doi:10.1007/s10533-011-9656-1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Van Engeland T, Bouma TJ, Morris EP, Brun FG, Peralta G, Lara M, Hendriks IE, Soetaert K, Middelburg JJ. 2011. Potential uptake of dissolved organic matter by seagrasses and macroalgae. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 427, 71–81 10.3354/meps09054 (doi:10.3354/meps09054) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Redfield AC. 1934. On the proportions of organic derivatives in seawater and their relation to the composition of plankton. James Johnstone Mem. Vol. University of Liverpool, 176–192 [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Klausmeier CA, Litchman E, Daufresne T, Levin SA. 2004. Optimal nitrogen-to-phosphorus stoichiometry of phytoplankton. Nature 429, 171–174 10.1038/nature02454 (doi:10.1038/nature02454) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Taylor PG, Townsend AR. 2010. Stoichiometric control of organic carbon–nitrate relationships from soils to the sea. Nature 464, 1178–1181 10.1038/nature08985 (doi:10.1038/nature08985) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Lunau M, Voss M, Erickson M, Dziallas C, Casciotti K, Ducklow H. 2012. Excess nitrate loads to coastal waters reduces nitrate removal efficiency: mechanism and implications for coastal eutrophication. Environ. Microbiol. (doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02773.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Falkowski PG. 1997. Evolution of the nitrogen cycle and its influence on the biological sequestration of CO2 in the ocean. Nature 387, 272–275 10.1038/387272a0 (doi:10.1038/387272a0) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Tyrrell T. 1999. The relative influences of nitrogen and phosphorus on oceanic primary production. Nature 400, 525–531 10.1038/22941 (doi:10.1038/22941) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Falkowski PG, Katz ME, Knoll AH, Quigg A, Raven JA, Schofield O, Taylor FJR. 2004. The evolution of modern eukaryotic phytoplankton. Science 305, 354–360 10.1126/science.1095964 (doi:10.1126/science.1095964) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Hamersley MR, et al. 2007. Anaerobic ammonium oxidation in the Peruvian oxygen minimum zone. Limnol. Oceanogr. 52, 923–933 10.4319/lo.2007.52.3.0923 (doi:10.4319/lo.2007.52.3.0923) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Thamdrup B, Dalsgaard T, Jensen MM, Ulloa O, Farias L, Escribano R. 2006. Anaerobic ammonium oxidation in the oxygen-deficient waters off northern Chile. Limnol. Oceanogr. 51, 2145–2156 10.4319/lo.2006.51.5.2145 (doi:10.4319/lo.2006.51.5.2145) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Ward BB, Devol AH, Rich JJ, Chang BX, Bulow SE, Naik H, Pratihary A, Jayakumar A. 2009. Denitrification as the dominant nitrogen loss process in the Arabian Sea. Nature 461, 78–82 10.1038/nature08276 (doi:10.1038/nature08276) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Bulow SE, Rich JJ, Naik HS, Pratihary AK, Ward BB. 2010. Denitrification exceeds anammox as a nitrogen loss pathway in the Arabian Sea oxygen minimum zone. Deep Sea Res. I: Oceanogr. Res. Papers 57, 384–393 10.1016/j.dsr.2009.10.014 (doi:10.1016/j.dsr.2009.10.014) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Jensen MM, Lam P, Revsbech NP, Nagel B, Gaye B, Jetten MS, Kuypers MM. 2011. Intensive nitrogen loss over the Omani Shelf due to anammox coupled with dissimilatory nitrite reduction to ammonium. ISME J. 5, 1660–1670 10.1038/ismej.2011.44 (doi:10.1038/ismej.2011.44) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Koeve W, Kähler P. 2010. Heterotrophic denitrification vs. autotrophic anammox: quantifying collateral effects on the oceanic carbon cycle. Biogeosciences 7, 2327–2337 10.5194/bg-7-2327-2010 (doi:10.5194/bg-7-2327-2010) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Chang BX, Devol AH, Emerson SR. 2010. Denitrification and the nitrogen gas excess in the eastern tropical South Pacific oxygen deficient zone. Deep Sea Res. I: Oceanogr. Res. Papers 57, 1092–1101 10.1016/j.dsr.2010.05.009 (doi:10.1016/j.dsr.2010.05.009) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Bange H. 2008. Gaseous nitrogen compounds (NO, N2O, N2, NH3) in the ocean. In Nitrogen in the marine environment (eds Capone DG, Bronk DA, Mulholland MR, Carpenter EJ.), pp. 51–94 New York, NY: Elsevier [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Bange H, Freing A, Kock A, Löscher C. 2010. Marine pathways to nitrous oxide. In Nitrous oxide and climate change (ed. Smith K.), pp. 36–62 London, UK: Earthscan [Google Scholar]
  • 84.IPCC 2007. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL.), pp. 996 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press [Google Scholar]
  • 85.WMO. 2010. Scientific assessment of ozone depletion: 2010 Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project-Report No. 52. Geneva, Switzerland: WMO.
  • 86.Ravishankara A, Daniel JS, Portmann RW. 2009. Nitrous oxide (N2O): the dominant ozone-depleting substance emitted in the 21st century. Science 326, 123–125 10.1126/science.1176985 (doi:10.1126/science.1176985) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Löscher CR, Kock A, Koenneke M, LaRoche J, Bange HW, Schmitz RA. 2012. Production of oceanic nitrous oxide by ammonia-oxidizing archaea. Biogeosciences 9, 2095–2122 10.5194/bg-9-2419-2012 (doi:10.5194/bg-9-2419-2012) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Alyson ES, Carolyn B, Matthew RM, Casciotti KL. 2011. Isotopic signature of N2O produced by marine ammonia-oxidizing archaea. Science 333, 1282–1285 10.1126/science.1208239 (doi:10.1126/science.1208239) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Bange H, Andreae MO. 1999. Nitrous oxide in the deep waters of the world's oceans. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 13, 1127–1135 10.1029/1999GB900082 (doi:10.1029/1999GB900082) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Freing A, Wallace DWR, Bange HW. 2012. Global oceanic production of nitrous oxide. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 367, 1245–1255 10.1098/rstb.2011.0360 (doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0360) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Codispoti L, Elkins J, Yoshinari T, Friederich G, Sakamoto C, Packard T. 1992. On the nitrous oxide flux from productive regions that contain low oxygen waters. In Oceanography of the Indian Ocean (ed. Desai BN.), pp. 271–284 Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Balkema [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Naqvi SWA, Bange HW, Farías L, Monteiro PMS, Scranton MI, Zhang J. 2010. Marine hypoxia/anoxia as a source of CH4 and N2O. Biogeosciences 7, 2159–2190 10.5194/bg-7-2159-2010 (doi:10.5194/bg-7-2159-2010) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Kock A, Schafstall J, Dengler M, Brandt P, Bange HW. 2012. Sea-to-air and diapycnal nitrous oxide fluxes in the eastern tropical North Atlantic Ocean. Biogeosciences 9, 957–964 10.5194/bg-9-957-2012 (doi:10.5194/bg-9-957-2012) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Nevison CD, Weiss RF, Erickson DJ., III 1995. Global oceanic emissions of nitrous oxide. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 15 809–15 820 10.1029/95JC00684 (doi:10.1029/95JC00684) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Suntharalingam P, Sarmiento JL. 2000. Factors governing the oceanic nitrous oxide distribution: simulations with an ocean general circulation model. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 14, 429–454 10.1029/1999GB900032 (doi:10.1029/1999GB900032) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Bange HW, Bell TG, Cornejo M, Freing A, Uher G, Upstill-Goddard RC, Zhang G. 2009. MEMENTO: a proposal to develop a database of marine nitrous oxide and methane measurements. Environ. Chem. 6, 195–197 10.1071/EN09033 (doi:10.1071/EN09033) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Stramma L, Johnson GC, Sprintall J, Mohrholz V. 2008. Expanding oxygen-minimum zones in the tropical oceans. Science 320, 655–658 10.1126/science.1153847 (doi:10.1126/science.1153847) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Bouillon S, et al. 2008. Mangrove production and carbon sinks: a revision of global budget estimates. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 22, GB2013. 10.1029/2007GB003052 (doi:10.1029/2007GB003052) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Middelburg JJ, Levin LA. 2009. Coastal hypoxia and sediment biogeochemistry. Biogeosciences 6, 1273–1293 10.5194/bg-6-1273-2009 (doi:10.5194/bg-6-1273-2009) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Voss M, et al. 2011. Nitrogen processes in coastal and marine ecosystems. In The European nitrogen assessment (eds Sutton MA, Howard CM, Erisman JW, Billen G, Bleeker A, Grennfelt P, Grinsven Hv, Grizzetti B.), pp. 147–176 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Gao H, et al. 2012. Intensive and extensive nitrogen loss from intertidal permeable sediments of the Wadden Sea. Limnol. Oceanogr. 57, 185–198 10.4319/lo.2012.57.1.0185 (doi:10.4319/lo.2012.57.1.0185) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Fennel K, Spitz YH, Letelier RM, Abbott MR, Karl DM. 2002. A deterministic model for N2 fixation at stn. ALOHA in the subtropical North Pacific Ocean. Deep Sea Res. 49, 1–3 [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Hood RR, Coles VJ, Capone DG. 2004. Modeling the distribiution of Trichodesmium and nitrogen fixation in the Atlantic Ocean. J. Geophys. Res. 109, C06006 10.1029/2002JC001753 (doi:10.1029/2002JC001753) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Oguz T, Ducklow HW, Malanotte-Rizzoli P. 2000. Modeling distinct vertical biogeochemical structure of the Black Sea: dynamical coupling of the oxic, suboxic, and anoxic layers. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 14, 1331–1352 10.1029/1999GB001253 (doi:10.1029/1999GB001253) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Voss M, Dippner JW, Montoya JP. 2001. Nitrogen isotope patterns in the oxygen deficient waters of the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean (ETNP). Deep Sea Res. I 48, 1905–1921 10.1016/S0967-0637(00)00110-2 (doi:10.1016/S0967-0637(00)00110-2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Hood RR, Christian JR. 2008. Ocean nitrogen cycle modeling. In Nitrogen in the marine environment (eds Capone DG, Bronk DA, Mulholland MR, Carpenter EJ.), pp. 1445–1495 Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Fasham MJR, Ducklow HW, McKelvie SM. 1990. A nitrogen-based model of plankton dynamics in the oceanic mixed layer. J. Mar. Res. 48, 591–639 [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Sarmiento JL, Slater RD, Fasham MJR, Ducklow HW, Toggweiler JR, Evans GT. 1993. A seasonal 3-dimensional ecosystem model of nitrogen cycling in the North Atlantic euphotic zone. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 7, 417–450 10.1029/93GB00375 (doi:10.1029/93GB00375) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Gruber N, Sarmiento J. 1997. Global patterns of marine nitrogen fixation and denitrification. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 11, 235–266 10.1029/97GB00077 (doi:10.1029/97GB00077) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Josey SA, Kent EC, Taylor PK. 2002. Wind stress forcing of the ocean in the SOC climatology: comparisons with the NCEP-NCAR, ECMWF, UWM/COADS, and Hellerman and Rosenstein datasets. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 32, 1993–2019 (doi:10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032<1993:WSFOTO>2.0.CO;2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Trenberth KE, Stepaniak DP, Hurrell JW, Fiorino M. 2001. Quality of reanalyses in the tropics. J. Clim. 14, 1499–1510 (doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<1499:QORITT>2.0.CO;2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Gruber N. 2011. Warming up, turning sour, losing breath: ocean biogeochemistry under global change. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 369, 1980–1996 10.1098/rsta.2011.0003 (doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Feely RA, Doney SC, Cooley SR. 2009. Ocean acidification: present conditions and future changes in a high-CO2 world. Oceanography 22, 36–47 10.5670/oceanog.2009.95 (doi:10.5670/oceanog.2009.95) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Keeling RF, Körtzinger A, Gruber N. 2010. Ocean deoxygenation in a warming world. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2, 199–229 10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163855 (doi:10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163855) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Hutchins DA, Fu F-X, Zhang Y, Warner ME, Feng Y, Portune K, Bernhardt PW, Mulholland MR. 2007. CO2 control of Trichodesmium N2 fixation, photosynthesis, growth rates, and elemental ratios: implications for past, present, and future ocean biogeochemistry. Limnol. Oceanogr. 52, 1293–1304 10.4319/lo.2007.52.4.1293 (doi:10.4319/lo.2007.52.4.1293) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Beman JM, Chow C-E, King AL, Feng Y, Fuhrman JA, Andersson A, Bates NR, Popp BN, Hutchins DA. 2011. Global declines in oceanic nitrification rates as consequence of ocean acidification. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 208–213 10.1073/pnas.1011053108 (doi:10.1073/pnas.1011053108) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.de Bie MJ, Middelburg JJ, Starink M, Laanbroek HJ. 2002. Factors controlling nitrous oxide at the microbial community and estuarine scale. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser 240, 1–9 10.3354/meps240001 (doi:10.3354/meps240001) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Suntharalingam P, Buitenhuis E, Le Quéré C, Dentener F, Nevison C, Butler JH, Bange HW, Forster G. 2012. Quantifying the impact of anthropogenic nitrogen deposition on oceanic nitrous oxide. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L07605. 10.1029/2011GL050778 (doi:10.1029/2011GL050778) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES