Death-Of-Outsourcing - PDF by by Cliff Justice, KPMG Partner
Death-Of-Outsourcing - PDF by by Cliff Justice, KPMG Partner
There is a revolution taking shape in the business services industry, one that disregards the traditional shared services and outsourcing paradigms and centers the design of support services on the needs and priorities of the enterprise as a whole.
Since the information technology outsourcing mega-deals of the 1990s and through the expansion of offshoring and business process outsourcing in the 2000s, companies have consistently sought ways to use sourcing strategies to reduce the cost of back office services. When part of a comprehensive strategy, outsourcing has proven to be a transformation catalyst that has helped companies implement new processes and technologies, reduce costs, access a global talent pool, and change their overall business through the use of partners. But today, the average deal size is smaller, performance expectations are higher and many providers are delivering more complex services with greater industry knowledge and business acumen. While cost is still key, success in a mature relationship is more often determined by its contribution to the business than by cost savings alone. Shared services has also steadily evolved from the days of simple accounts payable and data entry processing. In many companies it has moved up the value chain to provide a wider range of more complex services and, as a result, established an internal brand. Indeed, multi-functional captive delivery centers are an example of the success of the global shared services concept. Many organizations have monetized the asset and sold off their captives to become commercial service providers with specialties in an industry and function.
manufacturing has spawned a rapidly growing middle class in these regions, which is both increasing the cost of labor and broadening the potential customer base for many companies. As this success causes the benefits of labor arbitrage to disappear, how do organizations effectively serve new markets, and where is the next level of back office savings? As most companies would opt for a few hundred million new consumers over 20 percent additional savings on information technology (IT) and finance and accounting, the competitive advantage will go to those that can both connect with new customers and do business effectively in these new markets with lower costs, better data and market insights, and operational flexibility.
1 | Shared Services and Outsourcing Advisory / July 2012 2012 KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International). KPMG International provides no client services and is a Swiss entity with which the independent member firms of the KPMG network are affiliated.
of the enterprise gives companies the ability to enter new markets easier, integrate acquisitions faster, adopt new processes more rapidly, and access and analyze a wider range of data that, most importantly, serves their customer better. While many of these new business services organizations have different objectives, most share common traits. They are centrally managed, and usually have an integrated portfolio of capabilities typically a combination of external service providers, internal specialists and internal shared services. Most of these organizations are enabled by common technologies and governed by common processes. These companies have the characteristic of a delivery concept KPMG calls the Extended Global Enterpriseor EGE. The EGE is not a specific model or set delivery structure, but rather a paradigm for delivering business services based on the concepts of end-to-end processes, internal and outsourced service providers, high value services and strong central governance. Instead of relying on resources within the four walls of the enterprise, the EGE leverages a global pool of internal and outsourced resources to deliver a service that is nimble, aligned to the business, and connected with customers, employees and suppliers.
The EGE concept has four key attributes: First, its overall goal is to increase value to the business, and help achieve competitive advantage. Beyond meeting service levels and cost benchmarks, it also enables flexibility and the ability to quickly adopt new processes, assemble talent, deliver new technology and centrally collect and analyze relevant data. Second, its design is influenced more by customer need and business strategy than by the traditional organizational structure. Third, it consists of a balanced portfolio of services and processes that spans across functions, and deploys the most appropriate capabilities whether they are internal, globally sourced or technology enabled. Fourth, it is governed by an empowered organization that has a charter to support the business, manage the delivery model and is measured by the value it creates. Through alignment of global capabilities, processes and governance, implementation of an EGE-oriented model enables delivery of services in a way that not only supports the business but also advances it. Its about using the knowledge and capabilities of service providers both internal and external to make the enterprise more successful.
An abbreviated version of this article was published in CIO Update on April 20, 2012.
Does this approach always work? Not for everyone. But the results from recent KPMG surveys demonstrate that companies with services delivery designed on similar concepts have reported cost savings of 10-15 percent to 20 percent above and beyond the traditional shared services and outsourcing or decentralized models. Theyre reducing facilities costs by 10 to 15 percent, for example. And due to improved processes, theyre getting 8 to 13 percent savings on indirect goods and services.
Overcoming inertia
While the business impact is positive to the bottom line and the objectives of the business, adopting this paradigm represents a disruptive change that is almost always met with resistance. For example, because end-to-end processes are blind to organizational structure, this model impacts the traditional concept of functional empowerment. Thats a hard change management discussion. Other companies face inertia -- ironically -- because of their initial success. Some functional managers may have used outsourcing and shared services to reduce support costs by up to 30 percent and, justifiably, they shined within the enterprise. So when asking these people to revisit their model and take it to the next level, there is naturally some resistance. To overcome these challenges, organizations will be best served by picking the areas in which they want to improve, based on finances, culture and appetite for risk. They may focus on developing a commercial orientation, while going slower on the relocation of some services. Or they may put their efforts into governance and improving customer value.
a services delivery model that focuses on the holistic requirements and priorities of the enterprise gives companies the ability to enter new markets easier, integrate acquisitions faster, adopt new processes more rapidly, and access and analyze a wider range of data that, most importantly, serves their customer better.
2 | Shared Services and Outsourcing Advisory / July 2012 2012 KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International). KPMG International provides no client services and is a Swiss entity with which the independent member firms of the KPMG network are affiliated.
Following are some steps a company can take to move an EGE-oriented initiative forward: First, objectively review where the organization is and consider where it wants to go with support services From there, take a look at current outsourcing relationships and shared services capabilities Next, consider service delivery. What kind of strategy is in place? Is it aligning services with corporate objectives? Consider geography. Are all current markets being served? Is the organization prepared for expansion into future markets? Look at technology. Consider whether existing platforms support the integration of processes and providers. Dont forget culture. Will it support a governance structure that provides comprehensive oversight of services, including performance metrics? By answering these kinds of questions, an organization can identify gaps and opportunities and then develop a roadmap for improvement. The EGE is a concrete, true north compass to guide the redesign of the back office and prepare for an increasingly successful future.
To learn more, visit the Shared Services and Outsourcing Institute at http://www.kpmginstitutes.com/ shared-services-outsourcing-institute/
Cliff Justice based in the firms Houston office, leads KPMGs U.S. Shared Services and Outsourcing Advisory practice, one of the largest and most comprehensive sourcing and business services advisory practices in the world. Cliff is a recognized leader in shared services and outsourcing with more than 20 years of experience in industry operations, outsourcing, offshoring, and enterprise services transformation. Cliff Justice U.S. Leader Shared Services & Outsourcing Advisorypractice, part of KPMG Management Consulting T: +1 713 319 2781 E: [email protected]
Contact KPMG Shared Services and Outsourcing Advisory Americas Houston Tel: 1 713 319 2000 Europe, Middle East and Africa, Asia Pacific London Tel: (020) 7311 1000 For country, industry and servicespecific contacts, please visit: www.kpmg.com/Global/en/Pages/ contactus.aspx www.kpmg.com
2012 KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. Member firms of the KPMG network of independent firms are affiliated with KPMG International. KPMG International provides no client services. No member firm has any authority to obligate or bind KPMG International or any other member firm vis--vis third parties, nor does KPMG International have any such authority to obligate or bind any member firm. All rights reserved. The KPMG name, logo and cutting through complexity are registered trademarks of KPMG International. The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavor to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation. 1180_June2012