Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Jan 26;18(1):e0281010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281010

The king’s spice cabinet–Plant remains from Gribshunden, a 15th century royal shipwreck in the Baltic Sea

Mikael Larsson 1,*, Brendan Foley 1,2
Editor: John P Hart3
PMCID: PMC9879437  PMID: 36701280

Abstract

Maritime archaeological investigations of the wreck of the medieval warship Gribshunden (1495), flagship of King Hans of Denmark and Norway, have revealed diverse artifacts including exotic spices imported from far distant origins: saffron, ginger, clove, peppercorns, and almond. The special circumstances of the vessel’s last voyage add unique context to the assemblage. Gribshunden and an accompanying squadron conveyed the king, courtiers, noblemen, and soldiers from Copenhagen to a political summit in Kalmar, Sweden. At that conference, Hans expected the Swedish Council to elect him king of Sweden, and thereby fulfill his ambition to reunify the Nordic region under a single crown. To achieve this, Hans assembled in his fleet and particularly aboard his flagship the people and elite cultural signifiers that would convince the Swedish delegation to accept his rule. Along the way, the ships anchored near Ronneby, Blekinge. Written sources record that an explosion and fire caused Gribshunden to sink off Stora Ekön (Great Oak Island). Exotic spices were status markers among the aristocracy in Scandinavia and around the Baltic Sea during the Middle Ages (1050–1550 CE). Until the Gribshunden finds, these extravagances have rarely or never been represented archaeologically. Evidence of their use and consumption in medieval Scandinavia has been limited to sparse written references. We present here the botanical remains from the Gribshunden shipwreck and compare them to previous archaeobotanical finds from the medieval Baltic region. These opulent status symbols traveled with a medieval king en route to a major historical event. The combination of textual and archaeological evidence allows a novel analytical view of the social environment in which these luxurious foods were consumed.

Introduction

On the southern coast of Sweden, among the islands of the Blekinge archipelago, sits the wreck of a late medieval royal warship variously known as Gribshunden or Griffen (Fig 1). Built in 1485, probably in the Low Countries [1], the vessel was a “floating castle” that served as the flagship and mobile seat of government for King Hans of Denmark and Norway. Just before midsommar, at the end of June 1495, the ship anchored off Stora Ekön (Great Oak Island) [2]. Hans disembarked, presumably with a noble retinue to meet officials in the nearby town of Ronneby. While he was ashore, a fire and explosion claimed the ship. The hull settled onto a soft sea floor in about 11 meters of water. Some salvage undoubtedly occurred immediately, as the masts and rigging and perhaps even superstructure stood above the sea surface. Eventually, the upper works collapsed and fine-grained sediments infilled the hull, preserving the archaeological deposit.

Fig 1. Location of the Gribshunden shipwreck.

Fig 1

Map depicting the wreck site in southeastern Sweden (red quadrant), and showing the main medieval towns along the Baltic coasts with archaeobotanical data discussed in this paper. Area of detail show wreck site located north of Stora Ekön island. Republished from Media Tryck, Lund University under a CC BY license, with permission from Frida Nilsson, original copyright 2022.

The circumstances of the ship’s final voyage are noteworthy. Gribshunden sank while Hans sailed with it and a fleet to a political summit in Kalmar, Sweden to meet with the Swedish regent and noble council. At the culmination of the five-week negotiation, Hans expected the Swedish Council to elect him as their king, thereby fulfilling his ambition to re-unite the Nordic region under a single monarch. To achieve this result, Hans would demonstrate to the Swedish delegation the authority and wealth of his crown. He carried with him all manner of power displays: his warships, shipboard artillery, a battalion of professional soldiers, and small arms including crossbows and gunpowder weapons. Buttressing these hard power elements were soft power signifiers: coinage, artwork, splendid livery, and delicacies for feasting. Archaeological investigations of the site have produced material evidence of all of these facets of Hans’ strategy [37].

This study presents macrofossil botanical finds from the 2021 excavation campaign, which revealed a diverse assemblage of plant materials, including exotic flavorings with no Nordic-region archaeological precedent: saffron, cloves, and ginger. The same context produced peppercorns, mustard, caraway, dill, raspberry and blackberry, cucumber, grape, almonds, and hazelnuts. Preservation of these organic remains is due to the Baltic Sea’s exceptional environmental conditions. The Baltic is well-known for preserving archaeological material, particularly wooden shipwrecks. At the Gribshunden wreck site, this is due to low salinity of about 7.7 Practical Salinity Units, combined with low temperatures averaging 9 degrees Celsius (seasonal range 2–19˚ C) [5,6]. These factors prevent the propagation of the wood-eating Teredo navalis shipworm [8,9]. The wooden s lhipwreck structure on the sea floor creates a microenvironment by capturing drifting marine algae, with seasonal deposits of algae reaching depths of 40 cm in and around the wreck. As the algae decays, localized areas of oxygen depletion occur, characterized by the presence of white mats of organic matter. These factors contribute to excellent preservation of archaeological remains, particularly plant foods carried aboard the ship: cereals, oilseeds, fruits, vegetables, spices, nuts, and berries. All have been recovered from this site and identified through archaeobotanical research.

This is the first report on archaeobotanical material from the wreck site. We present all economic plant species found on this late medieval ship and archaeobotanical references for each taxon are summarized. The geographical frame of this investigation is centered on Scandinavia and the Baltic Sea area: we refer to this as the “Baltic region”. The temporal focus is the Middle Ages. In Scandinavian historical archaeology, this is typically divided into the Early Medieval period (1050–1300 CE) and the Late Medieval period (1300–1550 CE).

The plant remains from the wreck site are important for two reasons. First, the diversity of edible plants includes exotic species rarely or never found in medieval archaeological contexts, and most specimens from the wreck exhibit an excellent degree of preservation condition. The use of some of these spices in northern Europe is known only from medieval written sources. The Gribshunden collection of spices represents the earliest archaeological examples for several of these luxury goods in the Baltic region, and in Northern Europe [1013]. Second, the archaeological context of the plant remains is the sterncastle of the royal flagship. Here the archaeobotanical assemblage is found in an area accessible to certain sailors, such as the helmsmen, but hypothesized to have housed only senior officers and royal/noble passengers. This presents an opportunity to learn more about the social environments in which luxury goods were consumed in late medieval northern Europe. Artifacts recovered from the loci immediately surrounding the spices represent possessions of the king and noblemen. Finds include a purse of silver coins, armor, weapons, a cask containing a butchered sturgeon, and a wooden tankard incised with a crown symbol [3,14]. The newly-discovered stores of exotic foods and spices attest to other extravagances.

The Gribshunden assemblage of provisions and exotic spices is the only known archaeological example of a substantially complete royal medieval pantry. The archaeobotanical data and the context of the botanical finds provide an unparalleled insight into the workings of the late medieval Nordic royal court. We glimpse the cultural and social signifiers of the elite: how the monarch and nobility behaved, what they ate, how their food was prepared. This allows discussion of medieval elite consumption and the social differentiation of foodways.

Previous marine archaeobotanical work has identified plant remains from a few shipwrecks in Northern Europe, notably the 1545 wreck of Henry the VIII’s warship Mary Rose and the 15th century Copper Wreck near Gdansk [1517]. These studies contribute information about trade and commodity consumption, victualling at sea, and life on board ship. The botanical finds from these wrecks are compared and discussed in relation to the new finds from Gribshunden. These recent botanical discoveries are of some relevance to the experience of the medieval maritime world, but more generally provide insights to the use of luxury foods in the highest echelons of medieval society in the Baltic region.

Archaeological background

The wreck at Stora Ekön was re-discovered by sport scuba divers in the 1960-70s. Around 2000 a diver recognized the possibility that it was a medieval shipwreck, based on the distinctive oak gun carriages that once held wrought iron artillery. The Blekinge County Administrative Board then engaged a maritime archaeological reconnaissance of the wreck. This showed the main wreck site is approximately 30 m long and 10 m wide, with coherent structure underlying a mass of disarticulated and semi-articulated timbers. Between 2000 and 2012 archaeologists recovered nine oak gun carriages, collected thirteen dendrochronological samples from various structural elements, performed a limited test excavation along the centerline at the stern of the ship, and conducted an acoustic survey over the site. Concurrent with these archaeological activities, a naval historian identified the wreck as Gribshunden [1821].

After a multi-year hiatus, a new research initiative was launched in 2019 and a second limited excavation trench was opened. This straddled the starboard side of the hull slightly aft of amidships, revealing hull structure and producing 60 artifacts and samples [22]. Activities in 2020 and 2021 consisted of a metal detection survey, recovery of wooden cask components for dendrochronology and analytical chemistry, and a third excavation adjacent to the 2019 trench [5,6,23].

Materials and methods

Maritime archaeological excavation and sampling

Archaeological investigation in and around the locus of the archaeobotanical remains discussed here took place over two excavation campaigns (Fig 2). In 2019, a trench measuring 2 x 6 x 1.5 m was excavated forward of the archaeobotanical sampling locus. No archaeobotanical investigation was conducted during that excavation. In 2021, a trench measuring 2 x 3 x 1.2 m was placed aft and inboard of the 2019 trench, separated from it by about 1.3 m. Diving archaeologists employed standard excavation tools and methods, including a venturi water dredge for removal of suspended sediments. After each excavation rotation, a mesh catchment bag attached to the water dredge discharge was recovered and sifted on the deck of the surface support platform. The material captured in the catchment bag from a locus in the western corner of the trench included almond shell and peppercorns. Subsequent excavation in that locus delivered more almonds and peppercorns, and revealed deposits of saffron directly underneath and adjacent to a deck beam, in a stratum 5–10 cm below the sediment surface. Archaeological divers collected the saffron deposits by hand, and observed several additional discrete concentrations of archaeobotanical remains in the trench balk. They collected sediment block samples from this locus for archaeobotanical analysis, placing them in plastic containers. The saffron was recovered in a water-filled plastic sample bag. These samples were stored initially at Blekinge Museum and later shifted to the Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Lund University. At the conclusion of the excavation campaign, the trench balk at the spice locus was reinforced with casks staves that originated from a position directly adjacent to the spices, with the intention of continuing excavation and sample recovery in that locus in future interventions [6].

Fig 2. Three-dimensional model of the wreck site.

Fig 2

The model produced during the 2019–21 field campaigns illustrates the Gribshunden shipwreck site. The square identifies the outline of the excavation trench from where the archaeobotanical samples were collected. Republished from Media Tryck, Lund University under a CC BY license, with permission from Frida Nilsson, original copyright 2022.

All necessary permits were obtained for the described study, which complied with all relevant regulations. The 2021 maritime excavation campaign was conducted under permit 431-1299-2021 (permit holder: Blekinge Museum; project archaeological director Brendan Foley) authorized by Länsstyrelsen i Blekinge, Sweden (Blekinge County Administrative Board). The collected and studied botanical specimens are curated at the Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Lund University (address Helgonavägen 3, 223 63 Lund, Sweden, for contact: Dr. M Larsson).

Processing and laboratory methods

The botanical remains recovered from Gribshunden originate from four sediment block samples of 0.5–2.0 liter each. All samples were processed by floatation with running water, and sieved over three mesh sizes: 1 mm, 0.4 mm and 0.25 mm. The saffron stigma masses were collected by hand by divers, and the deposits were placed in a 5-liter bag during the dive. This was not subject to wet-sieving; the “water-sample” (sample 5, Table 1) contained the concentrations of only stigmas. Flotation was unnecessary, and would have posed a risk of damaging the delicate strands.

Table 1. List of economic plant species in the archaeobotanical plant remains from the Gribshunden wreck site.

    Sample no. 1 2 3 4 5
Sample vol. (liter) 2,0 2,0 1,6 0,5 water sample
Cereal grain Botanical remains
Triticum cf. aestivum Bread wheat testa · · 1 · ·
Triticum sp. Wheat indet. testa · 2 · · ·
Oilseeds
Linum usitatissimum Flax seed · · 1 · ·
Fruits and vegetables
Cucumis sativus Cucumber seed · 1 · · ·
Vitis vinifera Grape seed · 1 · · ·
Rubus fruticosus Blackberry seed · 1 1 · ·
Rubus idaeus Raspberry seed · · 1 · ·
Berry, indet. seed · · 1 · ·
Herbs and spices (and medicinal plants)
Anethum graveolens Dill fruit · 1 2 · ·
Brassica nigra Black mustard seed 7 82 33 4 ·
Carum carvi Caraway fruit 1 · 2 · ·
cf. Carum carvi Caraway fruit, mesocarp missing 3 1 4 · ·
Crocus sativus Saffron stigmas 450 ml
Crocus sativus Saffron ground stigmas (powder conglomerates) · · · ·
Humulus lupulus Hop fruit 1 · · · ·
Hyoscyamus niger Henbane seed · 1 · · ·
Piper nigrum Black pepper fruit (peppercorn) 179 979 658 139 ·
Piper nigrum Pepper stalk segment 1 9 6 · ·
Syzygium aromaticum Clove whole flower bud · 5 3 1 ·
Syzygium aromaticum Clove hypanthium, complete/near complete 8 32 14 7 ·
Syzygium aromaticum Clove hypanthium, half or less 23 88 62 27 ·
Syzygium aromaticum Clove globular head 5 17 11 · ·
Syzygium aromaticum Clove petals 9 15 24 3 ·
Syzygium aromaticum Clove ovary, complete/near complete 18 42 43 11 ·
Syzygium aromaticum Clove stalk segment 1 8 9 1 ·
Zingiber officinale Ginger rhizome epidermis parts 5 34 23 2 ·
Nuts
Corylus avellana Hazel endocarp fragm. 1 · · · ·
Prunus dulcis Almond testa, complete 8 35 15 17 ·
Prunus dulcis Almond testa, half or less 29 126 91 25 ·
Prunus dulcis Almond seed fragm. ·
Prunus dulcis Almond endocarp fragm. · 8 6 1 ·

Morphological identification of seeds, fruits, nutshells, flower parts, and leaves was undertaken using a microscope (x8–80), with comparisons made to relevant literature [2426] and to a modern reference collection of seeds at the Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Lund University. Since recovery, all plant remains have been stored in containers with water. The plant remains were kept in water during microscopic examination.

After identification, all species were quantified from individual samples. In some cases (clove and almond), different botanical parts of a species were identified; these parts were counted as separate examples. Complete and incomplete specimens were also distinguished. The approximate quantity of saffron was obtained by pouring the water sample containing the stigmas into a measuring beaker, allowing time for the stigmas to settle to the bottom of the beaker, and reading the volume. Presence of saffron stigmas in the four sediment samples (present in the hundreds) is indicated with (√), as it is unclear if the stigmas were in situ or were deposited in the samples due to excavation activity during which some stigmas dispersed into the water and might have settled on the seabed within the excavated unit. Presence of small endosperm (seed) fragments from almond, leaf parts and undetermined specimens are indicated in Tables 1 and S1 by presence (√). All analyzed plant material are held at the Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Lund University.

Results

The exotic spices, and the total botanical assemblage

All recovered botanical remains were subfossil specimens. Identified economic plant species are presented in Table 1. The preservation state is noteworthy. Many plant remains feature fruit flesh and skin, still colored (Figs 39) and the saffron retains its distinctive aroma after 527 years submerged. Excluding the saffron stigmas which were quantified by volume (450 ml), a total of 3097 plant remains representing 40 species were identified from the sediment samples (full dataset S1 Table). They comprise 1 species of cereal, 1 species of oilseed, 4 species of fruits and vegetables, 8 species of spices, 2 species of nuts, 1 species of medicinal plant, and 23 species of wild taxa. The spices are numerically the most abundant plant remains in the assemblage, representing 86%, followed by nuts 12%. Crops, fruits, and vegetables make up a small portion of all the edible plants recovered thus far from the shipwreck. Wild taxa are represented by 2% in the plant assemblage, and these most likely entered the deposits over time as contamination from the coastal environment. In addition to the identified plant remains listed in S1 Table, sediment samples contained small plant debris from marine algae and remains of marine animals (shells, ligaments, perioctracum from mussels).

Fig 3. Saffron from the Gribshunden shipwreck site.

Fig 3

Plant parts of saffron: a-c) stigmas, d) petri dish showing a portion of the recovered saffron stigmas.

Fig 9. Variety of plant species from the Gribshunden shipwreck.

Fig 9

Seeds of: a) cucumber, b) grape, c) black mustard, d) raspberry, e) hop, f) henbane.

The archaeobotanical data discussed in this paper include only economic plant species typically used in food preparation or medicinal application. Wild taxa of the local flora fall outside the scope of this research, and therefore are excluded. Notes on some critical identifications of plants rarely found or previously unknown from archaeological deposits are discussed below.

Crocus sativus (Fig 3). The most important part of the saffron flower for human use is one of its female organs: the style, ending in three red-orange stigmas. Identification of saffron was based on the presence of these stigmas, also known as filaments, strands, or saffron threads. The recovered saffron stigmas do not consist of smaller pieces that have broken apart over time, or from handling by divers or during laboratory preparation and examination. Instead, the stigmas have a characteristic trumpet-like shape at the end of the pestle, indicating that the recovered strands are intact. Today and presumably historically, the price of saffron is determined by its quality. Grading criteria include the length of the threads. High-grade saffron is composed of whole or cut threads (stigma with or without part of the style), and premium quality eliminates the yellow/orange part of the style [27]. Typical length of modern saffron stigmas are ca 2.5–3.5 cm [28]. Measurement of 50 Gribshunden stigmas with removed styles produced an average length of 2.36 cm. Thus, the Gribshunden saffron threads are consistent with modern grading for premium quality.

Several discrete concentrations of red material were noticed in sample 3, ranging in size from ca. 1x1 cm to ca. 5x5 cm. These were observed in the sample prior to wet sieving, and were removed from the sediment in which they were embedded. Each of the concentrations was placed in water, which quickly turned red/orange. Examination under a light microscope showed the concentrations were finely ground saffron stigmas; the water was colored as the powder dispersed into it. It is unclear how the ground saffron was stored on the ship, as no container or bag enclosing the powdery substance was observed. We hypothesize that the saffron might have been in textile bags which have not survived.

Piper nigrum (Fig 4). Black pepper was identified by the whole unprocessed fruits, in which the outer skin (epicarp) was complete or near complete among most of the specimens. The outer skin of the fruit shows the characteristic pattern of wrinkles from the drying process of unripe fruit. Some fruits entirely lacked their outer skin, or retained only fragments of it. This condition exposed the characteristic radial vessels of the fruit, resembling that of white peppercorn. Peppercorns with partially preserved and shriveled skin were able to be identified as black pepper. The loss of the outer skin surrounding the fruit is likely due to degradation over time or from handling during excavation or wet sieving. Some immature specimens and stalk parts were also recovered, including a few small stalk segments bearing unripe berries.

Fig 4. Black pepper from the Gribshunden shipwreck.

Fig 4

Plant parts of black pepper: a-c) different views of peppercorns, d) stalk segments, some with unripe berries of pepper.

Prunus dulcis (Fig 5). Almond was identified by the presence of its seed coat (testa). While the seed coats of some specimens were complete, most were incompletely preserved with seed coat halves or mere shreds. Small white seed bits from endosperm were attached to some seed coats. Fragments of the nutshell (endocarp) from almond were also found among the samples, characterized by pitted canals containing vascular bundles.

Fig 5. Almond from the Gribshunden shipwreck.

Fig 5

Plant parts of almond: a) seed coats, b) nutshells.

Syzgium aromaticum (Figs 6 and 7). Cloves consist of a lower quadrangular stalked portion (the hypanthium) that terminates in four thick spreading sepals, which surrounds a globular head (the crown) having four imbricated petals. Identification of clove was possible from complete unopened flower buds preserved, but also from different fragmented parts of clove that have broken up over time. These parts include the hypanthium, the globular head, detached membranous petals that would have been attached to the globular head, and fragmented ovaries and ovules which have been released from broken up ovaries situated in the upper part of the hypanthium. Clove stalk was also identified, as were numerous oil glands from the disintegrated hypanthium observed in the samples. Oil glands were not quantified, as these were present in the thousands.

Fig 6. Clove from the Gribshunden shipwreck.

Fig 6

Plant parts of clove: a-b) flower buds, c) stalks, d) side view of complete ovaries.

Fig 7. Clove from the Gribshunden shipwreck.

Fig 7

Different views of detached globular head of clove: a) side view with attached petals, b) side view without petals, c) proximal side (above) of globular head, d) distal side (below) of globular head.

Zingiber officinale (Fig 8). Ginger was represented by small parts of rhizome skin (epidermis) from the creeping underground stem. From rhizome skin parts, it was possible to identify the circular scars representing the nodes with small scales and buds, as well as small black dots on the surface of the skin. While most fragmentary skin was ca. 10–40 mm in length, a larger piece measured 60 mm. Adhering to some of the rhizome skins were whitish fibrous threads.

Fig 8. Ginger from the Gribshunden shipwreck.

Fig 8

Plant parts of ginger: a-c) rhizome skin showing scales and auxiliary buds, d) close-up of black-spotted surface of skin.

Cucumis sativus (Fig 9A). The seeds of cucumber can be difficult to distinguish from those of melon (Cucumis melo), as the size of the seeds are variable. Identification was possible by examining the fine anatomy of the seed surface: C. sativus has fine straight parallel lines in the middle of the seeds’ surface, and parallel lines which follow the oval shape of the seed. In comparison, C. melo have fine parallel lines of cells on the entire seed surface [29].

Discussion

Economic plants from the Gribshunden shipwreck and archaeological comparanda

The economic plant species from the Gribshunden botanical assemblage represent a wide range of food plants, presented here in five food categories: cereals, oilseeds, fruits and vegetables, spices and nuts. We acknowledge the overlap between culinary and medicinal applications of these plants. Henbane is the only non-food plant identified in this assemblage. Henbane had medicinal and magical purposes, and is presented under a separate heading. The archaeological context can help determine the most likely use for the recovered plants. All botanical remains from the Gribshunden shipwreck were recovered from sediments within a one square meter unit located toward the stern of the ship. The locus that produced the botanical remains also held several wooden casks presumed to have contained foodstuffs and beverages [3,23] Among these plant species, all are edible except henbane, which was used only medicinally. Then, as now, some of these plants are commonly consumed as flavorings (saffron, black pepper, clove, ginger, black mustard, dill, caraway), others eaten as snacks or used in baking (nuts, berries, grapes, flax), and some could be eaten as part of a meal (cucumber). Grapes could have been consumed as raisins. Raisins and almonds could be consumed alone or as ingredients in prepared dishes.

It is unclear how these food plants were stored and transported. No containers of wood, metal, glass, or ceramic were excavated in the same locus. Similarly, this locus produced no remains of bags made from textile or leather, though it is possible that bags simply have not survived. Shells from nuts and ground saffron (conglomerates of ground stigmas) were recovered in the botanical assemblage, suggesting that these foods were handled and prepared close to the sample area shortly before the ship sank. From this, we propose that the economic plant remains were foremost intended as foodstuffs.

We speculate that the ground saffron was separated into several small packages. This possibly suggests medicinal doses or discrete volumes of flavorings for food or beverage servings; it could also indicate division based on ownership, or even packaging as gifts. However, detailed discussion of specific culinary use or healing properties of respective food plants during the Middle Ages is outside the scope of this paper. Medicinal preparation and application of these spices in medieval Europe was diverse, and information from Scandinavia is at best fragmentary. An overview of previous archaeobotanical data from the medieval Baltic Sea region with reference to selected food plants recovered from Gribshunden is summarized in Table 2. For each of the five food categories, we present the individual Gribshunden plant species with a summary of relevant published archaeobotanical documentation for medieval Scandinavia and the Baltic region. The archaeological record is, of course, incomplete. Cereal grains, oilseeds, nutshells, or aromatic fruit or seed condiments are sometimes represented in archaeological deposits. However, those plants used for their vegetative parts rarely survive archaeologically, unless preserved in the waterlogged contexts of latrines, wells, or underwater environments. Preservation of food plants in the macrofossil record may further be prevented if processed and used in other forms, such as ground or as powder, or pressed into oil. Written sources that mention rare food plants can, however, complement archaeobotanical data with insights into the procurement and consumption of these plants.

Table 2. Previously recorded archaeobotanical finds of imported or rare food plant found at the Gribshunden shipwreck that illustrates the evidence of these in the Baltic Sea region during a time sequence from the Early to Late Medieval Age using presence and absence.

    Plant species Almond (Prunus dulcis) Black pepper (Piper nigrum) Clove (Syzygium aromaticum) Cucumber (Cucumis sativus) Ginger (Zingiber officinale) Grape (Vitis vinifera) Saffron (Crocusa sativus)
Timeline (CE) Countries  
Early Medieval Age (1050–1300) 1100 Denmark              
Sweden  
Northern Germany  
Northern Poland  
Estonia  
Finland  
Norway              
1200 Denmark              
Sweden  
Northern Germany  
Northern Poland  
Estonia  
Finland  
Norway              
Late Medival Age (1300–1550) 1300 Denmark            
Sweden  
Northern Germany  
Northern Poland  
Estonia  
Finland  
Norway            
1400 Denmark              
Sweden  
Northern Germany  
Northern Poland  
Estonia  
Finland  
Norway              
1500 Denmark              
Sweden  
Northern Germany  
Northern Poland  
Estonia  
Finland  
Norway              

Species that are commonly represented in medieval contexts are not included (i.e. wheat, flax, hop, local spices, hazel, berries, and henbane). The archaeobotanical records are based on [12,3037].

Cereals

Cereal grain was present in small quantities of a few seed coats from wheat grains (testa), with one grain probably bread wheat, also known as common wheat. Whole unprocessed cereal grain found on shipwrecks is often cargo. However, Gribshunden was a warship on a diplomatic mission, not a cargo-laden trading vessel. It is unknown if Gribshunden carried unprocessed grain as provisions, as most of the hold has not yet been investigated. A 1493 provisions list of another Danish warship, David, includes flour and bread [38]. This ship was equipped with a bakery and full galley. Similar facilities are not mentioned in accounts concerning Gribshunden. Considering the substantial time the king spent aboard his flagship, it must have been similarly outfitted; future excavations are likely to reveal these features. While it is likely that much of the bread and biscuit consumed by the common sailors was supplied from shore, it is probable that a bakery on board Gribshunden provided fresh baked goods for the noble passengers. The recovered wheat grains could have originated in these supplies of wheat flour, or as contamination among other products.

Until modern times, bread wheat was considered a luxurious cereal in the Baltic region. Used for making cakes and bread, it was appreciated for its white flour and dough properties. It produced a leavened loaf not possible to make with flour from the other wheat species [39]. Bread wheat’s medieval exclusivity might lie in dietary traditions and fashions, but it might also be due to its cultivation requirements. It is the most demanding species of all cereals, requiring humus-rich soils and laborious crop processing regimes. From 15th century Scandinavian accounts, cultivation of wheat is described as problematic as it was difficult to keep seed grain pure; rye would start to grow among the wheat rows, and after a few years it dominate the field [40]. Rye and barley were the more common cereal types in medieval Scandinavia, followed by oats [35,41]. Rye was used for bread making. Barley sometimes was used as food in whole-grained groats, but its primary use was in beer production. Oats were sustenance for both people and their horses.

Oilseeds

Plants with oil-rich seeds are represented on Gribshunden by flax. This plant has played an important economic role in Northern Europe since its introduction in the beginning of the first millennium CE. It is commonly found in medieval Baltic domestic archaeological contexts [42,43]. The plant was valued for its nutritious seeds, consumed whole by adding them to foods or pressed to extract oil, or used in medicinal preparations. Besides its seeds, flax was an important source of raw material in fiber production. The widespread documentation of the seeds in archaeological layers indicates that the plant was commonly used across all strata of society. The occurrence of flaxseeds on Gribshunden indicates consumption of the whole seeds, perhaps added to foods such as breads and porridge.

Fruits and vegetables

The plants in this category consist of seeds from four taxa: cucumber, grape, raspberry and blackberry. Cucumber’s botanical classification is as a fruit; but because it is often eaten as part of a main meal, its culinary definition is as a vegetable. Grape is a fruit, consumed fresh or dried as raisins, and in the medieval era it often was a dessert ingredient on elite tables [11]. Raspberry and blackberries are aggregate fruits, commonly referred to as berries, and these are indigenous to woodland areas across the Baltic region. Fresh berries are highly perishable, with shelf lives extending only a few days. However, preservation by drying or other means could prolong their storage life. The seeds from these berries occur frequently in medieval archaeobotanical material from both urban and rural contexts.

Archaeobotanical remains of cucumber from the Baltic region are rare for any period [35,44]. The few reported finds come from urban cultural layers of latrines or backyard deposits. A single seed dated to the 13th century has been recorded from a latrine from the coastal Hanseatic city of Gdansk, Poland, and cucumber seeds dated to the 8th-12th centuries have been reported from the Polish interior [45]. In Tartu, Estonia, cucumber seeds have also been found in excavations of 15th century latrines [46]. By the 16th century, seeds of cucumber become more frequent in archaeological layers from towns along the southern Baltic coast [35], and historical documents from Gdansk mention that cucumbers were grown in gardens [45]. The only medieval botanical evidence of cucumber in Scandinavia is a late medieval find of pollen from a latrine at Svendborg on the island Fyn, Denmark [47].

Grape seeds, or pips, dated to the medieval period are infrequent in Scandinavian archaeology. Grape has been reported from Bergen, Norway dating to 13th-14th century [48], and a few single pips dated to the 14th century have been reported from Sweden and Denmark [35,49]. Grape is more commonly encountered in excavations of Hanseatic towns in northern Poland, northern Germany, and Estonia [12,45,46,50].

If the primary consumption of grape products was as wine, and raisins did not play a significant role as imported goods to Scandinavia, this may explain the scant archaeobotanical finds of grape pips. While most grapes likely were imported from more southern regions, some level of local Baltic cultivation might have been attempted. From the 17th century, a written account from Poland reports that grapes did not ripen and were of poor quality [37]. A Danish bishop mentions in his diaries how the September frosts in 1694 and 1695 caused the local grapevines to lose their leaves [51]. Before the Middle Ages, sporadic finds of grape pips dating to 800–1000 CE have been documented in southern Scandinavia: at the trading town of Hedeby in Northern Schleswig [52], in a Viking Age grave on Gotland, Sweden [53], and from a royal Viking Age complex at Tissø, Denmark [54].

Spices

The eight species listed in this category are commonly employed as food flavorings, using the plants’ seeds, flowers, or rhizomes. Of these, saffron, black pepper, clove, and ginger are from geographical origins far distant from Scandinavia. We refer to these four as exotic spices. The others are species that grow well in the Baltic region: black mustard, dill, caraway, and hop. We refer to them as local spices. Beyond their properties for flavoring and coloring food (saffron), they were also used as food preservatives and medicine [55]. Their presence on Gribshunden complements the Scandinavian and the Baltic region archaeobotanical record, and their mentions in medieval written sources.

Exotic spices. The exotic spices identified from Gribshunden were luxurious foods in medieval North Europe, imported through a chain of traders extending to Asia. These are represented in the Gribshunden botanical assemblage by fruits (black pepper), stigmas (saffron), flower buds and stalks (clove) and rhizome skin (ginger). These plant parts were abundant in the samples from the wreck; this is remarkable because of their archaeological rarity. The delicate fragments of these plants seldom survive in terrestrial archaeological contexts. Spices from Asia were introduced to western and central Europe by the Roman legions during the first millennium CE [56,57], but archaeobotanical material and written sources show that such exotic spices first reach Northern Europe only in the early medieval period [58].

After the development of the Hanseatic League in 12th century, German merchants dominated Baltic trade networks, displacing Scandinavians traders. Historical documents indicate that the Hanse traded exotic spices in the Nordic region, conveyed from the Mediterranean and Asia through the continent to the Baltic coasts [58]. Exotic spices were known in medieval Scandinavia, as evidenced by a handful of historical sources. An early 13th century French cookbook was copied in courts across Europe, and translated to Danish by Henrik Harpestreng (d. 1244) [59,60]. It lists thirty-one abbreviated recipes, with dishes including ingredients and spices available only to the highest social strata: pepper, saffron, clove and ginger. The 1231 cadaster of the Danish King Valdemar II mentions one exotic spice, pepper, in a list of provisions that the king and his court expected on visitations within his kingdom [61]. A 1315 bequest to the abbey of Sorø, on the island of Zealand, Denmark, records that one course of a meal for duke Christopher of Halland and Samsø (he later became King Christopher II), was to be made with pepper [62]. In Sweden, according to an account from 1328 of a merchant in Stockholm, saffron, pepper and ginger were among the spices sold to the organizers of the burial of Birger Persson, the father of Saint Birgitta [63,64]. Later, an estate inventory from 1365 of Queen Blanche of Norway and Sweden lists clove among her spices [65], and in Stockholm in 1467, an account from a religious order mentions pepper and saffron [66].

Medieval written sources from the southern Baltic, especially from the Hanseatic towns in areas of northern Germany, northern Poland, and Estonia, reveal that a greater variety of exotic spices was more frequently consumed there than in Scandinavia, and by a wider but still exclusive segment of the population [12,45,46]. Studies of inventories and purchase lists from Baltic merchants, city councils, guilds, and wealthy households indicate saffron, pepper, clove and ginger were consumed by an expanding elite [11,12,58].

Previous archaeobotanical data from the Baltic region concerning the exotic spices found on Gribshunden are summarized below.

Black pepper is indigenous to the western coast of South India [67,68]. The peppercorns can be used ground, dried, or added whole to foods. While black pepper is mostly employed in cooking as a food seasoning or as a table spice, peppercorns also has medicinal uses. The spice could also have been used to make rancid meat palatable while at sea [69].

Among the four exotic plant species found on Gribshunden, black pepper is the only spice previously found in the Baltic region archaeobotanical record. The early finds of black pepper are rare and consist of a few fruits, an.d these are mostly documented in excavations in Hanseatic towns along the southern Baltic coasts. They occur first in Bremen, Rostock, and Oldenburg, Germany in the 13th-14th century [70]; then somewhat later in Gdansk and Elblag, Poland [71]; and Tartu, Estonia in the 14th-15th century [43]. Its rare archaeological appearances are only in contexts of exclusive buildings associated with high-ranking individuals, suggests pepper consumption was limited to the social elites during this period.

Archaeological documentation of peppercorn in medieval Scandinavia occurs at two sites: a single peppercorn from the 13th century cathedral in Turku, Finland [44], and from a 15th century latrine in Nӕstved, Denmark [72]. While finds of peppercorns increase somewhat in 17th century archaeological contexts, they are still rare. Typically finds are from latrine and waste deposits in urban contexts, such as in Copenhagen [73], and Stockholm and Jönköping, Sweden [74,75]. The Danish Bishop’s hall at St. Botolph’s church produced a single peppercorn [51]. These latter finds coincide with the establishment of several charter companies in northern Europe during the 17th century, including several East Indian Companies, which triggered an expansion of spice importation to the Baltic region.

Saffron joins the other three species previously not found in the archaeological material from Scandinavia or the Baltic region. Saffron is made from the dried stigmas of Crocus sativus, the saffron crocus. It is highly valued for flavoring foods and for coloring them golden-yellow, and for its medicinal properties. The delicate stigmas typically defy archaeological preservation. The recovery of an abundance of saffron stigmas and lumps of ground saffron from Gribshunden is exceptional; no archaeobotanical remains of saffron have previously been reported.

The geographical origin for saffron is not entirely understood. It is believed to have originated in the eastern Mediterranean, and was grown in Southwest Asia and the Mediterranean basin in Classical times [76]. The earliest evidence of saffron comes from iconography and artistic floral motifs of the Bronze Age Minoan culture in the Mediterranean. The ceramic Kamares Cup from Knossos holds an early iconographic representation of the crocus flower dating to 2100–1800 BCE [77]. A fresco depicting saffron in the Palace of Knossos in Crete dates to ca 1700–1600 BCE [78]. Another fresco, dated about 1500 BCE, is the `Saffron Gatherers’ at Akrotiri on the island of Santorini [79,80]. Plant ideograms found on Mycenaean Linear B tablets (1400–1100 BCE) perhaps indicate saffron [81,82]. Cultivation of saffron spread to Spain no later than the 10th century CE, and by the 14th century CE, Spain was a prominent exporter of saffron [83]. While the medieval Baltic trade in exotic spices expanded at the end of the 15th century, the geographic origin of the Gribshunden saffron is as yet undetermined; future aDNA analysis may suggest its source.

Clove and ginger are the two other Gribshunden exotic spices that are without precedent in the medieval Baltic macrofossil record. The aromatic flower buds of clove are commonly used as a spice or for medicinal purposes. The rhizome of ginger can be used fresh, dried as a powder, or preserved in vinegar for similar purposes. The origin of ginger is not known, but it is believed to have evolved in Southeast Asia [84]. Cloves are native to Indonesia [85]. Trade in these spices from India to Europe can be traced back at least as far as the Classical period [75,86]. These spices probably first reached the Baltic region in the Middle Ages through Hanse middlemen [35].

Archaeologically, finds of clove and ginger are both rare and geographically sporadic. The only possible clove find in the Baltic region is pollen detected in a 17th century latrine in Copenhagen [47]. It was tentatively identified as Myrtaceae, and interpreted as clove. Beyond the Baltic, clove pollen has been documented in Dutch cesspits dating from the 16th to 19th centuries [87]. Macrofossil finds of clove have been reported from a few sites. At Les Jacobins convent, France, a few fragments of the flower bud, dated to the 17th century, was documented among embalming plants [88]. At the ancient port of Mantai, Sir Lanka, a site related to the early days of Indian Ocean trade, one clove was found dating to ca. 900–1100 CE [89]. Finds of ginger are limited to two archaeological sites: dry roots reported among foodstuffs in a tomb of a Han woman who died in China 168 BCE [90], and from an excavation at the Port of Qusier al-Qadim, Egypt ca. 1050–1190 CE [91].

Local spices. Spices in this group are plant species that grows well in Scandinavia and were commonly available in the medieval period. These food and beverage flavorings are connected to garden cultivation, and include black mustard, dill, caraway, and hop. Hop is typically not defined as a spice, but we include it in this category because of its primary use as a flavoring and stability agent in beer. Dill and caraway can both be considered spices or herbs depending on which plant parts are used. Their seeds are frequently used to spice stews and soups, or to flavor baked goods. When the aromatic leaves are utilized in cooking or eaten raw, they are commonly described as herbs; or if the root is consumed, a vegetable.

The seeds, aromatic leaves, and roots of the plants in this group are all used for cooking. While all of these parts could be preserved on the shipwreck, only their seeds have been recovered from Gribshunden. Black mustard was most plentiful in the samples, while the other species are more sparsely represented. The seeds of black mustard can be pressed to produce oil, but the predominant use is as a spice and in the production of mustard. It is likely that black mustard, dill, and caraway were available at hand for day-to-day culinary use during the voyage.

Archaeobotanical records from Northern Europe show that some level of gardening existed parallel to arable cultivation beginning in the Early Iron Age [92]. Black mustard and dill are among the spices utilized earliest. They likely were introduced from northern areas of continental Europe, where the Roman occupation influenced food production in Germania and spread the knowledge of garden cultivation [36]. Sporadic finds of black mustard and dill seeds in archaeological contexts are reported from the last centuries BCE and the first centuries CE in southern Scandinavia [93,94]. The diversity of seeds from plants linked to gardening increases in Northern Europe around 800–1000 CE [32,92]. During this time, caraway and hop are occasionally recorded in archaeological layers.

An expanding diversity of species in early medieval Scandinavia coincides with the establishment of self-sufficient monasteries producing vegetables, fruits, herbs and spices at the beginning of the second millennium CE. In the developing urban centers of the 11th and 12th centuries, the archaeobotanical record indicates that horticulture became an important part of household autonomy [31,95,96]. Seeds from black mustard, dill, caraway and hops are represented in many medieval contexts, particularly in urban cultural layers [31,36,97,98]. As such, these species seems to have been well-integrated into local medieval Scandinavia cultivation. Similarly, these species are frequently encountered in archaeobotanical material from medieval southern Baltic coastal towns [58]. The widespread presence of seeds from black mustard, dill, caraway and hops in medieval archaeological layers around the Baltic region suggests that these were commonly grown in gardens, and it is therefore possible that local producers supplied these plants to Gribshunden. Nevertheless, produce that could be supplied locally may still have been sourced from long-distance networks. A study of the Swedish Navy in the 16th and early 17th centuries describes procurement of staple food supplies such as meats, grain, peas, butter, and salt through networks of Baltic ports, but there is no mention of sourcing spices. In that era, vegetables, bread, and beer were typically sourced in proximity to shipyards or picked up during the journey. During the first leg of a voyage it was not uncommon that each sailor brought his own food [99].

Hop was represented in the botanical assemblage by a single fruit (seed). Unlike the other local spices, hop seeds are not utilized. For this reason, only female plants are grown in hop fields to prevent the ripening of fruits. Male plants are cultivated separately for breeding purposes. The flavor and aroma of hops are instead from the oils of the hop cone. Hop’s foremost use is as a flavoring and stability agent in beer-making, and the frequency of its archaeological occurrence may be a testament to the vital role of brewing in medieval society. The oils contained in the cones possess antibiotic properties important to the brewing process. Hops suppress bacterial growth, while allowing brewer’s yeast to thrive. Hop fruits are common in medieval archaeobotanical material from the Baltic region. However, the seeds found in terrestrial archaeological layers are likely a result of unintentional pollination and dispersal of seeds when handling hop cones [100,101]. The single hop seed recovered from Gribshunden suggest that it was accidental contamination, possibly coming in with the beer in barrels, or among other foodstuffs.

Information about local horticulture from Scandinavian written sources of the 15th century is scarce, with the exception of hop, as the late medieval period witnessed the beginnings of domestic brewing regulation. Scandinavian laws from 13th-15th century stipulated farmers’ obligation to grow certain quantities of hops, and also regulated sales of hops [102,103]. Hop is frequently mentioned in Hanseatic towns’ pile duty books (documents recording fees paid by incoming and outgoing vessels) as a plant produced in specific areas [12]. Cultivation regions included Zeeland in the Netherlands, the coast of Jutland, Denmark, and areas of contemporary Poland. From there, it was exported to urban areas around the Baltic for use in commercial and domestic breweries [12], indicating that beer and malt were commonly traded throughout medieval societies [10,104,105].

Nuts

This category comprises two species of nuts: almond, which originates from southern regions with milder climates and was imported to Scandinavia; and hazel, which is indigenous to the Baltic region, but might also have been cultivated. Nuts can easily be stored for long periods. They are an oil-rich food high in calories, and an important source of protein and carbohydrates. They could be eaten raw on their own, added to main dishes, or used in desserts.

Almond was mainly represented in the samples by the seed coat, but also by some shell fragments and bits of endosperm still attached to some seed coats. Archaeological finds of almond are exceptionally rare from the Middle Ages in the Baltic region. The earliest evidence is from Oldenburg, Germany, dated to the 13th and 14th centuries [50], while a later find dates to 17th century Poland [45]. Archaeological excavations conducted in 1937 at Aalborg, Denmark, produced almond shells dated to ca. 1700 [51]. From medieval Scandinavia, evidence of almond consumption is limited to a few written references to the nut: the 1467 account from a monastery in Stockholm [66], and a 1578 post-medieval account of spices purchased for the Swedish royal court [106]. Studies of archival documents associated with some festival purchases in 15th and 16th century Reval (modern Tallinn, Estonia) and Riga, Latvia indicate the upper classes consumed luxuries including almonds during festivals [11]. Almond was particularly versatile on royal tables, used in spiced almond milk, or even in marchpane (marzipan) [107,108].

In contrast to almond, shells from hazelnut are common in both urban and rural medieval contexts around the Baltic region. Evidence of its use dates back to the Mesolithic [109111]. Hazel is native to Europe and grows wild as far north as central Scandinavia. But it also has been cultivated, as management of hazel forests is mentioned in medieval Scandinavian legislation [37]. The species was valued primarily for its nuts, but its leaves were also used for animal fodder [112].

Medicinal plants

Henbane is a poisonous plant often connected to cult, magic, and medicine, e.g. as drug, poison, and in amulets [113]. In small doses henbane could be used as a general analgesic. In large doses it could be used as an ingredient in witches’ ointment. It also acted as a love philter, and at highest doses it was a poison [114116]. It is indigenous to the Mediterranean region, but was introduced to Northern Europe during the Pre-Roman Iron Age, about 400–300 BCE [92,117]. From the first millennium CE henbane seeds occur occasionally in Scandinavian contexts [118]. Henbane is widely detected in various urban medieval contexts throughout northern Europe, likely due to cultivation and common use [119]. However, the plant easily spreads from gardens to other areas around living quarters, so henbane also may represent a weed in urban layers [120,121].

Descriptions of early medieval Scandinavian medicinal use of henbane were recorded by Henrik Harpestreng, physician to Danish King Erik IV. In his herbals Liber Herbarum [122], he recommended direct application of the seeds to relieve toothache. This palliative is also described in a 15th century Swedish medicinal manuscript [123]. Other prescriptions directed heating the seeds over a fire or a hot iron, and leading the resulting smoke onto the aching tooth [114]. Similar treatment was described in other parts of Europe, for example by the herbalist of Queen Elizabeth I in the late 16th century [116].

The henbane seed from Gribshunden may represent onboard medicinal supplies, carried for analgesic purposes. Alternatively, with only a single seed found on Gribshunden so far, it may have been accidental contamination among other food supplies. Given the range of wild taxa in the botanical assemblage, another possibility is that the henbane originated from coastal vegetation. If future excavation on the wreck produces greater numbers of henbane seeds, its purpose may become clear.

Medicinal benefits are possible for the other spices. Then, as now, various food plants were present both in the kitchen and the apothecary. For example, saffron, pepper, cloves, and ginger could have been consumed both for their aromatic and medicinal properties when added to food or beverages. Contextually, the range of economic plant species from Gribshunden represent those typically used in food preparation; only henbane is a non-food plant. For this reason, it is possible that these spices were foremost linked to food consumption, rather than for medicinal use alone.

One exception may be hop. Outside of beer-making, hop also has medicinal application and may have been brought onboard for that use. A sedative effect of hop is its most common medicinal application, able to induce sleep [124]. Bedclothes could be stuffed with plants believed to bring calm: for instance, the fresh odor of hop cones, together with lavender and lemon balm. A Scandinavian archaeological example exists from the casket of a Swedish bishop buried in Lund in 1679 [125]. The stuffing of the pillow and mattresses upon which he laid were filled with plants including hop cones and an abundance of hop seeds. No hop cones have yet been found in the botanical assemblage from Gribshunden; interpretation of similar use is speculative.

Elite consumers of plant foods recovered from Gribshunden

Knowledge about historical victualling and the diet of ships’ crews is primarily derived from written sources. Information on maritime foodstuffs is scant for 15th century Scandinavia, and in the case of Gribshunden, no records detail the diet on board during its last voyage. For the years 1487 and 1493, however, documents provide some expenses for King Hans’ naval fleet [38]. The documents are scattered summaries kept by the king’s secretaries, usually recording supplies of arms and recruitment of soldiers. Notes from 1493 mention funds set aside for ships’ crew victuals. They consumed meat, butter, fish, bread, flour, salt, and vinegar. The accounts relate an ordinary and monotonous diet, similar to the fare of other sailors in medieval northern Europe. Provisions aboard three 16th century Swedish naval ships (Lindormen 1546, Sankt Erik 1561, Vita Falken 1562) list the same foods, with the addition of peas [126]. Nowhere is there mention of spices, vegetables, fruit or berries for the common Jack Tars. Other accounts in Hans’ documents detail consumption of beer and bread, with higher-quality varieties differentiated according to rank and social status [38]. Higher-ranking individuals ate bread and biscuits made from wheat and washed it down with German beer. The working crew endured hard bread and lower quality local beer. Future excavations on Gribshunden may reveal even more stark differences in the food and drink of the nobility and the common soldier and sailor.

Baltic underwater archaeobotany offers additional victualing details from other medieval shipwrecks. Finds on the 15th century Copper Wreck in the gulf of Gdansk included food remains of beans, plums, hazel, walnuts and onions [16]. The wreck also contained garlic, interpreted as medicinal [17]. These archaeobotanical data complement information in documents of the ship’s owner. These list expenses for victuals including meat, fish, salt, butter, fat, bread, flour, and beer [16]. Very few other medieval ships from the Baltic Sea have been archaeobotanically investigated. Two 13th century wrecks are the Gedeby shipwreck, by the island of Falster, Denmark; and a cog vessel close to Oskarshamn, Sweden [127,128]. These were small vessels transporting livestock, grain, and iron. The wrecks produced only a few cereal food plants, interpreted as cargo remains.

Outside the Baltic region, a well-documented wreck from Northern Europe is the 16th century carrack-type warship Mary Rose, flagship of Henry VIII [15]. Botanical remains from the wreck include peppercorn, hops, cereals, hazel, walnut, plum/greengage, cherry, and grapes. While nuts and fruit would have added variety to the diet, it is unclear if these were limited to officers, particularly as the fruits were mainly found in the ship’s hold and some in the galley supplies. The presence of peppercorns on Mary Rose is of particular interest for the study of Gribshunden. The recovery of peppercorn from multiple loci on Mary Rose suggests that some could have been for general use in the galley, while individual crew members also cached some for their personal use [129]. Among the contents of a barbers-surgeon’s chest were a few peppercorns, believed to have been part of medicinal supplies. Future excavations on Gribshunden may reveal similar multiplicity of use.

The plant material from Gribshunden contributes new knowledge about the foodstuffs consumed by the social elite in medieval Scandinavia. Considering that Gribshunden sank in the beginning of June, perishables such as ginger, grapes, berries, and cucumber were likely preserved as dried fruit, pickles, or jams to have been available for consumption all year around. It is unclear if ginger rhizomes were stored fresh or were preserved in some form. If fresh, the rhizomes must have been procured within days of Gribshunden’s departure from Copenhagen, as fresh ginger has a short shelf life. Other foodstuffs recovered from Gribshunden could be stored for far longer than fresh ginger. Spices from far distant origin, such as black pepper, saffron, and cloves would keep for long periods if they remained dry. Dill, black mustard, and caraway were likely sourced locally. Flaxseeds, almond, and hazelnut have long storage lives. It is probable that nuts were stored on board in their shells and cracked opened when ready for consumption, as broken shell parts were recovered from both nut species.

It is tempting to compare this wide variety of fresh produce to records of medieval maritime provisioning; but as the royal flagship, Gribshunden is a special case. Instead, the exotic foodstuffs from the king’s spice cabinet provide a window into the consumption patterns that likely followed in the elite landscapes of castles ashore. Despite the popularity of exotic spices among the medieval aristocracy, very few of these foods have survived archaeologically. The preservation of these plant foods on Gribshunden constitutes a discovery of great historical value. Spices and other exotic foods such as almonds were typically consumed only by society’s wealthiest. On Gribshunden these were not victuals for the working crew. Exotic food items are probably some of the most easily identifiable indicators of social context. King Hans was travelling on the ship together with his courtiers; these expensive exotic foods are linked to these passengers.

Danish archival sources from 1487 relate brief but telling details specific to King Hans’ expenses and activities aboard his flagship [38]. While laid up awaiting favorable winds in 1487 en route to Gotland and at a stop on Bornholm island on the return, Hans gambled on card games. In those few weeks, his recorded losses totaled 42 marks, nearly the annual salary of one of the ship’s senior officers. He ate candy and nuts, and with his companions, drank wine and particularly beer. On that voyage the ship reprovisioned with fresh barrels of local beer, as well as embstøll, a hopped Prussian beer originally brewed in Einbeck, Germany. Other recorded purchases for Hans’ sea voyages are consistent. He bought more confectionaries for the apothecary, nuts, and saffron while voyaging to Års, Jylland, Denmark. The amount of saffron purchased was prodigious: the cost was 36 mark danske, equivalent to nine months of salary for a senior officer on Gribshunden, or 18 months of salary for a sailor [38]. These documentary references combined with the remains of saffron, almonds, and hazelnut recovered from Gribshunden’s 1495 wrecking prove that the king regularly consumed these extravagant foods while at sea, and most probably while ashore.

In addition to information about the specific foodstuffs consumed, the written sources reveal circumstantial information about procedures and etiquette related to the king’s elite milieu at sea. The Gribshunden accounts of 1493 list royal court employees [38]. The “kelderswen” (källarsven), perhaps similar to an army quartermaster, managed the food stores. The “dugeswen”, perhaps similar to a chief steward, was responsible for laying out the royal tables for meals and banquets. No doubt similar roles and procedures were spelled out and followed when King Hans traveled on his flagship two years later.

The social context of luxury foods and spices

Food, both in its acquisition and consumption, provides insights to the economic and social aspects of a society. The archaeobotanical assemblage from Gribshunden shines a light on late medieval Nordic social structure. As King Hans traveled aboard his flagship on its final voyage, accompanied by a fleet of perhaps 18 other vessels, different social groups walked those decks. The king represented the pinnacle of the social hierarchy, the royal court and nobles represented the elite, the ship’s captain and senior officers another stratum, and the hired soldiers and ship’s crew the lowest social group in this floating castle. All of these individuals played important roles in the pageantry of the Kalmar political summit.

Saffron, black pepper, clove, ginger, almonds and grapes were exotic foods and spices out of reach for most people in medieval society due to cost and rarity. Only those who possessed sufficient financial resources could afford these expensive food items, a luxury limited to the elites. The elite certainly enjoyed consuming these foods, but their high cost and exotic nature also marked their social status [130].

The role of luxury foods and spices on Gribshunden may have served different purposes. The types of luxury foods found were primarily those of flavorings, and while at sea, these could have had been used for preparation of meals served to the King and his men, and other dried foods (grapes and nuts) could have been enjoyed as snacks. An interesting analog is a later royal document from 1627, which show that Gustav II Adolf (King of Sweden 1611–32) was well-stocked with spices and other exclusive foods on his naval trips [131]. Cucumbers, almonds, rice, figs, ginger, pepper, anise, nutmeg, saffron and alum were on his menu. Such historic documentation together with the botanical food remains from Gribshunden, suggest that consumption of luxury foods among royals was not limited to the main living quarters on land, but was part of the royal environment at all times, even at sea. Food is more than diet. It is inextricably linked to the expression of social and cultural identity. The consumption of luxurious foods was a crucial aspect of King Hans’ and other monarchs’ presentation of themselves to their subjects.

Had Gribshunden safely arrived in Kalmar, from its decks Hans would have employed all manner of elite signaling to impress the Swedish Council. The consumption of exotic foods certainly was symbolic of prestige and social superiority within Hans’ realm. It also demonstrated that King Hans and medieval Denmark were culturally integrated with the rest of Europe, and the world beyond the continental borders. The goal of the Kalmar negotiations was for Sweden to re-join the Nordic Union, consolidating the entire region under Hans’ rule. During the summer-long summit, Hans would have hosted banquets for the Swedish Council, possibly onboard Gribshunden but more likely on the grounds of Kalmar Castle and within the castle itself. Through hospitality and feasting, food is recognized in many cultures as a tool for the creation and maintenance of social relations. Feasting embodies two principal characteristics: first, a communal aspect of consumption in large groups, with food (and drinks) that are different from everyday practices; and second, a display of social prominence, with the presentation of food conveying economic success, high status, and cultural power [130]. Additionally, knowledge from and of foreign cultures is a way for the élites in stratified societies to manifest their status and secure political power [132]. All of the events that might have procceded in Kalmar were likely constructed not merely for practical purposes; they were political theater. The presentation of exclusive foods and decorative dishes would, in both organization and content, be designed as an integral part of the entertainment, and be a part of the display of the king’s status and power.

The banquets hosted by the elites featured feasting and lavish displays. These established and strengthened relationships, and were critical activities to bind political support and networks between states [133,134]. An example of this from the late medieval period is the great feast hosted by Henry VIII at Greenwich in 1527 to celebrate the conclusion of a treaty with France. From written accounts of the event, the courtly feast displayed a variety of luxurious foods and featured several exotic plant foods, such as clove, ginger, almond, mace, and cinnamon (but no saffron) [108]. If King Hans planned a banquet, the use of exotic foods and spices in elaborate cuisine would have showcased the symbolic power of the Danish crown. It would have been clear to all witnesses and participants that the Danish court followed the culinary trends of European courtly societies. It would have signaled the cosmopolitan identity of the king, his access to luxury commodities from far distant origins, and his royal court’s position in the global economy.

Along with hosting feasts, gift-giving played an integral part in the building and strengthening of relations in medieval culture [135]. Gifts of food and drink were common across medieval society. They could be contributions in kind to feasts or celebrations, or take the form of support and donations to individuals or institutions [136,137]. These gifts were as significant as the rank of the donor. In the upper echelon of northern European society, the range of gifted foodstuffs could be venison or other game, high-status birds, fresh fish, and wine [136]. Gifts played an important role in negotiations as well. The role of spices as prestige commodities during the Middle Ages was underlined by their use as gifts on political occasions [135]. For instance, spices prepared as gifts for ambassadors in the Baltic region are documented from Reval [46]. In 1494, the Reval Town Council sent an ambassador to Moscow. As gifts to dukes and a bishop, he presented foodstuffs including boxes of spices. On another occasion when traveling to meet nobles in Wenden and Narva in 1498, among the foods presented by the ambassador from Reval were pepper, saffron, ginger, and mustard. Gribshunden’s luxury foods similarly might have been intended as representation gifts on arrival in Kalmar. Similar to feasts, gifts made by the crown would express an opportunity to secure the peace by strengthening a personal relationship between the two rulers. Gifts, banquet ingredients, or at-sea consumables: given the context and the circumstances of the journey, all are possible purposes for the exotic foods recovered from Gribshunden.

Conclusion

This first study of plant remains from the 15th century flagship Gribshunden demonstrates that delicate plant parts that normally do not survive in the archaeological contexts on land can persist in the marine environment. The archaeological potential of plant remains in underwater environments connected to wreck sites is extraordinary. The presence of a range of economic plants aboard the ship indicates a high-status lifestyle involving the use of luxury foods. The exceptional finds of saffron, clove, ginger, black peppercorn, and almond from the shipwreck offer a unique keyhole view to the historical consumption and social signifying of luxurious foods. Access to these items was restricted by high cost. On Gribshunden as on shore, the possession and consumption of such luxury plants would be inextricably linked to the most elite social milieu.

Supporting information

S1 Table. List of archaeobotanical plant remains from the Gribshunden wreck site.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Blekinge Museum Director Marcus Sandekjer and Head of Collections Christoffer Sandahl. We acknowledge the 2021 archaeological field team: Jan-Erik Andersson, Staffan von Arbin, Mikael Björk, Paola Derudas, Paolo Iglic, Marie Jonsson, and Phillip Short. We thank Marcus Lecaros for image editing. The authors thank the academic editors and anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by funds awarded to Brendan Foley from Crafood Foundation, Sweden [grant numbers 20190008 and 20200003], the Swordspoint Foundation, USA [no grant number], and the Huckleberry Foundation, USA [no grant number], and by funds awarded to Mikael Larsson from the Swedish Research Council [grant number 2019-02547], supplemented by internal funding from Blekinge Museum and the Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Lund University. Brendan Foley received salary from the Swordspoint Foundation, USA [no grant number], the Huckleberry Foundation, USA [no grant number], Blekinge Museum and the Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Lund University. Mikael Larsson received salary from the Swedish Research Council [grant number 2019-02547]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Hansson A, Linderson H, Foley B. The Danish royal flagship gribshunden–Dendrochronology on a late medieval carvel sunk in the Baltic Sea. Dendrochronologia. 2021;68. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Etting V, Straetkvern K, Gregory D. Gribshunden. In: Nationalmuseets Arbejdsmark 2019. 2019. p. 102–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Macheridis S, Hansson MC, Foley BP. Fish in a barrel: Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus) from the Baltic Sea wreck of the royal Danish flagship Gribshunden (1495). J Archaeol Sci Reports [Internet]. 2020;33(March):102480. Available from: doi: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102480 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ingvardson GT, Müter D, Foley BP. Purse of medieval silver coins from royal shipwreck revealed by X-ray microscale Computed Tomography (μCT) scanning. J Archaeol Sci Reports [Internet]. 2022;43(April):103468. Available from: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2022.103468. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Foley B. Forskningsundersökning av skeppsvrak vid Stora Ekön, RAÄ Ronneby 728. Karlskrona; 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Foley B. Gribshunden Forskningsundersökning av skeppsvrak vid Stora Ekön, RAÄ Ronneby 728 Marinarkeologisk undersökning, 2021. Karlskrona; 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hansson A, Linderson H, Foley B. Casks from Gribshunden (1495)–Dendrochronology of Late Medieval Shipboard Victual Containers. Int J Naut Archaeol [Internet]. 2022;0(0):1–18. Available from: 10.1080/10572414.2022.2132715. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lippert H, Weigelt R, Glaser K, Krauss R, Bastrop R, Karsten U. Teredo navalis in the Baltic Sea: Larval dynamics of an invasive wood-boring bivalve at the edge of its distribution. Front Mar Sci. 2017;4(OCT). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Appelqvist C, Havenhand JN, Toth GB. Distribution and abundance of teredinid recruits along the Swedish coast—Are shipworms invading the Baltic Sea? J Mar Biol Assoc United Kingdom. 2015;95(4):783–90. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Söderberg J. Oceanic thirst? Food consumption in mediaeval Sweden. Scand Econ Hist Rev [Internet]. 2015;63(2):135–53. Available from: 10.1080/03585522.2014.987315. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mänd A. Festive food in medieval Riga and Reval. Mediu Aev Quotidianum. 1999;41:43–93. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Badura M, Możejko B, Święta-Musznicka J, Latałowa M. The comparison of archaeobotanical data and the oldest documentary records (14th–15th century) of useful plants in medieval Gdańsk, northern Poland. Veg Hist Archaeobot. 2015;24(3):441–54. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Poulsen B. The Widening of Import Trade and Consumption around 1200 A.D.: a Danish Perspective. In: Berggren L, Hybel N, Landen A, editors. Cogs, Cargoes, and Commerce: Maritime Bulk Trade in Northern Europe, 1150–1400. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies; 2002. p. 31–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ingvardson GT, Müter D, Foley BP. Purse of medieval silver coins from royal shipwreck revealed by X-ray microscale Computed Tomography (μCT) scanning. J Archaeol Sci Reports. 2022. Jun;43:103468. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gardiner J, Allen MJ, editors. Before the Mast: Life and Death Aboard the Mary Rose. Portsmouth: Mary Rose Trust; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Badura M. The Plant Remains. In: Ossowski W, editor. The Copper Ship a medieval shipwreck and its cargo. Gdansk: National Maritime Museum in Gdansk; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Badura M, Mozejko B, Ossowski W. Bulbs of onion (Allium cepa L.) and garlic (Allium sativum L.) from the 15th-century Copper Wreck in Gdańsk (Baltic Sea): A part of victualling? J Archaeol Sci. 2013;40(11):4066–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Einarsson L, Wallbom B. Marinarkeologisk besiktning och provtagning för datering av ett fartygsvrak beläget i farvattnen syd Saxemara, Ronneby kommun, Blekinge län Kalmar. 2001.
  • 19.Einarsson L, Wallbom B. Fortsatta marinarkeologiska undersökningar av ett fartygsvrak beläget vid St. Ekö Ronneby kommun, Blekinge län. 2002.
  • 20.Einarsson L, Gainsford M. Rapport om 2006 års marinarkeologiska undersökningar av Skeppsvraket vid St. Ekö Saxemara, Ronneby kommun–Blekinge län. 2007.
  • 21.Einarsson L. Rapport om hydroakustisk kartering och kompletterande dendrokronologisk provtagning och analys av vraket vid St. Ekö, Ronneby kommun, Blekinge län. 2012.
  • 22.Adams J, Rönnby J. The Danish Griffin: The Wreck of an Early Modern Royal Carvel from 1495. Int J Naut Archaeol. 2022. Jan 2;51(1):46–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hansson A, Linderson H, Foley B. Casks from Gribshunden (1495)–Dendrochronology of Late Medieval Shipboard Victual Containers. Int J Naut Archaeol. 2022; [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tuncay HO, Yeşil Y. Comparative Fruit Anatomy and Morphology of Four Species Known As Cumin (Kimyon) In Turkey. KSU J Agric Nat. 2019;22(4):547–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cappers R, Bekker R, Jans J. 2006 Digitale Zandenatlas van Nederland. Groningen archaeological studies volume 4. Groningen: Barkhuis Publishing; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Neef R, Cappers RTJ, Bekker RM, Boulos L, Dinies M, Ertuğ ZF, et al. Digital Atlas of Economic Plants in Archaeology [Internet]. Vol. 17. Groningen: Barkhuis; 2012. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt20p56d7. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ordoudi SA, Tsimidou MZ. Saffron Quality: Effect of Agricultural Practices, Processing and Storage. In: Dris R, Jain SM, editors. Production Practices and Quality Assessment of Food Crops Volume 1: Preharvest Practice [Internet]. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2004. p. 209–60. Available from: 10.1007/1-4020-2533-5_8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Aytekin A, Acikgoz AO. Hormone and Microorganism Treatments in the Cultivation of Saffron (Crocus Sativus L.) Plants. Molecules. 2008;13(5):1135–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sostaric R, Kuster H. Roman plant remains from Veli Brijun (island of Brioni), Croatia. Veg Hist Archaeobot. 2001;10:227–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kroll H. Literature on archaeological remains of cultivated plants (1998/ 1999). Veg Hist Archaeobot. 2000;9(1):31–68. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Karg S, Robinson DE. Karg S., D.E. Robinson: Secondary food plants from medieval sites in Denmark: fruits, nuts, vegetables, herbs and spices. In: K. Viklund, R. Engelmark (eds.) Nordic Archaeobotany-NAG 2000 in Umeå. Archaeology and Environment 15, 2002, 133–142. Archaeol Environ. 2002 Jan 1;15:133–42.
  • 32.Sloth PR, Hansen UL, Karg S. Viking Age garden plants from southern Scandinavia: diversity, taphonomy and cultural aspects. Danish J Archaeol [Internet]. 2012. May 1;1(0 SE-Research Article):27–38. Available from: https://tidsskrift.dk/dja/article/view/124962. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kroll H. Literature on archaeological remains of cultivated plants (1997/1998). Veg Hist Archaeobot [Internet]. 1999. Sep 21;8(1/2):129–63. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.ludwig.lub.lu.se/stable/23417651. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Karg S. Food from gardens in Northern Europe–Archaeobotanical and written records dated to the medieval period and early modern times. In: Bakels C, Fennema K, Out WA, Vermeeren C, editors. Van Planten en Slakken–of Plants and Snails Festschrift for Wim Kuijper. Leiden: Sidestone Press; 2010. p. 115–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Karg S. Long term dietary traditions: archaeobotanical records from Denmark dated to the Middle Ages and early modern times. Karg S. (ed.). In: Karg S, editor. Medieval Food Traditions in Northern Europe PNM Series of the National Museum of Denmark Studies in Archaeology and History 12. Copenhagen: National Museum of Denmark; 2007. p. 137–59. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Karg S. Evidence of garden plants in Southern Scandinavia. From Iron Age to Early Modern Times Based on Archaeological Plant Records. Landskabsarkitektur Trädgård Växtproduktionsvetenskab. Rapportserie 25, 2014, 241–249. 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Karg S. Fruit and nut choices in the medieval and early Modern Baltic countries. In: Raus MP, editor. Des fruits d`ici et d`ailleurs Regards sur l`histoire de quelques fruits consommés en Europe. Omniscience; 2016. p. 197–211. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wegen CF, Plesner CUA, Becker TA, Garde HG. Danske magazin ser. 4 vol. 1 [Internet]. København: Det Kongelige Danske Selskab for Faedrelandets Historie og Sprog; 1864. p. 65–90, 172–83. Available from: file://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/008697829. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hansson AM. Grain-paste, porridge and bread: Ancient cereal-based food. Vol. 7, Laborativ Arkeologi. 1994. p. 5–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Myrdal J. Medeltidens åkerbruk: agrarteknik i Sverige ca 1000 till 1520. [Internet]. Nordiska museet; 1985. (Nordiska museets handlingar: 105). Available from: https://ludwig.lub.lu.se/login?url = https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,uid&db=cat07147a&AN=lub.355417&site=eds-live&scope=site. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Myrdal J. Farming and feudalism: 1000–1700. In: Myrdal J, Morell M, editors. The agrarian history of Sweden: from 4000 BC to AD 2000. Lund: Nordic Academic Press; 2011. p. 72–117. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Karg S. Long term dietary traditions: archaeobotanical records from Denmark dated to the Middle Ages and early modern times. In: Karg S, editor. Medieval Food Traditions in Northern Europe. Copenhagen: PNM Series of the National Museum of Denmark. Studies in Archaeolgy and History 12; 2007. p. 137–59. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Latałowa M, Badura M, Jarosińska J, Święta-Musznicka J. Useful plants in medieval and post-medieval archaeobotanical material from the Hanseatic towns of Northern Poland (Kołobrzeg, Gdańsk and Elbla̧g). In: Karg S, editor. Medieval Food Traditions in Northern Europe. Copenhagen: PNM Series of the National Museum of Denmark. Studies in Archaeology and History; 12; 2007. p. 39–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lempiäinen T, Karg S. Archaeobotanical evidence of plants from the medieval period to early modern times in Finland. Medieval food traditions in Northern Europe. 2007. 97–118 p. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Latałowa M, Badura M, Jarosińska J, Święta-Musznicka J. Useful plants in medieval and post-medieval archaeobotanical material from the Hanseatic towns of Northern Poland (Kołobrzeg, Gdańsk and Elbla̧g). In: Medieval Food Traditions in Northern Europe. 2007. p. 39–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sillasoo Ü, Hiie S, Karg S. An archaeobotanical approach to investigating food of the Hanseatic period in Estonia. Mediev Food Tradit North Eur. 2007. Jan 1;12:73–96. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hald MM, Magnussen B, Appel L, Christensen JT, Hansen CH, Henriksen PS, et al. Fragments of meals in eastern Denmark from the Viking Age to the Renaissance: New evidence from organic remains in latrines. J Archaeol Sci Reports [Internet]. 2020;31(April):102361. Available from: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102361. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Herteig AE. Kongers havn og handels sete. Fra de arkeologiske undersøkelser på Bryggen i Bergen 1955–68 [The harbor of kings and the seat of trade. From the archaeological investigations at Bryggen in Bergen 1955–1968]. Oslo: Aschehoug; 1969. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Heimdahl J. Environmental reconstructions at a medieval and post-medieval urban settlement in Norrköping. Stockholm; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Alsleben A. Food consumption in the Hanseatic towns of Germany. Copenhagen: The National Museum of Denmark; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Jensen PM. Using plant remains to identify diaspora communities in Late Medieval and Early Modern Aalborg. In: Linaa J, editor. Urban diaspora The rise and fall of diaspora communities in early modern Denmark and Sweden Jutland Archaeological Society Publications 112. Moesgaard Museum; 2020. p. 75–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Behre KE. Ernährung und Umwelt der wikingerzeitlichen Siedlung Haithabu. Die ausgrabungen in Haithabu Vol. 8. Neumünster: Wachholtz Verlag; 1983. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hjelmqvist H. Ett bidrag till vinrankans äldste historia i Norden. Sven Bot Tidskr. 1993;87:275–81. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Henriksen PS, Holst S, Frei KM. Iron and Viking Age grapes from Denmark–vine seeds found at the royal complexes by Lake Tissø. Danish J Archaeol [Internet]. 2017;6(1):3–10. Available from: 10.1080/21662282.2017.1293397. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Cappers RTJ. Roman Foodprints at Berenike [Internet]. Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press at UCLA; 2006. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvdjrqwh. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Livarda A. Spicing up life in northwestern Europe: Exotic food plant imports in the Roman and medieval world. Veg Hist Archaeobot. 2011;20(2):143–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Orengo HA, Livarda A. The seeds of commerce: A network analysis-based approach to the Romano-British transport system. J Archaeol Sci [Internet]. 2016;66:21–35. Available from: 10.1016/j.jas.2015.12.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Karg S. Medieval Food Traditions in Northern Europe. In: Karg S, editor. Studies in Archaeology and History 12. Copenhagen: PNM Series of the National Museum of Denmark; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Grewe R, Hieatt CB. Libellus de arte coquinaria: an early northern cookery book [Internet]. Tempe: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies; 2001. Available from: https://search.library.wisc.edu/catalog/999916584102121. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Veirup H. Til taffel hos Kong Valdemar: Europas ӕldste kogbog efter to middelalderhåndskrifter fra 1300tallet. Systime; 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Aakjær S. Kong Valdemars jordebog. Aakjær S, editor. Vol. vol 1. Copenhagen: Samfund til udgivelse af gammel nordisk litteratur; 1943. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Blatt F. Sprog- og Litteraturselskab, Diplomatarium Danicum, series 1–2. Blatt F, editor. Vol. 2:7. Copenhagen: C.A. Reitzels Boghandel; 1938. 261 p. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Yrwing H. Kryddor. In: Kulturhistoriskt lexikon för nordisk medeltid från vikingatid till reformationstid (’A cultural-historical encyclopaedia of the Nordic Middle Ages, from the Viking Age to the Reformation period’). Malmö: Allhem; 1964. p. 473–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Harrison D. Jarlens sekel, en berättelse om 1200-talets Sverige. Stockholm: Ordfront Förlag; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Høeg OA. Krydder. In: Granlund J, editor. Kulturhistorisk leksikon for nordisk middelalder fra vikingtid til reformasjonstid (’A cultural-historical encyclopaedia of the Nordic Middle Ages, from the Viking Age to the Reformation period’). Oslo: Gyldendal; 1964. p. 467–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Dahlbäck G. I Medeltidens Stockholm. Stockholm: Stockholm stad 81; 1987. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Hooker JD. The flora of British India. Vol. 5. London: L. Reeve and Co.; 1886. 78–95 p. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Thangaselvabal T, Gailce Leo Justin C, Leelamathi M. Black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) ‘the king of spices’–A review. Agric Rev. 2008;29(2):89–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Moolhuizen C. Shipping pepper: Examining botanical contents of a 17th-century shipwreck at Texel Roads, the Netherlands. Analecta Praehist Leiden / Misc Archaeol Leiden. 2009;41:87–96. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Alsleben A. Food consumption in the Hanseatic towns of Germany. In: Karg S, editor. Copenhagen: PNM Series of the National Museum of Denmark. Studies in Archaeology and History 12; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Sillasoo Ü, Hiie S. An archaeobotanical approach to investigating food of the Hanseatic period in Estonia. In: Karg S, editor. Medieval Food Traditions In Northern Europe. Copenhagen: PNM Series of the National Museum of Denmark. Studies in Archaeology and History 12; 2007. p. 73–96. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Moltsen ASA. Lag- og makrofossilanalyser fra Kompagnistræde 2–6, Næstved (NÆM2004- 200)’, NOK rep. 10–2005. Copenhagen; 2005.
  • 73.Andersen VL, Moltsen A. The dyer and the cook: finds from 8 Pilestræde, Copenhagen, Denmark. Post-Medieval Archaeol [Internet]. 2007. Dec 1;41(2):242–63. Available from: 10.1179/174581307X236247. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Heimdahl J, Pettersson C. Från sumpig lyx till torrlagd misär. Populär arkeologi. 2007;20–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Hoogervorst TG. If Only Plants Could Talk: Reconstructing Pre-Modern Biological Translocations in the Indian Ocean. Sead, Identity Hist From Bay Bengal to South China Sea. 2013;(April 2011):30. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Winterhalter P, Straubinger M. Saffron—Renewed interest in an ancient spice. Food Rev Int. 2000;16(1):39–59. [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Negbi M, Negbi O. Saffron Crocus Domestication in Bronze Age Crete. In: Waldren W, Ensenyat J, editors. World Islands in Prehistory: International Insular Investigations Deia International Conference of Prehistory. Oxford: BAR International Series 1095. Oxford: Archaeopress; 2002. p. 267–74. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Goliaris A. Saffron cultivation in Greece. In: Negbi M, editor. Saffron: Crocus sativus L. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1999. p. 73–85. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.D̲oumas C. The wall-paintings of Thera / text, Christos Doumas. Athens: Athens: Thera Fondation, 1992.; 1992. 191 p.: col. ill. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Negbi M. Saffron cultivation: past, present and future prospects. In: Negbi M, editor. Saffron: Crocus sativus L. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1999. p. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Day J. Counting threads. Safffron in Aegean Bronze Age Writing and Society. Oxford J Archaeol. 2011;30(4):369–91. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Sarpaki A. Condiments, perfume and dye plants in Linear B: a look at the textual and archaeobotanical evidence. In: Michailidou A, editor. Manufacture and Measurement Counting, Measuring and Recording Craft Items in Early Aegean Societies (Μελετήματα 33). 2001. p. 197–265. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Halvorson S. Saffron Cultivation and Culture in Central Spain. Focus Geogr [Internet]. 2008. Jun 1;51(1):17–24. Available from: 10.1111/j.1949-8535.2008.tb00215.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Munda S, Dutta S, Haldar S, Lal M. Chemical Analysis and Therapeutic Uses of Ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) Essential Oil: A Review. J Essent Oil Bear Plants. 2018. Jul 4;21(4):994–1002. [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kamatou GP, Vermaak I, Viljoen AM. Eugenol—From the Remote Maluku Islands to the International Market Place: A Review of a Remarkable and Versatile Molecule. Molecules. 2012. Jun 6;17(6):6953–81. doi: 10.3390/molecules17066953 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Pliny the Elder. Natural History, Volume I: Books 1–2. Translated by H. Rackham. Cambridge: Loeb Classical Library; 330.Harvard University Press; 1938. [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Hondelink MMAA, Schepers M. The common and the rare: a review of Early Modern Dutch plant food consumption based on archaeobotanical urban cesspit data. Veg Hist Archaeobot [Internet]. 2020;29(5):553–65. Available from: 10.1007/s00334-019-00766-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Corbineau R, Ruas MP, Barbier-Pain D, Fornaciari G, Dupont H, Colleter R. Plants and aromatics for embalming in Late Middle Ages and modern period: a synthesis of written sources and archaeobotanical data (France, Italy). Veg Hist Archaeobot. 2018. Jan 8;27(1):151–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Kingwell-Banham E, Bohingamuwa W, Perera N, Adikari G, Crowther A, Fuller DQ, et al. Spice and rice: pepper, cloves and everyday cereal foods at the ancient port of Mantai, Sri Lanka. Antiquity [Internet]. 2018/12/11. 2018;92(366):1552–70. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/article/spice-and-rice-pepper-cloves-and-everyday-cereal-foods-at-the-ancient-port-of-mantai-sri-lanka/57A710C9438E73D78C21494A9E99A1E7. [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Yϋ YS. Han. In: Chang KC, editor. Food in Chinese culture Anthropological and historical perspectives. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1977. p. 53–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 91.van der Veen M. Consumption, trade and Innovation. Exploring the botanical remains from the Roman and Islamic Ports at Quseir al-Qadim, Egypt. vol. 6. Journal of African Archaeology Monograph Series; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Jensen HA. Catalogue of late- and post-glacial macrofossils of Spermatophyta from Denmark, Schleswig, Scania, Halland, and Blekinge dated 13,000 B.P. to 1536 A.D. Vol. 6, Danmarks Geologiske Undersøgelse Serie A. 1985. 1–95 p. [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Heimdahl J. Barbariska trädgårdsmästare Nya perspektiv på hortikulturen i Sverige fram till 1200-talets slut. Fornvännen. 2010;105(105):265–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Larsson M, Ingemark D. Roman horticulture beyond the frontier: garden cultivation at Iron Age Uppåkra (Sweden). J Rom Archaeol [Internet]. 2015/10/27. 2015;28(1):393–402. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/article/roman-horticulture-beyond-the-frontier-garden-cultivation-at-iron-age-uppakra-sweden/21B0E7BB8995D1A8B5D247BB2B4FDD48. [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Helweg KK. Gardening at medieval farmsteads: In: Vanhanen S, Lagerås P, editors. Archaeobotanical studies of past plant cultivation in northern Europe [Internet]. Barkhuis; 2020. p. 119–30. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv19qmf01.11. [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Andréasson A, Gräslund Berg E, Heimdahl J, Jakobsson A, Larsson I, Petersson E. Sources to the History of Gardening. In: Andréasson A GBEHJJALIPE, editor. Department of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management, SLU; Alnarp; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Behre KE. The history of beer additives in Europe—A review. Veg Hist Archaeobot. 1999;8(1–2):35–48. [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Alanko T. Cloister, manor and botanical gardens in medieval and early modern Finland and Sweden–An archaeobotanical approach to garden history. University of Helsinki; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Zettersten A. Svenska flottans historia åren 1522–1634. Stockholm: J. Seligmann; 1890. [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Karg S, Günther D. Der Einfluss der Hanse auf mittelalterliche Ernährungsgewohnheiten. In: Helmig G, Scholkmann B, Untermann M, editors. Medieval Europe Basel 2002, 3rd International Conference of Medieval and Later Archaeology in Basel (Switzerland) 10–15 September 2002. Basel: Archaologische Bodenforschung Basel-Stadt; 2002. p. 140–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Heimdahl J. Traces of a foreign kitchen. In: Linaa J, Maltin E, Rosén C, Larsson D, Heimdahl J, Carlsson K, et al., editors. Urban Diaspora The rise and fall of diaspora communities in Early Modern Denmark and Sweden Archaeology, history, science. Jutland Archaeological Society; 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Jensen HA. Seeds and other Diasopres in Medieval Layers from Svendborg. The Archaeology of Svendborg, Denmark, n° 2. Odense: Odense University Press; 1979. [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Hofsten N von. Pors och andra humleersättningar och ölkryddor i äldre tider = Bog myrtle (Myrica gale) and other substitutes for hops in former times. Uppsala & Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard; 1960. 245 s. [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Pajic M. ‘Ale for an Englishman is a natural drink’: The Dutch and the origins of beer brewing in late medieval England. J Mediev Hist. 2019;45(3):285–300. [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Holterman B. The Fish Lands: German trade with Iceland, Shetland and the Faroe Islands in the late 15th and 16th Century. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter GmbH; 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Granlund L, Jonsson R, Ödman A. Arkeologi på kungliga slottet från 1600-talet till 1980-talet med utställningen”Från ringmursborg till renässanspalats”. Stockholm: Slottsmuseum; 1984. p. 11. [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Woolgar CM. Medieval food and colour. J Mediev Hist. 2018;44(1):1–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Lehmann G. Henry VIII’s great feast at Greenwich, May 1527. Court Hist [Internet]. 2018;23(1):1–12. Available from: 10.1080/14629712.2018.1457494. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Cunningham P. Caching your savings: The use of small-scale storage in European prehistory. J Anthropol Archaeol [Internet]. 2011;30(2):135–44. Available from: 10.1016/j.jaa.2010.12.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Kubiak-Martens L. The plant food component of the diet at the late Mesolithic (Ertebølle) settlement at Tybrind Vig, Denmark. Veg Hist Archaeobot. 1999;8(1–2):117–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Kirleis W. Atlas of Neolithic plant remains from northern central Europe. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Regnell M. Charcoals from Uppåkra as indicators of leaf fodder. In: Larsson L, Hårdh B, editors. Centrality–regionality The social structure of southern Sweden during the Iron Age (Uppåkrastudier 7). Acta Archaeologica Lundensia; 2003. p. 105–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Campbell EA. Don’t say it with nightshades: Sentimental botany and the natural history of Atropa Belladonna. Vic Lit Cult. 2007;35(2):607–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Månsson A. En myckit nyttigh örta-book. Stockholm: Meurer; 1642. [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Tunón H. Giftiga växter. In: Tunón H, Pettersson B, Iwarsson M, editors. Människan och floran Etnobiologi i Sverige. Stockholm: Wahlström & Widstrand; 2005. p. 455–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Gerard J. The herball or Generall historie of plantes. Johnson T, editor. London: Adam Islip, Joice Norton and Richard Whitakers; 1633. [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Lempiainen T. Past occurrence of Hyoscyamus niger L. (Solanaceae) in Finland according to the macrofossil finds. Ann Bot Fenn. 1991;28(4):261–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Heimdahl J. Barbariska trädgårdsmästare. Nya perspektiv på hortikulturen i Sverige fram till 1200-talets slut. (Barbarian gardeners. New perspectives on horticulture in Swedenuntil the end of the 13th century). Fornvännen. 2010;105:265–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Heimdahl J. Bolmörtens roll i magi och medicin under den svenska förhistorien och medeltiden (The role of henbane in magic and medicine during Pre-history and the Middle Ages in Sweden). Fornvännen. 2009;104(2):112–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Archaeobotanical Grieg J. and historical record compared–a new look at the taphonomy of edible and other useful plants from the 11th to the 18th centuries A.D. Circaea. 1996;12(2):211–47. [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Heimdahl J. Bolmörtens roll i magi och medicin under den svenska förhistorien och medeltiden. Fornvännen. 2009;104:112–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Harpestraeng H. Liber herbarum. Copenhagen: Poul Hauberg; 1936. [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Franckenius J. Speculum botanicum. 2nnd ed. Upsaliae; 1638. [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Wilson DG. Plant Remains From the Graveney Boat and the Early History of Humulus Lupulus L. in W. Europe. New Phytol. 1975;75(3):627–48. [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Lagerås P. Från trädgård till grav: växterna i biskop Peder Winstrups kista. Ale. 2016;4:15–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Söderlind U. Skrovmål: Kosthållning och matlagning i den svenska flottan från 1500-tal till 1700-tal. Stockholm: Carlssons; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Cederlund CO. Handelsvaror i 1200-talets sjöfart. De spåras med mikroanalys i Oskarshamns-koggen. Mar Tidskr. 1991;2:10–1. [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Robinson D, Aaby B. Pollen and plant macrofossil analyses from the Gedesby ship—a medieval shipwreck from Falster, Denmark. Veg Hist Archaeobot. 1994;3:167–82. [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Smith W, Green FJ. Food, packing and plants: the archaeobotanical remains. In: Gardiner J, Allen MJ, editors. Before the Mast: Life and death aboard the Mary Rose The archaeology of the Mary Rose. Oxbow Books; 2005. p. 588–602. [Google Scholar]
  • 130.van der Veen M. When is food a luxury? World Archaeol. 2003;34(3):405–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Hovförtäring (Royal food consumption). Vol. 8. Stockholm: The Royal Palace Archives; 1627. [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Helms MW. Ulysses’ sail. An ethnographic odyssey of power, knowledge, and geographical distance. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1988. [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Hayden B. The Power of Feasts: From Prehistory to the Present [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/power-of-feasts/43805916A59F9D3A2012464BE1F8CEF4. [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Pape C. The early Danish-Muscovite treaties, 1493–1523: texts, contexts, diplomacy. Aarhus University Press; 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Smith SH. Demystifying a change in taste: Spices, space, and social hierarchy in Europe, 1380–1750. Int Hist Rev. 2007;29(2):237–57. [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Woolgar CM. Gifts of food in late medieval England. J Mediev Hist [Internet]. 2011;37(1):6–18. Available from: 10.1016/j.jmedhist.2010.12.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Heal F. Food gifts, the household and the politics of exchange in early modern England. Past Present. 2008;199(1):41–70. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

John P Hart

25 Nov 2022

PONE-D-22-28990The king’s spice cabinet – Plant remains from Gribshunden, a 15th century royal shipwreck in the Baltic SeaPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Larsson,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Both reviewers make suggestions for improving the manuscript. Please consider these while making your revisions, and pay particular attention for the need of additional references for factual statements. Text citation numbers need to be in brackets rather than parentheses. Please be sure to check the references cited section to make sure it is consistent with the journal's style requirements. Also please provide accession or catalog numbers for the specimens if available.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 09 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at [email protected]. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

John P. Hart, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In your manuscript, please provide additional information regarding the specimens used in your study. Ensure that you have reported specimen numbers and complete repository information, including museum name and geographic location. If permits were required, please ensure that you have provided details for all permits that were obtained, including the full name of the issuing authority, and add the following statement:

'All necessary permits were obtained for the described study, which complied with all relevant regulations.'

If no permits were required, please include the following statement:

'No permits were required for the described study, which complied with all relevant regulations.'

For more information on PLOS ONE's requirements for paleontology and archaeology research, see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-paleontology-and-archaeology-research.

3. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match. 

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

4. We note that Figures 1 and 2 in your submission contain [map/satellite] images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

a. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figures 1 and 2 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license.  

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an ""Other"" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

b. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

5. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This paper present important evidence that should be published, however, I think on occasion the text can be repetitive and so I suggest the authors go through and check whether text is being repeated and either condense or remove. For example, I think that the section 'The Baltic preservative environment and Northern European maritime archaeobotanical comparanda' (98) although useful is repeated in more detail and with more references in the discussion, making this paper very long while not adding any new information. I would suggest removing this and just commenting in the introduction that these sites exist and that you will be looking at them more in detail in the discussion. The section on preservation (100-112) could then go into the intro to explain the site.

I also feel that the authors should double check where they reference and where they don’t. Periodically I wanted to see where they got that information from and there didn’t seem to be a reference e.g. around 778 (the archival sources).

Table two I think needs some more information. First, how many sites are we talking about? You could have frequency rather than presence absence, because we don’t know how rare the finds are from this table. The figures look great, although Figure 2 could be clearer as it was a bit pixelated in my version.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript presented for the review addresses an interesting aspect of maritime archaeobotany. It should be stressed that analysis of plant remains from underwater sites are among the less frequently described, especially in the context of Baltic region, which is related to the nature of the site. Some of the plant findings may be overlooked at the stage of collecting samples, and some of them are damaged due to inadequate storage or conservation processes. In this context, very careful work is essential, as it means - undamaged samples of the material and its thorough preparation for research. This made it possible to add more information, this time botanical, about the history of Gribshunden, a 15th century royal shipwreck. The very interesting element of the article is the comparison of the obtained results with archaeobotanical and historical data from not only ship wrecks, but also from Baltic towns.

A huge contribution of the article is the presentation of archaeobotanical data, which are generally not recorded at terrestrial archaeological sites. First of all I mean the finds of saffron, the presence of which in ancient towns is generally known only on the basis of historical sources

Generally, the submitted article is very well suitable for publication in PlosOne as the data set and the available information is impressive, the research methods are a good example of interdisciplinary cooperation and the historical background for data interpretation is comprehensively enrolled by the article. I recommend the manuscript to be accepted after minor revision.

In detail I want to suggest the following changes or I have some questions. I did not add these comments to the text because it seems to me that what she presented below is understandable.

1. The overall structure of the article is correct, but in my opinion, the Abstract should be shortened. I think that too much historical data was presented here, which is important, but not quite in this part of the article. I would put more emphasis on pointing out the uniqueness of the archaeobotanical finds described in the article.

2. Introduction is also rather lengthy. It contains a general background on the history of the ship and archaeobotanical study. The research problem is only presented at the end of this long part. I suggest a small reorganization and focusing on the main research problem.

3. Materials and methods - According to the Authors, the botanical material was preserved uncharred. Could any part of the plant remains be partially mineralized?

4. The chapter The Baltic preservative environment and Northern European maritime archaeobotanical comparanda it seems like a good part for discussion. I suggest to move it.

5. Table 1. List of economic plant species… – I believe that taxa such as Rubus spp. should be in the fruit category. Nuts should be a separate category.

6. Fig. 1. I would prefer that the map shows the main cities within the Baltic Sea where archaeobotanical research was conducted and the results of which were used to create the article.

7. I wonder if it's not worth commenting on the lack of figs (Ficus carica) in the materials from the wreck. Fig remains are one of the most commonly found traces of exotic fruit in materials from mediaeval towns. According to the authors, is her absence from the list due to the possibility of being overlooked or is she simply not on the ship? Which would probably be strange considering the presence of other luxury products.

8. Flax (Linum usitatissimum) it could also mean a kind of medicinal plant.

9. Henban (Hyoscyamus niger) represents ruderal weeds. Of course, it is also a very interesting plant which is used in traditional herbal medicine. I would be very careful with a story about the plant's role on a royal ship based on a single find, which could be totally accidental. Yes, Authors wrote “If future excavation on the wreck produces greater numbers of henbane seeds, its purpose may become clear”, but I suggest shortening this paragraph.

10. Copy editing of the English is needed as some phrases seem to be too long and too complex (hard to read at times…).

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at [email protected]. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Jan 26;18(1):e0281010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281010.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


3 Jan 2023

We are grateful for the comments and suggestions by the reviewers and appreciate the time taken to do so. The suggestions have been very useful and have much improved the submitted manuscript. We have followed most of the recommendations and suggestions by the reviewers. All changes can be tracked in the Revised Manuscript with Track Changes.

We look forward to hearing from you regarding our submission. We will respond to any further questions and comments that you may have.

Thanks for your time!

Author comments on revision

Specific corrections to the manuscript are separated below according to sections. More generally, as suggested by reviewer #2, the language and phrasing has been revised throughout the manuscript. In addition, repetitive text has been either condensed or removed.

Abstract

Reviewer #2 pointed out that the abstract was rather long and had too many historical details. We wish, however, for the abstract to remain as first submitted. If this study was intended for an archaeobotanical journal we would condense the historical aspect. As this is an interdisciplinary study, with potential interest among readers from various research fields, we find that providing details on the historical context of the botanical finds to potentially be of interest when reading the abstract.

Word limit according to the journal is 300 words, our abstract is 268 word.

Introduction

Both reviewers commented on the Introduction section being rather lengthy. To address this, the Introduction section was reorganized. The two subheadings Historical background and The Baltic preservative environment and Northern Europe maritime archaeobotanical comparanda were merged and some text was removed. The research focus is more explicitly emphasized as well. Some historical data was removed as these aspects of the study is discussed in more detail in the Discussion section. As advised by reviewer #1, the part on preservation was placed in the Introduction to explain the site. Subheading Archaeological background was removed from the Introduction, and placed as a separate heading following the Introduction.

Material and methods

All material recovered were subfossil. Partial mineralization of plant remains was not observed.

Results

The absence of fig seeds in the samples is indeed, noteworthy. As pointed out by reviewer #2, seeds from figs is a common exotic food commodity in material from medieval towns. All samples were carefully analyzed and no botanical remains or species were overlooked. Fig seeds were simply not in the collected samples. However, future investigations of the shipwreck may present new species and complement the economic food plants presented in this study.

Discussion

The five food categories was revised as suggested by reviewer #2. Raspberry and blackberry has been placed under the category Fruits and vegetables, and the two nut species (almond, hazel) are placed in a separated category, Nuts. This reorganization is corrected throughout the manuscript.

Subheading Oilseeds. That flax may have had medicinal application has been commented.

Subheading Medicinal plants. As pointed out by reviewer #2, while henbane is an interesting plant, having served multiple purposes in medieval times, with only one seed found, it is somewhat unclear if it representing medicinal use or a ruderal weed. We therefore, as suggested by reviewer #2, shortened the discussion on henbane.

Figures

Figure 1. As suggested by reviewer #2, the map was edited to include locations of the main medieval towns along the Baltic coasts with archaeobotanical data discussed in the manuscript.

Figure 2. Resolution of figure 2 may have been affected by uploading the submission as a pdf when sent to reviewers.

Tables

Table 1. Plant categories was adjusted as suggested by reviewer #2. Berries are placed in Fruits and berries; nuts is a category on its own.

Table 2. To add sites and frequency of recorded number of seeds rather than presence and absence is a good point raised by reviewer #1. Based on the finds from Gribshunden, the purpose of the table was, however, for the reader to get a visual overview of the presence of these species found in the archaeological layers of medieval towns in Scandinavia and around the Baltic region. To include sites and seed frequency in the table is problematic for some species and geographical areas. As some original sources presenting archaeological data from the Baltic region is only reported or published in the native language of respective countries of the region, or reported in only domestic journals or books, we have had to use secondary literature for some archaeobotanical information. Thus, to list frequency for some species and only presence for others would be inconsistent. For this reason, we decided to keep presence and absence in Table 2 as originally submitted. Nevertheless, in the subsection Economic plants from the Gribshunden shipwreck and archaeological comparanda of the Discussion section, we discuss sites or town from where botanical remains of respective species have been found, and if botanical remains for the species is common or rare, or when possible, we mention frequency.

As dill, black mustard, caraway are common in cultural layers around Scandinavia and the Baltic region during the Middle Ages, these species were removed from table 2. Instead, we focus on the plants species found at the wreck site of Gribshunden that are rare and exotic in Scandinavia and the Baltic region.

References

References in the text have been double check to make sure that references are placed correctly.

Seven references were added to the manuscript:

Kamatou, GP, Vermaak, I, Viljoen, M, 2012. Eugenol - from the remote Maluku Island to the international market place: a review of a remarkable and versatile molecule. Molecules 2012, 17, 6953-6981

Etting V, Straetkvern K, Gregory D. Gribshunden. In: Nationalmuseets Arbejdsmark 2019. 2019. p. 102–13.

Franckenius, Johansson 1638(1659): Speculum botanicum. 2nd edition, Upsaliae

Thangaselvabal T., Gailce Leo Justin C., Leelamathi M. Black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) ‘the king of spices’ – A review. Agricultural reviews, 2008, vol 29, issue 2, 89-98.

Hooker J.D. 1886. The Flora of British India. L. Reeve and Co., London, pp. 78–95. 5.

Corbineau, R, Ruas, M-P, Barbier-Pain, D, Fornaciari, G, Dupont, H, Colleter, R. Plants and aromatics for embalming in Late Middle Ages and modern period: a synthesis of written sources and archaeobotanical data (France, Italy). Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 2018, 27 (1), pp.151-164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-017-0620-4

Golaris A. Saffron cultivation in Greece. In: Negbi M, editor. Saffron : Crocus sativus L. Amsterdam, Harwood Academic Publishers, 1999, p. 73-85

Two references were removed from the manuscript:

Lempiäinen M, Timonen T, Harju P, Alvik R. Underwater archaeobotany: plant and wood analyses from the Vrouw Maria, a 1771 shipwreck in the Finnish Baltic Sea. Veg Hist Archaeobot [Internet]. 2022;31(1):97–106. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-021-00840-3

Manders M, Kuijper W. Shipwrecks in Dutch Waters with Botanical Cargo or Victuals. In: Bakels C, Kamermans H, editors. Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia. Leiden: Leiden University; 2015. p. 141–72.

Additional requirements outlined by the journal.

1. Style requirements have been addresses for the title page.

2. Figure 1 and 2; format has been change from Pdf to tiff.

3. Table 1 and 2; reformatted to make them editable. In doing so, Table 2 had to be changed from landscape view to portrait view to meet journal requirements.

4. Reference list has been reviewed to make sure that it is complete and correct.

5. Repository information and permit numbers (incl. full name of the issuing authority, have been added to the section: Material and Method.

6. Funding information has been revised.

7. Copyright details has been added to the figure caption to Figs 1 and 2 in the manuscript and a Content Permission Form has been uploaded from illustrator Frida Nilsson at Lund University.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

John P Hart

13 Jan 2023

The king’s spice cabinet – Plant remains from Gribshunden, a 15th century royal shipwreck in the Baltic Sea

PONE-D-22-28990R1

Dear Dr. Larsson,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at [email protected].

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact [email protected].

Kind regards,

John P. Hart, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

John P Hart

17 Jan 2023

PONE-D-22-28990R1

The king’s spice cabinet – Plant remains from Gribshunden, a 15th century royal shipwreck in the Baltic Sea

Dear Dr. Larsson:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact [email protected].

If we can help with anything else, please email us at [email protected].

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. John P. Hart

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. List of archaeobotanical plant remains from the Gribshunden wreck site.

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES