0% found this document useful (0 votes)
158 views6 pages

Evolutionary Process Model Vs Precpective Model

The document describes several prescriptive and evolutionary software development process models, including the waterfall, incremental, RAD, prototyping, spiral, and concurrent development models. Prescriptive models like waterfall prescribe a linear sequence of phases, while evolutionary models like prototyping and spiral are iterative and allow for more user feedback. Each model has advantages like flexibility or early delivery of working software, and disadvantages like increased costs or complexity.

Uploaded by

Malini Sharma
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
158 views6 pages

Evolutionary Process Model Vs Precpective Model

The document describes several prescriptive and evolutionary software development process models, including the waterfall, incremental, RAD, prototyping, spiral, and concurrent development models. Prescriptive models like waterfall prescribe a linear sequence of phases, while evolutionary models like prototyping and spiral are iterative and allow for more user feedback. Each model has advantages like flexibility or early delivery of working software, and disadvantages like increased costs or complexity.

Uploaded by

Malini Sharma
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

A.

Prescriptive Process Model:


 A prescriptive process model is a model that describes "how to do"
according to a certain software process system.
 A prescriptive model prescribes how a new software system should be
developed. Prescriptive models are used as guidelines or frameworks to
organize and structure how software development activities should be
performed, and in what order.

B. Evolutionary Process Model:


 Evolutionary Process Models are iterative. They are characterized in a
manner that enables software engineers to develop increasingly more
complete versions of the software.

Examples of Prescriptive Process Models:


1. Waterfall Model
 In a waterfall model, each phase must be completed fully before the next phase
can begin. This type of model is basically used for the project which is small and
there are no uncertain requirements.
 In this model the testing starts only after the development is complete.
Advantages of waterfall model:
o This model is simple and easy to understand and use.
o In this model phases are processed and completed one at a time. Phases
do not overlap.
o Waterfall model works well for smaller projects where requirements are
very well understood.

Disadvantages of waterfall model:


o Once an application is in the testing stage, it is very difficult to go back and
change something that was not well-thought out in the concept stage.
o High amounts of risk and uncertainty.

o Not a good model for complex and object-oriented projects.

o Poor model for long and ongoing projects.

o Not suitable for the projects where requirements are at a moderate to high
risk of changing.

2. Incremental Process Model


 In incremental model the whole requirement is divided into various builds.
Multiple development cycles take place here, making the life cycle a “multi-
waterfall” cycle.
 Cycles are divided up into smaller, more easily managed modules. Each module
passes through the requirements, design, implementation and testing phases.
 A working version of software is produced during the first module, so you have
working software early on during the software life cycle.
 Each subsequent release of the module adds function to the previous release.
The process continues till the complete system is achieved.
Advantages of Incremental model:
o Generates working software quickly and early during the software life
cycle.
o This model is more flexible – less costly to change scope and
requirements.
o It is easier to test and debug during a smaller iteration.

o In this model customer can respond to each built.

o Easier to manage risk because risky pieces are identified and handled
during it’d iteration.

Disadvantages of Incremental model:


o Needs good planning and design.
o Needs a clear and complete definition of the whole system before it can
be broken down and built incrementally.
o Total cost is higher than waterfall.
3. The RAD Model
 RAD model is Rapid Application Development model. It is a type of incremental
model. In RAD model the components or functions are developed in parallel as if
they were mini projects.
 The developments are time boxed, delivered and then assembled into a working
prototype. This can quickly give the customer something to see and use and to
provide feedback regarding the delivery and their requirements.
Advantages of the RAD model:
o Reduced development time.
o Increases reusability of components

o Encourages customer feedback

Disadvantages of RAD model:


o Depends on strong team and individual performances for identifying
business requirements.
o Only system that can be modularized can be built using RAD

o Requires highly skilled developers/designers.


B. Evolutionary Process Model:
 Evolutionary Process Models are iterative. They are characterized in a manner
that enables software engineers to develop increasingly more complete versions
of the software.

Examples of Evolutionary Process Models:


1. Prototyping Model
 The basic idea here is that instead of freezing the requirements before a design
or coding can proceed, a throwaway prototype is built to understand the
requirements. This prototype is developed based on the currently known
requirements.
 By using this prototype, the client can get an “actual feel” of the system, since the
interactions with prototype can enable the client to better understand the
requirements of the desired system.
Advantages of Prototype model:
o Users are actively involved in the development
o Since in this methodology a working model of the system is provided, the
users get a better understanding of the system being developed.
o Errors can be detected much earlier.

o Quicker user feedback is available leading to better solutions.

o Missing functionality can be identified easily

Disadvantages of Prototype model:


o Leads to implementing and then repairing way of building systems.
o Practically, this methodology may increase the complexity of the system
as scope of the system may expand beyond original plans.
2. Spiral Model
 The spiral model is similar to the incremental model, with more emphasis placed
on risk analysis.
 The spiral model has four phases: Planning, Risk Analysis, Engineering and
Evaluation. A software project repeatedly passes through these phases in
iterations (called Spirals in this model).
Advantages of Spiral model:
o High amount of risk analysis hence, avoidance of Risk is enhanced.
o Good for large and mission-critical projects.

o Strong approval and documentation control.

o Additional Functionality can be added at a later date.

Disadvantages of Spiral model:


o Can be a costly model to use.
o Risk analysis requires highly specific expertise.

o Project’s success is highly dependent on the risk analysis phase.

o Doesn’t work well for smaller projects.

3. Concurrent Development Model


 The concurrent development model - called concurrent engineering .It provides
an accurate state of the current state of a project.
Advantages of Concurrent Development Model:
o Focus on concurrent engineering activities in a software engineering
process such as prototyping, analysis modeling, requirements
specification and design.
o Represented schematically as a series of major technical activities, tasks
and their associated states.

Disadvantages of Concurrent Development Model:


o Because all of the stages are working simultaneously, any changes to
user requirements halts the work on any component dependent on the
component being changed. This can lead to a much longer development
cycle than originally planned for.
o Additionally, this model requires excellent and current communication
between all teams, which is sometimes not easily feasible.

You might also like