BRIDGE HYDRAULIC REPORT

Bridge Number: I70-59-05180 CEBL & JCWB

Route Identification: I-70

Crossing: Branch of McCracken Creek

Location: 0.43 miles East of SR 39

County: Hendricks

E
PL
M
SA

Prepared by:
Robyn M. Toole, P.E.
WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff
September 22, 2016
Des No. 1600384 & 1600385
Bridge No. I70-59-05180 CEBL & JCWB

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Location.................................................................................................................................... 4
2. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 4
3. Project Summary ....................................................................................................................... 5
4. Hydrologic Analysis .................................................................................................................... 6
4.1 Drainage Area ...................................................................................................................... 6
4.2 Runoff Curve Number ........................................................................................................... 6
4.3 Rainfall Volume .................................................................................................................... 6
4.4 Time of Concentration/Lag Time ............................................................................................ 6
4.5 Hydrologic Modeling Results .................................................................................................. 7

E
5. Hydraulic Analysis...................................................................................................................... 7
5.1 Data and Methodology .......................................................................................................... 7
6. Scour Analysis ........................................................................................................................... 8
PL
6.1 Results and Conclusions ........................................................................................................ 8
6.2 Proposed Countermeasures ................................................................................................... 9
M
SA

Page 2 of 9
Des No. 1600384 & 1600385
Bridge No. I70-59-05180 CEBL & JCWB

APPENDICES

Appendix A: General Project Information

1. Existing Bridge Plans
2. Latest INDOT Bridge Inspection Report with Site Photos
3. Field Inspection Notes from 05-04-16 site visit
4. Photographic Log from 05-04-16 site visit
5. INDOT Hydraulics QA Checklist

Appendix B: Hydrologic Data

1. Topographic Map with Drainage Area and Flowpath
2. Aerial Photo with Drainage Area and Flowpath
3. Web Soil Survey Data
4. L-THIA data
5. Curve Number Calculation
6. NOAA Point Precipitation Frequency Estimates

E
7. TR-55 Worksheet for Time of Concentration and Flow
8. HEC-HMS Inputs and Results

Appendix C: Hydraulic Data

1. Cross-Section Map
PL
2. CheckRAS Output
3. HEC-RAS Scour Analysis Results

Appendix D: Proposed Structure Information

M
1. Proposed Structure Sheets
SA

Page 3 of 9
Des No. 1600384 & 1600385
Bridge No. I70-59-05180 CEBL & JCWB

1. LOCATION
The I-70 crossing of Branch McCracken Creek is located 0.43 miles east of the I-70 junction with SR
39 in Section 25, Township 14 North and Range 1 West, in Hendricks County, Indiana, as shown
below on the USGS Mooresville West quadrangle map.

E
PL
M
SA

2. INTRODUCTION
The Branch McCracken Creek Bridge is composed of two 3-span bridges, one carrying the I-70
westbound lanes and the other carrying the I-70 eastbound lanes, located in Hendricks County,
Indiana within the INDOT Crawfordsville District. An excerpt of the original bridge plans is provided
in Appendix A-1 and the most recent INDOT inspection report is provided in Appendix A-2.
This report presents the hydrologic analysis and proposed condition scour analysis for the I-70
crossing of Branch of McCracken Creek. Both the Eastbound (Bridge No. I70-59-05180 CEBL) and
Westbound (Bridge No. I70-59-05180 JCWB) bridges at this crossing will be widened to allow for
the addition of one travel lane in each direction. The bridge piers will be extended as part of the
Page 4 of 9
Des No. 1600384 & 1600385
Bridge No. I70-59-05180 CEBL & JCWB

widening of both bridges. Pertinent information about the existing structure is provided below.
Survey data, LiDAR elevation data, field reconnaissance, existing bridge plans (Appendix A-1), and
previous inspection reports (Appendix A-2) were utilized to develop a model of the existing
conditions for this structure.

EXISTING STRUCTURE INFORMATION

· Year Built: 1966
· Year Reconstructed: 1996
· Surface Type: Concrete Cast-in-Place
· Out-to-Out of Copings (Eastbound): 51’9”
· Out-to-Out of Copings (Westbound): 55’5”
· Out-to-Out of Bridge Floor (Eastbound): 73’0”
· Out-to-Out of Bridge Floor (Westbound): 73’0”
· Skew: 0 degrees
· Type of Superstructure: Slab, Concrete Continuous
· Spans: 3

E
· Type of Substructure/Foundation: Spread Footing
· Spans: 22’0”, 27’6”, 22’0”
· Location: Rural PL
· INDOT District: Crawfordsville
· Quadrangle: Mooresville West

I-70 is classified as a Principal, Arterial. In the existing condition it consists of three 12’ lanes with a
10’ outside shoulder and a 4’ inside shoulder in each direction. The area around the Branch
M
McCracken Creek crossing consists of a mix of farm fields, wooded areas and suburban
developments. The bridge was constructed in 1966. The bridge piers are on relatively shallow
spread footings; the abutments are supported by piles.
SA

3. PROJECT SUMMARY
The intent of the proposed work at the McCracken Creek Bridge is to rehabilitate the bridge deck,
as well as widen the existing 4’ inside shoulder to a 10’ shoulder and add one 12’ travel lane. The
existing bridges have a 45.5’ gap between them (measured perpendicular to the bridge face). The
proposed widening would leave a 9.0’ gap in the proposed condition. There is no proposed change
to the bridge opening area. Pavement design has not been completed, but based on amount of
available freeboard no change to the bridge net waterway opening is anticipated.
INDOT personnel met with WSP | Parsons Brinkerhoff staff on-site on May 4, 2016 to inspect
Bridge No. I70-60-5180 and discuss the details of the bridge widening associated with the added
travel lanes project. During inspection, it was observed that one of the bridge pier footings was
exposed. Field Inspection Notes are provided in Appendix A-3 and a log of the photographs taken
during the field inspection is provided in Appendix A-4.
Permit requirements for the project are summarized below.

Page 5 of 9
Des No. 1600384 & 1600385
Bridge No. I70-59-05180 CEBL & JCWB

PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
· Hendricks County GIS was referenced to verify that Branch McCracken Creek is not a
regulated drain at the I-70 crossing in Hendricks County
· Rule 5 Permit will be investigated
· IDEM Section 401 Permit will be required
· IDEM Isolated Wetlands Permit will be investigated
· USACE Section 404 Permit will be required
· IDNR Construction in a Floodway permit is not required due to the drainage area being less
than 50 square miles in a rural area

4. HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS
4.1 Drainage Area

The contributing watershed boundary was delineated using the field survey data provided by
INDOT’s survey team and 1-foot contours created from the 2011-2013 Indiana Orthophotography

E
(RGBI), LiDAR and Elevation data set available via the Indiana Spatial Data Portal (ISDP). The ISDP
LiDAR data and the survey information provided by INDOT are both set to the NAVD 1988 vertical
control datum. The delineated drainage area and time of concentration flowpath are shown on a
PL
topographic map with 10-foot contours in Appendix B-1 and on aerial photography in Appendix B-2.
The calculated drainage area is estimated to be 1,398 acres or 2.18 square miles.

4.2 Runoff Curve Number

M
The weighted runoff curve number (CN) was determined using the land use and soil group
combinations provided by aerial photography, the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey, the Purdue University Long Term Hydrologic Impact Analysis (L-THIA) tool, and
Figure 202-2E in the Indiana Design Manual (IDM). See Appendix B-3 for the Web Soil Survey
SA

information and Appendix B-4 for L-THIA information for the contributing watershed area. See
Appendix B-5 for the resultant land use and soil group breakdown as well as the calculation of the
weighted CN value used for the hydrologic analysis. The weighted runoff curve number was
estimated to be 83 for the contributing watershed area.

4.3 Rainfall Volume

Rainfall data was obtained from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Atlas
14 for the nearest gauge located in Indianapolis, Indiana. See Appendix B-6 for the NOAA output
utilized for hydrologic analysis. The rainfall distribution used was the 50% Probability Huff
Distribution (Quartile II) for the Indianapolis Station from IDM Figure 29-10A.

4.4 Time of Concentration/Lag Time

The time of concentration and the lag time were calculated using the TR-55 methodology as
specified in the Section 202-2.05 of the IDM. See Appendix B-7 for the worksheet showing
calculations for the contributing watershed. The calculated time of concentration was estimated to
be 101 minutes. The lag time was estimated to be 61 minutes (60% of the time of concentration).

Page 6 of 9
Des No. 1600384 & 1600385
Bridge No. I70-59-05180 CEBL & JCWB

4.5 Hydrologic Modeling Results

Figure 203-2C of the Indiana Design Manual (IDM) specifies the use of the 1% (100-year) annual
Exceedance Probability (EP) for allowable backwater and roadway serviceability. The SCS unit
hydrograph method was used to calculate the peak design discharge value for the 100-year annual
EP. The USACE HEC-HMS Version 4.0 software program was applied to calculate the peak discharge
for various storm durations to determine the highest peak discharge for the 100-year design storm
event. Based on the results of the hydrologic analysis, the 100-year peak design discharge was
determined to be 1,306 cfs. See Appendix B-8 for the HEC-HMS model results for the 100-year
design storm event for various storm durations.

5. HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS
5.1 Data and Methodology
A hydraulic model of the I-70 crossing of Branch McCracken Creek was developed using the USACE

E
HEC-RAS Version 4.1.0 software. Cross sections were developed using a combination of LiDAR
elevation data and the ground survey data collected by INDOT. Appendix C-1 contains a map of the
cross sections used for model development. Cross sections were started approximately 850 feet
PL
downstream of the downstream face of the eastbound I-70 bridge. The cross section designations
correlate to the river station measured upstream from the confluence of Branch McCracken Creek
with McCracken Creek.
There are two cross sections located between the westbound and eastbound I-70 bridges: cross
section 5185 and 5188. These cross sections are necessary for modeling the existing bridges in
M
HEC-RAS. The cross sections at river station 5185 and 5188 are elevation adjusted copies of the
cross section at river station 5323, which is the first cross-section upstream from the I-70 crossing.
This was done because the roadway embankment from the downstream side of the westbound
bridge meets the roadway embankment and upstream side of the eastbound bridge with no
SA

remaining natural topography available to create cross sections between the bridges.
There is a 36 ft. wide arch bridge located approximately 150 feet downstream of the eastbound I-
70 bridge which carries County Road 1000 S over Branch McCracken Creek. Information on the
location of this bridge, the low chord elevation, and the channel thalweg elevations at the bridge
faces was collected by the INDOT ground survey team. The CR 1000 S bridge is located between
the cross sections at river station 4912 and river station 5007.
The model vertical datum is NAVD88 and horizontal datum is NAD83.
Branch McCracken Creek is a natural stream channel with a bank-to-bank width of approximately
30 feet. The channel bottom is slightly meandering and the banks are overgrown with dense and
high grass. Agricultural fields with some forested and pastured land are located on both sides of
the channel.
The boundary condition used for the hydraulic model was the normal depth boundary condition. For
normal depth, Manning’s equation is used to calculate the normal depth of flow using the energy
slope. The energy slope can be approximated using the average slope of the channel. For the
Branch McCracken Creek model the average slope of the channel was calculated using the USGS
Topographic Map 10-foot contours. The CheckRAS output is included as Appendix C-2.

Page 7 of 9
Des No. 1600384 & 1600385
Bridge No. I70-59-05180 CEBL & JCWB

Hydraulic Data Table for Eastbound Bridge

Parameter Existing Proposed

Drainage Area (acres) 1,398 acres
Skew (degrees) 0 degrees
Q100 (cubic feet per second) 1,306 cfs
Q100 Elevation (feet NAVD88) 753.21
Q100 Headwater Elevation (feet NAVD88) 753.68 753.70
Gross Waterway Opening Below Q100 Elevation (feet NAVD88) 230 230
Road-Overflow Area (square feet) 0 0
Q100 Velocity (feet per second) 5.58 5.58
Minimum Low-Structure Elevation (feet NAVD88) 759.13 759.13

E
Hydraulic Data Table for Westbound Bridge

Parameter
Drainage Area (acres)
PL Existing Proposed
1,398 acres
Skew (degrees) 0 degrees
Q100 (cubic feet per second) 1,306 cfs
Q100 Elevation (feet NAVD88) 753.54
M
Q100 Headwater Elevation (feet NAVD88) 754.77 754.80
Gross Waterway Opening Below Q100 Elevation (feet NAVD88) 225 225
Road-Overflow Area (square feet) 0 0
Q100 Velocity (feet per second) 5.99 5.94
SA

Minimum Low-Structure Elevation (feet NAVD88) 759.13 759.13

6. SCOUR ANALYSIS
6.1 Results and Conclusions
Scour analysis for the proposed condition hydraulic model was performed using the Q 100 discharge
of 1,306 cfs. HEC-RAS Version 4.1.0 was used for analysis of contraction scour and pier scour as
described in IDM Section 203-303(04).
During the inspection of the eastbound bridge on September 14, 2015 a large scour hole was noted
between the piers. This scour hole could not be seen during the May 4, 2016 inspection likely due
to the murkiness of the water from spring rains. Results from the HEC-RAS scour analysis are
provided in the tables below. Appendix C-3 contains the HEC-RAS output and the bridge cross
section plot for the proposed condition for both the eastbound and westbound bridges. The cross
section at River Station 6015 was used as the approach cross section for both bridges.

Page 8 of 9
Des No. 1600384 & 1600385
Bridge No. I70-59-05180 CEBL & JCWB

Scour Data Table for Eastbound Bridge

Parameter
Q100 Maximum Velocity (feet per second) 6.82
Q100 Contraction Scour (feet) 2.23
Q100 Total Scour (feet) 5.83
Flowline Elevation (feet NAVD88) 744.60
Q100 Low-Scour Elevation (feet NAVD88) 738.77
Spread Footing Elevation (feet NAVD88) 739.64

Scour Data Table for Westbound Bridge

Parameter
Q100 Maximum Velocity (feet per second) 7.75

E
Q100 Contraction Scour (feet) 3.21
Q100 Total Scour (feet) 6.54
Flowline Elevation (feet NAVD88) 745.19
PL
Q100 Low-Scour Elevation (feet NAVD88)
Spread Footing Elevation (feet NAVD88)
738.65
739.64

6.2 Proposed Countermeasures

M
Based on the results of the scour analysis, both the eastbound and westbound North Branch
McCracken Creek bridges are considered to be scour critical. Class 1 Riprap is recommended for
scour protection at both abutments and piers at both the eastbound and westbound bridges based
SA

upon the Q100 maximum velocity and IDM Figure 203-2D. Class 1 Riprap will be placed around each
bridge pier at a minimum thickness of 3 feet and out to a distance of 6 feet from the outside wall of
the piers. For the bridge abutments, Class 1 riprap will be placed around the cone of the abutment
from top of bank to toe of slope with a square toe trench placed below the riprap and at a
minimum thickness of 2 feet.

Page 9 of 9
Des No. 1600384 & 1600385
Bridge No. I70-59-05180 CEBL & JCWB

APPENDIX A

E
General Project Information
PL
M
SA
E
PL
M
SA

Appendix A-1
E
PL
M
SA

Appendix A-1
E
PL
M
SA

Appendix A-1
Bridge Inspection Report
I70-60-05180 CEBL
I-70 EB
over
BRANCH MCCRACKEN CREEK

E
PL
M
SA

Inspection Date: 09/14/2015

Inspected By: Melvin Hughes
Inspection Type(s): Routine

Appendix A-2
TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE NUMBER

E
PL
M
SA

Appendix A-2
Inspector: Melvin Hughes Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

E
PL
M
SA

Latitude: 39.61572
Longitude: -86.472374

Appendix A-2
Page 3 of 25
Inspector: Melvin Hughes Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

Inspection notes by Melvin Hughes that do not appear elsewhere in the

report.
Both approach slabs have longitudinal cracking and the west has two
patches and 1 spall 1' x 1'.
The west joint has 8' missing.
Parapet walls are in good shape.

E
PL
M
SA

Appendix A-2
Page 4 of 25
Inspector: Melvin Hughes Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

IDENTIFICATION
(1) STATE CODE: 185 - Indiana (12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK: 1
(8) STRUCTURE: 041780 (13A) INVENTORY ROUTE: 0000000001
(5 A-B-C-D-E) INV. ROUTE: 1 - 1 - 1 - 00070 - 0 (13B) SUBROUTE NUMBER: 01
(2) HIGHWAY AGENCY 01 - Crawfordsville (16) LATITUDE: 39.61572
DISTRICT:
(17) LONGITUDE: -86.472374
(3) COUNTY CODE: 032 - HENDRICKS
(4) PLACE CODE: 00000 - N/A (98) BORDER

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED: BRANCH A) STATE NAME:

MCCRACKEN B) PERCENT %
(7) FACILITY CARRIED: I-70 EB
CREEK
(9) LOCATION: 00.43 E SR 39 (99) BORDER BRIDGE STRUCT.
NO:
(11) MILEPOINT: 0059.640

E
STRUCTURE TYPE AND MATERIAL
(43) STRUCTURE TYPE, MAIN: PL (45) NUMBER OF SPANS IN MAIN 003
UNIT:
A) KIND OF 2 - Concrete continuous (46) NUMBER OF APPROACH 0000
MATERIAL/DESIGN: SPANS:
B) TYPE OF DESIGN/CONSTR: 01 - Slab (107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE: 1 - Concrete
Cast-in-Place
(44) STRUCTURE TYPE, (108) WEARING SURFACE/PROT
M
APPROACH SPANS: SYS:
A) KIND OF 0 - Other A) WEARING SURFACE: 3 - Latex Concrete or
MATERIAL/DESIGN: similar additive
B) TYPE OF DESIGN/CONSTR: 00 - Other B) DECK MEMBRANE: 0 - None
SA

C) DECK PROTECTION: 0 - None

AGE OF SERVICE
(27) YEAR BUILT: 1966 (28) LANES:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: 1996 A) ON BRIDGE: 02
B) UNDER BRIDGE: 00
(42) TYPE OF SERVICE: (29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 029080
A) ON BRIDGE: 1 - Highway
(30) YEAR OF AVERAGE DAILY 2006
B) UNDER BRIDGE: 5 - Waterway TRAFFIC:
(109) AVERAGE DAILY TRUCK 28 %
TRAFFIC:
(19) BYPASS DETOUR LENGTH: 001 MI

Appendix A-2
Page 5 of 25
Inspector: Melvin Hughes Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

GEOMETRIC DATA
(48) LENGTH OF MAX SPAN: 0027.5 FT (35) STRUCTURE FLARED: 0 - No flare
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH: 00073.0 FT (10) INV RTE, MIN VERT 99.99 FT
CLEARANCE:
(50) CURB/SIDEWALK WIDTHS:
(47) TOT HORIZ CLEARANCE: 048.7 FT
A) LEFT 00.0 FT
(53) VERT CLEAR OVER BR RDWY: 99.99 FT
B) RIGHT: 00.0 FT
(54) MIN VERTICAL
(51) BRDG RDWY WIDTH 048.7 FT UNDERCLEARANCE:
CURB-TO-CURB: A) REFERENCE FEATURE: N
B) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR: 0 FT
(52) DECK WIDTH, OUT-TO-OUT: 051.7 FT
(55) LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE
(32) APPROACH ROADWAY 038.0 FT RIGHT:
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: 0 - No median A) REFERENCE FEATURE: N
B) MIN LATERAL UNDERCLEAR: 000.0 FT

E
(34) SKEW: 00 DEG (56) MIN LATERAL UNDERCLEAR 00.0 FT
ON LEFT:

INSPECTIONS
(90) INSPECTION DATE:
(92) CRITICAL FEATURE
09/14/2015
PL (91) DESIGNATED INSPECTION
FREQUENCY:
24 MONTHS

INSPECTION: (93) CRITICAL FEATURE

A) FRACTURE CRITICAL N INSPECTION DATE:
REQUIRED/FREQUENCY: A) FRACTURE CRITICAL DATE:
M
B) UNDERWATER INSPECTION N B) UNDERWATER INSP DATE:
REQUIRED/FREQUENCY:
C) OTHER SPECIAL INSPECTION N C) OTHER SPECIAL INSP DATE:
REQUIRED/FREQUENCY:
SA

CONDITION
(58) DECK: 6 - Satisfactory (60) SUBSTRUCTURE: 7 - Good Condition
Condition (minor (some minor
deterioration) problems)
(58.01) WEARING SURFACE: 6 - Satisfactory (61) CHANNEL/CHANNEL 7 - Bank protection
Condition PROTECTION: needs minor repairs
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE: 6 - Satisfactory (62) CULVERTS: N - Not Applicable
Condition (minor
deterioration)
CONDITION COMMENTS
(58) DECK: 6 - Satisfactory Condition (minor deterioration)
Comments:
There is a longitudinal crack with white efflorescence and rust stains in all 3 spans along the edge where the deck was widened.
All spans have longitudinal cracking and transverse in span B.{Melvin Hughes,09-14-2015}.
(58.01) WEARING SURFACE: 6 - Satisfactory Condition
Comments:
The wearing surface has a longitudinal crack along the lenght of the deck on the shoulder, south of the white edge line.{Melvin
Hughes,09-14-2015}.

Appendix A-2
Page 6 of 25
Inspector: Melvin Hughes Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE: 6 - Satisfactory Condition (minor deterioration)

Comments:
There is a longitudinal crack with white efflorescence and rust stains in all 3 spans along the edge where the deck was widened.
All spans have longitudinal cracking with efflorescence and transverse in span B.{Melvin Hughes,09-14-2015}.
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE: 7 - Good Condition (some minor problems)
Comments:
Pier 3 has a spall on the west pier wall.{Melvin Hughes,09-14-2015}.
(61) CHANNEL/CHANNEL 7 - Bank protection needs minor repairs
PROTECTION
Comments:
The water was not flowing during the inspection; The channel has a large scour under the structure between the piers.{Melvin
Hughes,09-14-2015}.
(62) CULVERTS: N - Not Applicable

E
Comments:
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: 6 - HS 20+Mod PL (66) INVENTORY RATING: 36
(70) BRIDGE POSTING 5 - Equal to or above (65) INVENTORY RATING METHOD: 2 - Allowable Stress
legal loads (AS)
(66B) INVENTORY RATING (H): 20
(41) STRUCTURE A - Open
OPEN/POSTED/CLOSED: (66D) DATE POSTED/CLOSED:
M
(64) OPERATING RATING: 61
(63) OPERATING RATING 2 - Allowable Stress (AS)
METHOD:
SA

APPRAISAL
SUFFICIENCY RATING: 95.3 (36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEATURE:
STATUS: 0 36A) BRIDGE RAILINGS: 1
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION: 6 36B) TRANSITIONS: 1
(68) DECK GEOMETRY: 9 36C) APPROACH GUARDRAIL: 1
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES, N 36D) APPROACH GUARDRAIL 1
VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL: ENDS:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY: 7 - Slight Chance of Overtopping Bridge
Comments:
Slight chance of over topping bridge deck and roadway approaches.
(72) APPROACH ROADWAY ALIGNMENT: 8 - Equal to present desirable criteria
Comments:
The approaching roadway and bridge alignments do not impede traffic in anyway for vehicles traveling at the current speed
limit.
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL BRIDGES: 7 - Countermeasures installed to correct scour problem
Comments:
The water was not flowing during the inspection; The channel has a large scour under the structure between the piers. Rip rap
was seen below the water at the piers.{Melvin Hughes,09-14-2015}.
Appendix A-2
Page 7 of 25
Inspector: Melvin Hughes Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

CLASSIFICATION
(20) TOLL: 3 - On Free Road (21) MAINT. RESPONSIBILITY: 01 - State Highway
Agency
(22) OWNER: 01 - State Highway
Agency (26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS OF 01 - Rural - Principal
INVENTORY RTE: Arterial - Interstate
(37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE: 5 - Not eligible
(100) STRAHNET HIGHWAY: Is on an Interstate
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: R - Right structure STRAHNET route
(North or East) (102) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC: 1-way traffic
(103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE:

(104) HIGHWAY SYSTEM OF 1 - Structure/Route is on

(105) FEDERAL LANDS 0-Not Applicable INVENTORY ROUTE: NHS
HIGHWAYS:
(110) DESIGNATED NATIONAL Inventory route on
(112) NBIS BRIDGE LENGTH: Yes NETWORK: National Truck Network

E
NAVIGATION DATA
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL: 0 - No navigation (39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEAR: 000.0 FT
control on waterway PL
(bridge permit not (116) MINIMUM NAVIGATION VERT. FT
required) CLEARANCE, VERT. LIFT BRIDGE:

(111) PIER OR ABUTMENT (40) NAV HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE: 0000.0 FT

PROTECTION:
M
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
(75A) TYPE OF WORK: 35 - Rehabilitation - (95) ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT COST: $ 000000
Deterioration
(96) TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ 000424
SA

(75B) WORK DONE BY: 1 - Work to be done by

contract (97) YR OF IMPROVEMENT COST EST: 2006
(76) LENGTH OF IMPROVEMENT: 000073 FT (114) FUTURE AVG DAILY TRAFFIC: 052665
(94) BRIDGE IMPROVEMENT $ 000424 (115) YR OF FUTURE ADT: 2033
COST:

Appendix A-2
Page 8 of 25
Inspector: Melvin Hughes Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

Total Condition Condition Condition Condition

Environment Units
Quantity State 1 State 2 State 3 State 4
38 - Reinforced Concrete Slab 2 - Low 3778 sq. ft. 3581 197 0 0
Longitudinal and transverse cracking with efflorescence.
1120 - Efflorescence/Rust Staining 95 95
1130 - Cracking (RC and Other) 102 102
510 - Wearing Surfaces 3559 sq. ft. 3486 73 0 0
3220 - Crack (Wearing Surface) 73 73
210 - Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall 2 - Low 104 ft. 103 0 1 0
Spall on the west side of pier 3 CS3.
1080 - Delamination/Spall/Patched Area 1 1

E
215 - Reinforced Concrete Abutment 2 - Low 103 ft. 103
301 - Pourable Joint Seal PL2 - Low 103 ft. 95 0 0 8
West joint is missing 8' of material.
2330 - Seal Damage 8 8
321 - Reinforced Concrete Approach Slab 2 - Low 1999 sq. ft. 1962 36 1 0
Both approach slabs have cracking and the west has spalling.
1080 - Delamination/Spall/Patched Area 1 1
M
1130 - Cracking (RC and Other) 36 36
331 - Reinforced Concrete Bridge Railing 2 - Low 146 ft. 146
SA

Appendix A-2
Page 9 of 25
Inspector: Melvin Hughes Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

E
PL
PHOTO 1

Description
M
SA

PHOTO 2

Description

Appendix A-2
Page 10 of 25
Inspector: Melvin Hughes Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

E
PL
PHOTO 3

Description
M
SA

PHOTO 4

Description

Appendix A-2
Page 11 of 25
Inspector: Melvin Hughes Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

E
PL
PHOTO 5

Description
M
SA

PHOTO 6

Description

Appendix A-2
Page 12 of 25
Inspector: Melvin Hughes Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

E
PL
PHOTO 7

Description
M
SA

PHOTO 8

Description

Appendix A-2
Page 13 of 25
Inspector: Melvin Hughes Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

E
PL
PHOTO 9

Description
M
SA

PHOTO 10

Description

Appendix A-2
Page 14 of 25
Inspector: Melvin Hughes Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

E
PL
PHOTO 11

Description
M
SA

PHOTO 12

Description

Appendix A-2
Page 15 of 25
Inspector: Melvin Hughes Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

E
PL
PHOTO 13

Description
M
SA

PHOTO 14

Description

Appendix A-2
Page 16 of 25
Inspector: Melvin Hughes Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

E
PL
PHOTO 15

Description
M
SA

PHOTO 16

Description

Appendix A-2
Page 17 of 25
Inspector: Melvin Hughes Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

E
PL
M
SA

Appendix A-2
Inspector: Melvin Hughes Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

Date Reported: 09/14/2015

Priority: Grey - 4
Work Code: Brush Cutting / Herbicide Spray

Deficiency Description:
Unwanted trees and brush around bridge.
Work Description:

Date Repairs Completed:

Maintenance Comments:

E
Stage: Open Stage: Open

PL
M
SA

PHOTO 1 Description PHOTO 2 Description

Appendix A-2
Page 19 of 25
Inspector: Melvin Hughes Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

Date Reported: 09/14/2015

Priority: Green - 3
Work Code: Approach Repair

Deficiency Description:
West approach slab has a 1' x 1' spall in the driving lane.
Work Description:

Date Repairs Completed:

Maintenance Comments:

E
Stage: Open

PL
M
SA

PHOTO 1 Description

Appendix A-2
Page 20 of 25
SA
M
PL
E

Appendix A-2
Page 21 of 25
SA
M
PL
E

Page 22 of 25 Appendix A-2

SA
M
PL
E

Page 23 of 25 Appendix A-2

SA
M
PL
E

Page 24 of 25 Appendix A-2

SA
M
PL
E

Page 25 of 25 Appendix A-2

Bridge Inspection Report
I70-60-05180 JCWB
I-70 WB
over
BRANCH MCCRACKEN CREEK

E
PL
M
SA

Inspection Date: 09/14/2015

Inspected By: Dan Bewley
Inspection Type(s): Routine

Appendix A-2
TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE NUMBER

E
PL
M
SA

Appendix A-2
Inspector: Dan Bewley Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

E
PL
M
SA

Latitude: 39.61597
Longitude: -86.472496

Appendix A-2
Page 3 of 36
Inspector: Dan Bewley Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

9/14/2015 Inspection notes by Dan Bewley that do not appear elsewhere on

the report. The approach pavement & guardrail seem to be in good
condition. The West approach slab only has concrete in the left lane &
emergency shoulder, the rest of it is in asphalt. The East approach slab
has a few spalled areas on the cold joint. The joints are in poor
condition. The wearing surface has a longitudinal wide crack in the right
emergency lane the entire length of the bridge. I also noted longitudinal
hair line cracks in the main 2 lanes of the bridge. Both parapet walls
meet CS 1 criteria. The East interior pier has an approximate 8' area of
spalls with exposed rebar. I also noted erosion occurring about mid span
at the East abutment. I can not see exposed piling but, I am assuming it
will be soon. Maintenance letter was written. Dan Bewley 9/14/2015

E
PL
M
SA

Appendix A-2
Page 4 of 36
Inspector: Dan Bewley Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

IDENTIFICATION
(1) STATE CODE: 185 - Indiana (12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK: 1
(8) STRUCTURE: 041790 (13A) INVENTORY ROUTE: 0000000001
(5 A-B-C-D-E) INV. ROUTE: 1 - 1 - 1 - 00070 - 0 (13B) SUBROUTE NUMBER: 01
(2) HIGHWAY AGENCY 01 - Crawfordsville (16) LATITUDE: 39.61597
DISTRICT:
(17) LONGITUDE: -86.472496
(3) COUNTY CODE: 032 - HENDRICKS
(4) PLACE CODE: 00000 - N/A (98) BORDER

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED: BRANCH A) STATE NAME:

MCCRACKEN B) PERCENT %
(7) FACILITY CARRIED: I-70 WB
CREEK
(9) LOCATION: 00.43 E SR 39 (99) BORDER BRIDGE STRUCT.
NO:
(11) MILEPOINT: 0059.640

E
STRUCTURE TYPE AND MATERIAL
(43) STRUCTURE TYPE, MAIN: PL (45) NUMBER OF SPANS IN MAIN 003
UNIT:
A) KIND OF 2 - Concrete continuous (46) NUMBER OF APPROACH 0000
MATERIAL/DESIGN: SPANS:
B) TYPE OF DESIGN/CONSTR: 01 - Slab (107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE: 1 - Concrete
Cast-in-Place
(44) STRUCTURE TYPE, (108) WEARING SURFACE/PROT
M
APPROACH SPANS: SYS:
A) KIND OF 0 - Other A) WEARING SURFACE: 3 - Latex Concrete or
MATERIAL/DESIGN: similar additive
B) TYPE OF DESIGN/CONSTR: 00 - Other B) DECK MEMBRANE: 0 - None
SA

C) DECK PROTECTION: 0 - None

AGE OF SERVICE
(27) YEAR BUILT: 1966 (28) LANES:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: 1996 A) ON BRIDGE: 02
B) UNDER BRIDGE: 00
(42) TYPE OF SERVICE: (29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 029080
A) ON BRIDGE: 1 - Highway
(30) YEAR OF AVERAGE DAILY 2006
B) UNDER BRIDGE: 5 - Waterway TRAFFIC:
(109) AVERAGE DAILY TRUCK 28 %
TRAFFIC:
(19) BYPASS DETOUR LENGTH: 001 MI

Appendix A-2
Page 5 of 36
Inspector: Dan Bewley Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

GEOMETRIC DATA
(48) LENGTH OF MAX SPAN: 0027.5 FT (35) STRUCTURE FLARED: 0 - No flare
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH: 00073.0 FT (10) INV RTE, MIN VERT 99.99 FT
CLEARANCE:
(50) CURB/SIDEWALK WIDTHS:
(47) TOT HORIZ CLEARANCE: 052.4 FT
A) LEFT 00.0 FT
(53) VERT CLEAR OVER BR RDWY: 99.99 FT
B) RIGHT: 00.0 FT
(54) MIN VERTICAL
(51) BRDG RDWY WIDTH 052.4 FT UNDERCLEARANCE:
CURB-TO-CURB: A) REFERENCE FEATURE: N
B) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR: 0 FT
(52) DECK WIDTH, OUT-TO-OUT: 055.4 FT
(55) LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE
(32) APPROACH ROADWAY 038.0 FT RIGHT:
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: 0 - No median A) REFERENCE FEATURE: N
B) MIN LATERAL UNDERCLEAR: 000.0 FT

E
(34) SKEW: 00 DEG (56) MIN LATERAL UNDERCLEAR 00.0 FT
ON LEFT:

INSPECTIONS
(90) INSPECTION DATE:
(92) CRITICAL FEATURE
09/14/2015
PL (91) DESIGNATED INSPECTION
FREQUENCY:
24 MONTHS

INSPECTION: (93) CRITICAL FEATURE

A) FRACTURE CRITICAL N INSPECTION DATE:
REQUIRED/FREQUENCY: A) FRACTURE CRITICAL DATE:
M
B) UNDERWATER INSPECTION N B) UNDERWATER INSP DATE:
REQUIRED/FREQUENCY:
C) OTHER SPECIAL INSPECTION N C) OTHER SPECIAL INSP DATE:
REQUIRED/FREQUENCY:
SA

CONDITION
(58) DECK: 6 - Satisfactory (60) SUBSTRUCTURE: 6 - Satisfactory
Condition (minor Condition (minor
deterioration) deterioration)
(58.01) WEARING SURFACE: 7 - Good Condition (61) CHANNEL/CHANNEL 6 - Bank slump.
PROTECTION: widespread minor
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE: 6 - Satisfactory
damage
Condition (minor
deterioration) (62) CULVERTS: N - Not Applicable

CONDITION COMMENTS
(58) DECK: 6 - Satisfactory Condition (minor deterioration)
Comments:
The bottom of the deck has a wide crack with efflorescence on the North cold joint. Some of the crack is wet. Photos were taken,
sketch was drawn & both are attached to the report. Dan Bewley 9/14/2015
(58.01) WEARING SURFACE: 7 - Good Condition
Comments:
The Wearing surface has a wide longitudinal crack in the Emergency lane. I did note 3 longitudinal hair line cracks in the main line
lanes of the bridge. Photos were taken & sketch was done. Both are attached to the report. Dan Bewley 9/14/2015

Appendix A-2
Page 6 of 36
Inspector: Dan Bewley Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE: 6 - Satisfactory Condition (minor deterioration)

Comments:
The bottom of the deck has a wide crack with efflorescence on the North cold joint. Some of the crack is wet. Photos were taken,
sketch was drawn & both are attached to the report. Dan Bewley 9/14/2015
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE: 6 - Satisfactory Condition (minor deterioration)
Comments:
The West abutment seems to be in good condition. The East abutment has a large eroded area about mid span. The West interior pier
seems to be in good condition & the East interior pier has approximately 8' of spalled area & a wide crack that goes from the top of
the pier to ground level. These are occurring on the East face. Dan Bewley 9/14/2015
(61) CHANNEL/CHANNEL 6 - Bank slump. widespread minor damage
PROTECTION
Comments:
The channel runs from the North toward the South & has good alignment to the bridge. The channel seems deeper along the East pier
& is slow moving. The banks are well vegetated. I could not cross over the channel. Photos were taken & attached to the report. Dan

E
Bewley 9/14/2015
(62) CULVERTS: N - Not Applicable
Comments:
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: 6 - HS 20+Mod
PL (66) INVENTORY RATING: 30
(70) BRIDGE POSTING 5 - Equal to or above (65) INVENTORY RATING METHOD: 2 - Allowable Stress
legal loads (AS)
M
(66B) INVENTORY RATING (H): 24
(41) STRUCTURE A - Open
OPEN/POSTED/CLOSED: (66D) DATE POSTED/CLOSED:
(64) OPERATING RATING: 49
SA

(63) OPERATING RATING 2 - Allowable Stress (AS)

METHOD:

APPRAISAL
SUFFICIENCY RATING: 91.3 (36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEATURE:
STATUS: 0 36A) BRIDGE RAILINGS: 1
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION: 6 36B) TRANSITIONS: 1
(68) DECK GEOMETRY: 9 36C) APPROACH GUARDRAIL: 1
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES, N 36D) APPROACH GUARDRAIL 1
VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL: ENDS:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY: 7 - Slight Chance of Overtopping Bridge
Comments:
Slight chance of overtopping the bridge. Dan Bewley 9/14/2015
(72) APPROACH ROADWAY ALIGNMENT: 8 - Equal to present desirable criteria
Comments:
Traffic is not impeded in any way. Dan Bewley 9/14/2015
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL BRIDGES: 7 - Countermeasures installed to correct scour problem
Comments:
Spread footings, NO piles, rip rap (sized by hydraulics) Dan Bewley 9/14/2015 Appendix A-2
Page 7 of 36
Inspector: Dan Bewley Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

CLASSIFICATION
(20) TOLL: 3 - On Free Road (21) MAINT. RESPONSIBILITY: 01 - State Highway
Agency
(22) OWNER: 01 - State Highway
Agency (26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS OF 01 - Rural - Principal
INVENTORY RTE: Arterial - Interstate
(37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE: 5 - Not eligible
(100) STRAHNET HIGHWAY: Is on an Interstate
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: L - Left structure (South STRAHNET route
or West) (102) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC: 1-way traffic
(103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE:

(104) HIGHWAY SYSTEM OF 1 - Structure/Route is on

(105) FEDERAL LANDS 0-Not Applicable INVENTORY ROUTE: NHS
HIGHWAYS:
(110) DESIGNATED NATIONAL Inventory route on
(112) NBIS BRIDGE LENGTH: Yes NETWORK: National Truck Network

E
NAVIGATION DATA
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL: 0 - No navigation (39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEAR: 000.0 FT
control on waterway PL
(bridge permit not (116) MINIMUM NAVIGATION VERT. FT
required) CLEARANCE, VERT. LIFT BRIDGE:

(111) PIER OR ABUTMENT (40) NAV HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE: 0000.0 FT

PROTECTION:
M
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
(75A) TYPE OF WORK: 35 - Rehabilitation - (95) ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT COST: $ 000000
Deterioration
(96) TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ 000442
SA

(75B) WORK DONE BY: 1 - Work to be done by

contract (97) YR OF IMPROVEMENT COST EST: 2006
(76) LENGTH OF IMPROVEMENT: 000073 FT (114) FUTURE AVG DAILY TRAFFIC: 052665
(94) BRIDGE IMPROVEMENT $ 000442 (115) YR OF FUTURE ADT: 2030
COST:

Appendix A-2
Page 8 of 36
Inspector: Dan Bewley Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

Total Condition Condition Condition Condition

Environment Units
Quantity State 1 State 2 State 3 State 4
38 - Reinforced Concrete Slab 1- Ben. 4045 sq. ft. 3895 150
The reinforced concrete slab has a wide crack with efflorescence on
the North cold joint. The wearing surface has a wide crack that mirrors
the cold joint in the emergency lane. The main lanes have longitudinal
hail line cracks. Photos were taken & sketches were drawn. Dan
Bewley 9/14/2015
510 - Wearing Surfaces 3826 sq. ft. 3826
210 - Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall 1- Ben. 111 ft. 111
The East interior pier on the East face has a wide vertical crack from
top to bottom & next to that there is an approximate 8' wide area of

E
spalls with exposed rebar. Photos were taken & sketches drawn.
Both are attached to the report. Dan Bewley 9/14/2015
215 - Reinforced Concrete Abutment PL1- Ben. 110 ft. 110
The concrete on the abutments seem to be in good condition. There
is however erosion occurring about mid span at the East abutment. I
can not tell if piling is exposed yet. If not I assume it soon will be. Dan
Bewley 9/14/2015
302 - Compression Joint Seal 1- Ben. 74 ft. 37 37
The Compression Joint Seal only exist in the left lane & left
M
emergency shoulder area at the West end. The right, ramp &
emergency lanes are paved with asphalt. The East joint is missing the
rubber material in the right lane & the joint has no adhesion in the
emergency lane. Dan Bewley 9/14/2015
SA

321 - Reinforced Concrete Approach Slab 1- Ben. 2149 sq. ft. 2063 86
The East approach slab has a few areas of spalling occurring on the
cold joints. I also noted a wide longitudinal crack in the emergency
lane. The West approach only has concrete in the left emergency
shoulder & lane. The rest of the approach area is asphalt. Photos
were taken & sketches were done. Dan Bewley 9/14/2015
331 - Reinforced Concrete Bridge Railing 1- Ben. 146 ft. 146
North bridge rail is in good condition, South bridge rail has vertical hair
line cracks spaced about 4' to 5'. Dan Bewley 9/14/2015

Appendix A-2
Page 9 of 36
Inspector: Dan Bewley Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

E
PL
PHOTO 1

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (1) Road alignment looking West

M
SA

PHOTO 2

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (17) Road alignment looking East

Appendix A-2
Page 10 of 36
Inspector: Dan Bewley Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

E
PL
PHOTO 3

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (2) East approach pavement & guardrail condition
M
SA

PHOTO 4

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (16) West approach pavement condition

Appendix A-2
Page 11 of 36
Inspector: Dan Bewley Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

E
PL
PHOTO 5

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (14) West approach has asphalt on the right, emergency & ramp
extit lanes
M
SA

PHOTO 6

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (15) West asphalt approach slab has an asphalt patct on the right
lane

Appendix A-2
Page 12 of 36
Inspector: Dan Bewley Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

E
PL
PHOTO 7

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (13) Asphalt portion of the West approach slab has spalls & cracks
in the joint area
M
SA

PHOTO 8

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (3) East concrete approach slab condition

Appendix A-2
Page 13 of 36
Inspector: Dan Bewley Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

E
PL
PHOTO 9

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (4) East concrete approach slab has spall along center line
M
SA

PHOTO 10

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (5) East concrete approach slab has wide crack in the North cold
joint

Appendix A-2
Page 14 of 36
Inspector: Dan Bewley Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

E
PL
PHOTO 11

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (6) East 1A bridge joint condition

M
SA

PHOTO 12

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (12) West 1A rubber is only in the left lane

Appendix A-2
Page 15 of 36
Inspector: Dan Bewley Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

E
PL
PHOTO 13

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (11) West 1A bridge joiint is missing in the right & exit lanes
M
SA

PHOTO 14

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (7) East 1A bridge joint has spall in shoulder area & missing rubber
in right lane

Appendix A-2
Page 16 of 36
Inspector: Dan Bewley Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

E
PL
PHOTO 15

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (8) Wearing surface has wide crack on North cold joint
M
SA

PHOTO 16

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (9) Wearring surface has 2 longitudinal hair line cracks in the right
lane

Appendix A-2
Page 17 of 36
Inspector: Dan Bewley Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

E
PL
PHOTO 17

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (10) North parapet wall is in good condition

M
SA

PHOTO 18

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (19) South coping condition

Appendix A-2
Page 18 of 36
Inspector: Dan Bewley Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

E
PL
PHOTO 19

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (27) North coping condition

M
SA

PHOTO 20

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (28) North coping has leached vertical cracks at both interior piers

Appendix A-2
Page 19 of 36
Inspector: Dan Bewley Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

E
PL
PHOTO 21

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (20) West abutment condition

M
SA

PHOTO 22

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (32) East abutment condition

Appendix A-2
Page 20 of 36
Inspector: Dan Bewley Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

E
PL
PHOTO 23

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (33) East abutment has erosion occurring about mid span, piling is
exposed
M
SA

PHOTO 24

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (21) Bottom of the West span

Appendix A-2
Page 21 of 36
Inspector: Dan Bewley Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

E
PL
PHOTO 25

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (22) The West span has efflorescence on the North cold joint
M
SA

PHOTO 26

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (25) Center span condition

Appendix A-2
Page 22 of 36
Inspector: Dan Bewley Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

E
PL
PHOTO 27

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (30) East span condition

M
SA

PHOTO 28

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (31) East span has efflorescence on the North cold joint

Appendix A-2
Page 23 of 36
Inspector: Dan Bewley Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

E
PL
PHOTO 29

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (24) East interior pier condition West face
M
SA

PHOTO 30

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (29) West interior pier condition East face

Appendix A-2
Page 24 of 36
Inspector: Dan Bewley Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

E
PL
PHOTO 31

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (34) East interior pier has abouth 8' of spalling with exposed rebar
on the East face
M
SA

PHOTO 32

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (35) East interior pier has wide vertical crack on the East face
about mid span

Appendix A-2
Page 25 of 36
Inspector: Dan Bewley Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

E
PL
PHOTO 33

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (26) Up stream alignment or looking North from below the bridge
M
SA

PHOTO 34

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (23) Down stream alignment or looking South from below the
bridge

Appendix A-2
Page 26 of 36
Inspector: Dan Bewley Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

E
PL
PHOTO 35

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (18) Profile looking NE

M
SA

PHOTO 36

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (36) Trees growing arond the parapet wall on the South side

Appendix A-2
Page 27 of 36
Inspector: Dan Bewley Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

E
PL
PHOTO 37

Description 9-14-2015 I70-60-05180JCWB (37) Trees growing over the North parapet wall
M
SA

Appendix A-2
Page 28 of 36
Inspector: Dan Bewley Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

E
PL
M
SA

Appendix A-2
Inspector: Dan Bewley Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

Date Reported: 09/16/2015

Priority: Yellow - 2
Work Code: Erosion Control / Rip Rap

Deficiency Description:
Erosion is occurring mid span of the East abutment.
Work Description:

Date Repairs Completed:

Maintenance Comments:

E
Stage: Open Stage: Open

PL
M
SA

PHOTO 1 Description PHOTO 2 Description

Appendix A-2
Page 30 of 36
Inspector: Dan Bewley Asset Name:
Inspection Date: Facility Carried:
Bridge Inspection Report

Date Reported: 09/16/2015

Priority: Green - 3
Work Code: Brush Cutting / Herbicide Spray

Deficiency Description:
Trees growing along both sides of the structure.
Work Description:

Date Repairs Completed:

Maintenance Comments:

E
Stage: Open Stage: Open

PL
M
SA

PHOTO 1 Description PHOTO 2 Description

Appendix A-2
Page 31 of 36
SA
M
PL
E

Appendix A-2
Page 32 of 36
E
PL
M
SA

Appendix A-2
Page 33 of 36
E
PL
M
SA

Appendix A-2
Page 34 of 36
E
PL
M
SA

Appendix A-2
Page 35 of 36
E
PL
M
SA

Appendix A-2
Page 36 of 36
Description: I-70 over Branch of McCracken Creek
Structure Number(s): I70-60-05180 CEBL & JCWB
Location: 0.43 mile East of SR39, Hendricks County

ITEM DESCRIPTION ACTION BY

1 Bridge Approach

New approach slabs where installed during the rehabilitation of

1.1 these structures in 1996. New approach slabs will be constructed to

E
accommodate the new widened section of roadway.

2 Bridge Superstructure PL
Bridge Deck is original from 1966, in 1996 the previous overlay was
2.1 removed and a new overlay as well as joints where replaced. The
bridge deck was also widened during this time.

The underside of the deck have several areas of cracking and

M
2.2 efflorescence in each span. The worst areas of cracking and
leaching is along the joints where the bridges where widened.

Due to the quality of this deck it was talked about possibly keeping
SA

the superstructure and just widening it on the median side to

accommodate the extra lane. Mick will be checking into having the
2.3 deck tested or cored. WSP Parsons Brinckerhoff will also Mick Brinkerhoff
investigate alternate overlay options other than LMC. They will also
look into completely closing in the median to see if this would be a
best value option.

Another option that will be looked into is the use of Conspan

2.4
structures which would eliminate this structure.

3 Bridge Substructure

Other than widening the piers no other work will be needed on the
3.1
substructure.

4 Bridge Embankments

Banks are in great shape. WSP Parsons Brinckerhoff will be doing WSP | Parsons
4.1
a scour analysis to see if any scour measures need to be taken. Brinckerhoff

5 Utilities

Appendix A-3
5.1 No utilities in the area to be effected.
END OF SECTION

E
PL
M
SA

2/2 Appendix A-3

Des No. 1600384 & 1600385
Bridge No. I70-59-05180 CEBL & JCWB

E
PL
Photo 1: Upstream Face of Eastbound Bridge (facing south)
M
SA

Photo 2: Roadway over Eastbound Bridge (facing northwest)

Appendix A-4
Des No. 1600384 & 1600385
Bridge No. I70-59-05180 CEBL & JCWB

E
PL
Photo 2: Looking Upstream from beneath the Eastbound Bridge (facing north)
M
SA

Photo 3: Looking Downstream from beneath the Westbound Bridge (facing south)

Appendix A-4
Des No. 1600384 & 1600385
Bridge No. I70-59-05180 CEBL & JCWB

E
PL
Photo 4: Downstream Channel (facing south)
M
SA

Photo 5: Upstream Channel (facing north)

Appendix A-4
Hydraulics QA Checklist

Route: I-70 Des No. 1600384 & 1600385

County: Hendricks City or Town: Indianapolis
Description: I-70 Branch McCracken Creek
(Bridge No. I70-59-05180 CEBL & JCWB)
Designer: R. Toole Reviewer: R. Rampone
DESIGN APPURTENANCES
MAPS Dissipators, Riprap
USGS Quad. Scale 1:24000 Date 2013 Scour Analysis/Evaluation
ARC GIS Date
Flood-Insurance Firm and FHBM
Soils Map TECHNICAL RESOURCES
Aerial Photos Scale Date Indiana Design Manual, Part II
Other ___________________

E
STUDIES BY EXTERNAL AGENCIES
FEMA Flood-Insurance Studies DISCHARGE CALCULATIONS
NRCS Watershed Studies Drainage Area Delineation
USGS Gages and Studies
Interim Floodplain Studies
PL Drainage Areas of IN Streams
DNR Discharge Letter
Rational Formula
STUDIES BY INTERNAL SOURCES HEC-HMS / TR-20
M
Office Records NRCS
Gaging Da
Flood Record (High Water, Newspaper) Regional Analysis
Coordinated Discharges of IN Streams
SA

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORTS Log-Pearson Type III Gage Rating

CALIBRATION OF HIGH-WATER DATA HIGH-WATER ELEVATIONS

Discharge and Frequency of H.W. el. INDOT Survey
Influences Responsible for H.W. el. - Check Plans for Existing Structure
Maps for Larger Streams Nearby that May DNR Historic Flood Profiles
Backwater the Site Maintenance Records
Analyze Hydraulic Performance of External Sources
Existing Facility for 100-Year Flood Personal Reconnaissance
Analyze Hydraulic Performance of
Proposed Facility for 100-Year Flood
Field Reconnaissance Revisions Report
ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS COMPUTER PROGRAMS
INDOT HY8
HEC-RAS River Analysis System
TECHNICAL AIDS Log-Pearson Type III Analysis
Indiana Design Manual, Part II WSPRO Water-Surface Profile
INDOT and FHWA Directives PFP-HYDRA
FHWA Publications HEC-HMS / TR 20
HEC-RAS Scour Analysis

Other______________________

Designed by:_________________________ 09-20-2016

Date:________

E
Reviewed by:_________________________ 09-20-2016
Date:________
PL
M
SA

Appendix A-5
Des No. 1600384 & 1600385
Bridge No. I70-59-05180 CEBL & JCWB

APPENDIX B

E
Hydrologic Data
PL
M
SA
SA
M
PL
E
SA
M
PL
E
E
PL
M
SA

Appendix B-3
E
PL
M
SA

Appendix B-3
E
PL
M
SA

Appendix B-3
E
PL
M
SA

Appendix B-3
E
PL
M
SA

Appendix B-3
E
PL
M
SA

Appendix B-4
WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff
Runoff Coefficient Calculation
Based on IDM Figure 202-2E & IDM Figure 202-2F

Project: INDOT I-70 Added Travel Lanes Calculated By: RMT Date: 7/29/2016
Location: Bridge I70-59-05180 Checked By: RAR Date: 8/3/2016

average slope % 0.008

Soil CN C
Land use Area (acres)
group (IDM 202-2F) (IDM 202-2E)
Water Any 4.9 100 1
Commercial A 89 0.7
Commercial B 92 0.78
Commercial C 94 0.87
Commercial D 95 0.95

E
Agriculture A 67 0.3
Agriculture B 35.0 76 0.5
Agriculture C 212.0 83 0.5
Agriculture D 475.0 86 0.6
HD - Residential
HD - Residential
A
B 0.7
PL 77
85
0.6
0.65
HD - Residential C 2.2 90 0.7
HD - Residential D 2.5 92 0.75
LD - Residential A 54 0.25
M
LD - Residential B 70 0.3
LD - Residential C 80 0.35
LD - Residential D 9.5 85 0.4
Grass / Pasture A 49 0.1
SA

Grass / Pasture B 6.0 69 0.3

Grass / Pasture C 102.8 79 0.3
Grass / Pasture D 300.0 84 0.4
Forest A 43 0.1
Forest B 40.0 65 0.3
Forest C 45.0 76 0.3
Forest D 150.0 82 0.4
Industrial A 81 0.6
Industrial B 88 0.7
Industrial C 91 0.8
Industrial D 93 0.9
Others Any 100 1
Impervious Any 12.4 98 0.9

Total Area 1398.0

weighted CN 83

weighted C 0.48

Appendix B-5
E
PL
M
SA

Appendix B-6
E
PL
M
SA

Appendix B-6
WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff
Time of Concentration (Tc) or Travel Time (Tt)
Based on TR-55 Worksheet 3. & IDM Figure 202-2A

Project: INDOT I-70 Added Travel Lanes By: RMT Date: 7/29/2016
Location: Bridge I70-59-05180 Checked: RAR Date: 8/3/2016

Present or Developed? Present Tc or Tt through subarea? Tc

NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet.
Text in blue does not need to be entered -- it will be automatically calculated.

Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only) Segment ID A

1. Surface description (Figure 202-2B) Short Grass
2. Manning's roughness coefficient for sheet flow, n (Figure 202-2B) 0.15
3. Flow Length, L (total L <= 100 ft) ft 100
4. Two year 24-hour rainfall, P2 (NOAA Table) in 2.95
5. Land slope, s ft/ft 0.014 0.017 sub total
0.8 0.5 0.4
6. Tt = [0.007 (n L) ]/[p2 s ] hr 0.1962 0.1962

E
Shallow Concentrated Flow Segment ID B
7. Surface Description (paved or unpaved) PL unpaved
8. Flow Length, L ft 2422
9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft 0.010
10. Average Velocity, V (Figure 202-2D) ft/s 1.60 sub total
11. Tt = L/(3600 V) hr 0.4204 0.4204

Channel Flow Segment ID C D

M
12. Width of ditch bottom ft 5 3
13. Ratio of Horizontal to Vertical of left ditch side slope (XH:1V) 2 4
14. Ratio of Horizontal to Vertical of right ditch side slope (XH:1V) 2.5 6
15. Bankfull depth of flow: ft 2.0 2.0
SA

16. Cross sectional flow area, a ft2 19.00 26.00

17. Wetted Perimeter, pw ft2 14.86 23.41
18. Hydraulic radius, r=a/pw ft2 1.28 1.11
19. Channel slope, s ft/ft 0.013 0.006
20. Manning's roughness coeff. for channel flow, n (Figure 202-2C) 0.04 0.035
21. V=[1.49 r0.67 s0.5] /n ft/s 5.01 3.54
22. Flow Length, L ft 2994 11370 sub total
23. Tt = L/ (3600 V) hr 0.1661 0.8928 1.0589

24. Total Time of Concentration or Travel Time Tc/Tt for area in hours 1.6754
Tc/Tt for area in minutes (5 minutes is minimum) 101
Tlag (T lag = 0.6*Tc) for area in minutes 61

Appendix B-7
BASIN INPUTS

E
PL
M
SA

Appendix B-8
STORM INPUTS & OUTPUTS – 100 YEAR, 15 MINUTE STORM DURATION

E
PL
M
SA

Appendix B-8
STORM INPUTS & OUTPUTS – 100 YEAR, 30 MINUTE STORM DURATION

E
PL
M
SA

Appendix B-8
STORM INPUTS & OUTPUTS – 100 YEAR, 1 HOUR STORM DURATION

E
PL
M
SA

Appendix B-8
STORM INPUTS & OUTPUTS – 100 YEAR, 2 HOUR STORM DURATION

E
PL
M
SA

Appendix B-8
STORM INPUTS & OUTPUTS – 100 YEAR, 3 HOUR STORM DURATION

E
PL
M
SA

Appendix B-8
STORM INPUTS & OUTPUTS – 100 YEAR, 6 HOUR STORM DURATION

E
PL
M
SA

Appendix B-8
STORM INPUTS & OUTPUTS – 100 YEAR, 12 HOUR STORM DURATION

E
PL
M
SA

Appendix B-8
Des No. 1600384 & 1600385
Bridge No. I70-59-05180 CEBL & JCWB

APPENDIX C

E
Hydraulic Data
PL
M
SA
SA
M
PL
E
cHECk-RAS Report

HEC-RAS Project: bridge5180alt.prj

Plan File: bridge5180alt.p03
Geometry File: bridge5180alt.g03
Flow File: bridge5180alt.f01
Report Date: 9/20/2016

Message ID Message Cross sections affected Comments

BR LF 01 This is ($strucname$). The 5163(Bridge-UP); 5264(Bridge-UP)
selected profile is
$profilename$. Type of flow is
low flow because, 1. EGEL 3 of
$egel3$ is less than or equal to
MinTopRd of $minelweirflow$. 2.
EGEL 3 of $egel3$ is less than
MxLoCdU of $mxlocdu$.
CV LF 01 This is ($strucname$). The 4961
selected profile is
$profilename$. Type of flow is
low flow because, 1. EGEL 3
of $egel3$ is less than or equal
to MinTopRd of $minelweirflow$ .
2. EGEL 3 of $egel3$ is less
than MxLoCdU of $mxlocdu$ .

E
NT RS 02BDC This is the Downstream Bridge 5163(Bridge-DN); 5264(Bridge-DN) The Branch McCracken
Section (BRD). The channel n Creek channel was not
value of $chldn$ for the observed to have a
downstream internal bridge significantly different
opening section is equal to or PL roughness in the
larger than the channel n value channel at the bridge
of $chl2$ at Section 2. Usually, as compared to the
the channel "n" value of the upstream and downstream
bridge opening section represents portions of the stream
the area below the bridge deck channel.
and is less than the channel "n"
value of Section 2. The "n" value
for Section 2 represents the
natural valley channel section
M
roughness for the reach between
Section 3 and Section 4. Please
change the "n" value of the
internal bridge opening section
or provide supporting information
for the use of the higher "n"
value.
SA

NT RS 02BUC This is the Upstream Bridge 5163(Bridge-UP); 5264(Bridge-UP) The Branch McCracken
Section (BRU). The channel n Creek channel was not
value of $chlup$ for the upstream observed to have a
internal bridge opening section significantly different
is equal to or larger than the roughness in the
channel n value of $chl3$ at channel at the bridge
Section 3. Usually, the channel as compared to the
"n" value of the bridge opening upstream and downstream
section represents the area below portions of the stream
the bridge deck and is less than channel.
the channel "n" value of Section
3.
The "n" value for Section 3
represents the natural valley
channel section roughness for the
reach between Section 3 and
Section 4. Please change the "n"
value of the internal bridge
opening section or provide
supporting information for the
use of a higher "n" value.

Appendix C-2
XS DC 02 Constant discharge used for the
entire profile for $assignedname$
flood.
At least two discharges should be
selected; one at the mouth and
the other at the middle of the
watershed
or above the confluence of a
tributary. Or provide
explanation why only one
discharge should be used. Other
flood frequencies should also be
checked.

E
PL
M
SA

Appendix C-2
Contraction Scour
Left Channel Right
Input Data
Average Depth (ft): 1.90 4.73 1.55
Approach Velocity (ft/s): 0.79 3.67 0.75
Br Average Depth (ft): 2.06 7.48 1.73
BR Opening Flow (cfs): 31.63 1253.20 21.17
BR Top WD (ft): 10.01 28.36 7.65
Grain Size D50 (mm): 0.01 0.01 0.01
Approach Flow (cfs): 229.14 804.72 272.14
Approach Top WD (ft): 152.81 46.36 236.21
K1 Coefficient: 0.690 0.690 0.690
Results
Scour Depth Ys (ft): 0.22 2.23 0.12
Critical Velocity (ft/s):
Equation: Live Live Live

Pier Scour
All piers have the same scour depth

E
Input Data
Pier Shape: Round nose
Pier Width (ft): PL 1.50
Grain Size D50 (mm): 0.01000
Depth Upstream (ft): 8.64
Velocity Upstream (ft/s): 6.02
K1 Nose Shape: 1.00
Pier Angle: 0.00
Pier Length (ft): 70.00
M
K2 Angle Coef: 1.00
K3 Bed Cond Coef: 1.10
Grain Size D90 (mm):
K4 Armouring Coef: 1.00
SA

Results
Scour Depth Ys (ft): 3.60
Froude #: 0.36
Equation: CSU equation
Pier Scour Limited to Maximum of Ys = 2.4 * a

Abutment Scour
Left Right
Input Data
Station at Toe (ft): -35.83 35.86
Toe Sta at appr (ft): -35.83 35.86
Abutment Length (ft): 137.96 380.01
Depth at Toe (ft): 2.06 2.52
K1 Shape Coef: 1.00 - Vertical abutment
Degree of Skew (degrees): 90.00 90.00
K2 Skew Coef: 1.00 1.00
Projected Length L' (ft): 137.96 380.01
Avg Depth Obstructed Ya (ft): 1.90 1.12
Flow Obstructed Qe (cfs): 206.89 261.41
Area Obstructed Ae (sq ft): 261.74 425.46
Results
Scour Depth Ys (ft): 0.00 0.00

Appendix C-3
Froude #: 0.00 0.00
Equation: HIRE HIRE

Combined Scour Depths

Pier Scour + Contraction Scour (ft):

Left Bank: 3.82
Channel: 5.83

Left abutment scour + contraction scour (ft): 0.22

Right abutment scour + contraction scour (ft): 0.12

E
PL
M
SA

Appendix C-3
Bridge Scour RS = 5163
765
Legend

WS PF 1

Ground

Ineff

Bank Sta
760 Contr Scour

Total Scour

E
PL
755
Elevation (ft)

750

M Flowline Elevation
= 744.60 feet
SA
Low Scour Elevation
745 = Flowline Elevation - (Pier + Contraction)
= 744.60 - 5.83
= 738.77 feet

740
-400 -200 0 200 400 600

Station (ft)

Approach Cross Section used = River Station 6015

Maximum Velocity at Bridge = 6.82 feet per second
Appendix C-3
Contraction Scour
Left Channel Right
Input Data
Average Depth (ft): 1.90 4.73 1.55
Approach Velocity (ft/s): 0.79 3.67 0.75
Br Average Depth (ft): 2.32 6.25 1.99
BR Opening Flow (cfs): 52.54 1216.34 37.13
BR Top WD (ft): 10.96 28.36 8.62
Grain Size D50 (mm): 0.01 0.01 0.01
Approach Flow (cfs): 229.14 804.72 272.14
Approach Top WD (ft): 152.81 46.36 236.21
K1 Coefficient: 0.690 0.690 0.690
Results
Scour Depth Ys (ft): 0.99 3.21 0.77
Critical Velocity (ft/s):
Equation: Live Live Live

Pier Scour
All piers have the same scour depth

E
Input Data
Pier Shape: Round nose
Pier Width (ft): 1.50
PL
Grain Size D50 (mm): 0.01000
Depth Upstream (ft): 7.77
Velocity Upstream (ft/s): 4.25
K1 Nose Shape: 1.00
Pier Angle: 0.00
Pier Length (ft): 73.67
M
K2 Angle Coef: 1.00
K3 Bed Cond Coef: 1.10
Grain Size D90 (mm):
K4 Armouring Coef: 1.00
SA

Results
Scour Depth Ys (ft): 3.33
Froude #: 0.27
Equation: CSU equation

Abutment Scour
Left Right
Input Data
Station at Toe (ft): -35.83 35.86
Toe Sta at appr (ft): -42.80 45.04
Abutment Length (ft): 131.29 371.30
Depth at Toe (ft): 3.15 3.62
K1 Shape Coef: 1.00 - Vertical abutment
Degree of Skew (degrees): 90.00 90.00
K2 Skew Coef: 1.00 1.00
Projected Length L' (ft): 131.29 371.30
Avg Depth Obstructed Ya (ft): 1.90 1.11
Flow Obstructed Qe (cfs): 196.88 251.37
Area Obstructed Ae (sq ft): 249.09 412.00
Results
Scour Depth Ys (ft): 0.00 0.00
Froude #: 0.00 0.00

Appendix C-3
Equation: HIRE HIRE

Combined Scour Depths

Pier Scour + Contraction Scour (ft):

Left Bank: 4.33
Channel: 6.54

Left abutment scour + contraction scour (ft): 0.99

Right abutment scour + contraction scour (ft): 0.77

E
PL
M
SA

Appendix C-3
Bridge Scour RS = 5264
765
Legend

WS PF 1

Ground

Ineff

Bank Sta
760 Contr Scour

Total Scour

E
PL
755
Elevation (ft)

750

M Flowline Elevation
= 745.19 feet
SA
Low Scour Elevation
745 = Flowline Elevation - (Pier + Contraction)
= 745.19 - 6.54
= 738.65 feet

740
-400 -200 0 200 400 600

Station (ft)

Approach Cross Section used = River Station 6015

Maximum Velocity at Bridge = 7.75 feet per second
Appendix C-3
Des No. 1600384 & 1600385
Bridge No. I70-59-05180 CEBL & JCWB

APPENDIX D

E
Proposed Structure Information
PL
M
SA
E
PL
M
SA

Appendix D-1
E
PL
M
SA

Appendix D-1
E
Bridge Pier Extensions

Bridge Deck Widening

PL
M
SA

Appendix D-1