Quality Check Tech
Quality Check Tech
Keywords
Image quality assessment, objective & subjective method
1. INTRODUCTION
With the development of imaging and multimedia
technologies, visual information, recorded by images has
become the main source for knowledge acquisition. In the
process of visual information acquisition, processing,
transmission, and storage, some artifacts or noise may be
introduced to images which degrade the visual quality. In a
typical digital imaging system, the image is captured and
transformed into digital signal by the sensor .This raw digital
image signal is then processed to reduce the noise and is
compressed for storage or transmission. When the image is Fig 1: Block diagram of Image Quality Assessment.
finally displayed on the screen to the end user, it might not be The most common being the blocking artifact, which is
same as the original version because it has been exposed to usually the result of block-based compression algorithms
various kinds of distortions. running at low bit rates. At live we have conducted research
The sources of distortion could be ranged from motion into NR QA for blocking distortion as well as pioneering
blurring, Gaussian noise, sensor inadequacy, compression, research into NR measurement of distortion introduced by
error during transmission or the combination of many factors. Wavelet based compression algorithms based on Natural
To improve the performance of visual information acquisition, Scene Statistics modeling. Following are the methods of
transmission, processing, and storage systems, it is essential to image quality assessment.
assess visual qualities of the images; so that it can maintain,
control and possibly enhance the quality of the image before
2.1 Natural Image Quality Evaluator
storage or transmission. The objective of image quality (NIQE)
assessment is to provide computational models to measure the Natural Image Quality Evaluator (NIQE) blind image quality
perceptual quality of a given image. Recently, a number of assessment (IQA) is a completely blind image quality
techniques have been designed to evaluate the quality of analyzer that uses only measurable deviations from statistical
images and videos. regularities observed in natural images, without training on
human-rated distorted images, and, indeed without any
The accurate prediction of quality from an end-user
exposure to distorted images. However, all current state-of-
perspective has received increased attention with the growing
24
International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887)
Volume 163 – No 6, April 2017
the-art general purpose no reference (NR) IQA algorithms The parameters of the GGD (α,β), can be reliably estimated
require knowledge about anticipated distortions in the form of using the moment-matching based approach proposed. The
training examples and corresponding human opinion scores. signs of the transformed image coefficients have been
observed to follow a fairly regular structure. However,
distortions disturb this correlation structure. This deviation
can be captured by analyzing the sample distribution of the
products of pairs of adjacent coefficients computed along
horizontal, vertical and diagonal orientation.
These natural scene statistic features are derived from a
collection of natural, undistorted images. Experimental results
show that the new index delivers performance comparable to
top performing NR IQA models that require training on large
databases of human opinions of distorted images. This method
uses only two types of the NSS features. It uses a single
global MVG model to describe the test image
25
International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887)
Volume 163 – No 6, April 2017
1. Visual sensitivity to structural information 2) BLIINDS is non-distortion specific; while most NR-IQA
algorithms quantify a specific type of distortion, the features
2. Perceptual masking used in our algorithm are derived independently of the type of
3. Visual sensitivity to directional information distortion of the image and are effective across multiple
distortion types. Consequently, it can be deployed in a wide
4. Multiscale spatial visual processing and range of applications.
5. Intolerance to flagrantly visible visual distortions. 3) We propose a novel model for the statistics of DCT
In the following sections we explain how one or more of these coefficients.
HVS properties are embedded in the model. The framework 4) Since the framework operates entirely in the DCT domain,
of the proposed approach is summarized in Fig. An image the one can take exploit the availability of platforms devised for
IQA “pipeline” is first subjected to local 2-D DCT coefficient the fast computation of DCT transforms.
computation.
5) The method requires minimal training, and relies on a
simple probabilistic model for quality score prediction. This
leads to further computational gains.
6) Finally, the method correlates highly with human visual
perception of quality and yields highly competitive
performance, even with respect to state-of-the-art FR-IQA
algorithms.
26
International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887)
Volume 163 – No 6, April 2017
27
International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887)
Volume 163 – No 6, April 2017
of the local image gradient magnitudes and the Laplacian of [3] M. Saad, A. C. Bovik, and C. Charrier, “Blind image
Gaussian image responses is found. GRNN has been observed quality assessment: A natural scene statistics approach in
to yield better results than the back-propagation network or the DCT domain,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 21,
RBF (radial basis function) network in terms of prediction no. 8, pp. 3339–3352, 2012.
performance. The GRNN was implemented using the
MATLAB function new GRNN. The four perceptually [4] Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh, and E. P. Simoncelli,
motivated features can be used as inputs to the GRNN: “Image quality assessment: From error visibility to
structural similarity,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol.
1) The mean value of the phase congruency image of 13, no. 4, pp. 600–612, Apr. 2004.
distorted image (MPC),
[5] S. Daly, “The visible difference predictor: An algorithm
2) The entropy of the phase congruency image of for the assessment of image fidelity,” in Digital images
distorted image (EPC), and human vision (A. B. Watson, ed.), pp. 179–206,
Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1993.
3) The entropy of the distorted image (EDIS), and
[6] J. Lubin, “The use of psychophysical data and models in
4) The mean value of the gradient magnitude of the the analysis of display system performance,” in Digital
distorted image (MGDIS). images and human vision (A. B. Watson, ed.), pp. 163–
178, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1993.
3. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Our thanks to the experts who have contributed towards the [7] W. Xu and G. Hauske, “Picture quality evaluation based
research paper. on error segmentation,” Proc. SPIE, vol. 2308, pp. 1454–
1465, 1994.
4. REFERENCES
[1] A. Mittal, A. K. Moorthy, and A. C. Bovik, “No-reference [8] W. Osberger, N. Bergmann, and A. Maeder, “An
image quality assessment in the spatial domain,” IEEE automatic image quality assessment technique
Trans. Image Process. (to appear), 2012. incorporating high level perceptual factors,” in Proc.
IEEE Int. Conf. Image Proc., pp. 414– 418, 1998.
[2] A. K. Moorthy and A. C. Bovik, “Blind image quality
assessment: From natural scene statistics to perceptual [9] A. Mittal, R. Soundararajan and A. C. Bovik, “ Making a
quality,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 20, no. 12, pp. Completely Blind Image QualityAnalyzer ”, IEEE Signal
3350–3364, 2011. processing Letters, pp. 209-212, vol. 22, no. 3, March
2013.
IJCATM : www.ijcaonline.org
28