Activity 1 Book Review Analysis
Activity 1 Book Review Analysis
Directions: Read and analyze the book review on Tuesdays with Morrie and answer the questions that follow.
Source: https://yourteenmag.com/stuff-we-love/books/book-review-tuesdays-with-morrie
Process Questions:
Tuesdays with Morrie Book Review made by Alexis and Ellen Weeren is a biographical
approach wherein Mitch Albom as the author is one of the protagonists that shares his life experiences
when he meets Morrie Schwartz, his former professor, again. The review discusses that time is
precious and besides, we ought to pay more attention to how we choose to spend it. This key point
matters as it is implied to the discussion of life lessons shared by Morrie when he allows Albom to visit
during his last days. It hits different because Mitch realized that every single time is important for him to
live with happiness and learn to love things that he did not even know that it is essential for him to grow
with humanity. In general, as Morrie suffers from his illness, he tends to discuss that love is a rational
answer on how we treat each other. The key point also is about Albom’s visit to Morrie for remembering
and helping each other to enlighten themselves resulting to gain the most important lessons of his life
through death. Morrie shared valuable insights that allow Albom to cry openly in which he meant to say
that acceptance of ability and flaws without denying it is a good thing to develop yourself. Lastly, it is all
about the disillusionment of Albom about popular culture because he wholeheartedly accepts things
coming from Morrie's perception about life as it continues and ends.
2. Is the book review effective terms of language, approach to critiquing, and evidence to support
criticisms? Why or why not?
The overall critical approach was able to become effective due to the use of the subjective view
of the author to the review itself, mean to say that Alexos and Ellen Weeren was able to point out the
lesson of the book by placing themselves on the scene in a way of storytelling, in short, they used first-
person point of view. Furthermore, the review used simple and easy to understand words for more
general viewers. The thing that may get the review to become more effective is the incorporation of
shreds of evidence to support the criticism in which the manifestation of every quote mention is
understandable based on the mind of those critique professionals. They tend to think of a scenario that
is applicable to the lesson itself. This book review uses basic languages but engaging also to let the
readers continue the reading. Those pieces of evidence are way more philosophical and they are
integrated into the lesson of the book Tuesdays with Morrie.
3. In your opinion, is it just and appropriate to just focus on the negative points when writing a review for a
film/book? Explain your answer.
Remember, in writing a critical approach/review, a professional critic must never only focus on
the flaws of the film/book because it will only end up as destructive criticism. Writing a critique paper
must contain fair statements regarding its positive and negative points. When you are reviewing an
output, tend to balance your criticism in the way of finding its beauty and mentioning its mistakes but by
putting shreds of evidence and reasons why it is considered as flaws. In addition, focusing only on the
negative points will make the review worst and it may result in the downgrade of the film/book because
some of the readers based their decisions on what should be an attempt to watch or read by reading a
review. The choice of words is a must to objectify your point regarding the output. Somehow, writing a
review or critique paper is also complicated if you only mention positive points only. It only entails that
you should be fair in giving points that you see to the film/book. Lastly, mentioning negative points with
concrete pieces of evidence and suggestions is a way to say that you are still respectful to the
director/author. In short, be kind but never forget to be honest at all times to avoid wrong perceptions. A
review is made for improvement and appreciation, but not to destroy someone else's work.