0% found this document useful (0 votes)
62 views

MSO202 Lect 6

1. The document discusses methods for finding the radius of convergence of power series, including power series with gaps where the exponents are not consecutive integers. 2. It also covers calculating the radius of convergence of the Hadamard product and Cauchy product of two power series, as well as the definition and properties of complex integration over curves. 3. The key results are formulas for determining the radius of convergence from the ratio of consecutive terms of a power series, and proofs that the radius of convergence of the Hadamard product is at least the product of the individual radii, while the radius of the Cauchy product is the minimum of the individual radii.

Uploaded by

ab4aziz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
62 views

MSO202 Lect 6

1. The document discusses methods for finding the radius of convergence of power series, including power series with gaps where the exponents are not consecutive integers. 2. It also covers calculating the radius of convergence of the Hadamard product and Cauchy product of two power series, as well as the definition and properties of complex integration over curves. 3. The key results are formulas for determining the radius of convergence from the ratio of consecutive terms of a power series, and proofs that the radius of convergence of the Hadamard product is at least the product of the individual radii, while the radius of the Cauchy product is the minimum of the individual radii.

Uploaded by

ab4aziz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15

Lecture 6

To Find Radius of Convergence From Ratio of Consecutive



Terms an / an 1 of the Power Series  a n ( z  z0 ) 
n , an  0
n 0
for all n .

The formula for radius of convergence in terms of an 1 / an
does not work if an = 0 for infinitely many n’s.


The Series  n
a ( z  z 0 ) n
with an  0 for all n is called a
n 0
Power Series with Gaps, if n  n .

Theorem 3.
1/( n n 1 )1 1/(   )
If lim an / an 1  lim an / an 1 n n 1 ,
exists, then
n  R n
where R is the radius of convergence of the power series

 n
a ( z  z 0 ) n
, an  0 for all n and {n } is any increasing
n 0
sequence of non‐negative integers such that
n   as n   .


 

sup 1/( n n 1 ) B*


Proof. Let lim an / an 1  . Then,
n  inf A*

( A*   )n n1  | an / an 1 |  ( B*   )n n1 for all n  n0 .




n n0 ( n n 1 ) ....... ( n0 1 n0 )
 an0 ( A*   )  an  an0 ( B*   )
an0 1 an
(since an  an0 .... )
an0 an 1
1/ n 1/ n
 lim inf an  A* and limsup an  B* .
n  n 

1/(   )
Since, lim an / an 1 n n 1 exists, A*  B* .
n 

1/ n 1 1/  1/(   )
 lim an exists and  lim an n  lim an / an 1 n n1
n  R n n 


 



1
Example.  n ( z  z0 ) .
n2

n 0 2

The radius of convergence R of the above power series is
given by
2 2
n 1 1/( n  ( n 1) )
1 2
 lim  n 
R n  2 

1/(2 n 1)
1
 lim   1
n   2 


 


Radius of Convergence of Product of Power Series

Let

 n
a ( z  z n
0 has radius of convergence R1
)
n 0
and

 bn ( z  z0 )n has radius of convergence R2
n 0


Hadamard Product:  an bn  z  z0  is called the Hadamard
n

n 0
Product of the above two power series.

Let R* be its radius of convergence.

1/ n 1/ n 1/ n
Since, limsup an bn  limsup an limsup bn (prove!)
n  n  n 
1 1
 *
  R *
 R R
1 2  [min( R ,
1 2R )]2

R R R
1 2

 

*Cauchy Product:

The power series  ( a0bn  ...  an b0 ) ( z  z0 )n (*)
n 0
is called the Cauchy Product of the above two Power series.
Let R be its radius of convergence.

Proposition. If the radius of convergence of

f ( z )   an  z  z0  is R1 and radius of convergence of
n

n 0

g ( z )   bn  z  z0  is R2 , then the radius of convergence of
n

n 0
their Cauchy product is R  min( R1 , R2 ) .

Proof. WLOG assume that z0 = 0.
n
Let Sn ( z ) be n th
partial sum  ak z k (1)
k 0
n
Tn ( z ) be n th partial sum k
b z k
(2)
k 0
n
Pn ( z ) be n th partial sum  (a0bk  ...  ak b0 ) z k .
k 0
To show: If f(z) is limit of (1) as n  and g(z) is limit of (2)
as n  , then (*) has the sum f(z).g(z) in
z  z0  R  min( R1 , R2 ) , where R1 is the radius of
convergence for power series of f(z) and R2 is the radius of
convergence for power series of g(z).

 

Now,
Pn ( z )  a0b0  ( a0b1  a1b0 ) z  ...  ( a0bn  ...  an b0 ) z n
 a0Tn ( z )  a1Tn 1 ( z ) z  ...  anT0 ( z ) z n

 a0 ( n ( z )  g ( z ))  a1 ( n 1 ( z )  g ( z )) z  ...  an ( 0 ( z )  g ( z )) z n ,
where  n ( z )  Tn ( z )  g ( z )  Tn ( z )   n ( z )  g ( z )

 [ Sn ( z ) g ( z )]  [a0 n ( z )  a1 n 1 ( z ) z  ...  an 0 ( z ) z n ] .

Since,  n ( z ) 0 as n   in z  R2 ,  n ( z )   n  N and

further  ( z )   an z   in z  R1 ,
n

n 0
 n ( z )  a0 n ( z )  a1 z n 1 ( z )  ...  an z n 0 ( z )

 an z n 0 ( z )  ...  an  N z n  N  N ( z )

 an ( N 1) z n ( N 1) N 1 ( z )  ...  a0 n ( z )

 an z n 0 ( z )  ...  an  N z n  N  N ( z )
  ( z ) in z  min( R1 , R2 )
 lim  n ( z )   ( z ) ( since an zn  0 as n  )
n 
 lim  n ( z )  0, ( since  is arb.)
n 
 lim Pn ( z )  lim Sn ( z ) g ( z )  f ( z ). g ( z ) .
n  n 
 
 

 

Complex Integration

Let C : z (t ), a  t  b , be a  zn  
continuously differentiable
curve, i.e. z(t) is a continuously  zn 1  

differentiable function in [a, b] .



For any partition  z2   
C : z (t )  
 z1  
{a  t0 , t1 ,..., tm 1 , tm  b}of [a , b] ,
 z0  

let z (t j )  z j , j  0,1,..., m
a  t0 t1    t2    tn1    tn   

Let the function f : C  C be continuous on the curve C .
n
Consider the sum Sn   f ( m )( zm  zm 1 )
m 1
where,  m is any point on the curve lying between zm 1 and
zm .

Definition. Complex Integration of f on C is defined as

 f ( z ) dz  lim Sn , provided max zm  0 as n  
C n  1 m  n




 


Equivalently, using the definition of integral of real functions,
b
 f ( z ) dz   f ( z (t )) z (t ) dt . (*)
C a

Note. The definition (*) is independent of the parametric
representation of C. For if w(t) , c  t  d , is another
parametric representation of C . Let  :  c, d    a, b be one‐
one onto differentiable function such that  ( c )  a ,  ( d )  b
and w(t )  z ( (t )) . Then,
d d
 (t ) dt   f ( z ( (t ))) z( (t )) (t ) dt
 f ( w(t )) w
c c

 (d ) b
  f ( z ( x )) z ( x ) dx   f ( z ( x )) z( x ) dx
 (c) a


z (t )  
w( t )  

a  b  c  d 


 (t )  




 

For studying the properties of integration of a function


f : C  C, we need the definition and properties of a function
F : [a, b]  C.

Integration of Functions F : [a, b]  C

Let F (t )  u (t )  i v (t ), a  t  b . Define,

b b b
 F (t ) dt   u (t ) dt  i  v (t ) dt
a a a

Properties.

b b
(i) Re  F (t ) dt   Re F (t ) dt
a a
b b
(ii)   F (t ) dt    F (t ) dt ,   a complex constant
a a
b b
(iii) |  F (t ) dt |   | F (t ) | dt
a a

Proof: (i) and (ii) immediately follow from the definition.






10 
 

b
i0
(iii) Let r0 e   F (t ) dt . Then,
a
b
r0   e i0 F (t ) dt
a

 
b
  Re e i0 F (t ) dt (using (i ))
a
b b
 i0
  e F (t ) dt   F (t ) dt (using property of real integral)
a a

11 
 

Properties of Complex Integration  f ( z ) dz


C

(1)  f ( z ) dz    f ( z ) dz (use that if parametric rep. of C is
C C
z (t ), a  t  b , then parametric rep. of –C is z ( t ) : b  t   a
or, alternatively, z (b  ( a  t )) : a  t  b )


(2)   f ( z ) dz    f ( z ) dz ( easily follows from definition )
C C

(3)
 ( f  g ) dz   f dz   g dz ( follows easily from definition )
C C C
12 
 

(4) If C1 is continuous curve from 1 to 1 , C2 is a


continuous curve  2 to  2 and 1   2 and the curve C is
union of curves C1 and C2 , then

 f ( z ) dz   f dz   f dz
C C1 C2

(5)  f ( z ) dz  ML, where L is the length of C and
C
f ( z )  M for z  C .

(The property (5) is called ML‐Estimate of the integral).

13 
 

Proof (4):

Let C1 : z1 (t ), 0  t  1 and C2 : z2 (t ), 0  t  1 .

 z (2t ), 0  t  1 / 2
Then, C = z(t), where z (t )   1
 z2 (2t  1), 1 / 2  t  1

Therefore,

1
 f ( z ) dz   f ( z (t )) z (t ) dt
C 0

1/2 1
  f ( z (t )) z(t ) dt   f ( z (t )) z (t ) dt
0 1/2

1/2 1
  f ( z1 (2t ))( z1 (2t ).2) dt   f ( z2 (2t  1)) ( z2 (2t  1).2) dt
0 1/2
1 1
  f ( z1 (t ) ( z1 (t ).) dt   f ( z2 (t ) z2 (t ) dt
0 0
  f ( z ) dz   f ( z ) dz
C1 C2

14 
 

Proof (5):
b
 f ( z ) dz   f ( z (t ) z (t ) dt
C a

b
 M  z (t ) dt  ML
a

15 
 

Example 1: Show that


dz
 4  4 2, where C : The line segment joining i and 1.
Cz
        i   
Solution:
y  1 x
L = length of C = 2


On C, z  x  y  x  (1  x )
2 2 2 2


4 1 1 1
 z  ( x 2  (1  x )2 )2  (2 x 2  2 x  1)2  [2( x  )2  ]2 
2 2 4

Using Property 5, we now get the required estimate of the
integral in Example 1.

You might also like