Performance in Language Learning
Performance in Language Learning
MODULE 2 UNIT 1
This unit is a continuation of what you learnt in Module 1 unit 7 where you
were introduced to psycholinguistics and language learning. You were told that
psycholinguistics is one of the subfields of applied linguistics and that it is not
only important for AL but also for other areas of language work. You also
learnt that the principal concern of psychology of language is to give an
account of the psychological processes that go on when people produce or
understand utterances- that is, the investigation of language performance. You
were also taught the differences and similarities between language acquisition
and language learning and that the issue performance in language learning will
be discussed in this unit. I think you now remember some of the things we
talked about in the last unit.
CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Objectives
3.0 Main content
3.1 Productive and receptive performance
3.2 Process of language learning
3.2.1 Recognition
3.2.2 Identification
3.3 Theories of language learning
3.3.1 Language learning
3.3.2 Inductive learning
3.3.3 Deductive learning
3.4 Language learning and language teaching
4.0 Conclusion
5.0 Summary
6.0 Tutor marked assignments
7.0 References and further reading
1.0 INTRODUCTION
81
Language performance has to do with the psychological processes that go on
when people use sentences. The language skills that scholars commonly refer
to are listening, speaking reading and writing. As labelled categories, they do
not take care of what goes on in the head. We still have to rely on
psycholinguists to tell us what goes on when people actually use language.
Corder notes that there are two types of performance-productive (the ones we
say or do) and receptive performance (the ones we listen to or exposed to).
Before we go on, let us look at what you are expected to be able to do after you
have completed reading through this unit. Below are some of the objectives of
this unit.
2.0 OBJECTIVES
Production and performance are two basic activities that human beings engage
in during language learning. The language teacher should not approach his
work based on the teaching of speaking, hearing, writing and reading alone
because the pupils are already familiar with these in their mother tongue.
Learning to read and write presupposes the ability to speak and hear- that is the
possession of some verbal behaviour. The language teacher does not start from
the scratch because the learner already has a base on which the teacher can
build the new language activities. He/she only needs to extend this skill in the
pupils relatively to a particular level (Corder (1973). For example, one can read
and make meaning of writing in a language that has some Roman alphabets
because one knows the alphabets.
In speaking, we need the skill to make use of our organs in such a way that we
are able to control all the sounds that we produce. We should be able to
82
monitor our own production. This is a productive performance and the ability
to monitor our own production is what Corder refers to as auditory feedback.
He notes that deaf speakers often take on certain peculiarities of sound because
of the lack of the monitoring process.
3.2.1 Recognition
3.2.2 Identification
83
of linguistic information, the execution of the programme which is the actual
set of articulatory actions; and the monitoring function which is simultaneous
with the execution.
Some theories of language learning were discussed in Mod 1 unit 2. You will
get to know a few more in this section as they relate to performance in
language learning. Researchers ask questions on how the child and the learner
acquire language skills. The answers to their question border on the theories of
language acquisition and learning. Below are some of them.
84
inherited categories or concepts common to all human language (linguistic
universals). He refers to this latter theory as the nativist hypothesis which is
based on three considerations; first, all human language in spite of their
obvious superficial differences show remarkable superficial similarities;
second, the process of constructing a theory from the data i.e the inductive
theory would take too long, third; that the data on which it works is too
distorted and partial for the purpose.
The deductive theory assumes that language is peculiar to human beings- that
they are born with a specific programme for acquiring it. To Skinner (1957), it
is learned by some sort of data-processing by heuristic (aiding or guiding)
processes of hypothesis formation and testing; that language is a matter of rule-
governed behaviour, not responses but rules for making responses.
Teachers have probably noticed some deficiencies in the theories and have
therefore decided to stick to the techniques which seem to be working for them
and their students. To the teachers, the techniques they use are as good as the
newer techniques which emphasise audiovisual. In short, teachers seem to be
using an eclectic approach to get the best from their pupils. Recently however,
with the advent of computer facilities, there has been a lot of research on how
to use the computer to aid learning. This is fast gaining grounds in many
advanced countries and this has led to a shift in emphasis from the traditional
method to some other modern methods of teaching. You will be introduced to
this in one of the units latter on in this course.
4.0 CONCLUSION
In this unit we have talked about performance in language learning and that
performance has to do with the psychological processes that go on when people
85
use sentences. The process of language learning involves recognition and
identification and that the speech production functions involved in
identification are – ideational, planning, execution, monitoring and storage.
Inductive and deductive learning are some of the learning theories that we
have. You have learnt about some other learning theories in Mod 1 unit 2.
5.0 SUMMARY
86